The Western Union Company (WU) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WU) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Credit Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WU | $7.48 | -2.98% | 2.3B | 5.49 | $1.36 | +12.73% |
| V | $323.57 | +1.06% | 620.4B | 28.24 | $11.46 | +0.80% |
| MA | $491.08 | +1.93% | 434B | 28.46 | $17.26 | +0.66% |
| AXP | $310.66 | -0.60% | 212B | 19.38 | $16.03 | +1.10% |
| COF | $180.67 | -1.38% | 112.5B | 55.61 | $3.25 | +1.67% |
| BNH | $15.46 | +0.06% | 102.9B | N/A | N/A | +0.57% |
| DFS | $200.05 | -0.21% | 50.3B | 10.69 | $18.72 | N/A |
| IX | $37.88 | -4.73% | 42B | 15.15 | $2.50 | +2.62% |
| PYPL | $41.29 | -3.42% | 36.4B | 7.75 | $5.33 | +1.02% |
| SUNB | $79.36 | -2.37% | 32.8B | 24.36 | $3.26 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
WU vs V Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, V has a market cap of 620.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while V trades at $323.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas V's P/E ratio is 28.24. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to V's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check V's competition here
WU vs MA Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, MA has a market cap of 434B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while MA trades at $491.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas MA's P/E ratio is 28.46. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to MA's ROE of +2.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to MA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check MA's competition here
WU vs AXP Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, AXP has a market cap of 212B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while AXP trades at $310.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas AXP's P/E ratio is 19.38. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to AXP's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to AXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check AXP's competition here
WU vs COF Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, COF has a market cap of 112.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while COF trades at $180.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas COF's P/E ratio is 55.61. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to COF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to COF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check COF's competition here
WU vs BNH Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, BNH has a market cap of 102.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while BNH trades at $15.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas BNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to BNH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to BNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check BNH's competition here
WU vs DFS Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, DFS has a market cap of 50.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while DFS trades at $200.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas DFS's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to DFS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to DFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check DFS's competition here
WU vs IX Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, IX has a market cap of 42B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while IX trades at $37.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas IX's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to IX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to IX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check IX's competition here
WU vs PYPL Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, PYPL has a market cap of 36.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while PYPL trades at $41.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas PYPL's P/E ratio is 7.75. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to PYPL's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to PYPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check PYPL's competition here
WU vs SUNB Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, SUNB has a market cap of 32.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while SUNB trades at $79.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas SUNB's P/E ratio is 24.36. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to SUNB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to SUNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check SUNB's competition here
WU vs SYF Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, SYF has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while SYF trades at $70.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas SYF's P/E ratio is 7.33. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to SYF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to SYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check SYF's competition here
WU vs SOFI Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, SOFI has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while SOFI trades at $16.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas SOFI's P/E ratio is 35.62. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to SOFI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to SOFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check SOFI's competition here
WU vs GPN Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, GPN has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while GPN trades at $66.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas GPN's P/E ratio is 24.38. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to GPN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to GPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check GPN's competition here
WU vs KKRS Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, KKRS has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while KKRS trades at $16.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas KKRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to KKRS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to KKRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check KKRS's competition here
WU vs ALLY Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ALLY has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while ALLY trades at $42.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas ALLY's P/E ratio is 10.38. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to ALLY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to ALLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check ALLY's competition here
WU vs COF-PI Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, COF-PI has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while COF-PI trades at $17.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas COF-PI's P/E ratio is 0.70. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to COF-PI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to COF-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check COF-PI's competition here
WU vs COF-PJ Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, COF-PJ has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while COF-PJ trades at $17.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas COF-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.68. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to COF-PJ's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to COF-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check COF-PJ's competition here
WU vs COF-PK Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, COF-PK has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while COF-PK trades at $16.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas COF-PK's P/E ratio is 0.66. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to COF-PK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to COF-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check COF-PK's competition here
WU vs FCFS Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, FCFS has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while FCFS trades at $225.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas FCFS's P/E ratio is 28.25. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to FCFS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to FCFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check FCFS's competition here
WU vs AGM-PC Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, AGM-PC has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while AGM-PC trades at $348.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas AGM-PC's P/E ratio is 31.38. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to AGM-PC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to AGM-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check AGM-PC's competition here
WU vs COF-PL Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, COF-PL has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while COF-PL trades at $15.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas COF-PL's P/E ratio is 0.61. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to COF-PL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to COF-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check COF-PL's competition here
WU vs COF-PN Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, COF-PN has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while COF-PN trades at $15.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas COF-PN's P/E ratio is 0.60. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to COF-PN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to COF-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check COF-PN's competition here
WU vs SYF-PB Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, SYF-PB has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while SYF-PB trades at $25.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas SYF-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to SYF-PB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to SYF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check SYF-PB's competition here
WU vs SLMBP Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, SLMBP has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while SLMBP trades at $74.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas SLMBP's P/E ratio is 34.78. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to SLMBP's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to SLMBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check SLMBP's competition here
