Startek, Inc. (SRT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SRT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Information Technology Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRT | $4.42 | +1.14% | 178.3M | -6.60 | -$0.67 | N/A |
| IBM | $305.63 | -7.17% | 287.5B | 27.04 | $11.31 | +2.19% |
| ACN | $177.43 | -4.72% | 109.3B | 14.55 | $12.20 | +3.57% |
| INFY | $12.46 | -4.74% | 50.6B | 15.58 | $0.80 | +4.13% |
| FI | $63.80 | +0.16% | 34.3B | 9.86 | $6.47 | N/A |
| FISV | $55.08 | -2.44% | 29.4B | 8.51 | $6.47 | N/A |
| CTSH | $53.51 | -2.96% | 25.4B | 11.61 | $4.61 | +2.40% |
| WIT | $2.13 | -3.62% | 22.4B | 16.42 | $0.13 | +5.73% |
| FIS | $40.86 | -3.90% | 21.1B | 7.92 | $5.16 | +4.04% |
| BR | $152.59 | -1.45% | 17.7B | 16.31 | $9.36 | +2.50% |
Stock Comparison
SRT vs IBM Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, IBM has a market cap of 287.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while IBM trades at $305.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas IBM's P/E ratio is 27.04. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to IBM's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to IBM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check IBM's competition here
SRT vs ACN Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, ACN has a market cap of 109.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while ACN trades at $177.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas ACN's P/E ratio is 14.55. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ACN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to ACN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check ACN's competition here
SRT vs INFY Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, INFY has a market cap of 50.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while INFY trades at $12.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas INFY's P/E ratio is 15.58. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to INFY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to INFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check INFY's competition here
SRT vs FI Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, FI has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while FI trades at $63.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas FI's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to FI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check FI's competition here
SRT vs FISV Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, FISV has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while FISV trades at $55.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas FISV's P/E ratio is 8.51. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FISV's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to FISV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check FISV's competition here
SRT vs CTSH Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, CTSH has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while CTSH trades at $53.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas CTSH's P/E ratio is 11.61. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CTSH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to CTSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check CTSH's competition here
SRT vs WIT Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, WIT has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while WIT trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas WIT's P/E ratio is 16.42. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to WIT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to WIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check WIT's competition here
SRT vs FIS Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, FIS has a market cap of 21.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while FIS trades at $40.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas FIS's P/E ratio is 7.92. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FIS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to FIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check FIS's competition here
SRT vs BR Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, BR has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while BR trades at $152.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas BR's P/E ratio is 16.31. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BR's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check BR's competition here
SRT vs CDW Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, CDW has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while CDW trades at $137.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas CDW's P/E ratio is 16.74. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CDW's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to CDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check CDW's competition here
SRT vs LDOS Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, LDOS has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while LDOS trades at $124.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas LDOS's P/E ratio is 11.38. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to LDOS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to LDOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check LDOS's competition here
SRT vs GIB Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, GIB has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while GIB trades at $66.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas GIB's P/E ratio is 11.94. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GIB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to GIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check GIB's competition here
SRT vs AUR Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, AUR has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while AUR trades at $6.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas AUR's P/E ratio is -16.16. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AUR's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to AUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check AUR's competition here
SRT vs APLD Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, APLD has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while APLD trades at $44.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas APLD's P/E ratio is -117.66. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to APLD's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to APLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check APLD's competition here
SRT vs CACI Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, CACI has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while CACI trades at $528.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas CACI's P/E ratio is 21.79. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CACI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to CACI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check CACI's competition here
SRT vs JKHY Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, JKHY has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while JKHY trades at $133.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas JKHY's P/E ratio is 18.59. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to JKHY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to JKHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check JKHY's competition here
SRT vs INGM Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, INGM has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while INGM trades at $30.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas INGM's P/E ratio is 20.30. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to INGM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to INGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check INGM's competition here
SRT vs GDS Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, GDS has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while GDS trades at $35.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas GDS's P/E ratio is 20.69. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GDS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to GDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check GDS's competition here
SRT vs G Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, G has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while G trades at $32.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas G's P/E ratio is 9.91. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to G's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to G. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check G's competition here
SRT vs DLB Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, DLB has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while DLB trades at $54.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas DLB's P/E ratio is 21.78. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DLB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to DLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check DLB's competition here
SRT vs EPAM Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, EPAM has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while EPAM trades at $97.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas EPAM's P/E ratio is 13.98. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to EPAM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to EPAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check EPAM's competition here
SRT vs SAIC Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, SAIC has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while SAIC trades at $114.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas SAIC's P/E ratio is 12.91. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SAIC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to SAIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check SAIC's competition here
SRT vs EXLS Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, EXLS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while EXLS trades at $29.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas EXLS's P/E ratio is 18.76. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to EXLS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to EXLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check EXLS's competition here
SRT vs PSFE-WT Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, PSFE-WT has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while PSFE-WT trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas PSFE-WT's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PSFE-WT's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to PSFE-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check PSFE-WT's competition here
