Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HUBB) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUBB | $475.42 | -1.96% | 25.6B | 28.70 | $16.90 | +1.15% |
| VRT | $297.53 | -10.23% | 124.4B | 81.38 | $3.98 | +0.06% |
| BE | $255.01 | -11.25% | 82.9B | -9713.00 | -$0.03 | N/A |
| ABB | $37.13 | -1.14% | 69B | 23.65 | $1.57 | N/A |
| AME | $226.71 | -0.67% | 52.4B | 34.60 | $6.61 | +0.55% |
| NVT | $162.45 | -7.91% | 28.1B | 58.95 | $2.95 | +0.47% |
| FPS | $58.86 | -1.54% | 15.8B | 3232.50 | $0.02 | N/A |
| AEIS | $296.95 | -7.92% | 12.2B | 66.86 | $4.80 | +0.12% |
| POWL | $286.42 | -4.44% | 10.9B | 58.49 | $5.13 | +0.12% |
| AYI | $301.71 | -3.56% | 9.3B | 22.60 | $13.63 | +0.24% |
Stock Comparison
HUBB vs VRT Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, VRT has a market cap of 124.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while VRT trades at $297.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas VRT's P/E ratio is 81.38. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to VRT's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is less volatile compared to VRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check VRT's competition here
HUBB vs BE Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, BE has a market cap of 82.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while BE trades at $255.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas BE's P/E ratio is -9713.00. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is less volatile compared to BE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check BE's competition here
HUBB vs ABB Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, ABB has a market cap of 69B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while ABB trades at $37.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas ABB's P/E ratio is 23.65. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ABB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is more volatile compared to ABB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check ABB's competition here
HUBB vs AME Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, AME has a market cap of 52.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while AME trades at $226.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas AME's P/E ratio is 34.60. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AME's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is more volatile compared to AME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check AME's competition here
HUBB vs NVT Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, NVT has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while NVT trades at $162.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas NVT's P/E ratio is 58.95. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NVT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is less volatile compared to NVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check NVT's competition here
HUBB vs FPS Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, FPS has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while FPS trades at $58.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas FPS's P/E ratio is 3232.50. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FPS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is less volatile compared to FPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check FPS's competition here
HUBB vs AEIS Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, AEIS has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while AEIS trades at $296.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas AEIS's P/E ratio is 66.86. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AEIS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is less volatile compared to AEIS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check AEIS's competition here
HUBB vs POWL Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, POWL has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while POWL trades at $286.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas POWL's P/E ratio is 58.49. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to POWL's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is less volatile compared to POWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check POWL's competition here
HUBB vs AYI Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, AYI has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while AYI trades at $301.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas AYI's P/E ratio is 22.60. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AYI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is less volatile compared to AYI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check AYI's competition here
HUBB vs ENS Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, ENS has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while ENS trades at $225.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas ENS's P/E ratio is 30.94. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ENS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is less volatile compared to ENS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check ENS's competition here
HUBB vs WIRE Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, WIRE has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while WIRE trades at $289.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas WIRE's P/E ratio is 15.22. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to WIRE's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is more volatile compared to WIRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check WIRE's competition here
HUBB vs PLUG Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, PLUG has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while PLUG trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas PLUG's P/E ratio is -2.59. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PLUG's ROE of -1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is less volatile compared to PLUG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check PLUG's competition here
HUBB vs AMPX Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, AMPX has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while AMPX trades at $19.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas AMPX's P/E ratio is -72.74. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AMPX's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is less volatile compared to AMPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check AMPX's competition here
HUBB vs HAYW Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, HAYW has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while HAYW trades at $14.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas HAYW's P/E ratio is 19.44. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HAYW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is more volatile compared to HAYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check HAYW's competition here
HUBB vs ATKR Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, ATKR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while ATKR trades at $80.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas ATKR's P/E ratio is -23.66. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ATKR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is less volatile compared to ATKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check ATKR's competition here
HUBB vs EOSE Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, EOSE has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while EOSE trades at $6.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas EOSE's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to EOSE's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is less volatile compared to EOSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check EOSE's competition here
HUBB vs TE Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, TE has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while TE trades at $9.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas TE's P/E ratio is -6.23. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TE's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is less volatile compared to TE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check TE's competition here
HUBB vs PLPC Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, PLPC has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while PLPC trades at $362.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas PLPC's P/E ratio is 54.07. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PLPC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is less volatile compared to PLPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check PLPC's competition here
HUBB vs ENVX Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, ENVX has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while ENVX trades at $7.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas ENVX's P/E ratio is -10.32. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ENVX's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is less volatile compared to ENVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check ENVX's competition here
