AMETEK, Inc. (AME) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AME) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AME | $227.76 | +1.97% | 52.2B | 34.40 | $6.62 | +0.57% |
| VRT | $334.48 | +3.43% | 128.5B | 84.04 | $3.98 | +0.06% |
| BE | $303.10 | +10.82% | 86.2B | -10103.33 | -$0.03 | N/A |
| ABB | $37.13 | N/A | 69B | 23.65 | $1.57 | N/A |
| NVT | $173.39 | +1.07% | 28B | 58.98 | $2.94 | +0.48% |
| HUBB | $480.22 | +3.73% | 25.4B | 28.40 | $16.91 | +1.21% |
| FPS | $56.94 | +1.04% | 13.9B | 2846.77 | $0.02 | N/A |
| AEIS | $312.28 | +5.98% | 11.9B | 64.92 | $4.81 | +0.14% |
| POWL | $299.08 | +3.80% | 10.9B | 58.41 | $5.12 | +0.13% |
| AYI | $311.43 | +1.44% | 9.4B | 22.83 | $13.64 | +0.24% |
Stock Comparison
AME vs VRT Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, VRT has a market cap of 128.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while VRT trades at $334.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas VRT's P/E ratio is 84.04. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VRT's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is less volatile compared to VRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check VRT's competition here
AME vs BE Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, BE has a market cap of 86.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while BE trades at $303.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas BE's P/E ratio is -10103.33. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is less volatile compared to BE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check BE's competition here
AME vs ABB Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, ABB has a market cap of 69B. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while ABB trades at $37.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas ABB's P/E ratio is 23.65. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ABB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is more volatile compared to ABB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check ABB's competition here
AME vs NVT Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, NVT has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while NVT trades at $173.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas NVT's P/E ratio is 58.98. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NVT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is less volatile compared to NVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check NVT's competition here
AME vs HUBB Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, HUBB has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while HUBB trades at $480.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas HUBB's P/E ratio is 28.40. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HUBB's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is less volatile compared to HUBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check HUBB's competition here
AME vs FPS Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, FPS has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while FPS trades at $56.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas FPS's P/E ratio is 2846.77. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FPS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is less volatile compared to FPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check FPS's competition here
AME vs AEIS Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, AEIS has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while AEIS trades at $312.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas AEIS's P/E ratio is 64.92. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AEIS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is less volatile compared to AEIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check AEIS's competition here
AME vs POWL Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, POWL has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while POWL trades at $299.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas POWL's P/E ratio is 58.41. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to POWL's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is less volatile compared to POWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check POWL's competition here
AME vs AYI Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, AYI has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while AYI trades at $311.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas AYI's P/E ratio is 22.83. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AYI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is less volatile compared to AYI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check AYI's competition here
AME vs ENS Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, ENS has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while ENS trades at $237.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas ENS's P/E ratio is 30.80. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ENS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is less volatile compared to ENS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check ENS's competition here
AME vs PLUG Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, PLUG has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while PLUG trades at $4.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas PLUG's P/E ratio is -2.93. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PLUG's ROE of -1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is less volatile compared to PLUG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check PLUG's competition here
AME vs WIRE Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, WIRE has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while WIRE trades at $289.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas WIRE's P/E ratio is 15.22. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WIRE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is more volatile compared to WIRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check WIRE's competition here
AME vs AMPX Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, AMPX has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while AMPX trades at $22.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas AMPX's P/E ratio is -73.94. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AMPX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is less volatile compared to AMPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check AMPX's competition here
AME vs HAYW Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, HAYW has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while HAYW trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas HAYW's P/E ratio is 19.18. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HAYW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is less volatile compared to HAYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check HAYW's competition here
AME vs ATKR Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, ATKR has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while ATKR trades at $84.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas ATKR's P/E ratio is -23.46. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ATKR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is less volatile compared to ATKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check ATKR's competition here
AME vs EOSE Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, EOSE has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while EOSE trades at $9.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas EOSE's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EOSE's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is less volatile compared to EOSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check EOSE's competition here
AME vs TE Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, TE has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while TE trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas TE's P/E ratio is -6.44. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TE's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is less volatile compared to TE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check TE's competition here
AME vs PLPC Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, PLPC has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while PLPC trades at $387.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas PLPC's P/E ratio is 55.71. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PLPC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is less volatile compared to PLPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check PLPC's competition here
AME vs ENVX Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, ENVX has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while ENVX trades at $8.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas ENVX's P/E ratio is -10.64. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ENVX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is less volatile compared to ENVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check ENVX's competition here