SRT vs NCR Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, NCR has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while NCR trades at $27.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas NCR's P/E ratio is 49.24. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NCR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to NCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check NCR's competition here
SRT vs WAY Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, WAY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while WAY trades at $19.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas WAY's P/E ratio is 29.14. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to WAY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to WAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check WAY's competition here
SRT vs KEEL Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, KEEL has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while KEEL trades at $6.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas KEEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to KEEL's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to KEEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check KEEL's competition here
SRT vs INOD Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, INOD has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while INOD trades at $108.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas INOD's P/E ratio is 96.67. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to INOD's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to INOD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check INOD's competition here
SRT vs WNS Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, WNS has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while WNS trades at $76.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas WNS's P/E ratio is 21.36. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to WNS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is more volatile compared to WNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check WNS's competition here
SRT vs VNET Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, VNET has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while VNET trades at $10.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas VNET's P/E ratio is -8.54. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to VNET's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to VNET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check VNET's competition here
SRT vs KD Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, KD has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while KD trades at $12.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas KD's P/E ratio is 14.44. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to KD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to KD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check KD's competition here
SRT vs PRFT Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, PRFT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while PRFT trades at $75.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas PRFT's P/E ratio is 36.34. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PRFT's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is more volatile compared to PRFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check PRFT's competition here
SRT vs PAY Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, PAY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while PAY trades at $21.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas PAY's P/E ratio is 37.02. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PAY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to PAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check PAY's competition here
SRT vs NYAX Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, NYAX has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while NYAX trades at $68.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas NYAX's P/E ratio is 86.16. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NYAX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is more volatile compared to NYAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check NYAX's competition here
SRT vs NIQ Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, NIQ has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while NIQ trades at $8.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas NIQ's P/E ratio is -6.76. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NIQ's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to NIQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check NIQ's competition here
SRT vs FORTY Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, FORTY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while FORTY trades at $138.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas FORTY's P/E ratio is 35.26. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FORTY's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is more volatile compared to FORTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check FORTY's competition here
SRT vs FLYW Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, FLYW has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while FLYW trades at $14.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas FLYW's P/E ratio is 60.88. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to FLYW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to FLYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check FLYW's competition here
SRT vs BBAI Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, BBAI has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while BBAI trades at $4.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas BBAI's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BBAI's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to BBAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check BBAI's competition here
SRT vs GLOB Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, GLOB has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while GLOB trades at $39.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas GLOB's P/E ratio is 16.12. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GLOB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to GLOB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check GLOB's competition here
SRT vs CNXC Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, CNXC has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while CNXC trades at $27.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas CNXC's P/E ratio is -1.31. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CNXC's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to CNXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check CNXC's competition here
SRT vs CLVT Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, CLVT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while CLVT trades at $2.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas CLVT's P/E ratio is -11.79. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CLVT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to CLVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check CLVT's competition here
SRT vs AI Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, AI has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while AI trades at $10.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas AI's P/E ratio is -3.39. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AI's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to AI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check AI's competition here
SRT vs DXC Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, DXC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while DXC trades at $9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas DXC's P/E ratio is 91.60. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DXC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to DXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check DXC's competition here
SRT vs TWKS Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, TWKS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while TWKS trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas TWKS's P/E ratio is -12.08. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TWKS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is more volatile compared to TWKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check TWKS's competition here
SRT vs BTCM Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, BTCM has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while BTCM trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas BTCM's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BTCM's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to BTCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check BTCM's competition here
SRT vs WYFI Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, WYFI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while WYFI trades at $28.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas WYFI's P/E ratio is -28.31. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to WYFI's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to WYFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check WYFI's competition here
SRT vs VYX Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, VYX has a market cap of 986M. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while VYX trades at $7.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas VYX's P/E ratio is 25.55. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to VYX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to VYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check VYX's competition here
SRT vs ASGN Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, ASGN has a market cap of 895M. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while ASGN trades at $20.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas ASGN's P/E ratio is 9.32. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ASGN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to ASGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check ASGN's competition here
SRT vs AUROW Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, AUROW has a market cap of 864.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while AUROW trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas AUROW's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to AUROW's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to AUROW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check AUROW's competition here
