Unilever PLC (UL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (UL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Household & Personal Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UL | $55.31 | -0.41% | 119.8B | 18.37 | $3.01 | +4.11% |
| PG | $140.19 | -0.45% | 327.1B | 20.56 | $6.83 | +3.02% |
| CL | $84.87 | -3.85% | 67.9B | 32.90 | $2.58 | +2.44% |
| KVUE | $16.83 | -2.83% | 32.3B | 20.05 | $0.84 | +4.92% |
| KMB | $94.76 | -2.80% | 31.5B | 18.33 | $5.17 | +5.34% |
| EL | $82.05 | -1.63% | 29.7B | -117.20 | -$0.70 | +1.71% |
| CHD | $92.89 | -3.38% | 22B | 30.55 | $3.04 | +1.29% |
| SGI | $67.41 | -0.84% | 14.2B | 26.96 | $2.50 | +0.96% |
| CLX | $88.53 | -1.23% | 10.7B | 14.40 | $6.15 | +5.62% |
| NTCO | $6.60 | +0.38% | 4.6B | -11.37 | -$0.58 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
UL vs PG Comparison June 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 119.8B. In comparison, PG has a market cap of 327.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $55.31, while PG trades at $140.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.37, whereas PG's P/E ratio is 20.56. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to PG's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check PG's competition here
UL vs CL Comparison June 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 119.8B. In comparison, CL has a market cap of 67.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $55.31, while CL trades at $84.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.37, whereas CL's P/E ratio is 32.90. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CL's ROE of +4.75%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to CL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check CL's competition here
UL vs KVUE Comparison June 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 119.8B. In comparison, KVUE has a market cap of 32.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $55.31, while KVUE trades at $16.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.37, whereas KVUE's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to KVUE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to KVUE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check KVUE's competition here
UL vs KMB Comparison June 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 119.8B. In comparison, KMB has a market cap of 31.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $55.31, while KMB trades at $94.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.37, whereas KMB's P/E ratio is 18.33. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to KMB's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to KMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check KMB's competition here
UL vs EL Comparison June 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 119.8B. In comparison, EL has a market cap of 29.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $55.31, while EL trades at $82.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.37, whereas EL's P/E ratio is -117.20. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to EL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to EL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check EL's competition here
UL vs CHD Comparison June 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 119.8B. In comparison, CHD has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $55.31, while CHD trades at $92.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.37, whereas CHD's P/E ratio is 30.55. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CHD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to CHD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check CHD's competition here
UL vs SGI Comparison June 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 119.8B. In comparison, SGI has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $55.31, while SGI trades at $67.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.37, whereas SGI's P/E ratio is 26.96. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SGI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to SGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check SGI's competition here
UL vs CLX Comparison June 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 119.8B. In comparison, CLX has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $55.31, while CLX trades at $88.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.37, whereas CLX's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CLX's ROE of +28.26%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to CLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check CLX's competition here
UL vs NTCO Comparison June 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 119.8B. In comparison, NTCO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $55.31, while NTCO trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.37, whereas NTCO's P/E ratio is -11.37. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to NTCO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to NTCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check NTCO's competition here
UL vs ELF Comparison June 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 119.8B. In comparison, ELF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $55.31, while ELF trades at $51.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.37, whereas ELF's P/E ratio is 118.18. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ELF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to ELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check ELF's competition here
UL vs IPAR Comparison June 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 119.8B. In comparison, IPAR has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $55.31, while IPAR trades at $88.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.37, whereas IPAR's P/E ratio is 16.76. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to IPAR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to IPAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check IPAR's competition here
UL vs SPB Comparison June 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 119.8B. In comparison, SPB has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $55.31, while SPB trades at $79.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.37, whereas SPB's P/E ratio is 15.55. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SPB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to SPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check SPB's competition here
UL vs COTY Comparison June 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 119.8B. In comparison, COTY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $55.31, while COTY trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.37, whereas COTY's P/E ratio is -3.07. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to COTY's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to COTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check COTY's competition here
UL vs NWL Comparison June 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 119.8B. In comparison, NWL has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $55.31, while NWL trades at $3.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.37, whereas NWL's P/E ratio is -5.16. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to NWL's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to NWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check NWL's competition here
UL vs EPC Comparison June 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 119.8B. In comparison, EPC has a market cap of 853.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $55.31, while EPC trades at $18.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.37, whereas EPC's P/E ratio is -80.54. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to EPC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to EPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check EPC's competition here
UL vs HELE Comparison June 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 119.8B. In comparison, HELE has a market cap of 594.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $55.31, while HELE trades at $25.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.37, whereas HELE's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to HELE's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to HELE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check HELE's competition here
UL vs EWCZ Comparison June 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 119.8B. In comparison, EWCZ has a market cap of 319.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $55.31, while EWCZ trades at $5.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.37, whereas EWCZ's P/E ratio is 29.10. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to EWCZ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is more volatile compared to EWCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check EWCZ's competition here
UL vs NUS Comparison June 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 119.8B. In comparison, NUS has a market cap of 256.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $55.31, while NUS trades at $5.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.37, whereas NUS's P/E ratio is 4.90. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to NUS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to NUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check NUS's competition here
