The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PG) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Household & Personal Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PG | $140.78 | +0.42% | 327.8B | 20.58 | $6.84 | +3.03% |
| UL | $55.05 | -0.47% | 119.2B | 18.23 | $3.02 | +4.15% |
| CL | $85.10 | +0.27% | 68.1B | 32.99 | $2.58 | +2.47% |
| KVUE | $16.88 | +0.30% | 32.4B | 20.11 | $0.84 | +4.95% |
| KMB | $94.47 | -0.31% | 31.4B | 18.27 | $5.17 | +5.40% |
| EL | $82.90 | +1.04% | 30B | -118.46 | -$0.70 | +1.71% |
| CHD | $94.12 | +1.32% | 22.3B | 30.96 | $3.04 | +1.29% |
| SGI | $69.63 | +3.29% | 14.6B | 27.86 | $2.50 | +0.93% |
| CLX | $89.63 | +1.24% | 10.8B | 14.57 | $6.15 | +5.56% |
| NTCO | $6.60 | +0.38% | 4.6B | -11.37 | -$0.58 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
PG vs UL Comparison June 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 327.8B. In comparison, UL has a market cap of 119.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $140.78, while UL trades at $55.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 20.58, whereas UL's P/E ratio is 18.23. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to UL's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is more volatile compared to UL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check UL's competition here
PG vs CL Comparison June 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 327.8B. In comparison, CL has a market cap of 68.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $140.78, while CL trades at $85.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 20.58, whereas CL's P/E ratio is 32.99. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CL's ROE of +4.75%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to CL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check CL's competition here
PG vs KVUE Comparison June 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 327.8B. In comparison, KVUE has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $140.78, while KVUE trades at $16.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 20.58, whereas KVUE's P/E ratio is 20.11. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to KVUE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to KVUE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check KVUE's competition here
PG vs KMB Comparison June 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 327.8B. In comparison, KMB has a market cap of 31.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $140.78, while KMB trades at $94.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 20.58, whereas KMB's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to KMB's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to KMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check KMB's competition here
PG vs EL Comparison June 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 327.8B. In comparison, EL has a market cap of 30B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $140.78, while EL trades at $82.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 20.58, whereas EL's P/E ratio is -118.46. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to EL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to EL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check EL's competition here
PG vs CHD Comparison June 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 327.8B. In comparison, CHD has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $140.78, while CHD trades at $94.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 20.58, whereas CHD's P/E ratio is 30.96. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CHD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to CHD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check CHD's competition here
PG vs SGI Comparison June 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 327.8B. In comparison, SGI has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $140.78, while SGI trades at $69.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 20.58, whereas SGI's P/E ratio is 27.86. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SGI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to SGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check SGI's competition here
PG vs CLX Comparison June 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 327.8B. In comparison, CLX has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $140.78, while CLX trades at $89.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 20.58, whereas CLX's P/E ratio is 14.57. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CLX's ROE of +28.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to CLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check CLX's competition here
PG vs NTCO Comparison June 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 327.8B. In comparison, NTCO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $140.78, while NTCO trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 20.58, whereas NTCO's P/E ratio is -11.37. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NTCO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is more volatile compared to NTCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check NTCO's competition here
PG vs ELF Comparison June 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 327.8B. In comparison, ELF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $140.78, while ELF trades at $51.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 20.58, whereas ELF's P/E ratio is 116.90. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ELF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to ELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check ELF's competition here
PG vs IPAR Comparison June 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 327.8B. In comparison, IPAR has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $140.78, while IPAR trades at $88.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 20.58, whereas IPAR's P/E ratio is 16.87. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to IPAR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to IPAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check IPAR's competition here
PG vs SPB Comparison June 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 327.8B. In comparison, SPB has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $140.78, while SPB trades at $81.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 20.58, whereas SPB's P/E ratio is 15.96. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SPB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to SPB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check SPB's competition here
PG vs NWL Comparison June 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 327.8B. In comparison, NWL has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $140.78, while NWL trades at $3.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 20.58, whereas NWL's P/E ratio is -5.73. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NWL's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to NWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check NWL's competition here
PG vs COTY Comparison June 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 327.8B. In comparison, COTY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $140.78, while COTY trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 20.58, whereas COTY's P/E ratio is -2.97. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to COTY's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to COTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check COTY's competition here
PG vs EPC Comparison June 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 327.8B. In comparison, EPC has a market cap of 909.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $140.78, while EPC trades at $19.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 20.58, whereas EPC's P/E ratio is -85.78. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to EPC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to EPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check EPC's competition here
PG vs HELE Comparison June 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 327.8B. In comparison, HELE has a market cap of 582.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $140.78, while HELE trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 20.58, whereas HELE's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to HELE's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to HELE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check HELE's competition here
PG vs EWCZ Comparison June 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 327.8B. In comparison, EWCZ has a market cap of 319.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $140.78, while EWCZ trades at $5.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 20.58, whereas EWCZ's P/E ratio is 29.10. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to EWCZ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is more volatile compared to EWCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check EWCZ's competition here
PG vs NUS Comparison June 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 327.8B. In comparison, NUS has a market cap of 258M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $140.78, while NUS trades at $5.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 20.58, whereas NUS's P/E ratio is 4.92. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NUS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to NUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check NUS's competition here
