Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See CDNS's competitors and their performance on the NASDAQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Software - Application Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for CDNS and its NASDAQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDNS | $326.13 | +1.28% | 89.8B | 43.31 | $7.53 | N/A |
| GOOGM | $48.90 | +1.35% | 285.9B | 2.42 | $20.15 | N/A |
| GOOGN | $48.67 | +1.40% | 283.9B | 2.40 | $20.15 | N/A |
| SAP | $210.68 | +0.75% | 245.5B | 28.25 | $7.46 | +1.39% |
| CRM | $234.02 | -1.76% | 191.7B | 16.90 | $13.85 | +0.74% |
| SHOP | $142.25 | -2.00% | 184.6B | 90.03 | $1.58 | N/A |
| UBER | $69.62 | +0.57% | 141.7B | 14.56 | $4.78 | N/A |
| NOW | $135.62 | -1.57% | 140.2B | 36.94 | $3.67 | N/A |
| SNOW | $335.94 | +0.58% | 116.5B | 238.34 | $1.41 | N/A |
| ADP | $263.67 | +0.21% | 105.4B | 23.71 | $11.12 | +2.58% |
Stock Comparison
Alphabet Inc. Depository Shs Repr 1/20th Conv Pfd Registered Shs (NASDAQ: GOOGM)
CDNS vs GOOGM Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, GOOGM has a market cap of 285.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while GOOGM trades at $48.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas GOOGM's P/E ratio is 2.42. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GOOGM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to GOOGM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check GOOGM's competition here
Alphabet Inc. Depository Shs Repr 1/20th Conv Pfd Registered Shs (NASDAQ: GOOGN)
CDNS vs GOOGN Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, GOOGN has a market cap of 283.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while GOOGN trades at $48.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas GOOGN's P/E ratio is 2.40. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GOOGN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to GOOGN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check GOOGN's competition here
SAP SE (NYSE: SAP)
CDNS vs SAP Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, SAP has a market cap of 245.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while SAP trades at $210.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas SAP's P/E ratio is 28.25. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SAP's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to SAP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check SAP's competition here
Salesforce, Inc. (NYSE: CRM)
CDNS vs CRM Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, CRM has a market cap of 191.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while CRM trades at $234.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas CRM's P/E ratio is 16.90. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CRM's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to CRM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check CRM's competition here
Shopify Inc. (NASDAQ: SHOP)
CDNS vs SHOP Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, SHOP has a market cap of 184.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while SHOP trades at $142.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas SHOP's P/E ratio is 90.03. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SHOP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to SHOP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check SHOP's competition here
Uber Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: UBER)
CDNS vs UBER Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, UBER has a market cap of 141.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while UBER trades at $69.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas UBER's P/E ratio is 14.56. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to UBER's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to UBER. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check UBER's competition here
ServiceNow, Inc. (NYSE: NOW)
CDNS vs NOW Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, NOW has a market cap of 140.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while NOW trades at $135.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas NOW's P/E ratio is 36.94. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NOW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to NOW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check NOW's competition here
Snowflake Inc. (NYSE: SNOW)
CDNS vs SNOW Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, SNOW has a market cap of 116.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while SNOW trades at $335.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas SNOW's P/E ratio is 238.34. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SNOW's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to SNOW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check SNOW's competition here
Automatic Data Processing, Inc. (NASDAQ: ADP)
CDNS vs ADP Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, ADP has a market cap of 105.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while ADP trades at $263.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas ADP's P/E ratio is 23.71. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ADP's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to ADP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ADP's competition here
AppLovin Corporation (NASDAQ: APP)
CDNS vs APP Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, APP has a market cap of 104.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while APP trades at $310.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas APP's P/E ratio is 23.89. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to APP's ROE of +1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is similarly volatile compared to APP. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check APP's competition here
Datadog, Inc. (NASDAQ: DDOG)
CDNS vs DDOG Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, DDOG has a market cap of 95.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while DDOG trades at $268.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas DDOG's P/E ratio is 112.19. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DDOG's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to DDOG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DDOG's competition here
Adobe Inc. (NASDAQ: ADBE)
CDNS vs ADBE Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, ADBE has a market cap of 93.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while ADBE trades at $235.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas ADBE's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ADBE's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to ADBE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ADBE's competition here
Intuit Inc. (NASDAQ: INTU)
CDNS vs INTU Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, INTU has a market cap of 75.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while INTU trades at $275.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas INTU's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to INTU's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to INTU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check INTU's competition here
Nebius Group N.V. (NASDAQ: NBIS)
CDNS vs NBIS Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, NBIS has a market cap of 57B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while NBIS trades at $237.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas NBIS's P/E ratio is -119.26. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NBIS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to NBIS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check NBIS's competition here
Strategy Inc (NASDAQ: MSTR)
