Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, V has a market cap of 685.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while V trades at $367.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas V's P/E ratio is 29.53. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to V's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is more volatile compared to V. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check V's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, MA has a market cap of 497.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while MA trades at $567.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas MA's P/E ratio is 31.73. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MA's ROE of +2.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is more volatile compared to MA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check MA's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, AXP has a market cap of 208.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while AXP trades at $308.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas AXP's P/E ratio is 19.26. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AXP's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is more volatile compared to AXP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check AXP's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, COF-PN has a market cap of 126.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while COF-PN trades at $14.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas COF-PN's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to COF-PN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is more volatile compared to COF-PN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check COF-PN's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, COF-PL has a market cap of 126B. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while COF-PL trades at $14.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas COF-PL's P/E ratio is 3.15. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to COF-PL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is more volatile compared to COF-PL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check COF-PL's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, COF-PK has a market cap of 124.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while COF-PK trades at $15.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas COF-PK's P/E ratio is 3.27. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to COF-PK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is more volatile compared to COF-PK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check COF-PK's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, COF-PJ has a market cap of 123.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while COF-PJ trades at $16.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas COF-PJ's P/E ratio is 3.39. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to COF-PJ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is more volatile compared to COF-PJ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check COF-PJ's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, COF-PI has a market cap of 123.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while COF-PI trades at $16.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas COF-PI's P/E ratio is 3.49. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to COF-PI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is more volatile compared to COF-PI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check COF-PI's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, COF has a market cap of 122.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while COF trades at $200.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas COF's P/E ratio is 10.16. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to COF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is less volatile compared to COF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check COF's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, EP-PC has a market cap of 110.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while EP-PC trades at $49.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas EP-PC's P/E ratio is 27.93. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to EP-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is more volatile compared to EP-PC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check EP-PC's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, DFS has a market cap of 50.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while DFS trades at $200.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas DFS's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to DFS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is more volatile compared to DFS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check DFS's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, PYPL has a market cap of 47.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while PYPL trades at $55.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas PYPL's P/E ratio is 10.37. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PYPL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is less volatile compared to PYPL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check PYPL's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, IX has a market cap of 43.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while IX trades at $39.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas IX's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to IX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is more volatile compared to IX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check IX's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, SYF-PB has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while SYF-PB trades at $25.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas SYF-PB's P/E ratio is 2.62. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SYF-PB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is more volatile compared to SYF-PB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check SYF-PB's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, AFRM has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while AFRM trades at $71.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas AFRM's P/E ratio is 12.96. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AFRM's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is less volatile compared to AFRM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check AFRM's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, SYF-PA has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while SYF-PA trades at $18.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas SYF-PA's P/E ratio is 1.88. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SYF-PA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is more volatile compared to SYF-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check SYF-PA's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, SYF has a market cap of 23.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while SYF trades at $72.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas SYF's P/E ratio is 7.52. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SYF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is less volatile compared to SYF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check SYF's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, SOFI has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while SOFI trades at $16.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas SOFI's P/E ratio is 34.54. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SOFI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is more volatile compared to SOFI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check SOFI's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, GPN has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while GPN trades at $86.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas GPN's P/E ratio is 6.63. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GPN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is more volatile compared to GPN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check GPN's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, KKRS has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while KKRS trades at $15.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas KKRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to KKRS's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is more volatile compared to KKRS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check KKRS's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, OPFI-WT has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while OPFI-WT trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas OPFI-WT's P/E ratio is 0.19. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to OPFI-WT's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is more volatile compared to OPFI-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check OPFI-WT's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, ALLY has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while ALLY trades at $38.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas ALLY's P/E ratio is 8.51. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ALLY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is more volatile compared to ALLY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check ALLY's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, AGM-PC has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while AGM-PC trades at $348.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas AGM-PC's P/E ratio is 31.38. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AGM-PC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is less volatile compared to AGM-PC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check AGM-PC's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, FCFS has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while FCFS trades at $217.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas FCFS's P/E ratio is 23.18. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FCFS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is more volatile compared to FCFS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check FCFS's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, OMF has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while OMF trades at $57.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas OMF's P/E ratio is 8.50. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to OMF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is less volatile compared to OMF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check OMF's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, SLMBP has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while SLMBP trades at $73.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas SLMBP's P/E ratio is 20.25. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SLMBP's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is more volatile compared to SLMBP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check SLMBP's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, CACC has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while CACC trades at $555.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas CACC's P/E ratio is 12.50. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CACC's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is less volatile compared to CACC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check CACC's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, ORCC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while ORCC trades at $13.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas ORCC's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ORCC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is more volatile compared to ORCC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check ORCC's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, KLAR has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while KLAR trades at $12.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas KLAR's P/E ratio is -33.68. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to KLAR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is less volatile compared to KLAR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check KLAR's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, JSM has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while JSM trades at $17.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas JSM's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to JSM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is more volatile compared to JSM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check JSM's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, NNI has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while NNI trades at $124.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas NNI's P/E ratio is 15.13. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NNI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is more volatile compared to NNI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check NNI's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, SLM has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while SLM trades at $23.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas SLM's P/E ratio is 6.55. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SLM's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is less volatile compared to SLM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check SLM's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, ENVA has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while ENVA trades at $173.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas ENVA's P/E ratio is 11.56. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ENVA's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is more volatile compared to ENVA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check ENVA's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, BFH has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while BFH trades at $102.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas BFH's P/E ratio is 7.68. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BFH's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is less volatile compared to BFH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check BFH's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, SEZL has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while SEZL trades at $111.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas SEZL's P/E ratio is 24.86. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SEZL's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is less volatile compared to SEZL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check SEZL's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, ADS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while ADS trades at $56.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas ADS's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ADS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is less volatile compared to ADS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check ADS's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, AGM has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while AGM trades at $214.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas AGM's P/E ratio is 11.65. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AGM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is less volatile compared to AGM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check AGM's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, UPST has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while UPST trades at $23.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas UPST's P/E ratio is 22.22. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to UPST's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is less volatile compared to UPST. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check UPST's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, LC has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while LC trades at $19.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas LC's P/E ratio is 12.89. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is less volatile compared to LC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check LC's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, ECPG has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while ECPG trades at $98.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas ECPG's P/E ratio is 7.45. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ECPG's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is more volatile compared to ECPG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check ECPG's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, AGM-PE has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while AGM-PE trades at $19.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas AGM-PE's P/E ratio is 1.11. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AGM-PE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is more volatile compared to AGM-PE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check AGM-PE's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, AGM-PG has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while AGM-PG trades at $17.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas AGM-PG's P/E ratio is 0.94. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AGM-PG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is more volatile compared to AGM-PG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check AGM-PG's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, AGM-PF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while AGM-PF trades at $18.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas AGM-PF's P/E ratio is 1.01. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AGM-PF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is more volatile compared to AGM-PF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check AGM-PF's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, WU has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while WU trades at $6.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas WU's P/E ratio is 3.89. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WU's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is less volatile compared to WU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check WU's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, AGM-A has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while AGM-A trades at $146.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas AGM-A's P/E ratio is 8.09. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AGM-A's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is more volatile compared to AGM-A. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check AGM-A's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, EZPW has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while EZPW trades at $31.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas EZPW's P/E ratio is 16.06. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to EZPW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is less volatile compared to EZPW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check EZPW's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, ATLCL has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while ATLCL trades at $25.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas ATLCL's P/E ratio is 3.62. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ATLCL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is more volatile compared to ATLCL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check ATLCL's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, ATLCZ has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while ATLCZ trades at $25.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas ATLCZ's P/E ratio is 3.68. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ATLCZ's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is more volatile compared to ATLCZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check ATLCZ's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, ATLCP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while ATLCP trades at $23.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas ATLCP's P/E ratio is 3.08. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ATLCP's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is more volatile compared to ATLCP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check ATLCP's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, ATLC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while ATLC trades at $92.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas ATLC's P/E ratio is 11.62. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ATLC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is less volatile compared to ATLC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check ATLC's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, PRG has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while PRG trades at $32.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas PRG's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PRG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is more volatile compared to PRG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check PRG's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, JCAP has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while JCAP trades at $19.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas JCAP's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to JCAP's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is more volatile compared to JCAP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check JCAP's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, TRNI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while TRNI trades at $25.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas TRNI's P/E ratio is 11.36. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TRNI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is more volatile compared to TRNI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check TRNI's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, LU has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while LU trades at $1.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas LU's P/E ratio is -3.39. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LU's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is less volatile compared to LU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check LU's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, MGI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while MGI trades at $10.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas MGI's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MGI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is more volatile compared to MGI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check MGI's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, QFIN has a market cap of 950.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while QFIN trades at $7.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas QFIN's P/E ratio is 1.75. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to QFIN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is less volatile compared to QFIN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check QFIN's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, RWAYI has a market cap of 891.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while RWAYI trades at $24.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas RWAYI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RWAYI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is more volatile compared to RWAYI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check RWAYI's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, NAVI has a market cap of 857.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while NAVI trades at $9.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas NAVI's P/E ratio is 12.67. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NAVI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is less volatile compared to NAVI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check NAVI's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, WRLD has a market cap of 801.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while WRLD trades at $171.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas WRLD's P/E ratio is 23.30. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WRLD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is more volatile compared to WRLD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check WRLD's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, PRAA has a market cap of 787.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while PRAA trades at $20.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas PRAA's P/E ratio is 5.43. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PRAA's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is less volatile compared to PRAA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check PRAA's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, FINV has a market cap of 773.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while FINV trades at $3.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas FINV's P/E ratio is 2.73. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FINV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is similarly volatile compared to FINV. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check FINV's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, NEWTO has a market cap of 736.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while NEWTO trades at $25.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas NEWTO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NEWTO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is more volatile compared to NEWTO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check NEWTO's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, GDOT has a market cap of 694.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while GDOT trades at $12.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas GDOT's P/E ratio is 8.17. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GDOT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is less volatile compared to GDOT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check GDOT's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, AGM-PD has a market cap of 588.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while AGM-PD trades at $20.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas AGM-PD's P/E ratio is 1.11. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AGM-PD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is more volatile compared to AGM-PD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check AGM-PD's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, OPFI has a market cap of 536.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while OPFI trades at $6.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas OPFI's P/E ratio is 19.10. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to OPFI's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is more volatile compared to OPFI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check OPFI's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, QD has a market cap of 528.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while QD trades at $3.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas QD's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to QD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is less volatile compared to QD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check QD's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, SCE-PM has a market cap of 498.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while SCE-PM trades at $22.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas SCE-PM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SCE-PM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is less volatile compared to SCE-PM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check SCE-PM's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, ORBS has a market cap of 442.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while ORBS trades at $1.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas ORBS's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ORBS's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is less volatile compared to ORBS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check ORBS's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, OPRT has a market cap of 392.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while OPRT trades at $8.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas OPRT's P/E ratio is 6.63. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to OPRT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is less volatile compared to OPRT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check OPRT's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, RWAYZ has a market cap of 390.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while RWAYZ trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas RWAYZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RWAYZ's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is more volatile compared to RWAYZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check RWAYZ's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, HTT has a market cap of 389.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while HTT trades at $2.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas HTT's P/E ratio is 4.15. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HTT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is less volatile compared to HTT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check HTT's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, LPRO has a market cap of 371.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while LPRO trades at $3.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas LPRO's P/E ratio is 68.13. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LPRO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is more volatile compared to LPRO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check LPRO's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, TREE has a market cap of 343.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while TREE trades at $24.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas TREE's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TREE's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is less volatile compared to TREE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check TREE's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, RWAY has a market cap of 287.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while RWAY trades at $6.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas RWAY's P/E ratio is 4.77. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RWAY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is less volatile compared to RWAY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check RWAY's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, RM has a market cap of 284.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while RM trades at $30.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas RM's P/E ratio is 6.27. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is more volatile compared to RM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check RM's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, PMTS has a market cap of 284M. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while PMTS trades at $24.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas PMTS's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PMTS's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is less volatile compared to PMTS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check PMTS's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, MFIN has a market cap of 276.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while MFIN trades at $11.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas MFIN's P/E ratio is 8.14. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MFIN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is more volatile compared to MFIN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check MFIN's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, RWAYL has a market cap of 251.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while RWAYL trades at $25.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas RWAYL's P/E ratio is 17.69. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to RWAYL's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is more volatile compared to RWAYL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check RWAYL's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, TROO has a market cap of 216.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while TROO trades at $1.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas TROO's P/E ratio is -7.73. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TROO's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is less volatile compared to TROO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check TROO's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, CPSS has a market cap of 207.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while CPSS trades at $9.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas CPSS's P/E ratio is 10.39. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CPSS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is less volatile compared to CPSS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check CPSS's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, SWKHL has a market cap of 190.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while SWKHL trades at $25.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas SWKHL's P/E ratio is -28.91. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SWKHL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is more volatile compared to SWKHL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check SWKHL's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, IFIN-WT has a market cap of 149.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while IFIN-WT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas IFIN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to IFIN-WT's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is less volatile compared to IFIN-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check IFIN-WT's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, SUNL has a market cap of 146.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while SUNL trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas SUNL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SUNL's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is less volatile compared to SUNL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check SUNL's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, FOA has a market cap of 129.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while FOA trades at $14.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas FOA's P/E ratio is 3.66. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FOA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is less volatile compared to FOA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check FOA's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, LX has a market cap of 125.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while LX trades at $0.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas LX's P/E ratio is 0.88. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is less volatile compared to LX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check LX's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, SUIG has a market cap of 119.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while SUIG trades at $1.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas SUIG's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SUIG's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is less volatile compared to SUIG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check SUIG's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, YRD has a market cap of 86.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while YRD trades at $0.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas YRD's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to YRD's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is more volatile compared to YRD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check YRD's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, NISN has a market cap of 81.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while NISN trades at $16.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas NISN's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NISN's ROE of -2.99%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is less volatile compared to NISN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check NISN's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, JFIN has a market cap of 78.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while JFIN trades at $1.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas JFIN's P/E ratio is 1.47. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to JFIN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is more volatile compared to JFIN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check JFIN's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, FOA-WT has a market cap of 72.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while FOA-WT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas FOA-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FOA-WT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is less volatile compared to FOA-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check FOA-WT's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, ANTA has a market cap of 69.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while ANTA trades at $2.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas ANTA's P/E ratio is 10.90. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ANTA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is less volatile compared to ANTA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check ANTA's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, ELVT has a market cap of 58.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while ELVT trades at $1.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas ELVT's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ELVT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is more volatile compared to ELVT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check ELVT's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, ADBT has a market cap of 55M. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while ADBT trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas ADBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ADBT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is less volatile compared to ADBT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check ADBT's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, VRM has a market cap of 51.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while VRM trades at $9.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas VRM's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to VRM's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is less volatile compared to VRM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check VRM's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, XYF has a market cap of 34.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while XYF trades at $5.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas XYF's P/E ratio is 1.34. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to XYF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is less volatile compared to XYF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check XYF's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, JT has a market cap of 16.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while JT trades at $0.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas JT's P/E ratio is -2.52. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to JT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is less volatile compared to JT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check JT's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, PT has a market cap of 13.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while PT trades at $0.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas PT's P/E ratio is -9.61. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is less volatile compared to PT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check PT's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, DXF has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while DXF trades at $0.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas DXF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to DXF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is less volatile compared to DXF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check DXF's competition here

Nicholas Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ: NICK) plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NICK stands at 45.2M. In comparison, IACOW has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, NICK is priced at $6.19 on the NASDAQ, while IACOW trades at $0.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NICK currently has a P/E ratio of -1.79, whereas IACOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NICK's ROE is -0.05%, compared to IACOW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NICK is more volatile compared to IACOW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NICK.Check IACOW's competition here