PG vs PTNM Comparison June 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 327.8B. In comparison, PTNM has a market cap of 207.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $140.78, while PTNM trades at $10.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 20.58, whereas PTNM's P/E ratio is 346.33. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PTNM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is more volatile compared to PTNM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check PTNM's competition here
PG vs ACU Comparison June 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 327.8B. In comparison, ACU has a market cap of 169M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $140.78, while ACU trades at $44.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 20.58, whereas ACU's P/E ratio is 19.11. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ACU's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to ACU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check ACU's competition here
PG vs SLSN Comparison June 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 327.8B. In comparison, SLSN has a market cap of 95M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $140.78, while SLSN trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 20.58, whereas SLSN's P/E ratio is 134.50. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SLSN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to SLSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check SLSN's competition here
PG vs SKIN Comparison June 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 327.8B. In comparison, SKIN has a market cap of 79.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $140.78, while SKIN trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 20.58, whereas SKIN's P/E ratio is -4.69. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SKIN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to SKIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check SKIN's competition here
PG vs GROV Comparison June 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 327.8B. In comparison, GROV has a market cap of 52.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $140.78, while GROV trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 20.58, whereas GROV's P/E ratio is -4.59. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to GROV's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to GROV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check GROV's competition here
PG vs AXIL Comparison June 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 327.8B. In comparison, AXIL has a market cap of 47.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $140.78, while AXIL trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 20.58, whereas AXIL's P/E ratio is 57.67. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to AXIL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is more volatile compared to AXIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check AXIL's competition here
PG vs UG Comparison June 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 327.8B. In comparison, UG has a market cap of 32.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $140.78, while UG trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 20.58, whereas UG's P/E ratio is 13.48. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to UG's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to UG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check UG's competition here
PG vs MTEX Comparison June 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 327.8B. In comparison, MTEX has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $140.78, while MTEX trades at $5.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 20.58, whereas MTEX's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MTEX's ROE of -23.83%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to MTEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check MTEX's competition here
PG vs PHH Comparison June 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 327.8B. In comparison, PHH has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $140.78, while PHH trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 20.58, whereas PHH's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PHH's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to PHH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check PHH's competition here
PG vs RAY Comparison June 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 327.8B. In comparison, RAY has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $140.78, while RAY trades at $3.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 20.58, whereas RAY's P/E ratio is 4.20. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to RAY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to RAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check RAY's competition here
PG vs DSY Comparison June 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 327.8B. In comparison, DSY has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $140.78, while DSY trades at $1.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 20.58, whereas DSY's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to DSY's ROE of +14.77%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to DSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check DSY's competition here
PG vs BRSH Comparison June 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 327.8B. In comparison, BRSH has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $140.78, while BRSH trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 20.58, whereas BRSH's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BRSH's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to BRSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check BRSH's competition here
PG vs TANH Comparison June 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 327.8B. In comparison, TANH has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $140.78, while TANH trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 20.58, whereas TANH's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to TANH's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to TANH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check TANH's competition here
PG vs DSYWW Comparison June 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 327.8B. In comparison, DSYWW has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $140.78, while DSYWW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 20.58, whereas DSYWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to DSYWW's ROE of +14.77%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to DSYWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check DSYWW's competition here
PG vs TKLF Comparison June 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 327.8B. In comparison, TKLF has a market cap of 800K. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $140.78, while TKLF trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 20.58, whereas TKLF's P/E ratio is 1.72. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to TKLF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to TKLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check TKLF's competition here
PG vs BRSHW Comparison June 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 327.8B. In comparison, BRSHW has a market cap of 6.1K. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $140.78, while BRSHW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 20.58, whereas BRSHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BRSHW's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to BRSHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check BRSHW's competition here
PG vs SUMR Comparison June 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 327.8B. In comparison, SUMR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $140.78, while SUMR trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 20.58, whereas SUMR's P/E ratio is -3.66. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SUMR's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is more volatile compared to SUMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check SUMR's competition here
PG vs GROV-WT Comparison June 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 327.8B. In comparison, GROV-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $140.78, while GROV-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 20.58, whereas GROV-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to GROV-WT's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is more volatile compared to GROV-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check GROV-WT's competition here
PG vs REV Comparison June 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 327.8B. In comparison, REV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $140.78, while REV trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 20.58, whereas REV's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to REV's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is less volatile compared to REV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check REV's competition here
PG vs RDEN Comparison June 2026
PG plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PG stands at 327.8B. In comparison, RDEN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PG is priced at $140.78, while RDEN trades at $13.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PG currently has a P/E ratio of 20.58, whereas RDEN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PG's ROE is +0.31%, compared to RDEN's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, PG is more volatile compared to RDEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PG.Check RDEN's competition here