CDNS vs MSTR Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, MSTR has a market cap of 52.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while MSTR trades at $158.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas MSTR's P/E ratio is -1.63. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MSTR's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to MSTR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check MSTR's competition here
Workday, Inc. (NASDAQ: WDAY)
CDNS vs WDAY Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, WDAY has a market cap of 49.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while WDAY trades at $189.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas WDAY's P/E ratio is 19.61. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WDAY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to WDAY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check WDAY's competition here
Atlassian Corporation (NASDAQ: TEAM)
CDNS vs TEAM Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, TEAM has a market cap of 49.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while TEAM trades at $187.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas TEAM's P/E ratio is 37.62. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TEAM's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to TEAM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check TEAM's competition here
Veeva Systems Inc. (NYSE: VEEV)
CDNS vs VEEV Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, VEEV has a market cap of 45.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while VEEV trades at $280.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas VEEV's P/E ratio is 33.70. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VEEV's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to VEEV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check VEEV's competition here
Autodesk, Inc. (NASDAQ: ADSK)
CDNS vs ADSK Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, ADSK has a market cap of 44.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while ADSK trades at $209.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas ADSK's P/E ratio is 18.81. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ADSK's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to ADSK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ADSK's competition here
Roper Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: ROP)
CDNS vs ROP Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, ROP has a market cap of 36.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while ROP trades at $358.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas ROP's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ROP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to ROP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ROP's competition here
Strategy Inc (NASDAQ: STRC)
CDNS vs STRC Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, STRC has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while STRC trades at $98.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas STRC's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to STRC's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to STRC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check STRC's competition here
ANSYS, Inc. (NASDAQ: ANSS)
CDNS vs ANSS Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, ANSS has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while ANSS trades at $374.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas ANSS's P/E ratio is 55.53. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ANSS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to ANSS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ANSS's competition here
MicroStrategy Incorporated 10.00% Series A Perpetual Strife Preferred Stock (NASDAQ: STRF)
CDNS vs STRF Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, STRF has a market cap of 30.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while STRF trades at $103.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas STRF's P/E ratio is -1.07. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to STRF's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to STRF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check STRF's competition here
Zoom Communications, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZM)
CDNS vs ZM Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, ZM has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while ZM trades at $89.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas ZM's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ZM's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to ZM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ZM's competition here
Strategy Inc (NASDAQ: STRD)
CDNS vs STRD Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, STRD has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while STRD trades at $73.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas STRD's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to STRD's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to STRD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check STRD's competition here
Bending Spoons S.p.A. (NASDAQ: BSP)
CDNS vs BSP Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, BSP has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while BSP trades at $33.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas BSP's P/E ratio is 77.33. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BSP's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to BSP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check BSP's competition here
Strategy Inc (NASDAQ: STRK)
CDNS vs STRK Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, STRK has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while STRK trades at $74.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas STRK's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to STRK's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to STRK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check STRK's competition here
Fair Isaac Corporation (NYSE: FICO)
CDNS vs FICO Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, FICO has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while FICO trades at $863.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas FICO's P/E ratio is 21.71. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FICO's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to FICO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check FICO's competition here
SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: SSNC)
CDNS vs SSNC Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, SSNC has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while SSNC trades at $78.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas SSNC's P/E ratio is 12.28. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SSNC's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to SSNC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check SSNC's competition here
Unity Software Inc. (NYSE: U)
CDNS vs U Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, U has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while U trades at $41.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas U's P/E ratio is -78.43. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to U's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to U. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check U's competition here
Dynatrace, Inc. (NYSE: DT)
CDNS vs DT Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, DT has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while DT trades at $57.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas DT's P/E ratio is 32.75. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to DT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DT's competition here
Aspen Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: AZPN)
