Bread Financial Holdings, Inc. (ADS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ADS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Credit Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADS | $56.80 | +1.16% | 2.8B | 3.54 | $16.03 | +1.48% |
| V | $320.18 | +2.49% | 613.8B | 27.94 | $11.46 | +0.81% |
| MA | $481.76 | +2.17% | 425.7B | 27.88 | $17.28 | +0.68% |
| AXP | $312.56 | +3.99% | 213.3B | 19.52 | $16.01 | +1.09% |
| COF | $183.20 | +3.14% | 114B | 56.39 | $3.25 | +1.63% |
| BNH | $15.45 | -0.00% | 103.6B | N/A | N/A | +0.56% |
| DFS | $200.05 | -0.21% | 50.3B | 10.69 | $18.72 | N/A |
| IX | $39.76 | +1.30% | 44.1B | 15.84 | $2.51 | +2.50% |
| PYPL | $42.75 | +0.33% | 37.7B | 8.02 | $5.33 | +0.98% |
| SUNB | $81.29 | +5.08% | 33.6B | 24.93 | $3.26 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ADS vs V Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, V has a market cap of 613.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while V trades at $320.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas V's P/E ratio is 27.94. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to V's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check V's competition here
ADS vs MA Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, MA has a market cap of 425.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while MA trades at $481.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas MA's P/E ratio is 27.88. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MA's ROE of +2.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to MA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check MA's competition here
ADS vs AXP Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AXP has a market cap of 213.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while AXP trades at $312.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas AXP's P/E ratio is 19.52. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AXP's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to AXP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check AXP's competition here
ADS vs COF Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, COF has a market cap of 114B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while COF trades at $183.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas COF's P/E ratio is 56.39. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to COF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to COF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check COF's competition here
ADS vs BNH Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, BNH has a market cap of 103.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while BNH trades at $15.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas BNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BNH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to BNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check BNH's competition here
ADS vs DFS Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, DFS has a market cap of 50.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while DFS trades at $200.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas DFS's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DFS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to DFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check DFS's competition here
ADS vs IX Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, IX has a market cap of 44.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while IX trades at $39.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas IX's P/E ratio is 15.84. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to IX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check IX's competition here
ADS vs PYPL Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PYPL has a market cap of 37.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while PYPL trades at $42.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas PYPL's P/E ratio is 8.02. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PYPL's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to PYPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check PYPL's competition here
ADS vs SUNB Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SUNB has a market cap of 33.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while SUNB trades at $81.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas SUNB's P/E ratio is 24.93. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SUNB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to SUNB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check SUNB's competition here
ADS vs SYF Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SYF has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while SYF trades at $70.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas SYF's P/E ratio is 7.33. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SYF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to SYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check SYF's competition here
ADS vs SOFI Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SOFI has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while SOFI trades at $17.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas SOFI's P/E ratio is 38.11. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SOFI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to SOFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check SOFI's competition here
ADS vs GPN Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, GPN has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while GPN trades at $67.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas GPN's P/E ratio is 24.93. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GPN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to GPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check GPN's competition here
ADS vs KKRS Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, KKRS has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while KKRS trades at $16.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas KKRS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KKRS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to KKRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check KKRS's competition here
ADS vs ALLY Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ALLY has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while ALLY trades at $42.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas ALLY's P/E ratio is 10.29. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ALLY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to ALLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check ALLY's competition here
ADS vs COF-PI Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, COF-PI has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while COF-PI trades at $18.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas COF-PI's P/E ratio is 0.71. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to COF-PI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to COF-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check COF-PI's competition here
ADS vs COF-PJ Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, COF-PJ has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while COF-PJ trades at $17.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas COF-PJ's P/E ratio is 0.68. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to COF-PJ's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to COF-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check COF-PJ's competition here
ADS vs COF-PK Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, COF-PK has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while COF-PK trades at $16.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas COF-PK's P/E ratio is 0.66. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to COF-PK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to COF-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check COF-PK's competition here
ADS vs COF-PL Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, COF-PL has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while COF-PL trades at $15.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas COF-PL's P/E ratio is 0.62. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to COF-PL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to COF-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check COF-PL's competition here
ADS vs AGM-PC Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AGM-PC has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while AGM-PC trades at $348.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas AGM-PC's P/E ratio is 31.38. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AGM-PC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to AGM-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check AGM-PC's competition here
ADS vs FCFS Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, FCFS has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while FCFS trades at $222.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas FCFS's P/E ratio is 27.87. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FCFS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to FCFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check FCFS's competition here
ADS vs COF-PN Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, COF-PN has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while COF-PN trades at $15.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas COF-PN's P/E ratio is 0.61. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to COF-PN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to COF-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check COF-PN's competition here
ADS vs SYF-PB Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SYF-PB has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while SYF-PB trades at $25.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas SYF-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SYF-PB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to SYF-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check SYF-PB's competition here
ADS vs SLMBP Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SLMBP has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while SLMBP trades at $74.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas SLMBP's P/E ratio is 34.36. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SLMBP's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to SLMBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check SLMBP's competition here