WU vs SYF-PA Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, SYF-PA has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while SYF-PA trades at $19.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas SYF-PA's P/E ratio is 2.65. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to SYF-PA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to SYF-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check SYF-PA's competition here
WU vs OMF Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, OMF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while OMF trades at $55.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas OMF's P/E ratio is 8.25. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to OMF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to OMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check OMF's competition here
WU vs CGABL Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, CGABL has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while CGABL trades at $16.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas CGABL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to CGABL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to CGABL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check CGABL's competition here
WU vs CACC Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, CACC has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while CACC trades at $544.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas CACC's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to CACC's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to CACC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check CACC's competition here
WU vs OBDC Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, OBDC has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while OBDC trades at $11.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas OBDC's P/E ratio is 15.74. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to OBDC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to OBDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check OBDC's competition here
WU vs ORCC Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ORCC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while ORCC trades at $13.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas ORCC's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to ORCC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to ORCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check ORCC's competition here
WU vs JSM Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, JSM has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while JSM trades at $18.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas JSM's P/E ratio is 15.23. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to JSM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to JSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check JSM's competition here
WU vs NNI Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, NNI has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while NNI trades at $129.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas NNI's P/E ratio is 11.22. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to NNI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to NNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check NNI's competition here
WU vs SLM Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, SLM has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while SLM trades at $22.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas SLM's P/E ratio is 6.22. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to SLM's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to SLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check SLM's competition here
WU vs ENVA Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ENVA has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while ENVA trades at $168.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas ENVA's P/E ratio is 13.75. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to ENVA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to ENVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check ENVA's competition here
WU vs SEZL Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, SEZL has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while SEZL trades at $116.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas SEZL's P/E ratio is 24.12. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to SEZL's ROE of +0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to SEZL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check SEZL's competition here
WU vs BFH Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, BFH has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while BFH trades at $91.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas BFH's P/E ratio is 7.44. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to BFH's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to BFH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check BFH's competition here
WU vs ADS Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ADS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while ADS trades at $56.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas ADS's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to ADS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to ADS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check ADS's competition here
WU vs UPST Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, UPST has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while UPST trades at $29.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas UPST's P/E ratio is 72.54. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to UPST's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to UPST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check UPST's competition here
WU vs LC Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, LC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while LC trades at $17.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas LC's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to LC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to LC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check LC's competition here
WU vs AGM Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, AGM has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while AGM trades at $180.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas AGM's P/E ratio is 10.44. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to AGM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to AGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check AGM's competition here
WU vs QFIN Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, QFIN has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while QFIN trades at $14.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas QFIN's P/E ratio is 2.55. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to QFIN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to QFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check QFIN's competition here
WU vs EZPW Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, EZPW has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while EZPW trades at $31.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas EZPW's P/E ratio is 17.27. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to EZPW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to EZPW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check EZPW's competition here
WU vs AGM-A Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, AGM-A has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while AGM-A trades at $134.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas AGM-A's P/E ratio is 7.72. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to AGM-A's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to AGM-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check AGM-A's competition here
WU vs ATLC Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ATLC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while ATLC trades at $84.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas ATLC's P/E ratio is 11.62. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to ATLC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to ATLC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check ATLC's competition here
WU vs FINV Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, FINV has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while FINV trades at $4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas FINV's P/E ratio is 3.97. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to FINV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to FINV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check FINV's competition here
WU vs MGI Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, MGI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while MGI trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas MGI's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to MGI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to MGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check MGI's competition here
WU vs OCSL Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, OCSL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while OCSL trades at $11.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas OCSL's P/E ratio is 20.20. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to OCSL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to OCSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check OCSL's competition here
WU vs RWAYL Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, RWAYL has a market cap of 909.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while RWAYL trades at $25.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas RWAYL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to RWAYL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to RWAYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check RWAYL's competition here
WU vs JCAP Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, JCAP has a market cap of 900M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while JCAP trades at $16.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas JCAP's P/E ratio is 3.15. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to JCAP's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to JCAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check JCAP's competition here
WU vs RWAYI Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, RWAYI has a market cap of 893.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while RWAYI trades at $24.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas RWAYI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to RWAYI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to RWAYI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check RWAYI's competition here
