Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, IBM has a market cap of 300.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while IBM trades at $320.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas IBM's P/E ratio is 28.36. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IBM's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to IBM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check IBM's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, ACN has a market cap of 121B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while ACN trades at $196.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas ACN's P/E ratio is 16.11. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ACN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to ACN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check ACN's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, INFY has a market cap of 54.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while INFY trades at $13.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas INFY's P/E ratio is 16.77. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to INFY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to INFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check INFY's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, FI has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while FI trades at $63.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas FI's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is more volatile compared to FI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check FI's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, CTSH has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while CTSH trades at $57.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas CTSH's P/E ratio is 12.40. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CTSH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to CTSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check CTSH's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, WIT has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while WIT trades at $2.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas WIT's P/E ratio is 18.54. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WIT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to WIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check WIT's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, FIS has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while FIS trades at $43.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas FIS's P/E ratio is 8.46. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FIS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is more volatile compared to FIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check FIS's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, BR has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while BR trades at $160.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas BR's P/E ratio is 17.11. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BR's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is more volatile compared to BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check BR's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, CDW has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while CDW trades at $141.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas CDW's P/E ratio is 17.19. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CDW's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to CDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check CDW's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, LDOS has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while LDOS trades at $127.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas LDOS's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LDOS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is more volatile compared to LDOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check LDOS's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, GIB has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while GIB trades at $71.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas GIB's P/E ratio is 12.87. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GIB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is more volatile compared to GIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check GIB's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, AUR has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while AUR trades at $7.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas AUR's P/E ratio is -17.37. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AUR's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to AUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check AUR's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, APLD has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while APLD trades at $47.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas APLD's P/E ratio is -126.16. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to APLD's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to APLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check APLD's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, CACI has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while CACI trades at $524.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas CACI's P/E ratio is 21.64. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CACI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to CACI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check CACI's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, JKHY has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while JKHY trades at $140.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas JKHY's P/E ratio is 19.58. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JKHY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is more volatile compared to JKHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check JKHY's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, GDS has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while GDS trades at $35.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas GDS's P/E ratio is 20.89. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GDS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is more volatile compared to GDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check GDS's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, INGM has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while INGM trades at $29.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas INGM's P/E ratio is 19.44. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to INGM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to INGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check INGM's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, G has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while G trades at $34.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas G's P/E ratio is 10.57. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to G's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to G. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check G's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, EPAM has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while EPAM trades at $108.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas EPAM's P/E ratio is 15.64. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EPAM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to EPAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check EPAM's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, DLB has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while DLB trades at $56.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas DLB's P/E ratio is 22.25. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DLB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is more volatile compared to DLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check DLB's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, SAIC has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while SAIC trades at $115.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas SAIC's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SAIC's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to SAIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check SAIC's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, EXLS has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while EXLS trades at $30.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas EXLS's P/E ratio is 19.48. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EXLS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to EXLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check EXLS's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, PSFE-WT has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while PSFE-WT trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas PSFE-WT's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PSFE-WT's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is more volatile compared to PSFE-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check PSFE-WT's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, WAY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while WAY trades at $21.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas WAY's P/E ratio is 32.72. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WAY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to WAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check WAY's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, NCR has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while NCR trades at $27.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas NCR's P/E ratio is 49.24. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NCR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is more volatile compared to NCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check NCR's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, INOD has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while INOD trades at $115.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas INOD's P/E ratio is 102.96. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to INOD's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to INOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check INOD's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, KEEL has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while KEEL trades at $6.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas KEEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KEEL's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to KEEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check KEEL's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, WNS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while WNS trades at $76.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas WNS's P/E ratio is 21.36. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WNS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is more volatile compared to WNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check WNS's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, PAY has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while PAY trades at $24.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas PAY's P/E ratio is 42.54. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PAY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is more volatile compared to PAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check PAY's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, VNET has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while VNET trades at $10.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas VNET's P/E ratio is -8.76. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VNET's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to VNET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check VNET's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, KD has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while KD trades at $12.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas KD's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to KD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check KD's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, NYAX has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while NYAX trades at $73.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas NYAX's P/E ratio is 93.20. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NYAX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is more volatile compared to NYAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check NYAX's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, PRFT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while PRFT trades at $75.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas PRFT's P/E ratio is 36.34. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PRFT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is more volatile compared to PRFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check PRFT's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, NIQ has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while NIQ trades at $8.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas NIQ's P/E ratio is -7.30. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NIQ's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to NIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check NIQ's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, FLYW has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while FLYW trades at $16.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas FLYW's P/E ratio is 69.21. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FLYW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to FLYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check FLYW's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, FORTY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while FORTY trades at $127.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas FORTY's P/E ratio is 33.42. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FORTY's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to FORTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check FORTY's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, GLOB has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while GLOB trades at $44.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas GLOB's P/E ratio is 18.09. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GLOB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to GLOB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check GLOB's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, BBAI has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while BBAI trades at $5.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas BBAI's P/E ratio is -7.72. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BBAI's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to BBAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check BBAI's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, CNXC has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while CNXC trades at $30.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas CNXC's P/E ratio is -1.43. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CNXC's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to CNXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check CNXC's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, CLVT has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while CLVT trades at $2.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas CLVT's P/E ratio is -12.98. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CLVT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to CLVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check CLVT's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, DXC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while DXC trades at $10.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas DXC's P/E ratio is 103.25. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DXC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to DXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check DXC's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, AI has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while AI trades at $11.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas AI's P/E ratio is -3.72. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AI's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to AI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check AI's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, TWKS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while TWKS trades at $4.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas TWKS's P/E ratio is -12.08. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TWKS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is more volatile compared to TWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check TWKS's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, BTCM has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while BTCM trades at $1.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas BTCM's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BTCM's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is more volatile compared to BTCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check BTCM's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, WYFI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while WYFI trades at $31.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas WYFI's P/E ratio is -31.88. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WYFI's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to WYFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check WYFI's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, VYX has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while VYX trades at $7.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas VYX's P/E ratio is 26.64. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VYX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is more volatile compared to VYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check VYX's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, AUROW has a market cap of 980M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while AUROW trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas AUROW's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AUROW's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to AUROW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check AUROW's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, EFOR has a market cap of 951.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while EFOR trades at $23.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas EFOR's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EFOR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to EFOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check EFOR's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, ASGN has a market cap of 895M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while ASGN trades at $20.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas ASGN's P/E ratio is 9.32. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ASGN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to ASGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check ASGN's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, MGIC has a market cap of 853.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while MGIC trades at $17.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas MGIC's P/E ratio is 21.20. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MGIC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is more volatile compared to MGIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check MGIC's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, CTLP has a market cap of 825.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while CTLP trades at $11.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas CTLP's P/E ratio is 280.00. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CTLP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is more volatile compared to CTLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check CTLP's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, NABL has a market cap of 802.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while NABL trades at $4.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas NABL's P/E ratio is -85.20. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NABL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to NABL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check NABL's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, SHAZ has a market cap of 778.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while SHAZ trades at $79.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas SHAZ's P/E ratio is -22.10. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SHAZ's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to SHAZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check SHAZ's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, CLVT-PA has a market cap of 755.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while CLVT-PA trades at $4.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas CLVT-PA's P/E ratio is -7.93. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CLVT-PA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to CLVT-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check CLVT-PA's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, VRRM has a market cap of 742.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while VRRM trades at $4.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas VRRM's P/E ratio is 5.96. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VRRM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to VRRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check VRRM's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, CD has a market cap of 684M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while CD trades at $8.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas CD's P/E ratio is -215.25. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CD's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to CD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check CD's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, GDYN has a market cap of 657.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while GDYN trades at $7.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas GDYN's P/E ratio is 131.00. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GDYN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to GDYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check GDYN's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, PHLT has a market cap of 611.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while PHLT trades at $7.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas PHLT's P/E ratio is -775.00. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PHLT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is more volatile compared to PHLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check PHLT's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, TASK has a market cap of 595.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while TASK trades at $6.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas TASK's P/E ratio is 5.84. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TASK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to TASK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check TASK's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, TSSI has a market cap of 439.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while TSSI trades at $15.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas TSSI's P/E ratio is 30.12. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TSSI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to TSSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check TSSI's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, IBEX has a market cap of 431.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while IBEX trades at $32.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas IBEX's P/E ratio is 10.07. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IBEX's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is more volatile compared to IBEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check IBEX's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, PSFE has a market cap of 417.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while PSFE trades at $8.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas PSFE's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PSFE's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to PSFE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check PSFE's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, TLS has a market cap of 392.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while TLS trades at $5.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas TLS's P/E ratio is -14.97. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TLS's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to TLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check TLS's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, SDHI has a market cap of 367.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while SDHI trades at $10.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas SDHI's P/E ratio is 207.81. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SDHI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is more volatile compared to SDHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check SDHI's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, DMRC has a market cap of 365.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while DMRC trades at $16.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas DMRC's P/E ratio is -13.04. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DMRC's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to DMRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check DMRC's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, UIS has a market cap of 347M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while UIS trades at $4.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas UIS's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to UIS's ROE of +1.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to UIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check UIS's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, BBAI-WT has a market cap of 315.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while BBAI-WT trades at $0.