Inter Parfums, Inc. (IPAR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (IPAR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Household & Personal Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IPAR | $94.37 | -2.11% | 3B | 17.91 | $5.27 | +3.34% |
| PG | $143.56 | -1.61% | 334.3B | 20.99 | $6.84 | +2.96% |
| UL | $56.45 | -1.03% | 122.7B | 18.45 | $3.06 | +4.01% |
| CL | $90.13 | -1.67% | 72.1B | 34.94 | $2.58 | +2.31% |
| KVUE | $17.28 | -2.04% | 33.2B | 20.57 | $0.84 | +4.77% |
| KMB | $97.60 | -2.54% | 32.4B | 18.88 | $5.17 | +5.14% |
| EL | $88.95 | -2.11% | 32.2B | -127.04 | -$0.70 | +1.56% |
| CHD | $95.63 | -2.05% | 22.7B | 31.46 | $3.04 | +1.25% |
| SGI | $70.81 | -0.77% | 14.9B | 28.33 | $2.50 | +0.90% |
| CLX | $90.02 | -6.42% | 10.9B | 14.64 | $6.15 | +5.41% |
Stock Comparison
IPAR vs PG Comparison June 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 3B. In comparison, PG has a market cap of 334.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $94.37, while PG trades at $143.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas PG's P/E ratio is 20.99. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PG's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is more volatile compared to PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check PG's competition here
IPAR vs UL Comparison June 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 3B. In comparison, UL has a market cap of 122.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $94.37, while UL trades at $56.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas UL's P/E ratio is 18.45. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to UL's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is more volatile compared to UL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check UL's competition here
IPAR vs CL Comparison June 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 3B. In comparison, CL has a market cap of 72.1B. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $94.37, while CL trades at $90.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas CL's P/E ratio is 34.94. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CL's ROE of +4.75%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is more volatile compared to CL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check CL's competition here
IPAR vs KVUE Comparison June 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 3B. In comparison, KVUE has a market cap of 33.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $94.37, while KVUE trades at $17.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas KVUE's P/E ratio is 20.57. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KVUE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is more volatile compared to KVUE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check KVUE's competition here
IPAR vs KMB Comparison June 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 3B. In comparison, KMB has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $94.37, while KMB trades at $97.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas KMB's P/E ratio is 18.88. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KMB's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is less volatile compared to KMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check KMB's competition here
IPAR vs EL Comparison June 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 3B. In comparison, EL has a market cap of 32.2B. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $94.37, while EL trades at $88.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas EL's P/E ratio is -127.04. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is more volatile compared to EL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check EL's competition here
IPAR vs CHD Comparison June 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 3B. In comparison, CHD has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $94.37, while CHD trades at $95.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas CHD's P/E ratio is 31.46. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CHD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is more volatile compared to CHD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check CHD's competition here
IPAR vs SGI Comparison June 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 3B. In comparison, SGI has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $94.37, while SGI trades at $70.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas SGI's P/E ratio is 28.33. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SGI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is less volatile compared to SGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check SGI's competition here
IPAR vs CLX Comparison June 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 3B. In comparison, CLX has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $94.37, while CLX trades at $90.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas CLX's P/E ratio is 14.64. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CLX's ROE of +28.26%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is less volatile compared to CLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check CLX's competition here
IPAR vs NTCO Comparison June 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 3B. In comparison, NTCO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $94.37, while NTCO trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas NTCO's P/E ratio is -11.37. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NTCO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is more volatile compared to NTCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check NTCO's competition here
IPAR vs ELF Comparison June 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 3B. In comparison, ELF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $94.37, while ELF trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas ELF's P/E ratio is 127.30. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ELF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is less volatile compared to ELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check ELF's competition here
IPAR vs COTY Comparison June 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 3B. In comparison, COTY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $94.37, while COTY trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas COTY's P/E ratio is -3.43. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to COTY's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is less volatile compared to COTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check COTY's competition here
IPAR vs SPB Comparison June 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 3B. In comparison, SPB has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $94.37, while SPB trades at $78.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas SPB's P/E ratio is 15.36. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SPB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is more volatile compared to SPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check SPB's competition here
IPAR vs NWL Comparison June 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 3B. In comparison, NWL has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $94.37, while NWL trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas NWL's P/E ratio is -5.07. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NWL's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is less volatile compared to NWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check NWL's competition here
IPAR vs EPC Comparison June 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 3B. In comparison, EPC has a market cap of 806.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $94.37, while EPC trades at $17.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas EPC's P/E ratio is -76.13. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EPC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is less volatile compared to EPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check EPC's competition here
IPAR vs HELE Comparison June 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 3B. In comparison, HELE has a market cap of 631.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $94.37, while HELE trades at $27.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas HELE's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HELE's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is less volatile compared to HELE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check HELE's competition here
IPAR vs EWCZ Comparison June 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 3B. In comparison, EWCZ has a market cap of 319.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $94.37, while EWCZ trades at $5.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas EWCZ's P/E ratio is 29.10. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EWCZ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is more volatile compared to EWCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check EWCZ's competition here
IPAR vs NUS Comparison June 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 3B. In comparison, NUS has a market cap of 280.1M. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $94.37, while NUS trades at $5.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas NUS's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NUS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is less volatile compared to NUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check NUS's competition here