WU vs BBDC Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, BBDC has a market cap of 872.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while BBDC trades at $8.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas BBDC's P/E ratio is 9.81. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to BBDC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to BBDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check BBDC's competition here
WU vs WRLD Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, WRLD has a market cap of 825.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while WRLD trades at $167.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas WRLD's P/E ratio is 24.04. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to WRLD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to WRLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check WRLD's competition here
WU vs NEWTO Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, NEWTO has a market cap of 737.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while NEWTO trades at $25.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas NEWTO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to NEWTO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to NEWTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check NEWTO's competition here
WU vs NAVI Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, NAVI has a market cap of 734.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while NAVI trades at $7.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas NAVI's P/E ratio is -12.60. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to NAVI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to NAVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check NAVI's competition here
WU vs NEWTG Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, NEWTG has a market cap of 725.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while NEWTG trades at $25.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas NEWTG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to NEWTG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to NEWTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check NEWTG's competition here
WU vs GDOT Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, GDOT has a market cap of 718.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while GDOT trades at $12.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas GDOT's P/E ratio is -9.53. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to GDOT's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to GDOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check GDOT's competition here
WU vs PRAA Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, PRAA has a market cap of 610.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while PRAA trades at $16.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas PRAA's P/E ratio is -2.24. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to PRAA's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to PRAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check PRAA's competition here
WU vs LU Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, LU has a market cap of 607.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while LU trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas LU's P/E ratio is -4.03. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to LU's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to LU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check LU's competition here
WU vs AGM-PD Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, AGM-PD has a market cap of 600.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while AGM-PD trades at $20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas AGM-PD's P/E ratio is 1.84. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to AGM-PD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to AGM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check AGM-PD's competition here
WU vs NRDS Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, NRDS has a market cap of 580.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while NRDS trades at $7.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas NRDS's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to NRDS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to NRDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check NRDS's competition here
WU vs QD Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, QD has a market cap of 528.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while QD trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas QD's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to QD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to QD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check QD's competition here
WU vs MCVT Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, MCVT has a market cap of 501.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while MCVT trades at $6.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas MCVT's P/E ratio is 25.46. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to MCVT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to MCVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check MCVT's competition here
WU vs TREE Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, TREE has a market cap of 500.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while TREE trades at $35.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas TREE's P/E ratio is 2.77. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to TREE's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to TREE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check TREE's competition here
WU vs HTT Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, HTT has a market cap of 474.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while HTT trades at $2.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas HTT's P/E ratio is 4.65. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to HTT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to HTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check HTT's competition here
WU vs IACO Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, IACO has a market cap of 433.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while IACO trades at $9.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas IACO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to IACO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to IACO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check IACO's competition here
WU vs KRAQ Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, KRAQ has a market cap of 429.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while KRAQ trades at $9.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas KRAQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to KRAQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to KRAQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check KRAQ's competition here
WU vs RWAYZ Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, RWAYZ has a market cap of 390.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while RWAYZ trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas RWAYZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to RWAYZ's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to RWAYZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check RWAYZ's competition here
WU vs ATLCZ Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ATLCZ has a market cap of 386.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while ATLCZ trades at $25.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas ATLCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to ATLCZ's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to ATLCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check ATLCZ's competition here
WU vs ATLCL Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ATLCL has a market cap of 382M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while ATLCL trades at $25.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas ATLCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to ATLCL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to ATLCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check ATLCL's competition here
WU vs ATLCP Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ATLCP has a market cap of 357.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while ATLCP trades at $24.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas ATLCP's P/E ratio is 3.11. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to ATLCP's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to ATLCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check ATLCP's competition here
WU vs LX Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, LX has a market cap of 349.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while LX trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas LX's P/E ratio is 1.70. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to LX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to LX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check LX's competition here
WU vs RM Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, RM has a market cap of 328.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while RM trades at $35.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas RM's P/E ratio is 7.24. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to RM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to RM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check RM's competition here
WU vs NEWTI Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, NEWTI has a market cap of 324.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while NEWTI trades at $25.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas NEWTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to NEWTI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to NEWTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check NEWTI's competition here
WU vs LPRO Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, LPRO has a market cap of 249.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while LPRO trades at $2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas LPRO's P/E ratio is -42.20. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to LPRO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to LPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check LPRO's competition here
WU vs CURR Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, CURR has a market cap of 243.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while CURR trades at $3.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas CURR's P/E ratio is -10.60. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to CURR's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to CURR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check CURR's competition here
