PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PEP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Beverages - Non-Alcoholic Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PEP | $142.15 | -0.27% | 194.3B | 22.32 | $6.37 | +4.01% |
| KO | $76.82 | -2.46% | 330.6B | 24.16 | $3.18 | +2.67% |
| MNST | $88.54 | -0.56% | 86.6B | 42.77 | $2.07 | N/A |
| KDP | $30.06 | -1.60% | 40.9B | 22.27 | $1.35 | +3.05% |
| CCEP | $92.02 | -0.42% | 40.8B | 18.52 | $4.97 | +2.58% |
| KOF | $106.80 | -0.77% | 22.4B | -242.66 | -$0.44 | +3.84% |
| COKE | $170.27 | -3.99% | 13.4B | 23.36 | $7.29 | +0.58% |
| PRMB | $23.02 | -4.84% | 8.4B | 121.18 | $0.19 | +1.91% |
| CELH | $27.75 | -7.53% | 7.1B | 64.53 | $0.43 | N/A |
| AKO-B | $28.68 | +0.46% | 4.5B | 14.42 | $1.96 | +3.71% |
Stock Comparison
PEP vs KO Comparison June 2026
PEP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEP stands at 194.3B. In comparison, KO has a market cap of 330.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PEP is priced at $142.15, while KO trades at $76.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEP currently has a P/E ratio of 22.32, whereas KO's P/E ratio is 24.16. In terms of profitability, PEP's ROE is +0.44%, compared to KO's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, PEP is less volatile compared to KO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEP.Check KO's competition here
PEP vs MNST Comparison June 2026
PEP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEP stands at 194.3B. In comparison, MNST has a market cap of 86.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PEP is priced at $142.15, while MNST trades at $88.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEP currently has a P/E ratio of 22.32, whereas MNST's P/E ratio is 42.77. In terms of profitability, PEP's ROE is +0.44%, compared to MNST's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PEP is more volatile compared to MNST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEP.Check MNST's competition here
PEP vs KDP Comparison June 2026
PEP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEP stands at 194.3B. In comparison, KDP has a market cap of 40.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PEP is priced at $142.15, while KDP trades at $30.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEP currently has a P/E ratio of 22.32, whereas KDP's P/E ratio is 22.27. In terms of profitability, PEP's ROE is +0.44%, compared to KDP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PEP is more volatile compared to KDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEP.Check KDP's competition here
PEP vs CCEP Comparison June 2026
PEP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEP stands at 194.3B. In comparison, CCEP has a market cap of 40.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PEP is priced at $142.15, while CCEP trades at $92.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEP currently has a P/E ratio of 22.32, whereas CCEP's P/E ratio is 18.52. In terms of profitability, PEP's ROE is +0.44%, compared to CCEP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PEP is more volatile compared to CCEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEP.Check CCEP's competition here
PEP vs KOF Comparison June 2026
PEP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEP stands at 194.3B. In comparison, KOF has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PEP is priced at $142.15, while KOF trades at $106.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEP currently has a P/E ratio of 22.32, whereas KOF's P/E ratio is -242.66. In terms of profitability, PEP's ROE is +0.44%, compared to KOF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PEP is more volatile compared to KOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEP.Check KOF's competition here
PEP vs COKE Comparison June 2026
PEP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEP stands at 194.3B. In comparison, COKE has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PEP is priced at $142.15, while COKE trades at $170.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEP currently has a P/E ratio of 22.32, whereas COKE's P/E ratio is 23.36. In terms of profitability, PEP's ROE is +0.44%, compared to COKE's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PEP is less volatile compared to COKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEP.Check COKE's competition here
PEP vs PRMB Comparison June 2026
PEP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEP stands at 194.3B. In comparison, PRMB has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PEP is priced at $142.15, while PRMB trades at $23.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEP currently has a P/E ratio of 22.32, whereas PRMB's P/E ratio is 121.18. In terms of profitability, PEP's ROE is +0.44%, compared to PRMB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PEP is less volatile compared to PRMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEP.Check PRMB's competition here
PEP vs CELH Comparison June 2026
PEP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEP stands at 194.3B. In comparison, CELH has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PEP is priced at $142.15, while CELH trades at $27.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEP currently has a P/E ratio of 22.32, whereas CELH's P/E ratio is 64.53. In terms of profitability, PEP's ROE is +0.44%, compared to CELH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PEP is less volatile compared to CELH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEP.Check CELH's competition here
