Powell Industries, Inc. (POWL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (POWL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| POWL | $288.12 | +1.30% | 10.5B | 56.38 | $5.11 | +0.13% |
| VRT | $323.39 | +2.43% | 124.2B | 81.27 | $3.98 | +0.06% |
| BE | $273.51 | -4.03% | 77.8B | -9118.33 | -$0.03 | N/A |
| ABB | $37.13 | -1.14% | 69B | 23.65 | $1.57 | N/A |
| AME | $223.36 | -1.10% | 51.2B | 33.74 | $6.62 | +0.57% |
| NVT | $171.55 | +2.73% | 27.8B | 58.37 | $2.94 | +0.48% |
| HUBB | $462.93 | -2.26% | 24.5B | 27.38 | $16.91 | +1.21% |
| FPS | $56.35 | +3.09% | 13.8B | 2816.50 | $0.02 | N/A |
| AEIS | $294.65 | -2.49% | 11.2B | 61.26 | $4.81 | +0.14% |
| AYI | $307.00 | +0.62% | 9.3B | 22.50 | $13.64 | +0.24% |
Stock Comparison
POWL vs VRT Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, VRT has a market cap of 124.2B. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while VRT trades at $323.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas VRT's P/E ratio is 81.27. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to VRT's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to VRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check VRT's competition here
POWL vs BE Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, BE has a market cap of 77.8B. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while BE trades at $273.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas BE's P/E ratio is -9118.33. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to BE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check BE's competition here
POWL vs ABB Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ABB has a market cap of 69B. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while ABB trades at $37.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas ABB's P/E ratio is 23.65. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ABB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to ABB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check ABB's competition here
POWL vs AME Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, AME has a market cap of 51.2B. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while AME trades at $223.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas AME's P/E ratio is 33.74. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AME's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to AME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check AME's competition here
POWL vs NVT Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, NVT has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while NVT trades at $171.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas NVT's P/E ratio is 58.37. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NVT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to NVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check NVT's competition here
POWL vs HUBB Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, HUBB has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while HUBB trades at $462.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas HUBB's P/E ratio is 27.38. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HUBB's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to HUBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check HUBB's competition here
POWL vs FPS Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, FPS has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while FPS trades at $56.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas FPS's P/E ratio is 2816.50. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to FPS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to FPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check FPS's competition here
POWL vs AEIS Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, AEIS has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while AEIS trades at $294.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas AEIS's P/E ratio is 61.26. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AEIS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to AEIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check AEIS's competition here
POWL vs AYI Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, AYI has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while AYI trades at $307.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas AYI's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AYI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to AYI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check AYI's competition here
POWL vs ENS Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ENS has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while ENS trades at $227.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas ENS's P/E ratio is 29.57. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ENS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to ENS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check ENS's competition here
POWL vs WIRE Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, WIRE has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while WIRE trades at $289.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas WIRE's P/E ratio is 15.22. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to WIRE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to WIRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check WIRE's competition here
POWL vs PLUG Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, PLUG has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while PLUG trades at $3.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas PLUG's P/E ratio is -2.83. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PLUG's ROE of -1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to PLUG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check PLUG's competition here
POWL vs AMPX Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, AMPX has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while AMPX trades at $21.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas AMPX's P/E ratio is -70.16. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AMPX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to AMPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check AMPX's competition here
POWL vs HAYW Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, HAYW has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while HAYW trades at $14.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas HAYW's P/E ratio is 19.18. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HAYW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to HAYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check HAYW's competition here
POWL vs ATKR Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ATKR has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while ATKR trades at $81.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas ATKR's P/E ratio is -22.81. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ATKR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to ATKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check ATKR's competition here
POWL vs EOSE Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, EOSE has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while EOSE trades at $8.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas EOSE's P/E ratio is -1.41. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to EOSE's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to EOSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check EOSE's competition here
POWL vs ENVX Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ENVX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while ENVX trades at $8.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas ENVX's P/E ratio is -10.59. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ENVX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to ENVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check ENVX's competition here
POWL vs PLPC Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, PLPC has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while PLPC trades at $376.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas PLPC's P/E ratio is 54.21. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PLPC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to PLPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check PLPC's competition here
POWL vs TE Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, TE has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while TE trades at $10.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas TE's P/E ratio is -5.57. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TE's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to TE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check TE's competition here
POWL vs HOLI Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, HOLI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while HOLI trades at $26.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas HOLI's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HOLI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to HOLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check HOLI's competition here
POWL vs AMPX-WT Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, AMPX-WT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while AMPX-WT trades at $10.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas AMPX-WT's P/E ratio is -28.71. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AMPX-WT's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to AMPX-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check AMPX-WT's competition here
POWL vs ENR Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ENR has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while ENR trades at $18.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas ENR's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ENR's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to ENR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check ENR's competition here
POWL vs FCEL Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, FCEL has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while FCEL trades at $21.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas FCEL's P/E ratio is -3.28. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to FCEL's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to FCEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check FCEL's competition here
POWL vs ADSE Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ADSE has a market cap of 707.1M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while ADSE trades at $11.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas ADSE's P/E ratio is -10.26. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ADSE's ROE of +4.92%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to ADSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check ADSE's competition here
POWL vs SLDP Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, SLDP has a market cap of 629.7M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while SLDP trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas SLDP's P/E ratio is -6.96. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SLDP's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to SLDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check SLDP's competition here
POWL vs KE Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, KE has a market cap of 619.5M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while KE trades at $25.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas KE's P/E ratio is 24.53. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to KE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to KE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check KE's competition here
