Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CELH) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Beverages - Non-Alcoholic Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CELH | $28.13 | +1.37% | 7.2B | 65.42 | $0.43 | N/A |
| KO | $79.48 | +3.46% | 341.9B | 24.99 | $3.18 | +2.58% |
| PEP | $141.92 | -0.16% | 193.9B | 22.27 | $6.37 | +4.02% |
| MNST | $89.55 | +1.14% | 87.6B | 43.26 | $2.07 | N/A |
| CCEP | $94.74 | +2.96% | 42B | 19.06 | $4.97 | +2.54% |
| KDP | $30.53 | +1.56% | 41.5B | 22.61 | $1.35 | +3.00% |
| KOF | $106.47 | -0.31% | 22.4B | -241.95 | -$0.44 | +3.85% |
| COKE | $179.91 | +5.66% | 14.1B | 24.68 | $7.29 | +0.55% |
| PRMB | $22.95 | -0.30% | 8.3B | 120.89 | $0.19 | +1.91% |
| AKO-B | $27.31 | -4.78% | 4.3B | 13.80 | $1.96 | +3.71% |
Stock Comparison
CELH vs KO Comparison June 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 7.2B. In comparison, KO has a market cap of 341.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $28.13, while KO trades at $79.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 65.42, whereas KO's P/E ratio is 24.99. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KO's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is more volatile compared to KO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check KO's competition here
CELH vs PEP Comparison June 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 7.2B. In comparison, PEP has a market cap of 193.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $28.13, while PEP trades at $141.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 65.42, whereas PEP's P/E ratio is 22.27. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PEP's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is more volatile compared to PEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check PEP's competition here
CELH vs MNST Comparison June 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 7.2B. In comparison, MNST has a market cap of 87.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $28.13, while MNST trades at $89.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 65.42, whereas MNST's P/E ratio is 43.26. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MNST's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is more volatile compared to MNST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check MNST's competition here
CELH vs CCEP Comparison June 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 7.2B. In comparison, CCEP has a market cap of 42B. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $28.13, while CCEP trades at $94.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 65.42, whereas CCEP's P/E ratio is 19.06. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CCEP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is more volatile compared to CCEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check CCEP's competition here
CELH vs KDP Comparison June 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 7.2B. In comparison, KDP has a market cap of 41.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $28.13, while KDP trades at $30.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 65.42, whereas KDP's P/E ratio is 22.61. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KDP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is more volatile compared to KDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check KDP's competition here
CELH vs KOF Comparison June 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 7.2B. In comparison, KOF has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $28.13, while KOF trades at $106.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 65.42, whereas KOF's P/E ratio is -241.95. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KOF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is more volatile compared to KOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check KOF's competition here
CELH vs COKE Comparison June 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 7.2B. In comparison, COKE has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $28.13, while COKE trades at $179.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 65.42, whereas COKE's P/E ratio is 24.68. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to COKE's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is less volatile compared to COKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check COKE's competition here
CELH vs PRMB Comparison June 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 7.2B. In comparison, PRMB has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $28.13, while PRMB trades at $22.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 65.42, whereas PRMB's P/E ratio is 120.89. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PRMB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is more volatile compared to PRMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check PRMB's competition here
CELH vs AKO-B Comparison June 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 7.2B. In comparison, AKO-B has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $28.13, while AKO-B trades at $27.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 65.42, whereas AKO-B's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AKO-B's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is more volatile compared to AKO-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check AKO-B's competition here
CELH vs COCO Comparison June 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 7.2B. In comparison, COCO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $28.13, while COCO trades at $74.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 65.42, whereas COCO's P/E ratio is 53.69. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to COCO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is more volatile compared to COCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check COCO's competition here
CELH vs PRMW Comparison June 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 7.2B. In comparison, PRMW has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $28.13, while PRMW trades at $24.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 65.42, whereas PRMW's P/E ratio is 47.47. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PRMW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is more volatile compared to PRMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check PRMW's competition here
CELH vs AKO-A Comparison June 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 7.2B. In comparison, AKO-A has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $28.13, while AKO-A trades at $22.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 65.42, whereas AKO-A's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AKO-A's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is more volatile compared to AKO-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check AKO-A's competition here