PEP vs AKO-B Comparison June 2026
PEP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEP stands at 194.3B. In comparison, AKO-B has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PEP is priced at $142.15, while AKO-B trades at $28.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEP currently has a P/E ratio of 22.32, whereas AKO-B's P/E ratio is 14.42. In terms of profitability, PEP's ROE is +0.44%, compared to AKO-B's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PEP is less volatile compared to AKO-B. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEP.Check AKO-B's competition here
PEP vs COCO Comparison June 2026
PEP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEP stands at 194.3B. In comparison, COCO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PEP is priced at $142.15, while COCO trades at $73.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEP currently has a P/E ratio of 22.32, whereas COCO's P/E ratio is 53.61. In terms of profitability, PEP's ROE is +0.44%, compared to COCO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PEP is more volatile compared to COCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEP.Check COCO's competition here
PEP vs PRMW Comparison June 2026
PEP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEP stands at 194.3B. In comparison, PRMW has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PEP is priced at $142.15, while PRMW trades at $24.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEP currently has a P/E ratio of 22.32, whereas PRMW's P/E ratio is 47.47. In terms of profitability, PEP's ROE is +0.44%, compared to PRMW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PEP is more volatile compared to PRMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEP.Check PRMW's competition here
PEP vs AKO-A Comparison June 2026
PEP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEP stands at 194.3B. In comparison, AKO-A has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PEP is priced at $142.15, while AKO-A trades at $22.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEP currently has a P/E ratio of 22.32, whereas AKO-A's P/E ratio is 11.55. In terms of profitability, PEP's ROE is +0.44%, compared to AKO-A's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PEP is less volatile compared to AKO-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEP.Check AKO-A's competition here
PEP vs FIZZ Comparison June 2026
PEP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEP stands at 194.3B. In comparison, FIZZ has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PEP is priced at $142.15, while FIZZ trades at $34.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEP currently has a P/E ratio of 22.32, whereas FIZZ's P/E ratio is 17.36. In terms of profitability, PEP's ROE is +0.44%, compared to FIZZ's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, PEP is less volatile compared to FIZZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEP.Check FIZZ's competition here
PEP vs CHA Comparison June 2026
PEP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEP stands at 194.3B. In comparison, CHA has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PEP is priced at $142.15, while CHA trades at $11.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEP currently has a P/E ratio of 22.32, whereas CHA's P/E ratio is 15.59. In terms of profitability, PEP's ROE is +0.44%, compared to CHA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PEP is less volatile compared to CHA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEP.Check CHA's competition here
PEP vs SUJA Comparison June 2026
PEP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEP stands at 194.3B. In comparison, SUJA has a market cap of 325.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PEP is priced at $142.15, while SUJA trades at $13.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEP currently has a P/E ratio of 22.32, whereas SUJA's P/E ratio is -14.89. In terms of profitability, PEP's ROE is +0.44%, compared to SUJA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PEP is less volatile compared to SUJA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEP.Check SUJA's competition here
PEP vs OTLY Comparison June 2026
PEP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEP stands at 194.3B. In comparison, OTLY has a market cap of 267.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PEP is priced at $142.15, while OTLY trades at $8.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEP currently has a P/E ratio of 22.32, whereas OTLY's P/E ratio is -1.72. In terms of profitability, PEP's ROE is +0.44%, compared to OTLY's ROE of -4.48%. Regarding short-term risk, PEP is less volatile compared to OTLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEP.Check OTLY's competition here
PEP vs BUDA Comparison June 2026
PEP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEP stands at 194.3B. In comparison, BUDA has a market cap of 105.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PEP is priced at $142.15, while BUDA trades at $8.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEP currently has a P/E ratio of 22.32, whereas BUDA's P/E ratio is 33.44. In terms of profitability, PEP's ROE is +0.44%, compared to BUDA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PEP is less volatile compared to BUDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEP.Check BUDA's competition here
