Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, GOOGM has a market cap of 285.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while GOOGM trades at $48.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas GOOGM's P/E ratio is 2.42. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to GOOGM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to GOOGM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check GOOGM's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, GOOGN has a market cap of 283.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while GOOGN trades at $48.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas GOOGN's P/E ratio is 2.40. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to GOOGN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to GOOGN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check GOOGN's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 245.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while SAP trades at $210.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 28.25. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to SAP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check SAP's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 191.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while CRM trades at $234.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 16.90. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to CRM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check CRM's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 184.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while SHOP trades at $142.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 90.03. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check SHOP's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 141.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while UBER trades at $69.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 14.56. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to UBER. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check UBER's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 140.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while NOW trades at $135.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 36.94. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to NOW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check NOW's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 116.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while SNOW trades at $335.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is 238.34. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check SNOW's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, ADP has a market cap of 105.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while ADP trades at $263.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas ADP's P/E ratio is 23.71. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ADP's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to ADP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check ADP's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 104.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while APP trades at $310.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 23.89. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to APP's ROE of +1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to APP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check APP's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 95.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while DDOG trades at $268.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 112.19. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check DDOG's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 93.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while ADBE trades at $235.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check ADBE's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, CDNS has a market cap of 89.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while CDNS trades at $326.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas CDNS's P/E ratio is 43.31. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CDNS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to CDNS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check CDNS's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 75.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while INTU trades at $275.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to INTU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check INTU's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, NBIS has a market cap of 57B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while NBIS trades at $237.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas NBIS's P/E ratio is -119.26. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to NBIS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to NBIS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check NBIS's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 52.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while MSTR trades at $158.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -1.63. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check MSTR's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 49.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while WDAY trades at $189.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 19.61. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check WDAY's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 49.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while TEAM trades at $187.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is 37.62. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check TEAM's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, VEEV has a market cap of 45.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while VEEV trades at $280.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas VEEV's P/E ratio is 33.70. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to VEEV's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to VEEV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check VEEV's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 44.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while ADSK trades at $209.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 18.81. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check ADSK's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, ROP has a market cap of 36.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while ROP trades at $358.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas ROP's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ROP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to ROP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check ROP's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, STRC has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while STRC trades at $98.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas STRC's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to STRC's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to STRC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check STRC's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while ANSS trades at $374.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 55.53. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check ANSS's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 30.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while STRF trades at $103.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is -1.07. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to STRF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check STRF's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while ZM trades at $89.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to ZM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check ZM's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, STRD has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while STRD trades at $73.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas STRD's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to STRD's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to STRD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check STRD's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, BSP has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while BSP trades at $33.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas BSP's P/E ratio is 77.33. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to BSP's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to BSP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check BSP's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while STRK trades at $74.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to STRK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check STRK's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while SSNC trades at $78.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 12.28. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check SSNC's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, U has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while U trades at $41.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas U's P/E ratio is -78.43. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to U's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to U. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check U's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while DT trades at $57.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 32.75. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to DT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check DT's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while AZPN trades at $264.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AZPN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check AZPN's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while PTC trades at $138.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 14.21. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to PTC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check PTC's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while TYL trades at $325.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 28.05. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to TYL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check TYL's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while DOCU trades at $67.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 16.75. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check DOCU's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while GRAB trades at $3.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 22.44. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check GRAB's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while GWRE trades at $145.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 41.74. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check GWRE's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while MANH trades at $206.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 40.24. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to MANH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check MANH's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while BKI trades at $75.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check BKI's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, AUR has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while AUR trades at $6.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas AUR's P/E ratio is -12.58. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AUR's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to AUR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check AUR's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, GRABW has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while GRABW trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas GRABW's P/E ratio is 0.15. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to GRABW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to GRABW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check GRABW's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while DAY trades at $69.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is -73.54. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to DAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to DAY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check DAY's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while XM trades at $18.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check XM's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while HUBS trades at $213.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is 18.22. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to HUBS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check HUBS's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while CDAY trades at $69.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CDAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check CDAY's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while FROG trades at $89.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is 91.00. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to FROG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check FROG's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, CHYM has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while CHYM trades at $26.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas CHYM's P/E ratio is -382.57. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CHYM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to CHYM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check CHYM's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, FIG has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while FIG trades at $20.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas FIG's P/E ratio is 57.94. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to FIG's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to FIG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check FIG's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while PAYC trades at $220.