POWL vs MVST Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, MVST has a market cap of 486.4M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while MVST trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas MVST's P/E ratio is -8.11. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MVST's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to MVST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check MVST's competition here
POWL vs ELVA Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ELVA has a market cap of 442.8M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while ELVA trades at $11.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas ELVA's P/E ratio is 103.00. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ELVA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to ELVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check ELVA's competition here
POWL vs EOSEW Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, EOSEW has a market cap of 423.2M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while EOSEW trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas EOSEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to EOSEW's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to EOSEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check EOSEW's competition here
POWL vs TE-WT Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, TE-WT has a market cap of 399.4M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while TE-WT trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas TE-WT's P/E ratio is -0.74. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TE-WT's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to TE-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check TE-WT's competition here
POWL vs LTBR Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, LTBR has a market cap of 299.6M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while LTBR trades at $11.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas LTBR's P/E ratio is -15.21. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to LTBR's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to LTBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check LTBR's competition here
POWL vs EAF Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, EAF has a market cap of 264.9M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while EAF trades at $10.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas EAF's P/E ratio is -1.18. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to EAF's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to EAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check EAF's competition here
POWL vs FREY Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, FREY has a market cap of 241.8M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while FREY trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas FREY's P/E ratio is -13.91. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to FREY's ROE of -1.89%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to FREY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check FREY's competition here
POWL vs FREY-WT Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, FREY-WT has a market cap of 241.8M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while FREY-WT trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas FREY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to FREY-WT's ROE of -2.06%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to FREY-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check FREY-WT's competition here
POWL vs TGEN Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, TGEN has a market cap of 205.8M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while TGEN trades at $6.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas TGEN's P/E ratio is -20.24. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to TGEN's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to TGEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check TGEN's competition here
POWL vs RFIL Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, RFIL has a market cap of 190.2M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while RFIL trades at $17.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas RFIL's P/E ratio is 586.33. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to RFIL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to RFIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check RFIL's competition here
POWL vs ESP Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ESP has a market cap of 172.8M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while ESP trades at $57.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas ESP's P/E ratio is 15.14. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ESP's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to ESP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check ESP's competition here
POWL vs ENVXW Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ENVXW has a market cap of 158.8M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while ENVXW trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas ENVXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ENVXW's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to ENVXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check ENVXW's competition here
POWL vs SKYX Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, SKYX has a market cap of 127.2M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while SKYX trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas SKYX's P/E ratio is -3.90. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SKYX's ROE of -4.33%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to SKYX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check SKYX's competition here
POWL vs ULBI Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ULBI has a market cap of 120.9M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while ULBI trades at $7.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas ULBI's P/E ratio is -14.82. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ULBI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to ULBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check ULBI's competition here
POWL vs SVT Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, SVT has a market cap of 120M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while SVT trades at $46.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas SVT's P/E ratio is -120.36. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SVT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to SVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check SVT's competition here
POWL vs NVX Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, NVX has a market cap of 103.8M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while NVX trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas NVX's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NVX's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to NVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check NVX's competition here
POWL vs NEOV Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, NEOV has a market cap of 71M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while NEOV trades at $1.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas NEOV's P/E ratio is -6.19. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NEOV's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to NEOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check NEOV's competition here
POWL vs OPTT Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, OPTT has a market cap of 70.4M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while OPTT trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas OPTT's P/E ratio is -1.95. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to OPTT's ROE of -1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to OPTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check OPTT's competition here
POWL vs CBAT Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, CBAT has a market cap of 70M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while CBAT trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas CBAT's P/E ratio is -4.39. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CBAT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to CBAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check CBAT's competition here
POWL vs NEOVW Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, NEOVW has a market cap of 63.1M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while NEOVW trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas NEOVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NEOVW's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to NEOVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check NEOVW's competition here
POWL vs IPWR Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, IPWR has a market cap of 62.6M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while IPWR trades at $7.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas IPWR's P/E ratio is -6.13. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to IPWR's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to IPWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check IPWR's competition here
POWL vs PPSI Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, PPSI has a market cap of 51.9M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while PPSI trades at $4.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas PPSI's P/E ratio is -7.55. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PPSI's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to PPSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check PPSI's competition here
POWL vs ZOOZ Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ZOOZ has a market cap of 49.3M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while ZOOZ trades at $6.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas ZOOZ's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ZOOZ's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to ZOOZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check ZOOZ's competition here
POWL vs SLDPW Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, SLDPW has a market cap of 37.7M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while SLDPW trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas SLDPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SLDPW's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to SLDPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check SLDPW's competition here
POWL vs OESX Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, OESX has a market cap of 34.1M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while OESX trades at $9.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas OESX's P/E ratio is -7.29. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to OESX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to OESX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check OESX's competition here
POWL vs ADSEW Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ADSEW has a market cap of 34M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while ADSEW trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas ADSEW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ADSEW's ROE of +4.92%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to ADSEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check ADSEW's competition here