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas BBAI-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BBAI-WT's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to BBAI-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check BBAI-WT's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, XRXDW has a market cap of 310.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while XRXDW trades at $0.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas XRXDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to XRXDW's ROE of -1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to XRXDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check XRXDW's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, HCKT has a market cap of 303.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while HCKT trades at $12.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas HCKT's P/E ratio is 23.19. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HCKT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to HCKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check HCKT's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, SDHIU has a market cap of 294.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while SDHIU trades at $10.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas SDHIU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SDHIU's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is more volatile compared to SDHIU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check SDHIU's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, CNDT has a market cap of 271.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while CNDT trades at $1.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas CNDT's P/E ratio is -1.68. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CNDT's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to CNDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check CNDT's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, BULLZ has a market cap of 260.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while BULLZ trades at $1.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas BULLZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BULLZ's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to BULLZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check BULLZ's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, III has a market cap of 215.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while III trades at $4.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas III's P/E ratio is 21.48. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to III's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is more volatile compared to III. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check III's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, SRT has a market cap of 178.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while SRT trades at $4.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas SRT's P/E ratio is -6.60. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SRT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is more volatile compared to SRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check SRT's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, CTG has a market cap of 169M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while CTG trades at $10.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas CTG's P/E ratio is 350.00. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is more volatile compared to CTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check CTG's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, DVLT has a market cap of 157.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while DVLT trades at $0.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas DVLT's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DVLT's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to DVLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check DVLT's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, TTEC has a market cap of 133.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while TTEC trades at $2.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas TTEC's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TTEC's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is more volatile compared to TTEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check TTEC's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, ALYA has a market cap of 110.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while ALYA trades at $1.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas ALYA's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ALYA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to ALYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check ALYA's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, WYY has a market cap of 109.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while WYY trades at $11.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas WYY's P/E ratio is -58.47. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WYY's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to WYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check WYY's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, CSPI has a market cap of 99.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while CSPI trades at $9.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas CSPI's P/E ratio is -989.00. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CSPI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is more volatile compared to CSPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check CSPI's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, CTM has a market cap of 82.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while CTM trades at $0.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas CTM's P/E ratio is -43.52. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CTM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is more volatile compared to CTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check CTM's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, SIFYR has a market cap of 44.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while SIFYR trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas SIFYR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SIFYR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to SIFYR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check SIFYR's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, USIO has a market cap of 43M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while USIO trades at $1.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas USIO's P/E ratio is -19.50. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to USIO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is more volatile compared to USIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check USIO's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, JFU has a market cap of 36.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while JFU trades at $3.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas JFU's P/E ratio is 1.49. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JFU's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to JFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check JFU's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, CLPS has a market cap of 28.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while CLPS trades at $0.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas CLPS's P/E ratio is -3.95. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CLPS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to CLPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check CLPS's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, DTST has a market cap of 23.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while DTST trades at $3.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas DTST's P/E ratio is -12.78. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to DTST's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is more volatile compared to DTST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check DTST's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, VEEA has a market cap of 20.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while VEEA trades at $0.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas VEEA's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VEEA's ROE of +3.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to VEEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check VEEA's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, SAIH has a market cap of 19.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while SAIH trades at $10.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas SAIH's P/E ratio is -3.05. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SAIH's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to SAIH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check SAIH's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, SLAI has a market cap of 14.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while SLAI trades at $0.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas SLAI's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SLAI's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to SLAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check SLAI's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, CHOW has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while CHOW trades at $0.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas CHOW's P/E ratio is -4.22. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CHOW's ROE of +1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to CHOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check CHOW's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, GLE has a market cap of 11.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while GLE trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas GLE's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GLE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to GLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check GLE's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, SGLB has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while SGLB trades at $1.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas SGLB's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SGLB's ROE of -2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to SGLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check SGLB's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, TDTH has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while TDTH trades at $2.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas TDTH's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TDTH's ROE of +3.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to TDTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check TDTH's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, LHSW has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while LHSW trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas LHSW's P/E ratio is 6.17. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LHSW's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to LHSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check LHSW's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, LZMH has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while LZMH trades at $1.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas LZMH's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to LZMH's ROE of -3.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to LZMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check LZMH's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, ARBB has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while ARBB trades at $5.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas ARBB's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ARBB's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to ARBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check ARBB's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, VEEAW has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while VEEAW trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas VEEAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VEEAW's ROE of +3.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to VEEAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check VEEAW's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, JDZG has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while JDZG trades at $57.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas JDZG's P/E ratio is -8.13. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JDZG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to JDZG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check JDZG's competition here

FISV plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FISV stands at 31.5B. In comparison, GMM has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FISV is priced at $59.07, while GMM trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FISV currently has a P/E ratio of 9.13, whereas GMM's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, FISV's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GMM's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FISV is less volatile compared to GMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FISV.Check GMM's competition here