WU vs MFIN Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, MFIN has a market cap of 228M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while MFIN trades at $9.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas MFIN's P/E ratio is 6.46. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to MFIN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to MFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check MFIN's competition here
WU vs AGM-PE Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, AGM-PE has a market cap of 224.4M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while AGM-PE trades at $20.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas AGM-PE's P/E ratio is 1.85. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to AGM-PE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to AGM-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check AGM-PE's competition here
WU vs RWAY Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, RWAY has a market cap of 222.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while RWAY trades at $6.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas RWAY's P/E ratio is -77.00. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to RWAY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to RWAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check RWAY's competition here
WU vs IPFX Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, IPFX has a market cap of 220.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while IPFX trades at $10.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas IPFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to IPFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to IPFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check IPFX's competition here
WU vs OPRT Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, OPRT has a market cap of 217.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while OPRT trades at $4.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas OPRT's P/E ratio is 12.84. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to OPRT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to OPRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check OPRT's competition here
WU vs AGM-PF Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, AGM-PF has a market cap of 204.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while AGM-PF trades at $18.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas AGM-PF's P/E ratio is 1.69. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to AGM-PF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to AGM-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check AGM-PF's competition here
WU vs CPSS Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, CPSS has a market cap of 204.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while CPSS trades at $9.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas CPSS's P/E ratio is 11.09. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to CPSS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to CPSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check CPSS's competition here
WU vs PMTS Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, PMTS has a market cap of 195.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while PMTS trades at $17.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas PMTS's P/E ratio is 16.72. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to PMTS's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to PMTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check PMTS's competition here
WU vs AGM-PG Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, AGM-PG has a market cap of 191.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while AGM-PG trades at $17.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas AGM-PG's P/E ratio is 1.58. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to AGM-PG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to AGM-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check AGM-PG's competition here
WU vs FOA Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, FOA has a market cap of 175.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while FOA trades at $19.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas FOA's P/E ratio is 8.75. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to FOA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to FOA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check FOA's competition here
WU vs ANTA Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ANTA has a market cap of 163.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while ANTA trades at $7.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas ANTA's P/E ratio is 8.29. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to ANTA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to ANTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check ANTA's competition here
WU vs EMIS Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, EMIS has a market cap of 159.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while EMIS trades at $10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas EMIS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to EMIS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to EMIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check EMIS's competition here
WU vs IFIN-WT Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, IFIN-WT has a market cap of 149.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while IFIN-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas IFIN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to IFIN-WT's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to IFIN-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check IFIN-WT's competition here
WU vs SUNL Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, SUNL has a market cap of 146.1M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while SUNL trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas SUNL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to SUNL's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to SUNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check SUNL's competition here
WU vs AHG Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, AHG has a market cap of 126.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while AHG trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas AHG's P/E ratio is -2.79. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to AHG's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to AHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check AHG's competition here
WU vs YRD Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, YRD has a market cap of 105.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while YRD trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas YRD's P/E ratio is 13.44. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to YRD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to YRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check YRD's competition here
WU vs NISN Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, NISN has a market cap of 81.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while NISN trades at $16.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas NISN's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to NISN's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to NISN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check NISN's competition here
WU vs FOA-WT Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, FOA-WT has a market cap of 72.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while FOA-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas FOA-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to FOA-WT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to FOA-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check FOA-WT's competition here
WU vs ELVT Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ELVT has a market cap of 58.8M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while ELVT trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas ELVT's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to ELVT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to ELVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check ELVT's competition here
WU vs NICK Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, NICK has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while NICK trades at $6.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas NICK's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to NICK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to NICK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check NICK's competition here
WU vs XYF Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, XYF has a market cap of 31.9M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while XYF trades at $4.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas XYF's P/E ratio is 1.24. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to XYF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to XYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check XYF's competition here
WU vs OMCC Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, OMCC has a market cap of 29.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while OMCC trades at $4.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas OMCC's P/E ratio is -9.77. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to OMCC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to OMCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check OMCC's competition here
WU vs IPFXW Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, IPFXW has a market cap of 19.7M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while IPFXW trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas IPFXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to IPFXW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to IPFXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check IPFXW's competition here
WU vs JT Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, JT has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while JT trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas JT's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to JT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, WU is less volatile compared to JT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check JT's competition here
WU vs KRAQW Comparison June 2026
WU plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WU stands at 2.3B. In comparison, KRAQW has a market cap of 16.5M. Regarding current trading prices, WU is priced at $7.48, while KRAQW trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WU currently has a P/E ratio of 5.49, whereas KRAQW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, WU's ROE is +0.48%, compared to KRAQW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, WU is more volatile compared to KRAQW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WU.Check KRAQW's competition here