AME vs AMPX-WT Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, AMPX-WT has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while AMPX-WT trades at $12.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas AMPX-WT's P/E ratio is -31.11. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AMPX-WT's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is less volatile compared to AMPX-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check AMPX-WT's competition here
AME vs HOLI Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, HOLI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while HOLI trades at $26.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas HOLI's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HOLI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is more volatile compared to HOLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check HOLI's competition here
AME vs FCEL Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, FCEL has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while FCEL trades at $24.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas FCEL's P/E ratio is -3.80. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FCEL's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is less volatile compared to FCEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check FCEL's competition here
AME vs ENR Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, ENR has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while ENR trades at $18.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas ENR's P/E ratio is 6.71. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ENR's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is less volatile compared to ENR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check ENR's competition here
AME vs ADSE Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, ADSE has a market cap of 677.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while ADSE trades at $11.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas ADSE's P/E ratio is -9.83. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ADSE's ROE of +4.92%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is less volatile compared to ADSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check ADSE's competition here
AME vs SLDP Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, SLDP has a market cap of 670.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while SLDP trades at $3.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas SLDP's P/E ratio is -7.41. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SLDP's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is less volatile compared to SLDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check SLDP's competition here
AME vs KE Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, KE has a market cap of 643.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while KE trades at $26.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas KE's P/E ratio is 25.48. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is less volatile compared to KE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check KE's competition here
AME vs TE-WT Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, TE-WT has a market cap of 614.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while TE-WT trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas TE-WT's P/E ratio is -1.14. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TE-WT's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is less volatile compared to TE-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check TE-WT's competition here
AME vs MVST Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, MVST has a market cap of 509.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while MVST trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas MVST's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MVST's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is less volatile compared to MVST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check MVST's competition here
AME vs ELVA Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, ELVA has a market cap of 479.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while ELVA trades at $12.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas ELVA's P/E ratio is 111.55. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ELVA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is less volatile compared to ELVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check ELVA's competition here
AME vs EOSEW Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, EOSEW has a market cap of 423.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while EOSEW trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas EOSEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EOSEW's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is less volatile compared to EOSEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check EOSEW's competition here
AME vs LTBR Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, LTBR has a market cap of 314.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while LTBR trades at $12.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas LTBR's P/E ratio is -15.97. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LTBR's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is less volatile compared to LTBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check LTBR's competition here
AME vs EAF Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, EAF has a market cap of 291.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while EAF trades at $11.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas EAF's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EAF's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is less volatile compared to EAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check EAF's competition here
AME vs FREY Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, FREY has a market cap of 241.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while FREY trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas FREY's P/E ratio is -13.91. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FREY's ROE of -1.89%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is less volatile compared to FREY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check FREY's competition here
AME vs FREY-WT Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, FREY-WT has a market cap of 241.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while FREY-WT trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas FREY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FREY-WT's ROE of -2.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is more volatile compared to FREY-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check FREY-WT's competition here
AME vs RFIL Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, RFIL has a market cap of 203.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while RFIL trades at $18.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas RFIL's P/E ratio is 626.00. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RFIL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is less volatile compared to RFIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check RFIL's competition here
AME vs TGEN Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, TGEN has a market cap of 193.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while TGEN trades at $6.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas TGEN's P/E ratio is -19.00. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TGEN's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is less volatile compared to TGEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check TGEN's competition here
AME vs ESP Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, ESP has a market cap of 174.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while ESP trades at $58.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas ESP's P/E ratio is 15.29. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ESP's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is less volatile compared to ESP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check ESP's competition here
AME vs ENVXW Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, ENVXW has a market cap of 158.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while ENVXW trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas ENVXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ENVXW's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is less volatile compared to ENVXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check ENVXW's competition here
AME vs SKYX Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, SKYX has a market cap of 135.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while SKYX trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas SKYX's P/E ratio is -4.17. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SKYX's ROE of -4.33%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is less volatile compared to SKYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check SKYX's competition here