IPAR vs PTNM Comparison June 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 3B. In comparison, PTNM has a market cap of 207.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $94.37, while PTNM trades at $10.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas PTNM's P/E ratio is 346.33. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PTNM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is more volatile compared to PTNM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check PTNM's competition here
IPAR vs ACU Comparison June 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 3B. In comparison, ACU has a market cap of 160.9M. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $94.37, while ACU trades at $42.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas ACU's P/E ratio is 18.20. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ACU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is more volatile compared to ACU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check ACU's competition here
IPAR vs SKIN Comparison June 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 3B. In comparison, SKIN has a market cap of 100.3M. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $94.37, while SKIN trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas SKIN's P/E ratio is -5.95. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SKIN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is less volatile compared to SKIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check SKIN's competition here
IPAR vs SLSN Comparison June 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 3B. In comparison, SLSN has a market cap of 88.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $94.37, while SLSN trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas SLSN's P/E ratio is 125.50. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SLSN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is less volatile compared to SLSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check SLSN's competition here
IPAR vs GROV Comparison June 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 3B. In comparison, GROV has a market cap of 49.4M. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $94.37, while GROV trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas GROV's P/E ratio is -4.35. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GROV's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is less volatile compared to GROV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check GROV's competition here
IPAR vs AXIL Comparison June 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 3B. In comparison, AXIL has a market cap of 46.5M. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $94.37, while AXIL trades at $6.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas AXIL's P/E ratio is 56.83. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AXIL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is less volatile compared to AXIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check AXIL's competition here
IPAR vs UG Comparison June 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 3B. In comparison, UG has a market cap of 31.8M. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $94.37, while UG trades at $6.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas UG's P/E ratio is 13.31. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to UG's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is more volatile compared to UG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check UG's competition here
IPAR vs MTEX Comparison June 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 3B. In comparison, MTEX has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $94.37, while MTEX trades at $5.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas MTEX's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MTEX's ROE of -23.83%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is less volatile compared to MTEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check MTEX's competition here
IPAR vs PHH Comparison June 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 3B. In comparison, PHH has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $94.37, while PHH trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas PHH's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PHH's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is less volatile compared to PHH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check PHH's competition here
IPAR vs RAY Comparison June 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 3B. In comparison, RAY has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $94.37, while RAY trades at $3.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas RAY's P/E ratio is 4.64. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RAY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is less volatile compared to RAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check RAY's competition here
IPAR vs DSY Comparison June 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 3B. In comparison, DSY has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $94.37, while DSY trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas DSY's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DSY's ROE of +14.77%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is more volatile compared to DSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check DSY's competition here
IPAR vs BRSH Comparison June 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 3B. In comparison, BRSH has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $94.37, while BRSH trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas BRSH's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BRSH's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is less volatile compared to BRSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check BRSH's competition here
IPAR vs TANH Comparison June 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 3B. In comparison, TANH has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $94.37, while TANH trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas TANH's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TANH's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is less volatile compared to TANH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check TANH's competition here
IPAR vs DSYWW Comparison June 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 3B. In comparison, DSYWW has a market cap of 951.6K. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $94.37, while DSYWW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas DSYWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DSYWW's ROE of +14.77%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is more volatile compared to DSYWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check DSYWW's competition here
IPAR vs TKLF Comparison June 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 3B. In comparison, TKLF has a market cap of 804.2K. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $94.37, while TKLF trades at $1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas TKLF's P/E ratio is 1.73. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TKLF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is less volatile compared to TKLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check TKLF's competition here
IPAR vs BRSHW Comparison June 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 3B. In comparison, BRSHW has a market cap of 6.1K. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $94.37, while BRSHW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas BRSHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BRSHW's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is less volatile compared to BRSHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check BRSHW's competition here
IPAR vs SUMR Comparison June 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 3B. In comparison, SUMR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $94.37, while SUMR trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas SUMR's P/E ratio is -3.66. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SUMR's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is more volatile compared to SUMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check SUMR's competition here
IPAR vs GROV-WT Comparison June 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 3B. In comparison, GROV-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $94.37, while GROV-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas GROV-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GROV-WT's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is more volatile compared to GROV-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check GROV-WT's competition here
IPAR vs REV Comparison June 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 3B. In comparison, REV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $94.37, while REV trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas REV's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to REV's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is less volatile compared to REV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check REV's competition here
IPAR vs RDEN Comparison June 2026
IPAR plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, IPAR stands at 3B. In comparison, RDEN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, IPAR is priced at $94.37, while RDEN trades at $13.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
IPAR currently has a P/E ratio of 17.91, whereas RDEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, IPAR's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RDEN's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, IPAR is more volatile compared to RDEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for IPAR.Check RDEN's competition here