HUBB vs HOLI Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, HOLI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while HOLI trades at $26.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas HOLI's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HOLI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is more volatile compared to HOLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check HOLI's competition here
HUBB vs AMPX-WT Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, AMPX-WT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while AMPX-WT trades at $9.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas AMPX-WT's P/E ratio is -29.90. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AMPX-WT's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is less volatile compared to AMPX-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check AMPX-WT's competition here
HUBB vs ENR Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, ENR has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while ENR trades at $19.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas ENR's P/E ratio is 6.91. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ENR's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is less volatile compared to ENR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check ENR's competition here
HUBB vs FCEL Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, FCEL has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while FCEL trades at $17.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas FCEL's P/E ratio is -3.30. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FCEL's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is less volatile compared to FCEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check FCEL's competition here
HUBB vs ADSE Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, ADSE has a market cap of 644.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while ADSE trades at $11.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas ADSE's P/E ratio is -9.35. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ADSE's ROE of +4.92%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is less volatile compared to ADSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check ADSE's competition here
HUBB vs KE Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, KE has a market cap of 632.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while KE trades at $24.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas KE's P/E ratio is 25.05. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is less volatile compared to KE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check KE's competition here
HUBB vs SLDP Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, SLDP has a market cap of 612.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while SLDP trades at $2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas SLDP's P/E ratio is -6.77. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SLDP's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is less volatile compared to SLDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check SLDP's competition here
HUBB vs TE-WT Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, TE-WT has a market cap of 547.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while TE-WT trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas TE-WT's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TE-WT's ROE of -1.46%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is less volatile compared to TE-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check TE-WT's competition here
HUBB vs MVST Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, MVST has a market cap of 456.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while MVST trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas MVST's P/E ratio is -7.61. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MVST's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is less volatile compared to MVST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check MVST's competition here
HUBB vs ELVA Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, ELVA has a market cap of 434.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while ELVA trades at $10.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas ELVA's P/E ratio is 101.00. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ELVA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is less volatile compared to ELVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check ELVA's competition here
HUBB vs EOSEW Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, EOSEW has a market cap of 423.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while EOSEW trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas EOSEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to EOSEW's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is less volatile compared to EOSEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check EOSEW's competition here
HUBB vs LTBR Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, LTBR has a market cap of 286.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while LTBR trades at $9.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas LTBR's P/E ratio is -14.57. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LTBR's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is less volatile compared to LTBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check LTBR's competition here
HUBB vs EAF Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, EAF has a market cap of 249.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while EAF trades at $8.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas EAF's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to EAF's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is less volatile compared to EAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check EAF's competition here
HUBB vs FREY-WT Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, FREY-WT has a market cap of 241.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while FREY-WT trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas FREY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FREY-WT's ROE of -2.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is more volatile compared to FREY-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check FREY-WT's competition here
HUBB vs FREY Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, FREY has a market cap of 241.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while FREY trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas FREY's P/E ratio is -13.91. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FREY's ROE of -1.89%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is less volatile compared to FREY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check FREY's competition here
HUBB vs TGEN Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, TGEN has a market cap of 207.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while TGEN trades at $5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas TGEN's P/E ratio is -20.41. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TGEN's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is less volatile compared to TGEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check TGEN's competition here
HUBB vs RFIL Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, RFIL has a market cap of 198M. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while RFIL trades at $16.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas RFIL's P/E ratio is 610.33. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to RFIL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is less volatile compared to RFIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check RFIL's competition here
HUBB vs ESP Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, ESP has a market cap of 168M. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while ESP trades at $54.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas ESP's P/E ratio is 14.72. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ESP's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is less volatile compared to ESP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check ESP's competition here
HUBB vs ENVXW Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, ENVXW has a market cap of 158.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while ENVXW trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas ENVXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ENVXW's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is less volatile compared to ENVXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check ENVXW's competition here
HUBB vs SKYX Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, SKYX has a market cap of 122.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while SKYX trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas SKYX's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SKYX's ROE of -4.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is less volatile compared to SKYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check SKYX's competition here