AME vs SVT Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, SVT has a market cap of 120M. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while SVT trades at $46.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas SVT's P/E ratio is -120.36. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SVT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is more volatile compared to SVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check SVT's competition here
AME vs ULBI Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, ULBI has a market cap of 118.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while ULBI trades at $7.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas ULBI's P/E ratio is -14.55. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ULBI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is less volatile compared to ULBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check ULBI's competition here
AME vs NVX Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, NVX has a market cap of 103.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while NVX trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas NVX's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NVX's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is less volatile compared to NVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check NVX's competition here
AME vs OPTT Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, OPTT has a market cap of 75.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while OPTT trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas OPTT's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OPTT's ROE of -1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is less volatile compared to OPTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check OPTT's competition here
AME vs NEOV Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, NEOV has a market cap of 75.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while NEOV trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas NEOV's P/E ratio is -6.56. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NEOV's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is less volatile compared to NEOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check NEOV's competition here
AME vs CBAT Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, CBAT has a market cap of 70.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while CBAT trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas CBAT's P/E ratio is -4.40. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CBAT's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is less volatile compared to CBAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check CBAT's competition here
AME vs IPWR Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, IPWR has a market cap of 65.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while IPWR trades at $7.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas IPWR's P/E ratio is -6.42. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IPWR's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is less volatile compared to IPWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check IPWR's competition here
AME vs NEOVW Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, NEOVW has a market cap of 63.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while NEOVW trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas NEOVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NEOVW's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is less volatile compared to NEOVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check NEOVW's competition here
AME vs PPSI Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, PPSI has a market cap of 55.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while PPSI trades at $5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas PPSI's P/E ratio is -8.08. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PPSI's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is less volatile compared to PPSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check PPSI's competition here
AME vs ZOOZ Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, ZOOZ has a market cap of 49.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while ZOOZ trades at $6.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas ZOOZ's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ZOOZ's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is less volatile compared to ZOOZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check ZOOZ's competition here
AME vs SLDPW Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, SLDPW has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while SLDPW trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas SLDPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SLDPW's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is less volatile compared to SLDPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check SLDPW's competition here
AME vs ADSEW Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, ADSEW has a market cap of 33.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while ADSEW trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas ADSEW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ADSEW's ROE of +4.92%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is more volatile compared to ADSEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check ADSEW's competition here
AME vs OESX Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, OESX has a market cap of 32.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while OESX trades at $9.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas OESX's P/E ratio is -6.92. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OESX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is less volatile compared to OESX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check OESX's competition here
AME vs APWC Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, APWC has a market cap of 29M. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while APWC trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas APWC's P/E ratio is 4.68. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to APWC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is less volatile compared to APWC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check APWC's competition here
AME vs CHEV Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, CHEV has a market cap of 22.5M. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while CHEV trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas CHEV's P/E ratio is -28.57. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CHEV's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is more volatile compared to CHEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check CHEV's competition here
AME vs SDST Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, SDST has a market cap of 19M. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while SDST trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas SDST's P/E ratio is -1.16. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SDST's ROE of +3.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is less volatile compared to SDST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check SDST's competition here
AME vs FLUX Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, FLUX has a market cap of 18.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while FLUX trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas FLUX's P/E ratio is -3.12. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FLUX's ROE of -7.38%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is less volatile compared to FLUX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check FLUX's competition here
AME vs STI Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, STI has a market cap of 13.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while STI trades at $4.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas STI's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to STI's ROE of +4.71%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is less volatile compared to STI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check STI's competition here
AME vs GWH Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, GWH has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while GWH trades at $0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas GWH's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GWH's ROE of -12.52%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is less volatile compared to GWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check GWH's competition here
AME vs PITA Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, PITA has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while PITA trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas PITA's P/E ratio is -2.92. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PITA's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is more volatile compared to PITA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check PITA's competition here