UL vs PTNM Comparison June 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 119.8B. In comparison, PTNM has a market cap of 207.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $55.31, while PTNM trades at $10.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.37, whereas PTNM's P/E ratio is 346.33. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to PTNM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is more volatile compared to PTNM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check PTNM's competition here
UL vs ACU Comparison June 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 119.8B. In comparison, ACU has a market cap of 162.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $55.31, while ACU trades at $42.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.37, whereas ACU's P/E ratio is 18.34. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ACU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to ACU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check ACU's competition here
UL vs SLSN Comparison June 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 119.8B. In comparison, SLSN has a market cap of 88.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $55.31, while SLSN trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.37, whereas SLSN's P/E ratio is 125.50. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SLSN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to SLSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check SLSN's competition here
UL vs SKIN Comparison June 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 119.8B. In comparison, SKIN has a market cap of 82.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $55.31, while SKIN trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.37, whereas SKIN's P/E ratio is -4.88. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SKIN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to SKIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check SKIN's competition here
UL vs GROV Comparison June 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 119.8B. In comparison, GROV has a market cap of 48.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $55.31, while GROV trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.37, whereas GROV's P/E ratio is -4.26. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to GROV's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to GROV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check GROV's competition here
UL vs AXIL Comparison June 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 119.8B. In comparison, AXIL has a market cap of 47.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $55.31, while AXIL trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.37, whereas AXIL's P/E ratio is 58.33. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to AXIL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to AXIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check AXIL's competition here
UL vs UG Comparison June 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 119.8B. In comparison, UG has a market cap of 32.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $55.31, while UG trades at $6.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.37, whereas UG's P/E ratio is 13.44. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to UG's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is more volatile compared to UG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check UG's competition here
UL vs MTEX Comparison June 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 119.8B. In comparison, MTEX has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $55.31, while MTEX trades at $5.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.37, whereas MTEX's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MTEX's ROE of -23.83%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to MTEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check MTEX's competition here
UL vs PHH Comparison June 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 119.8B. In comparison, PHH has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $55.31, while PHH trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.37, whereas PHH's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to PHH's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to PHH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check PHH's competition here
UL vs RAY Comparison June 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 119.8B. In comparison, RAY has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $55.31, while RAY trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.37, whereas RAY's P/E ratio is 4.32. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to RAY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to RAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check RAY's competition here
UL vs DSY Comparison June 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 119.8B. In comparison, DSY has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $55.31, while DSY trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.37, whereas DSY's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to DSY's ROE of +14.77%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to DSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check DSY's competition here
UL vs BRSH Comparison June 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 119.8B. In comparison, BRSH has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $55.31, while BRSH trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.37, whereas BRSH's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to BRSH's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to BRSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check BRSH's competition here
UL vs TANH Comparison June 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 119.8B. In comparison, TANH has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $55.31, while TANH trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.37, whereas TANH's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to TANH's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to TANH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check TANH's competition here
UL vs DSYWW Comparison June 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 119.8B. In comparison, DSYWW has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $55.31, while DSYWW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.37, whereas DSYWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to DSYWW's ROE of +14.77%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to DSYWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check DSYWW's competition here
UL vs TKLF Comparison June 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 119.8B. In comparison, TKLF has a market cap of 825.4K. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $55.31, while TKLF trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.37, whereas TKLF's P/E ratio is 1.77. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to TKLF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to TKLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check TKLF's competition here
UL vs BRSHW Comparison June 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 119.8B. In comparison, BRSHW has a market cap of 6.1K. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $55.31, while BRSHW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.37, whereas BRSHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to BRSHW's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to BRSHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check BRSHW's competition here
UL vs REV Comparison June 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 119.8B. In comparison, REV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $55.31, while REV trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.37, whereas REV's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to REV's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is less volatile compared to REV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check REV's competition here
UL vs SUMR Comparison June 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 119.8B. In comparison, SUMR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $55.31, while SUMR trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.37, whereas SUMR's P/E ratio is -3.66. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SUMR's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is more volatile compared to SUMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check SUMR's competition here
UL vs GROV-WT Comparison June 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 119.8B. In comparison, GROV-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $55.31, while GROV-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.37, whereas GROV-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to GROV-WT's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is more volatile compared to GROV-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check GROV-WT's competition here
UL vs RDEN Comparison June 2026
UL plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UL stands at 119.8B. In comparison, RDEN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UL is priced at $55.31, while RDEN trades at $13.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UL currently has a P/E ratio of 18.37, whereas RDEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to RDEN's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, UL is more volatile compared to RDEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UL.Check RDEN's competition here