PEP vs ZVIA Comparison June 2026
PEP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEP stands at 194.3B. In comparison, ZVIA has a market cap of 100.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PEP is priced at $142.15, while ZVIA trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEP currently has a P/E ratio of 22.32, whereas ZVIA's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, PEP's ROE is +0.44%, compared to ZVIA's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PEP is less volatile compared to ZVIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEP.Check ZVIA's competition here
PEP vs SHOT Comparison June 2026
PEP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEP stands at 194.3B. In comparison, SHOT has a market cap of 47.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PEP is priced at $142.15, while SHOT trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEP currently has a P/E ratio of 22.32, whereas SHOT's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, PEP's ROE is +0.44%, compared to SHOT's ROE of -1.94%. Regarding short-term risk, PEP is less volatile compared to SHOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEP.Check SHOT's competition here
PEP vs BRFH Comparison June 2026
PEP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEP stands at 194.3B. In comparison, BRFH has a market cap of 35.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PEP is priced at $142.15, while BRFH trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEP currently has a P/E ratio of 22.32, whereas BRFH's P/E ratio is -13.88. In terms of profitability, PEP's ROE is +0.44%, compared to BRFH's ROE of -1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, PEP is less volatile compared to BRFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEP.Check BRFH's competition here
PEP vs REED Comparison June 2026
PEP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEP stands at 194.3B. In comparison, REED has a market cap of 16.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PEP is priced at $142.15, while REED trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEP currently has a P/E ratio of 22.32, whereas REED's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, PEP's ROE is +0.44%, compared to REED's ROE of -4.96%. Regarding short-term risk, PEP is less volatile compared to REED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEP.Check REED's competition here
PEP vs BNKK Comparison June 2026
PEP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEP stands at 194.3B. In comparison, BNKK has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PEP is priced at $142.15, while BNKK trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEP currently has a P/E ratio of 22.32, whereas BNKK's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, PEP's ROE is +0.44%, compared to BNKK's ROE of -1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, PEP is less volatile compared to BNKK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEP.Check BNKK's competition here
PEP vs BNKKW Comparison June 2026
PEP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEP stands at 194.3B. In comparison, BNKKW has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, PEP is priced at $142.15, while BNKKW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEP currently has a P/E ratio of 22.32, whereas BNKKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PEP's ROE is +0.44%, compared to BNKKW's ROE of -1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, PEP is less volatile compared to BNKKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEP.Check BNKKW's competition here
PEP vs GMCR Comparison June 2026
PEP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEP stands at 194.3B. In comparison, GMCR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PEP is priced at $142.15, while GMCR trades at $91.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEP currently has a P/E ratio of 22.32, whereas GMCR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PEP's ROE is +0.44%, compared to GMCR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PEP is more volatile compared to GMCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEP.Check GMCR's competition here
PEP vs CRVP Comparison June 2026
PEP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEP stands at 194.3B. In comparison, CRVP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PEP is priced at $142.15, while CRVP trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEP currently has a P/E ratio of 22.32, whereas CRVP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PEP's ROE is +0.44%, compared to CRVP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PEP is more volatile compared to CRVP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEP.Check CRVP's competition here
PEP vs NBEV Comparison June 2026
PEP plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PEP stands at 194.3B. In comparison, NBEV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PEP is priced at $142.15, while NBEV trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PEP currently has a P/E ratio of 22.32, whereas NBEV's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, PEP's ROE is +0.44%, compared to NBEV's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PEP is less volatile compared to NBEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PEP.Check NBEV's competition here