AME vs SES-WT Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, SES-WT has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while SES-WT trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas SES-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SES-WT's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is less volatile compared to SES-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check SES-WT's competition here
AME vs GCDT Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, GCDT has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while GCDT trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas GCDT's P/E ratio is -11.92. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GCDT's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is less volatile compared to GCDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check GCDT's competition here
AME vs POLA Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, POLA has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while POLA trades at $2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas POLA's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to POLA's ROE of -2.61%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is less volatile compared to POLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check POLA's competition here
AME vs NXU Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, NXU has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while NXU trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas NXU's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NXU's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is more volatile compared to NXU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check NXU's competition here
AME vs GWH-WT Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, GWH-WT has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while GWH-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas GWH-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GWH-WT's ROE of -12.52%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is less volatile compared to GWH-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check GWH-WT's competition here
AME vs MVSTW Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, MVSTW has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while MVSTW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas MVSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MVSTW's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is less volatile compared to MVSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check MVSTW's competition here
AME vs XPON Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, XPON has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while XPON trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas XPON's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to XPON's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is less volatile compared to XPON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check XPON's competition here
AME vs DFLI Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, DFLI has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while DFLI trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas DFLI's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DFLI's ROE of +12.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is less volatile compared to DFLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check DFLI's competition here
AME vs ELPW Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, ELPW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while ELPW trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas ELPW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ELPW's ROE of +3.89%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is less volatile compared to ELPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check ELPW's competition here
AME vs SDSTW Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, SDSTW has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while SDSTW trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas SDSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SDSTW's ROE of +3.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is less volatile compared to SDSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check SDSTW's competition here
AME vs CCTG Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, CCTG has a market cap of 623.2K. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while CCTG trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas CCTG's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CCTG's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is less volatile compared to CCTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check CCTG's competition here
AME vs DFLIW Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, DFLIW has a market cap of 485.9K. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while DFLIW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas DFLIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DFLIW's ROE of +12.27%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is less volatile compared to DFLIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check DFLIW's competition here
AME vs RAYA Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, RAYA has a market cap of 392.4K. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while RAYA trades at $4.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas RAYA's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RAYA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is less volatile compared to RAYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check RAYA's competition here
AME vs ZOOZW Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, ZOOZW has a market cap of 315.6K. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while ZOOZW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas ZOOZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ZOOZW's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is less volatile compared to ZOOZW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check ZOOZW's competition here
AME vs DCFCW Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, DCFCW has a market cap of 11.2K. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while DCFCW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas DCFCW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DCFCW's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is less volatile compared to DCFCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check DCFCW's competition here
AME vs DCFC Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, DCFC has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while DCFC trades at $3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas DCFC's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DCFC's ROE of +1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is more volatile compared to DCFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check DCFC's competition here
AME vs AIRM Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, AIRM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while AIRM trades at $42.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas AIRM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AIRM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is more volatile compared to AIRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check AIRM's competition here
AME vs BLNKW Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, BLNKW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while BLNKW trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas BLNKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BLNKW's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is less volatile compared to BLNKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check BLNKW's competition here
AME vs JUNO Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, JUNO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while JUNO trades at $86.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas JUNO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JUNO's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is more volatile compared to JUNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check JUNO's competition here
AME vs ENR-PA Comparison June 2026
AME plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AME stands at 52.2B. In comparison, ENR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, AME is priced at $227.76, while ENR-PA trades at $89.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AME currently has a P/E ratio of 34.40, whereas ENR-PA's P/E ratio is 42.39. In terms of profitability, AME's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ENR-PA's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, AME is less volatile compared to ENR-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AME.Check ENR-PA's competition here