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 21.36. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check PAYC's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while BSY trades at $31.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 24.76. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to BSY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check BSY's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while ESTC trades at $88.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is 34.13. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ESTC's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check ESTC's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while IDCC trades at $334.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 29.29. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check IDCC's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, OCFT has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while OCFT trades at $7.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas OCFT's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to OCFT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to OCFT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check OCFT's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, YMM has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while YMM trades at $8.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas YMM's P/E ratio is 13.11. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to YMM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to YMM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check YMM's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while NATI trades at $59.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check NATI's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while GTLB trades at $46.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is 45.93. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to GTLB's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check GTLB's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while SMAR trades at $56.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check SMAR's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while PCTY trades at $143.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check PCTY's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while PCOR trades at $49.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is 33.34. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check PCOR's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while ZETA trades at $29.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is 34.65. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check ZETA's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while CWAN trades at $24.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is 43.09. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CWAN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check CWAN's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while APPF trades at $204.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 35.89. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to APPF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check APPF's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while DSGX trades at $78.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 36.73. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check DSGX's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, MAAS has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while MAAS trades at $15.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas MAAS's P/E ratio is -4.77. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to MAAS's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to MAAS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check MAAS's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while DUOL trades at $143.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check DUOL's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while NICE trades at $112.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 9.59. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to NICE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check NICE's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, RNG has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while RNG trades at $76.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas RNG's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to RNG's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to RNG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check RNG's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while COUP trades at $80.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check COUP's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while CVLT trades at $145.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 33.30. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check CVLT's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, BLSH has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while BLSH trades at $37.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas BLSH's P/E ratio is 100.07. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to BLSH's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to BLSH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check BLSH's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while LYFT trades at $14.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 24.78. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check LYFT's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, DLB has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while DLB trades at $58.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas DLB's P/E ratio is 13.95. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to DLB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to DLB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check DLB's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while PEGA trades at $33.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 18.75. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check PEGA's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while TTAN trades at $58.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is 47.98. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check TTAN's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while OTEX trades at $22.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 5.09. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check OTEX's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, NIQ has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while NIQ trades at $17.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas NIQ's P/E ratio is 49.56. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to NIQ's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to NIQ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check NIQ's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, OCTV has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while OCTV trades at $18.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas OCTV's P/E ratio is 16.37. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to OCTV's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to OCTV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check OCTV's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, KVYO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while KVYO trades at $15.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas KVYO's P/E ratio is 20.24. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to KVYO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to KVYO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check KVYO's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, NAVN has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while NAVN trades at $19.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas NAVN's P/E ratio is 298.69. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to NAVN's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to NAVN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check NAVN's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while BILL trades at $44.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is 17.99. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to BILL's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to BILL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check BILL's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, GRND-WT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while GRND-WT trades at $6.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas GRND-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to GRND-WT's ROE of +3.57%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to GRND-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check GRND-WT's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while DAVE trades at $324.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 26.12. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check DAVE's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while CVT trades at $8.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check CVT's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while PYCR trades at $22.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check PYCR's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, CCC has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while CCC trades at $6.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas CCC's P/E ratio is 17.69. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to CCC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to CCC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check CCC's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, YOU has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while YOU trades at $39.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas YOU's P/E ratio is 26.95. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to YOU's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to YOU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check YOU's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while SRAD trades at $13.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 220.67. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check SRAD's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, FSLY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while FSLY trades at $24.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas FSLY's P/E ratio is 53.11. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to FSLY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to FSLY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check FSLY's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, WIX has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while WIX trades at $73.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas WIX's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to WIX's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to WIX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check WIX's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while BULL trades at $7.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is -7.34. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to BULL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to BULL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check BULL's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, BULLW has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while BULLW trades at $2.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas BULLW's P/E ratio is 51.02. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to BULLW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to BULLW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check BULLW's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while PWSC trades at $22.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check PWSC's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while WK trades at $69.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas WK's P/E ratio is 24.27. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to WK's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to WK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check WK's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while MNDY trades at $83.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 18.84. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check MNDY's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while AYX trades at $48.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check AYX's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while QTWO trades at $56.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is 24.30. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to QTWO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check QTWO's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while ENV trades at $63.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check ENV's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, FRSH has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while FRSH trades at $12.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas FRSH's P/E ratio is 21.62. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to FRSH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to FRSH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check FRSH's competition here

Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FICO stands at 18.6B. In comparison, PSFE-WT has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FICO is priced at $863.09 on the NYSE, while PSFE-WT trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FICO currently has a P/E ratio of 21.71, whereas PSFE-WT's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, FICO's ROE is -0.33%, compared to PSFE-WT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, FICO is less volatile compared to PSFE-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FICO.Check PSFE-WT's competition here