POWL vs APWC Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, APWC has a market cap of 29.7M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while APWC trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas APWC's P/E ratio is 4.80. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to APWC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to APWC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check APWC's competition here
POWL vs CHEV Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, CHEV has a market cap of 22.5M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while CHEV trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas CHEV's P/E ratio is -28.57. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CHEV's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to CHEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check CHEV's competition here
POWL vs FLUX Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, FLUX has a market cap of 19.1M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while FLUX trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas FLUX's P/E ratio is -3.21. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to FLUX's ROE of -7.38%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to FLUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check FLUX's competition here
POWL vs SDST Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, SDST has a market cap of 18.8M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while SDST trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas SDST's P/E ratio is -1.14. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SDST's ROE of +3.02%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to SDST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check SDST's competition here
POWL vs STI Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, STI has a market cap of 13M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while STI trades at $4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas STI's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to STI's ROE of +4.71%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to STI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check STI's competition here
POWL vs GWH Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, GWH has a market cap of 12.9M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while GWH trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas GWH's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to GWH's ROE of -12.52%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to GWH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check GWH's competition here
POWL vs SES-WT Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, SES-WT has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while SES-WT trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas SES-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SES-WT's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to SES-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check SES-WT's competition here
POWL vs PITA Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, PITA has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while PITA trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas PITA's P/E ratio is -2.92. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PITA's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to PITA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check PITA's competition here
POWL vs GCDT Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, GCDT has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while GCDT trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas GCDT's P/E ratio is -11.83. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to GCDT's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to GCDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check GCDT's competition here
POWL vs POLA Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, POLA has a market cap of 5.6M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while POLA trades at $2.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas POLA's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to POLA's ROE of -2.61%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to POLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check POLA's competition here
POWL vs NXU Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, NXU has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while NXU trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas NXU's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NXU's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to NXU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check NXU's competition here
POWL vs GWH-WT Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, GWH-WT has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while GWH-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas GWH-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to GWH-WT's ROE of -12.52%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to GWH-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check GWH-WT's competition here
POWL vs MVSTW Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, MVSTW has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while MVSTW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas MVSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MVSTW's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to MVSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check MVSTW's competition here
POWL vs XPON Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, XPON has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while XPON trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas XPON's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to XPON's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to XPON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check XPON's competition here
POWL vs DFLI Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, DFLI has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while DFLI trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas DFLI's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DFLI's ROE of +12.27%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to DFLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check DFLI's competition here
POWL vs SDSTW Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, SDSTW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while SDSTW trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas SDSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SDSTW's ROE of +3.02%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to SDSTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check SDSTW's competition here
POWL vs ELPW Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ELPW has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while ELPW trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas ELPW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ELPW's ROE of +3.89%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to ELPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check ELPW's competition here
POWL vs CCTG Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, CCTG has a market cap of 593.3K. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while CCTG trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas CCTG's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CCTG's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to CCTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check CCTG's competition here
POWL vs DFLIW Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, DFLIW has a market cap of 546.6K. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while DFLIW trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas DFLIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DFLIW's ROE of +12.27%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to DFLIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check DFLIW's competition here
POWL vs RAYA Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, RAYA has a market cap of 363.6K. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while RAYA trades at $3.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas RAYA's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to RAYA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to RAYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check RAYA's competition here
POWL vs ZOOZW Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ZOOZW has a market cap of 315.6K. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while ZOOZW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas ZOOZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ZOOZW's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to ZOOZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check ZOOZW's competition here
POWL vs DCFCW Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, DCFCW has a market cap of 11.2K. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while DCFCW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas DCFCW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DCFCW's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to DCFCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check DCFCW's competition here
POWL vs DCFC Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, DCFC has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while DCFC trades at $3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas DCFC's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to DCFC's ROE of +1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to DCFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check DCFC's competition here
POWL vs BLNKW Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, BLNKW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while BLNKW trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas BLNKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BLNKW's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is less volatile compared to BLNKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check BLNKW's competition here
POWL vs AIRM Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, AIRM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while AIRM trades at $42.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas AIRM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to AIRM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to AIRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check AIRM's competition here
POWL vs ENR-PA Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, ENR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while ENR-PA trades at $89.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas ENR-PA's P/E ratio is 42.39. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ENR-PA's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to ENR-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check ENR-PA's competition here
POWL vs JUNO Comparison June 2026
POWL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, POWL stands at 10.5B. In comparison, JUNO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, POWL is priced at $288.12, while JUNO trades at $86.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
POWL currently has a P/E ratio of 56.38, whereas JUNO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, POWL's ROE is +0.29%, compared to JUNO's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, POWL is more volatile compared to JUNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for POWL.Check JUNO's competition here