CDNS vs AZPN Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, AZPN has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while AZPN trades at $264.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas AZPN's P/E ratio is 2403.00. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AZPN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to AZPN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check AZPN's competition here
PTC Inc. (NASDAQ: PTC)
CDNS vs PTC Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, PTC has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while PTC trades at $138.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas PTC's P/E ratio is 14.21. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PTC's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to PTC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PTC's competition here
Tyler Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: TYL)
CDNS vs TYL Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, TYL has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while TYL trades at $325.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas TYL's P/E ratio is 28.05. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TYL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to TYL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check TYL's competition here
DocuSign, Inc. (NASDAQ: DOCU)
CDNS vs DOCU Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, DOCU has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while DOCU trades at $67.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas DOCU's P/E ratio is 16.75. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DOCU's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to DOCU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DOCU's competition here
Grab Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: GRAB)
CDNS vs GRAB Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, GRAB has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while GRAB trades at $3.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas GRAB's P/E ratio is 22.44. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GRAB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to GRAB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check GRAB's competition here
Guidewire Software, Inc. (NYSE: GWRE)
CDNS vs GWRE Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, GWRE has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while GWRE trades at $145.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas GWRE's P/E ratio is 41.74. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GWRE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to GWRE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check GWRE's competition here
Manhattan Associates, Inc. (NASDAQ: MANH)
CDNS vs MANH Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, MANH has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while MANH trades at $206.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas MANH's P/E ratio is 40.24. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MANH's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to MANH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check MANH's competition here
Black Knight, Inc. (NYSE: BKI)
CDNS vs BKI Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, BKI has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while BKI trades at $75.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas BKI's P/E ratio is 47.96. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BKI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to BKI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check BKI's competition here
Aurora Innovation, Inc. (NASDAQ: AUR)
CDNS vs AUR Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, AUR has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while AUR trades at $6.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas AUR's P/E ratio is -12.58. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AUR's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to AUR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check AUR's competition here
Grab Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: GRABW)
CDNS vs GRABW Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, GRABW has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while GRABW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas GRABW's P/E ratio is 0.15. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GRABW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to GRABW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check GRABW's competition here
Dayforce Inc (NYSE: DAY)
CDNS vs DAY Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, DAY has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while DAY trades at $69.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas DAY's P/E ratio is -73.54. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to DAY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DAY's competition here
Qualtrics International Inc. (NASDAQ: XM)
CDNS vs XM Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, XM has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while XM trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas XM's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to XM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to XM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check XM's competition here
HubSpot, Inc. (NYSE: HUBS)
CDNS vs HUBS Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, HUBS has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while HUBS trades at $213.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas HUBS's P/E ratio is 18.22. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HUBS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to HUBS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check HUBS's competition here
Dayforce Inc. (NYSE: CDAY)
CDNS vs CDAY Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, CDAY has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while CDAY trades at $69.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas CDAY's P/E ratio is 2317.33. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CDAY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to CDAY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check CDAY's competition here
JFrog Ltd. (NASDAQ: FROG)
CDNS vs FROG Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, FROG has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while FROG trades at $89.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas FROG's P/E ratio is 91.00. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FROG's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to FROG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check FROG's competition here
Chime Financial, Inc. Class A Common Stock (NASDAQ: CHYM)
CDNS vs CHYM Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, CHYM has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while CHYM trades at $26.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas CHYM's P/E ratio is -382.57. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CHYM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to CHYM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check CHYM's competition here
Figma, Inc. (NYSE: FIG)
CDNS vs FIG Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, FIG has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while FIG trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas FIG's P/E ratio is 57.94. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FIG's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to FIG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check FIG's competition here
Paycom Software, Inc. (NYSE: PAYC)