SRT vs MGIC Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, MGIC has a market cap of 853.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while MGIC trades at $17.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas MGIC's P/E ratio is 21.20. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MGIC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is more volatile compared to MGIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check MGIC's competition here
SRT vs EFOR Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, EFOR has a market cap of 841.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while EFOR trades at $20.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas EFOR's P/E ratio is 9.12. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to EFOR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to EFOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check EFOR's competition here
SRT vs CTLP Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, CTLP has a market cap of 825.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while CTLP trades at $11.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas CTLP's P/E ratio is 280.00. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CTLP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is more volatile compared to CTLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check CTLP's competition here
SRT vs SHAZ Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, SHAZ has a market cap of 784.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while SHAZ trades at $80.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas SHAZ's P/E ratio is -22.25. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SHAZ's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to SHAZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check SHAZ's competition here
SRT vs CLVT-PA Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, CLVT-PA has a market cap of 755.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while CLVT-PA trades at $4.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas CLVT-PA's P/E ratio is -7.93. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CLVT-PA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to CLVT-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check CLVT-PA's competition here
SRT vs NABL Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, NABL has a market cap of 714M. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while NABL trades at $3.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas NABL's P/E ratio is -75.80. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to NABL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to NABL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check NABL's competition here
SRT vs CD Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, CD has a market cap of 635.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while CD trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas CD's P/E ratio is -200.00. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CD's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to CD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check CD's competition here
SRT vs VRRM Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, VRRM has a market cap of 627.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while VRRM trades at $4.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas VRRM's P/E ratio is 5.04. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to VRRM's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to VRRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check VRRM's competition here
SRT vs PHLT Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, PHLT has a market cap of 611.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while PHLT trades at $7.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas PHLT's P/E ratio is -775.00. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PHLT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is more volatile compared to PHLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check PHLT's competition here
SRT vs GDYN Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, GDYN has a market cap of 588.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while GDYN trades at $7.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas GDYN's P/E ratio is 117.33. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GDYN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to GDYN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check GDYN's competition here
SRT vs TASK Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, TASK has a market cap of 528.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while TASK trades at $5.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas TASK's P/E ratio is 5.19. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TASK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to TASK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check TASK's competition here
SRT vs IBEX Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, IBEX has a market cap of 402.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while IBEX trades at $30.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas IBEX's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to IBEX's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to IBEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check IBEX's competition here
SRT vs TSSI Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, TSSI has a market cap of 391.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while TSSI trades at $13.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas TSSI's P/E ratio is 26.79. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TSSI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to TSSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check TSSI's competition here
SRT vs PSFE Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, PSFE has a market cap of 373.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while PSFE trades at $7.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas PSFE's P/E ratio is -2.05. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to PSFE's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to PSFE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check PSFE's competition here
SRT vs SDHI Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, SDHI has a market cap of 369.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while SDHI trades at $10.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas SDHI's P/E ratio is 208.80. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SDHI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is more volatile compared to SDHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check SDHI's competition here
SRT vs TLS Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, TLS has a market cap of 327M. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while TLS trades at $4.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas TLS's P/E ratio is -12.49. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TLS's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to TLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check TLS's competition here
SRT vs DMRC Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, DMRC has a market cap of 321.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while DMRC trades at $14.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas DMRC's P/E ratio is -11.48. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DMRC's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to DMRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check DMRC's competition here
SRT vs XRXDW Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, XRXDW has a market cap of 319.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while XRXDW trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas XRXDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to XRXDW's ROE of -1.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to XRXDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check XRXDW's competition here
SRT vs UIS Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, UIS has a market cap of 307.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while UIS trades at $4.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas UIS's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to UIS's ROE of +1.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to UIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check UIS's competition here
SRT vs BBAI-WT Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, BBAI-WT has a market cap of 297M. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while BBAI-WT trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas BBAI-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BBAI-WT's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to BBAI-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check BBAI-WT's competition here
SRT vs SDHIU Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, SDHIU has a market cap of 294.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while SDHIU trades at $10.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas SDHIU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SDHIU's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is more volatile compared to SDHIU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check SDHIU's competition here
SRT vs HCKT Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, HCKT has a market cap of 277.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while HCKT trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas HCKT's P/E ratio is 21.15. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to HCKT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to HCKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check HCKT's competition here
SRT vs BULLZ Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, BULLZ has a market cap of 260.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while BULLZ trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas BULLZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to BULLZ's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to BULLZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check BULLZ's competition here
SRT vs CNDT Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, CNDT has a market cap of 249.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while CNDT trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas CNDT's P/E ratio is -1.55. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CNDT's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to CNDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check CNDT's competition here
SRT vs III Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, III has a market cap of 207.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while III trades at $4.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas III's P/E ratio is 20.62. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to III's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to III. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check III's competition here