CELH vs FIZZ Comparison June 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 7.2B. In comparison, FIZZ has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $28.13, while FIZZ trades at $36.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 65.42, whereas FIZZ's P/E ratio is 18.26. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FIZZ's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is less volatile compared to FIZZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check FIZZ's competition here
CELH vs CHA Comparison June 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 7.2B. In comparison, CHA has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $28.13, while CHA trades at $11.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 65.42, whereas CHA's P/E ratio is 15.59. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CHA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is more volatile compared to CHA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check CHA's competition here
CELH vs SUJA Comparison June 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 7.2B. In comparison, SUJA has a market cap of 334.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $28.13, while SUJA trades at $14.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 65.42, whereas SUJA's P/E ratio is -15.28. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SUJA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is less volatile compared to SUJA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check SUJA's competition here
CELH vs OTLY Comparison June 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 7.2B. In comparison, OTLY has a market cap of 255.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $28.13, while OTLY trades at $8.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 65.42, whereas OTLY's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OTLY's ROE of -4.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is less volatile compared to OTLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check OTLY's competition here
CELH vs BUDA Comparison June 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 7.2B. In comparison, BUDA has a market cap of 106.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $28.13, while BUDA trades at $8.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 65.42, whereas BUDA's P/E ratio is 33.80. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BUDA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is less volatile compared to BUDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check BUDA's competition here
CELH vs ZVIA Comparison June 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 7.2B. In comparison, ZVIA has a market cap of 101.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $28.13, while ZVIA trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 65.42, whereas ZVIA's P/E ratio is -14.10. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ZVIA's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is less volatile compared to ZVIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check ZVIA's competition here
CELH vs SHOT Comparison June 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 7.2B. In comparison, SHOT has a market cap of 47.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $28.13, while SHOT trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 65.42, whereas SHOT's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SHOT's ROE of -1.94%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is less volatile compared to SHOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check SHOT's competition here
CELH vs BRFH Comparison June 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 7.2B. In comparison, BRFH has a market cap of 35.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $28.13, while BRFH trades at $2.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 65.42, whereas BRFH's P/E ratio is -13.88. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BRFH's ROE of -1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is less volatile compared to BRFH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check BRFH's competition here
CELH vs REED Comparison June 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 7.2B. In comparison, REED has a market cap of 15.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $28.13, while REED trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 65.42, whereas REED's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to REED's ROE of -4.96%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is less volatile compared to REED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check REED's competition here
CELH vs BNKK Comparison June 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 7.2B. In comparison, BNKK has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $28.13, while BNKK trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 65.42, whereas BNKK's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BNKK's ROE of -1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is less volatile compared to BNKK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check BNKK's competition here
CELH vs BNKKW Comparison June 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 7.2B. In comparison, BNKKW has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $28.13, while BNKKW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 65.42, whereas BNKKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BNKKW's ROE of -1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is less volatile compared to BNKKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check BNKKW's competition here
CELH vs CRVP Comparison June 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 7.2B. In comparison, CRVP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $28.13, while CRVP trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 65.42, whereas CRVP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CRVP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is more volatile compared to CRVP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check CRVP's competition here
CELH vs NBEV Comparison June 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 7.2B. In comparison, NBEV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $28.13, while NBEV trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 65.42, whereas NBEV's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NBEV's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is less volatile compared to NBEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check NBEV's competition here
CELH vs GMCR Comparison June 2026
CELH plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CELH stands at 7.2B. In comparison, GMCR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CELH is priced at $28.13, while GMCR trades at $91.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CELH currently has a P/E ratio of 65.42, whereas GMCR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CELH's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GMCR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CELH is more volatile compared to GMCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CELH.Check GMCR's competition here