HUBB vs SVT Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, SVT has a market cap of 120M. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while SVT trades at $46.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas SVT's P/E ratio is -120.36. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SVT's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is more volatile compared to SVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check SVT's competition here
HUBB vs ULBI Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, ULBI has a market cap of 115.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while ULBI trades at $6.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas ULBI's P/E ratio is -14.16. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ULBI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is less volatile compared to ULBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check ULBI's competition here
HUBB vs NVX Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, NVX has a market cap of 99.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while NVX trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas NVX's P/E ratio is -1.22. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NVX's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is less volatile compared to NVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check NVX's competition here
HUBB vs NEOV Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, NEOV has a market cap of 72.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while NEOV trades at $1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas NEOV's P/E ratio is -6.31. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NEOV's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is less volatile compared to NEOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check NEOV's competition here
HUBB vs OPTT Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, OPTT has a market cap of 69.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while OPTT trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas OPTT's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OPTT's ROE of -1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is less volatile compared to OPTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check OPTT's competition here
HUBB vs CBAT Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, CBAT has a market cap of 66.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while CBAT trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas CBAT's P/E ratio is -4.17. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CBAT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is less volatile compared to CBAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check CBAT's competition here
HUBB vs IPWR Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, IPWR has a market cap of 63.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while IPWR trades at $5.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas IPWR's P/E ratio is -6.20. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to IPWR's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is less volatile compared to IPWR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check IPWR's competition here
HUBB vs NEOVW Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, NEOVW has a market cap of 63.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while NEOVW trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas NEOVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NEOVW's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is less volatile compared to NEOVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check NEOVW's competition here
HUBB vs STI Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, STI has a market cap of 60.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while STI trades at $35.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas STI's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to STI's ROE of +4.71%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is less volatile compared to STI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check STI's competition here
HUBB vs PPSI Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, PPSI has a market cap of 55M. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while PPSI trades at $4.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas PPSI's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PPSI's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is less volatile compared to PPSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check PPSI's competition here
HUBB vs ZOOZ Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, ZOOZ has a market cap of 46.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while ZOOZ trades at $5.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas ZOOZ's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ZOOZ's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is less volatile compared to ZOOZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check ZOOZ's competition here
HUBB vs SLDPW Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, SLDPW has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while SLDPW trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas SLDPW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SLDPW's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is less volatile compared to SLDPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check SLDPW's competition here
HUBB vs OESX Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, OESX has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while OESX trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas OESX's P/E ratio is -6.69. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OESX's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is less volatile compared to OESX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check OESX's competition here
HUBB vs ADSEW Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, ADSEW has a market cap of 29M. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while ADSEW trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas ADSEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ADSEW's ROE of +4.92%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is less volatile compared to ADSEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check ADSEW's competition here
HUBB vs APWC Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, APWC has a market cap of 28.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while APWC trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas APWC's P/E ratio is 4.57. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to APWC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is less volatile compared to APWC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check APWC's competition here
HUBB vs SDST Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, SDST has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while SDST trades at $2.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas SDST's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SDST's ROE of +3.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is less volatile compared to SDST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check SDST's competition here
HUBB vs FLUX Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, FLUX has a market cap of 18.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while FLUX trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas FLUX's P/E ratio is -3.06. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FLUX's ROE of -7.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is less volatile compared to FLUX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check FLUX's competition here
HUBB vs CHEV Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, CHEV has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while CHEV trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas CHEV's P/E ratio is -21.43. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CHEV's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is more volatile compared to CHEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check CHEV's competition here
HUBB vs GWH Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, GWH has a market cap of 12.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while GWH trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas GWH's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GWH's ROE of -12.52%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is less volatile compared to GWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check GWH's competition here
HUBB vs PITA Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, PITA has a market cap of 11.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while PITA trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas PITA's P/E ratio is -2.92. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PITA's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is more volatile compared to PITA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check PITA's competition here