ADS vs SYF-PA Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SYF-PA has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while SYF-PA trades at $19.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas SYF-PA's P/E ratio is 2.65. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SYF-PA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to SYF-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check SYF-PA's competition here
ADS vs OMF Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, OMF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while OMF trades at $55.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas OMF's P/E ratio is 8.24. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to OMF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to OMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check OMF's competition here
ADS vs CGABL Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CGABL has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while CGABL trades at $16.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas CGABL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CGABL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to CGABL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check CGABL's competition here
ADS vs CACC Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CACC has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while CACC trades at $548.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas CACC's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CACC's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to CACC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check CACC's competition here
ADS vs OBDC Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, OBDC has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while OBDC trades at $11.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas OBDC's P/E ratio is 16.14. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to OBDC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to OBDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check OBDC's competition here
ADS vs ORCC Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ORCC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while ORCC trades at $13.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas ORCC's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ORCC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to ORCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check ORCC's competition here
ADS vs JSM Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, JSM has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while JSM trades at $18.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas JSM's P/E ratio is 15.36. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JSM's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to JSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check JSM's competition here
ADS vs NNI Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, NNI has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while NNI trades at $129.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas NNI's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NNI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to NNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check NNI's competition here
ADS vs SLM Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SLM has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while SLM trades at $22.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas SLM's P/E ratio is 6.19. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SLM's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to SLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check SLM's competition here
ADS vs ENVA Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ENVA has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while ENVA trades at $167.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas ENVA's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ENVA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to ENVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check ENVA's competition here
ADS vs SEZL Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SEZL has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while SEZL trades at $120.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas SEZL's P/E ratio is 25.14. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SEZL's ROE of +0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to SEZL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check SEZL's competition here
ADS vs BFH Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, BFH has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while BFH trades at $91.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas BFH's P/E ratio is 7.44. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BFH's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to BFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check BFH's competition here
ADS vs UPST Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, UPST has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while UPST trades at $32.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas UPST's P/E ratio is 78.71. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to UPST's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to UPST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check UPST's competition here
ADS vs WU Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, WU has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while WU trades at $7.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas WU's P/E ratio is 5.67. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WU's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to WU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check WU's competition here
ADS vs LC Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, LC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while LC trades at $17.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas LC's P/E ratio is 11.71. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to LC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check LC's competition here
ADS vs QFIN Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, QFIN has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while QFIN trades at $15.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas QFIN's P/E ratio is 2.68. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to QFIN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to QFIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check QFIN's competition here
ADS vs AGM Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AGM has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while AGM trades at $182.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas AGM's P/E ratio is 10.49. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AGM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to AGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check AGM's competition here
ADS vs EZPW Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, EZPW has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while EZPW trades at $32.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas EZPW's P/E ratio is 17.38. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EZPW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to EZPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check EZPW's competition here
ADS vs AGM-A Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AGM-A has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while AGM-A trades at $134.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas AGM-A's P/E ratio is 7.72. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AGM-A's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to AGM-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check AGM-A's competition here
ADS vs FINV Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, FINV has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while FINV trades at $5.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas FINV's P/E ratio is 4.10. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FINV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to FINV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check FINV's competition here
ADS vs ATLC Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ATLC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while ATLC trades at $82.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas ATLC's P/E ratio is 11.36. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ATLC's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to ATLC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check ATLC's competition here
ADS vs OCSL Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, OCSL has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while OCSL trades at $12.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas OCSL's P/E ratio is 20.70. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to OCSL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to OCSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check OCSL's competition here
ADS vs MGI Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, MGI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while MGI trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas MGI's P/E ratio is 32.32. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MGI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to MGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check MGI's competition here
ADS vs RWAYL Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RWAYL has a market cap of 909.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while RWAYL trades at $25.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas RWAYL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RWAYL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to RWAYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check RWAYL's competition here
ADS vs RWAYI Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RWAYI has a market cap of 892.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while RWAYI trades at $24.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas RWAYI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RWAYI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to RWAYI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check RWAYI's competition here
ADS vs JCAP Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, JCAP has a market cap of 888.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while JCAP trades at $16.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas JCAP's P/E ratio is 3.11. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JCAP's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to JCAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check JCAP's competition here
