Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, GOOGM has a market cap of 285.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while GOOGM trades at $48.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas GOOGM's P/E ratio is 2.42. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GOOGM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to GOOGM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check GOOGM's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, GOOGN has a market cap of 283.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while GOOGN trades at $48.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas GOOGN's P/E ratio is 2.40. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GOOGN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to GOOGN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check GOOGN's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 245.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while SAP trades at $210.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 28.25. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to SAP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check SAP's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 191.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while CRM trades at $234.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 16.90. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to CRM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check CRM's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 184.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while SHOP trades at $142.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 90.03. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check SHOP's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 141.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while UBER trades at $69.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 14.56. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to UBER. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check UBER's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 140.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while NOW trades at $135.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 36.94. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to NOW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check NOW's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 116.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while SNOW trades at $335.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is 238.34. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is less volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check SNOW's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, ADP has a market cap of 105.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while ADP trades at $263.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas ADP's P/E ratio is 23.71. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ADP's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to ADP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check ADP's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 104.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while APP trades at $310.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 23.89. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to APP's ROE of +1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to APP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check APP's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 95.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while DDOG trades at $268.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 112.19. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is less volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check DDOG's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 93.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while ADBE trades at $235.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check ADBE's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 89.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while CDNS trades at $326.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 43.31. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check CDNS's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 75.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while INTU trades at $275.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to INTU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check INTU's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, NBIS has a market cap of 57B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while NBIS trades at $237.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas NBIS's P/E ratio is -119.26. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NBIS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is less volatile compared to NBIS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check NBIS's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 52.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while MSTR trades at $158.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -1.63. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check MSTR's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 49.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while WDAY trades at $189.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 19.61. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check WDAY's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, VEEV has a market cap of 45.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while VEEV trades at $280.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas VEEV's P/E ratio is 33.70. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to VEEV's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to VEEV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check VEEV's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 44.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while ADSK trades at $209.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 18.81. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check ADSK's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, ROP has a market cap of 36.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while ROP trades at $358.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas ROP's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ROP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to ROP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check ROP's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, STRC has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while STRC trades at $98.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas STRC's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to STRC's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to STRC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check STRC's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while ANSS trades at $374.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 55.53. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check ANSS's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 30.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while STRF trades at $103.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is -1.07. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to STRF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check STRF's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while ZM trades at $89.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to ZM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check ZM's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, STRD has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while STRD trades at $73.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas STRD's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to STRD's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to STRD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check STRD's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, BSP has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while BSP trades at $33.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas BSP's P/E ratio is 77.33. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BSP's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is less volatile compared to BSP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check BSP's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while STRK trades at $74.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to STRK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check STRK's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while FICO trades at $863.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 21.71. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to FICO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check FICO's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while SSNC trades at $78.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 12.28. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check SSNC's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, U has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while U trades at $41.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas U's P/E ratio is -78.43. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to U's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is less volatile compared to U. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check U's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while DT trades at $57.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 32.75. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to DT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check DT's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while AZPN trades at $264.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AZPN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check AZPN's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while PTC trades at $138.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 14.21. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to PTC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check PTC's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while TYL trades at $325.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 28.05. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to TYL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check TYL's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while DOCU trades at $67.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 16.75. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check DOCU's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while GRAB trades at $3.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 22.44. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check GRAB's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while GWRE trades at $145.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 41.74. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is less volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check GWRE's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while MANH trades at $206.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 40.24. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to MANH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check MANH's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while BKI trades at $75.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check BKI's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, AUR has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while AUR trades at $6.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas AUR's P/E ratio is -12.58. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AUR's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to AUR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check AUR's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, GRABW has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while GRABW trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas GRABW's P/E ratio is 0.15. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GRABW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is less volatile compared to GRABW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check GRABW's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while DAY trades at $69.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is -73.54. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to DAY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check DAY's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while XM trades at $18.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check XM's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while HUBS trades at $213.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is 18.22. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to HUBS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is less volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check HUBS's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while CDAY trades at $69.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CDAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check CDAY's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while FROG trades at $89.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is 91.00. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is less volatile compared to FROG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check FROG's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, CHYM has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while CHYM trades at $26.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas CHYM's P/E ratio is -382.57. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CHYM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to CHYM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check CHYM's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, FIG has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while FIG trades at $20.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas FIG's P/E ratio is 57.94. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FIG's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is less volatile compared to FIG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check FIG's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while PAYC trades at $220.