HUBB vs SES-WT Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, SES-WT has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while SES-WT trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas SES-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SES-WT's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is more volatile compared to SES-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check SES-WT's competition here
HUBB vs GCDT Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, GCDT has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while GCDT trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas GCDT's P/E ratio is -11.83. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GCDT's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is less volatile compared to GCDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check GCDT's competition here
HUBB vs POLA Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, POLA has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while POLA trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas POLA's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to POLA's ROE of -2.61%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is less volatile compared to POLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check POLA's competition here
HUBB vs NXU Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, NXU has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while NXU trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas NXU's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NXU's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is more volatile compared to NXU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check NXU's competition here
HUBB vs GWH-WT Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, GWH-WT has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while GWH-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas GWH-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GWH-WT's ROE of -12.52%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is less volatile compared to GWH-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check GWH-WT's competition here
HUBB vs MVSTW Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, MVSTW has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while MVSTW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas MVSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MVSTW's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is less volatile compared to MVSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check MVSTW's competition here
HUBB vs XPON Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, XPON has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while XPON trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas XPON's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to XPON's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is less volatile compared to XPON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check XPON's competition here
HUBB vs DFLI Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, DFLI has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while DFLI trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas DFLI's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DFLI's ROE of +12.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is less volatile compared to DFLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check DFLI's competition here
HUBB vs ELPW Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, ELPW has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while ELPW trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas ELPW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ELPW's ROE of +3.89%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is less volatile compared to ELPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check ELPW's competition here
HUBB vs SDSTW Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, SDSTW has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while SDSTW trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas SDSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SDSTW's ROE of +3.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is more volatile compared to SDSTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check SDSTW's competition here
HUBB vs CCTG Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, CCTG has a market cap of 550.7K. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while CCTG trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas CCTG's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CCTG's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is less volatile compared to CCTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check CCTG's competition here
HUBB vs DFLIW Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, DFLIW has a market cap of 405.7K. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while DFLIW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas DFLIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DFLIW's ROE of +12.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is less volatile compared to DFLIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check DFLIW's competition here
HUBB vs ZOOZW Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, ZOOZW has a market cap of 356.9K. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while ZOOZW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas ZOOZW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ZOOZW's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is more volatile compared to ZOOZW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check ZOOZW's competition here
HUBB vs RAYA Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, RAYA has a market cap of 333.4K. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while RAYA trades at $3.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas RAYA's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to RAYA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is less volatile compared to RAYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check RAYA's competition here
HUBB vs DCFCW Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, DCFCW has a market cap of 11.2K. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while DCFCW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas DCFCW's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DCFCW's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is less volatile compared to DCFCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check DCFCW's competition here
HUBB vs DCFC Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, DCFC has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while DCFC trades at $3.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas DCFC's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DCFC's ROE of +1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is more volatile compared to DCFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check DCFC's competition here
HUBB vs AIRM Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, AIRM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while AIRM trades at $42.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas AIRM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AIRM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is more volatile compared to AIRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check AIRM's competition here
HUBB vs BLNKW Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, BLNKW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while BLNKW trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas BLNKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BLNKW's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is less volatile compared to BLNKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check BLNKW's competition here
HUBB vs JUNO Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, JUNO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while JUNO trades at $86.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas JUNO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to JUNO's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is more volatile compared to JUNO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check JUNO's competition here
HUBB vs ENR-PA Comparison June 2026
HUBB plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HUBB stands at 25.6B. In comparison, ENR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HUBB is priced at $475.42, while ENR-PA trades at $89.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HUBB currently has a P/E ratio of 28.70, whereas ENR-PA's P/E ratio is 42.39. In terms of profitability, HUBB's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ENR-PA's ROE of +1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HUBB is less volatile compared to ENR-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUBB.Check ENR-PA's competition here