ADS vs BBDC Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, BBDC has a market cap of 880.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while BBDC trades at $8.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas BBDC's P/E ratio is 9.89. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BBDC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to BBDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check BBDC's competition here
ADS vs WRLD Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, WRLD has a market cap of 828.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while WRLD trades at $167.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas WRLD's P/E ratio is 24.11. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WRLD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to WRLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check WRLD's competition here
ADS vs NEWTO Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, NEWTO has a market cap of 750.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while NEWTO trades at $26.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas NEWTO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NEWTO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to NEWTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check NEWTO's competition here
ADS vs NAVI Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, NAVI has a market cap of 730.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while NAVI trades at $7.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas NAVI's P/E ratio is -12.53. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NAVI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to NAVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check NAVI's competition here
ADS vs GDOT Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, GDOT has a market cap of 727.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while GDOT trades at $12.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas GDOT's P/E ratio is -9.65. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GDOT's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to GDOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check GDOT's competition here
ADS vs NEWTG Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, NEWTG has a market cap of 725.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while NEWTG trades at $25.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas NEWTG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NEWTG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to NEWTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check NEWTG's competition here
ADS vs LU Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, LU has a market cap of 652M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while LU trades at $1.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas LU's P/E ratio is -4.32. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LU's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to LU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check LU's competition here
ADS vs AGM-PD Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AGM-PD has a market cap of 606.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while AGM-PD trades at $20.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas AGM-PD's P/E ratio is 1.86. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AGM-PD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to AGM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check AGM-PD's competition here
ADS vs NRDS Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, NRDS has a market cap of 591.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while NRDS trades at $8.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas NRDS's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NRDS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to NRDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check NRDS's competition here
ADS vs PRAA Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PRAA has a market cap of 573.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while PRAA trades at $15.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas PRAA's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PRAA's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to PRAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check PRAA's competition here
ADS vs QD Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, QD has a market cap of 528.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while QD trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas QD's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to QD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to QD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check QD's competition here
ADS vs TREE Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TREE has a market cap of 505.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while TREE trades at $36.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas TREE's P/E ratio is 2.81. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TREE's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to TREE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check TREE's competition here
ADS vs MCVT Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, MCVT has a market cap of 501.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while MCVT trades at $6.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas MCVT's P/E ratio is 25.46. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MCVT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to MCVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check MCVT's competition here
ADS vs HTT Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, HTT has a market cap of 481.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while HTT trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas HTT's P/E ratio is 4.72. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HTT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to HTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check HTT's competition here
ADS vs IACO Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, IACO has a market cap of 433.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while IACO trades at $9.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas IACO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IACO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to IACO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check IACO's competition here
ADS vs KRAQ Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, KRAQ has a market cap of 429.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while KRAQ trades at $9.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas KRAQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KRAQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to KRAQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check KRAQ's competition here
ADS vs RWAYZ Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RWAYZ has a market cap of 390.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while RWAYZ trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas RWAYZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RWAYZ's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to RWAYZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check RWAYZ's competition here
ADS vs ATLCZ Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ATLCZ has a market cap of 388.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while ATLCZ trades at $25.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas ATLCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ATLCZ's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to ATLCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check ATLCZ's competition here
ADS vs ATLCL Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ATLCL has a market cap of 381.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while ATLCL trades at $25.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas ATLCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ATLCL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to ATLCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check ATLCL's competition here
ADS vs LX Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, LX has a market cap of 377.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while LX trades at $2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas LX's P/E ratio is 1.84. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to LX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check LX's competition here
ADS vs ATLCP Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ATLCP has a market cap of 361M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while ATLCP trades at $23.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas ATLCP's P/E ratio is 3.14. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ATLCP's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to ATLCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check ATLCP's competition here
ADS vs RM Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RM has a market cap of 332M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while RM trades at $35.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas RM's P/E ratio is 7.31. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to RM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check RM's competition here
ADS vs NEWTI Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, NEWTI has a market cap of 324.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while NEWTI trades at $25.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas NEWTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NEWTI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to NEWTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check NEWTI's competition here
ADS vs CURR Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CURR has a market cap of 268.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while CURR trades at $3.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas CURR's P/E ratio is -11.70. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CURR's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to CURR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check CURR's competition here
ADS vs LPRO Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, LPRO has a market cap of 264.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while LPRO trades at $2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas LPRO's P/E ratio is -44.80. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LPRO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to LPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check LPRO's competition here