CDNS vs PAYC Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, PAYC has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while PAYC trades at $220.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas PAYC's P/E ratio is 21.36. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PAYC's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to PAYC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PAYC's competition here
Bentley Systems, Incorporated (NASDAQ: BSY)
CDNS vs BSY Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, BSY has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while BSY trades at $31.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas BSY's P/E ratio is 24.76. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BSY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to BSY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check BSY's competition here
Elastic N.V. (NYSE: ESTC)
CDNS vs ESTC Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, ESTC has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while ESTC trades at $88.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas ESTC's P/E ratio is 34.13. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ESTC's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to ESTC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ESTC's competition here
InterDigital, Inc. (NASDAQ: IDCC)
CDNS vs IDCC Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, IDCC has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while IDCC trades at $334.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas IDCC's P/E ratio is 29.29. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IDCC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to IDCC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check IDCC's competition here
OneConnect Financial Technology Co., Ltd. (NYSE: OCFT)
CDNS vs OCFT Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, OCFT has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while OCFT trades at $7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas OCFT's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to OCFT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to OCFT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check OCFT's competition here
Full Truck Alliance Co. Ltd. (NYSE: YMM)
CDNS vs YMM Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, YMM has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while YMM trades at $8.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas YMM's P/E ratio is 13.11. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to YMM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to YMM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check YMM's competition here
National Instruments Corporation (NASDAQ: NATI)
CDNS vs NATI Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, NATI has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while NATI trades at $59.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas NATI's P/E ratio is 44.44. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NATI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to NATI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check NATI's competition here
GitLab Inc. (NASDAQ: GTLB)
CDNS vs GTLB Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, GTLB has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while GTLB trades at $46.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas GTLB's P/E ratio is 45.93. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GTLB's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to GTLB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check GTLB's competition here
Smartsheet Inc. (NYSE: SMAR)
CDNS vs SMAR Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, SMAR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while SMAR trades at $56.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas SMAR's P/E ratio is -806.71. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SMAR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to SMAR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check SMAR's competition here
Paylocity Holding Corporation (NASDAQ: PCTY)
CDNS vs PCTY Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, PCTY has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while PCTY trades at $143.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas PCTY's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PCTY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to PCTY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PCTY's competition here
Procore Technologies, Inc. (NYSE: PCOR)
CDNS vs PCOR Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, PCOR has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while PCOR trades at $49.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas PCOR's P/E ratio is 33.34. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PCOR's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to PCOR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PCOR's competition here
Zeta Global Holdings Corp. (NYSE: ZETA)
CDNS vs ZETA Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, ZETA has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while ZETA trades at $29.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas ZETA's P/E ratio is 34.65. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ZETA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to ZETA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ZETA's competition here
Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: CWAN)
CDNS vs CWAN Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, CWAN has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while CWAN trades at $24.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas CWAN's P/E ratio is 43.09. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CWAN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to CWAN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check CWAN's competition here
AppFolio Inc. (NASDAQ: APPF)
CDNS vs APPF Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, APPF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while APPF trades at $204.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas APPF's P/E ratio is 35.89. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to APPF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to APPF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check APPF's competition here
The Descartes Systems Group Inc. (NASDAQ: DSGX)
CDNS vs DSGX Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, DSGX has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while DSGX trades at $78.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas DSGX's P/E ratio is 36.73. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DSGX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to DSGX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DSGX's competition here
Maase Inc. (NASDAQ: MAAS)
CDNS vs MAAS Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, MAAS has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while MAAS trades at $15.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas MAAS's P/E ratio is -4.77. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MAAS's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to MAAS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check MAAS's competition here
Duolingo, Inc. (NASDAQ: DUOL)
CDNS vs DUOL Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, DUOL has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while DUOL trades at $143.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas DUOL's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DUOL's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to DUOL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DUOL's competition here
NICE Ltd. (NASDAQ: NICE)
CDNS vs NICE Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, NICE has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while NICE trades at $112.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas NICE's P/E ratio is 9.59. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NICE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to NICE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check NICE's competition here