SRT vs CTG Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, CTG has a market cap of 169M. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while CTG trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas CTG's P/E ratio is 350.00. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CTG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is more volatile compared to CTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check CTG's competition here
SRT vs DVLT Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, DVLT has a market cap of 132.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while DVLT trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas DVLT's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DVLT's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to DVLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check DVLT's competition here
SRT vs WYY Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, WYY has a market cap of 113.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while WYY trades at $11.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas WYY's P/E ratio is -60.21. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to WYY's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to WYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check WYY's competition here
SRT vs TTEC Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, TTEC has a market cap of 110.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while TTEC trades at $2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas TTEC's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TTEC's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to TTEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check TTEC's competition here
SRT vs ALYA Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, ALYA has a market cap of 110.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while ALYA trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas ALYA's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ALYA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to ALYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check ALYA's competition here
SRT vs CSPI Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, CSPI has a market cap of 92.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while CSPI trades at $9.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas CSPI's P/E ratio is -917.50. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CSPI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to CSPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check CSPI's competition here
SRT vs CTM Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, CTM has a market cap of 72.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while CTM trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas CTM's P/E ratio is -38.36. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CTM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to CTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check CTM's competition here
SRT vs SIFYR Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, SIFYR has a market cap of 44.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while SIFYR trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas SIFYR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SIFYR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to SIFYR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check SIFYR's competition here
SRT vs USIO Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, USIO has a market cap of 42.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while USIO trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas USIO's P/E ratio is -19.12. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to USIO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to USIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check USIO's competition here
SRT vs JFU Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, JFU has a market cap of 34.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while JFU trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas JFU's P/E ratio is 1.40. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to JFU's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to JFU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check JFU's competition here
SRT vs CLPS Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, CLPS has a market cap of 26.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while CLPS trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas CLPS's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CLPS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to CLPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check CLPS's competition here
SRT vs DTST Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, DTST has a market cap of 21.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while DTST trades at $3.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas DTST's P/E ratio is -11.76. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to DTST's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to DTST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check DTST's competition here
SRT vs SAIH Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, SAIH has a market cap of 19.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while SAIH trades at $10.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas SAIH's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SAIH's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is more volatile compared to SAIH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check SAIH's competition here
SRT vs VEEA Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, VEEA has a market cap of 18.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while VEEA trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas VEEA's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to VEEA's ROE of +3.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to VEEA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check VEEA's competition here
SRT vs CHOW Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, CHOW has a market cap of 14.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while CHOW trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas CHOW's P/E ratio is -4.53. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to CHOW's ROE of +1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to CHOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check CHOW's competition here
SRT vs VEEAW Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, VEEAW has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while VEEAW trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas VEEAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to VEEAW's ROE of +3.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to VEEAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check VEEAW's competition here
SRT vs TDTH Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, TDTH has a market cap of 12.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while TDTH trades at $3.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas TDTH's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to TDTH's ROE of +3.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to TDTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check TDTH's competition here
SRT vs SLAI Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, SLAI has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while SLAI trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas SLAI's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SLAI's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to SLAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check SLAI's competition here
SRT vs SGLB Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, SGLB has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while SGLB trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas SGLB's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to SGLB's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to SGLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check SGLB's competition here
SRT vs GLE Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, GLE has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while GLE trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas GLE's P/E ratio is -11.25. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to GLE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to GLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check GLE's competition here
SRT vs LHSW Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, LHSW has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while LHSW trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas LHSW's P/E ratio is 6.17. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to LHSW's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to LHSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check LHSW's competition here
SRT vs ARBB Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, ARBB has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while ARBB trades at $5.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas ARBB's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to ARBB's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to ARBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check ARBB's competition here
SRT vs LZMH Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, LZMH has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while LZMH trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas LZMH's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to LZMH's ROE of -3.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to LZMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check LZMH's competition here
SRT vs JDZG Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, JDZG has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while JDZG trades at $67.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas JDZG's P/E ratio is -9.45. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to JDZG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to JDZG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check JDZG's competition here
SRT vs MASK Comparison June 2026
SRT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRT stands at 178.3M. In comparison, MASK has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SRT is priced at $4.42, while MASK trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRT currently has a P/E ratio of -6.60, whereas MASK's P/E ratio is 3.01. In terms of profitability, SRT's ROE is -0.00%, compared to MASK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SRT is less volatile compared to MASK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRT.Check MASK's competition here