ADS vs RWAY Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RWAY has a market cap of 230.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while RWAY trades at $6.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas RWAY's P/E ratio is -79.62. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RWAY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to RWAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check RWAY's competition here
ADS vs MFIN Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, MFIN has a market cap of 229.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while MFIN trades at $9.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas MFIN's P/E ratio is 6.51. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MFIN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to MFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check MFIN's competition here
ADS vs AGM-PE Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AGM-PE has a market cap of 223.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while AGM-PE trades at $20.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas AGM-PE's P/E ratio is 1.85. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AGM-PE's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to AGM-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check AGM-PE's competition here
ADS vs IPFX Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, IPFX has a market cap of 220.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while IPFX trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas IPFX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IPFX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to IPFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check IPFX's competition here
ADS vs OPRT Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, OPRT has a market cap of 220.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while OPRT trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas OPRT's P/E ratio is 13.01. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to OPRT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to OPRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check OPRT's competition here
ADS vs AGM-PF Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AGM-PF has a market cap of 205.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while AGM-PF trades at $18.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas AGM-PF's P/E ratio is 1.69. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AGM-PF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to AGM-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check AGM-PF's competition here
ADS vs PMTS Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PMTS has a market cap of 203.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while PMTS trades at $17.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas PMTS's P/E ratio is 17.36. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PMTS's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to PMTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check PMTS's competition here
ADS vs CPSS Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CPSS has a market cap of 200.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while CPSS trades at $9.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas CPSS's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CPSS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to CPSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check CPSS's competition here
ADS vs AGM-PG Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AGM-PG has a market cap of 191.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while AGM-PG trades at $17.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas AGM-PG's P/E ratio is 1.58. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AGM-PG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to AGM-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check AGM-PG's competition here
ADS vs FOA Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, FOA has a market cap of 179.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while FOA trades at $20.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas FOA's P/E ratio is 8.92. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FOA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to FOA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check FOA's competition here
ADS vs ANTA Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ANTA has a market cap of 174.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while ANTA trades at $7.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas ANTA's P/E ratio is 8.87. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ANTA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to ANTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check ANTA's competition here
ADS vs EMIS Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, EMIS has a market cap of 159.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while EMIS trades at $10.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas EMIS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EMIS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to EMIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check EMIS's competition here
ADS vs IFIN-WT Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, IFIN-WT has a market cap of 149.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while IFIN-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas IFIN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IFIN-WT's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to IFIN-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check IFIN-WT's competition here
ADS vs SUNL Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SUNL has a market cap of 146.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while SUNL trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas SUNL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SUNL's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to SUNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check SUNL's competition here
ADS vs AHG Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AHG has a market cap of 138.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while AHG trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas AHG's P/E ratio is -3.04. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AHG's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to AHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check AHG's competition here
ADS vs YRD Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, YRD has a market cap of 106.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while YRD trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas YRD's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to YRD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to YRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check YRD's competition here
ADS vs NISN Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, NISN has a market cap of 81.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while NISN trades at $16.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas NISN's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NISN's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to NISN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check NISN's competition here
ADS vs FOA-WT Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, FOA-WT has a market cap of 72.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while FOA-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas FOA-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FOA-WT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to FOA-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check FOA-WT's competition here
ADS vs ELVT Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ELVT has a market cap of 58.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while ELVT trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas ELVT's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ELVT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to ELVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check ELVT's competition here
ADS vs NICK Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, NICK has a market cap of 45.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while NICK trades at $6.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas NICK's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NICK's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to NICK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check NICK's competition here
ADS vs XYF Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, XYF has a market cap of 33.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while XYF trades at $4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas XYF's P/E ratio is 1.30. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to XYF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to XYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check XYF's competition here
ADS vs OMCC Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, OMCC has a market cap of 29.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while OMCC trades at $4.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas OMCC's P/E ratio is -9.77. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to OMCC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is more volatile compared to OMCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check OMCC's competition here
ADS vs DXF Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, DXF has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while DXF trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas DXF's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DXF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to DXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check DXF's competition here
ADS vs IPFXW Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, IPFXW has a market cap of 19.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while IPFXW trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas IPFXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IPFXW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to IPFXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check IPFXW's competition here
ADS vs KRAQW Comparison June 2026
ADS plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ADS stands at 2.8B. In comparison, KRAQW has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ADS is priced at $56.80, while KRAQW trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ADS currently has a P/E ratio of 3.54, whereas KRAQW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ADS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KRAQW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ADS is less volatile compared to KRAQW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ADS.Check KRAQW's competition here