RingCentral, Inc. (NYSE: RNG)
CDNS vs RNG Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, RNG has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while RNG trades at $76.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas RNG's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RNG's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to RNG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check RNG's competition here
Coupa Software Incorporated (NASDAQ: COUP)
CDNS vs COUP Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, COUP has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while COUP trades at $80.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas COUP's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to COUP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to COUP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check COUP's competition here
Commvault Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CVLT)
CDNS vs CVLT Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, CVLT has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while CVLT trades at $145.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas CVLT's P/E ratio is 33.30. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CVLT's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to CVLT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check CVLT's competition here
Bullish (NYSE: BLSH)
CDNS vs BLSH Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, BLSH has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while BLSH trades at $37.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas BLSH's P/E ratio is 100.07. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BLSH's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to BLSH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check BLSH's competition here
Lyft, Inc. (NASDAQ: LYFT)
CDNS vs LYFT Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, LYFT has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while LYFT trades at $14.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas LYFT's P/E ratio is 24.78. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LYFT's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to LYFT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check LYFT's competition here
Dolby Laboratories, Inc. (NYSE: DLB)
CDNS vs DLB Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, DLB has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while DLB trades at $58.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas DLB's P/E ratio is 13.95. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DLB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to DLB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DLB's competition here
Pegasystems Inc. (NASDAQ: PEGA)
CDNS vs PEGA Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, PEGA has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while PEGA trades at $33.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas PEGA's P/E ratio is 18.75. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PEGA's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to PEGA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PEGA's competition here
ServiceTitan, Inc. (NASDAQ: TTAN)
CDNS vs TTAN Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, TTAN has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while TTAN trades at $58.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas TTAN's P/E ratio is 47.98. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TTAN's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to TTAN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check TTAN's competition here
Open Text Corporation (NASDAQ: OTEX)
CDNS vs OTEX Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, OTEX has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while OTEX trades at $22.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas OTEX's P/E ratio is 5.09. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to OTEX's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to OTEX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check OTEX's competition here
NIQ Global Intelligence Plc (NYSE: NIQ)
CDNS vs NIQ Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, NIQ has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while NIQ trades at $17.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas NIQ's P/E ratio is 49.56. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NIQ's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to NIQ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check NIQ's competition here
Octave Intelligence plc (NASDAQ: OCTV)
CDNS vs OCTV Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, OCTV has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while OCTV trades at $18.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas OCTV's P/E ratio is 16.37. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to OCTV's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to OCTV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check OCTV's competition here
Klaviyo, Inc. (NYSE: KVYO)
CDNS vs KVYO Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, KVYO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while KVYO trades at $15.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas KVYO's P/E ratio is 20.24. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to KVYO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to KVYO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check KVYO's competition here
Navan, Inc. (NASDAQ: NAVN)
CDNS vs NAVN Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, NAVN has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while NAVN trades at $19.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas NAVN's P/E ratio is 298.69. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NAVN's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to NAVN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check NAVN's competition here
Bill.com Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: BILL)
CDNS vs BILL Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, BILL has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while BILL trades at $44.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas BILL's P/E ratio is 17.99. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BILL's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to BILL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check BILL's competition here
Grindr Inc. WT (NYSE: GRND-WT)
CDNS vs GRND-WT Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, GRND-WT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while GRND-WT trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas GRND-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GRND-WT's ROE of +3.57%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to GRND-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check GRND-WT's competition here
Dave Inc. (NASDAQ: DAVE)
CDNS vs DAVE Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, DAVE has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while DAVE trades at $324.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas DAVE's P/E ratio is 26.12. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DAVE's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to DAVE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check DAVE's competition here
Cvent Holding Corp. (NASDAQ: CVT)
CDNS vs CVT Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, CVT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while CVT trades at $8.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas CVT's P/E ratio is -40.57. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CVT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to CVT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check CVT's competition here