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 21.36. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check PAYC's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while BSY trades at $31.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 24.76. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to BSY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check BSY's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while ESTC trades at $88.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is 34.13. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ESTC's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is less volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check ESTC's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while IDCC trades at $334.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 29.29. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check IDCC's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, OCFT has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while OCFT trades at $7.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas OCFT's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to OCFT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to OCFT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check OCFT's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, YMM has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while YMM trades at $8.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas YMM's P/E ratio is 13.11. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to YMM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to YMM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check YMM's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while NATI trades at $59.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check NATI's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while GTLB trades at $46.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is 45.93. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GTLB's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check GTLB's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while SMAR trades at $56.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check SMAR's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while PCTY trades at $143.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check PCTY's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while PCOR trades at $49.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is 33.34. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check PCOR's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while ZETA trades at $29.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is 34.65. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is less volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check ZETA's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while CWAN trades at $24.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is 43.09. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CWAN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check CWAN's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while APPF trades at $204.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 35.89. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to APPF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check APPF's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while DSGX trades at $78.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 36.73. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check DSGX's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, MAAS has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while MAAS trades at $15.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas MAAS's P/E ratio is -4.77. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MAAS's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is less volatile compared to MAAS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check MAAS's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while DUOL trades at $143.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check DUOL's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while NICE trades at $112.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 9.59. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to NICE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check NICE's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, RNG has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while RNG trades at $76.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas RNG's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to RNG's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is less volatile compared to RNG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check RNG's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while COUP trades at $80.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check COUP's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while CVLT trades at $145.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 33.30. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check CVLT's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, BLSH has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while BLSH trades at $37.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas BLSH's P/E ratio is 100.07. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BLSH's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is less volatile compared to BLSH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check BLSH's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while LYFT trades at $14.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 24.78. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check LYFT's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, DLB has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while DLB trades at $58.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas DLB's P/E ratio is 13.95. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DLB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to DLB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check DLB's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while PEGA trades at $33.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 18.75. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check PEGA's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while TTAN trades at $58.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is 47.98. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is less volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check TTAN's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while OTEX trades at $22.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 5.09. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check OTEX's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, NIQ has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while NIQ trades at $17.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas NIQ's P/E ratio is 49.56. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NIQ's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to NIQ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check NIQ's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, OCTV has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while OCTV trades at $18.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas OCTV's P/E ratio is 16.37. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to OCTV's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to OCTV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check OCTV's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, KVYO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while KVYO trades at $15.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas KVYO's P/E ratio is 20.24. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to KVYO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is less volatile compared to KVYO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check KVYO's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, NAVN has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while NAVN trades at $19.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas NAVN's P/E ratio is 298.69. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NAVN's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to NAVN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check NAVN's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while BILL trades at $44.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is 17.99. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BILL's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to BILL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check BILL's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, GRND-WT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while GRND-WT trades at $6.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas GRND-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GRND-WT's ROE of +3.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to GRND-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check GRND-WT's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while DAVE trades at $324.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 26.12. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is less volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check DAVE's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while CVT trades at $8.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check CVT's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while PYCR trades at $22.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check PYCR's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, CCC has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while CCC trades at $6.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas CCC's P/E ratio is 17.69. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CCC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is less volatile compared to CCC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check CCC's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, YOU has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while YOU trades at $39.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas YOU's P/E ratio is 26.95. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to YOU's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to YOU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check YOU's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while SRAD trades at $13.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 220.67. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check SRAD's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, FSLY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while FSLY trades at $24.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas FSLY's P/E ratio is 53.11. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FSLY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is less volatile compared to FSLY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check FSLY's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, WIX has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while WIX trades at $73.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas WIX's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to WIX's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is less volatile compared to WIX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check WIX's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while BULL trades at $7.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is -7.34. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BULL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to BULL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check BULL's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, BULLW has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while BULLW trades at $2.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas BULLW's P/E ratio is 51.02. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BULLW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to BULLW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check BULLW's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while PWSC trades at $22.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check PWSC's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while WK trades at $69.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas WK's P/E ratio is 24.27. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to WK's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to WK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check WK's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while MNDY trades at $83.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 18.84. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check MNDY's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while AYX trades at $48.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check AYX's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while QTWO trades at $56.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is 24.30. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to QTWO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check QTWO's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while ENV trades at $63.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check ENV's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, FRSH has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while FRSH trades at $12.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas FRSH's P/E ratio is 21.62. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FRSH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to FRSH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check FRSH's competition here

Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TEAM stands at 49.3B. In comparison, PSFE-WT has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEAM is priced at $187.74 on the NASDAQ, while PSFE-WT trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TEAM currently has a P/E ratio of 37.62, whereas PSFE-WT's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, TEAM's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PSFE-WT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TEAM is more volatile compared to PSFE-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEAM.Check PSFE-WT's competition here