Paycor HCM, Inc. (NASDAQ: PYCR)
CDNS vs PYCR Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, PYCR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while PYCR trades at $22.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas PYCR's P/E ratio is -187.42. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PYCR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to PYCR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PYCR's competition here
CCC Intelligent Solutions Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: CCC)
CDNS vs CCC Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, CCC has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while CCC trades at $6.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas CCC's P/E ratio is 17.69. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CCC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to CCC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check CCC's competition here
Clear Secure, Inc. (NYSE: YOU)
CDNS vs YOU Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, YOU has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while YOU trades at $39.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas YOU's P/E ratio is 26.95. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to YOU's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to YOU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check YOU's competition here
Sportradar Group AG (NASDAQ: SRAD)
CDNS vs SRAD Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, SRAD has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while SRAD trades at $13.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas SRAD's P/E ratio is 220.67. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SRAD's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to SRAD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check SRAD's competition here
Fastly, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSLY)
CDNS vs FSLY Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, FSLY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while FSLY trades at $24.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas FSLY's P/E ratio is 53.11. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FSLY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to FSLY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check FSLY's competition here
Wix.com Ltd. (NASDAQ: WIX)
CDNS vs WIX Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, WIX has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while WIX trades at $73.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas WIX's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WIX's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to WIX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check WIX's competition here
Webull Corporation Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ: BULL)
CDNS vs BULL Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, BULL has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while BULL trades at $7.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas BULL's P/E ratio is -7.34. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BULL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to BULL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check BULL's competition here
Webull Corporation Warrants (NASDAQ: BULLW)
CDNS vs BULLW Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, BULLW has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while BULLW trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas BULLW's P/E ratio is 51.02. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BULLW's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to BULLW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check BULLW's competition here
PowerSchool Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: PWSC)
CDNS vs PWSC Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, PWSC has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while PWSC trades at $22.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas PWSC's P/E ratio is -67.09. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PWSC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to PWSC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PWSC's competition here
Workiva Inc. (NYSE: WK)
CDNS vs WK Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, WK has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while WK trades at $69.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas WK's P/E ratio is 24.27. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WK's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to WK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check WK's competition here
monday.com Ltd. (NASDAQ: MNDY)
CDNS vs MNDY Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, MNDY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while MNDY trades at $83.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas MNDY's P/E ratio is 18.84. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MNDY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to MNDY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check MNDY's competition here
Alteryx, Inc. (NYSE: AYX)
CDNS vs AYX Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, AYX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while AYX trades at $48.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas AYX's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AYX's ROE of -0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to AYX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check AYX's competition here
Q2 Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: QTWO)
CDNS vs QTWO Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, QTWO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while QTWO trades at $56.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas QTWO's P/E ratio is 24.30. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to QTWO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to QTWO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check QTWO's competition here
Envestnet, Inc. (NYSE: ENV)
CDNS vs ENV Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, ENV has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while ENV trades at $63.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas ENV's P/E ratio is -13.21. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ENV's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is more volatile compared to ENV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check ENV's competition here
Freshworks Inc. (NASDAQ: FRSH)
CDNS vs FRSH Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, FRSH has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while FRSH trades at $12.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas FRSH's P/E ratio is 21.62. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FRSH's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to FRSH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check FRSH's competition here
Paysafe Equity Warrants Exp 30th March 2026 (NYSE: PSFE-WT)
CDNS vs PSFE-WT Comparison September 2026
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: CDNS) plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CDNS stands at 89.8B. In comparison, PSFE-WT has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CDNS is priced at $326.13 on the NASDAQ, while PSFE-WT trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CDNS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.31, whereas PSFE-WT's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, CDNS's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PSFE-WT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CDNS is less volatile compared to PSFE-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CDNS.Check PSFE-WT's competition here