Chagee Holdings Limited American Depositary Shares (CHA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CHA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Beverages - Non-Alcoholic Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHA | $11.83 | -7.22% | 2.3B | 15.99 | $0.74 | +7.34% |
| KO | $78.76 | +0.45% | 339B | 24.78 | $3.18 | +2.62% |
| PEP | $142.54 | +0.38% | 194.8B | 22.38 | $6.37 | +3.99% |
| MNST | $89.04 | +0.91% | 87.1B | 43.01 | $2.07 | N/A |
| KDP | $30.55 | +0.63% | 41.6B | 22.63 | $1.35 | +2.97% |
| CCEP | $92.41 | +1.55% | 41B | 18.59 | $4.97 | +2.60% |
| KOF | $107.63 | -1.04% | 22.6B | -239.18 | -$0.45 | +3.78% |
| COKE | $177.34 | +1.34% | 13.9B | 24.33 | $7.29 | +0.57% |
| PRMB | $24.19 | -1.91% | 8.8B | 127.26 | $0.19 | +1.75% |
| CELH | $30.01 | -1.74% | 7.7B | 69.79 | $0.43 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CHA vs KO Comparison June 2026
CHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHA stands at 2.3B. In comparison, KO has a market cap of 339B. Regarding current trading prices, CHA is priced at $11.83, while KO trades at $78.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.99, whereas KO's P/E ratio is 24.78. In terms of profitability, CHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KO's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CHA is more volatile compared to KO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHA.Check KO's competition here
CHA vs PEP Comparison June 2026
CHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHA stands at 2.3B. In comparison, PEP has a market cap of 194.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CHA is priced at $11.83, while PEP trades at $142.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.99, whereas PEP's P/E ratio is 22.38. In terms of profitability, CHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PEP's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, CHA is more volatile compared to PEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHA.Check PEP's competition here
CHA vs MNST Comparison June 2026
CHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHA stands at 2.3B. In comparison, MNST has a market cap of 87.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CHA is priced at $11.83, while MNST trades at $89.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.99, whereas MNST's P/E ratio is 43.01. In terms of profitability, CHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MNST's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CHA is more volatile compared to MNST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHA.Check MNST's competition here
CHA vs KDP Comparison June 2026
CHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHA stands at 2.3B. In comparison, KDP has a market cap of 41.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CHA is priced at $11.83, while KDP trades at $30.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.99, whereas KDP's P/E ratio is 22.63. In terms of profitability, CHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KDP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CHA is more volatile compared to KDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHA.Check KDP's competition here
CHA vs CCEP Comparison June 2026
CHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHA stands at 2.3B. In comparison, CCEP has a market cap of 41B. Regarding current trading prices, CHA is priced at $11.83, while CCEP trades at $92.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.99, whereas CCEP's P/E ratio is 18.59. In terms of profitability, CHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CCEP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, CHA is more volatile compared to CCEP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHA.Check CCEP's competition here
CHA vs KOF Comparison June 2026
CHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHA stands at 2.3B. In comparison, KOF has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CHA is priced at $11.83, while KOF trades at $107.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.99, whereas KOF's P/E ratio is -239.18. In terms of profitability, CHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KOF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CHA is more volatile compared to KOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHA.Check KOF's competition here
CHA vs COKE Comparison June 2026
CHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHA stands at 2.3B. In comparison, COKE has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CHA is priced at $11.83, while COKE trades at $177.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.99, whereas COKE's P/E ratio is 24.33. In terms of profitability, CHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to COKE's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CHA is more volatile compared to COKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHA.Check COKE's competition here
CHA vs PRMB Comparison June 2026
CHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHA stands at 2.3B. In comparison, PRMB has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CHA is priced at $11.83, while PRMB trades at $24.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.99, whereas PRMB's P/E ratio is 127.26. In terms of profitability, CHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PRMB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CHA is more volatile compared to PRMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHA.Check PRMB's competition here
CHA vs CELH Comparison June 2026
CHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHA stands at 2.3B. In comparison, CELH has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CHA is priced at $11.83, while CELH trades at $30.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.99, whereas CELH's P/E ratio is 69.79. In terms of profitability, CHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CELH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CHA is more volatile compared to CELH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHA.Check CELH's competition here
CHA vs AKO-B Comparison June 2026
CHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHA stands at 2.3B. In comparison, AKO-B has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CHA is priced at $11.83, while AKO-B trades at $28.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.99, whereas AKO-B's P/E ratio is 14.76. In terms of profitability, CHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AKO-B's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CHA is more volatile compared to AKO-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHA.Check AKO-B's competition here
CHA vs COCO Comparison June 2026
CHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHA stands at 2.3B. In comparison, COCO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CHA is priced at $11.83, while COCO trades at $75.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.99, whereas COCO's P/E ratio is 54.48. In terms of profitability, CHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to COCO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CHA is more volatile compared to COCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHA.Check COCO's competition here
CHA vs PRMW Comparison June 2026
CHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHA stands at 2.3B. In comparison, PRMW has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CHA is priced at $11.83, while PRMW trades at $24.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.99, whereas PRMW's P/E ratio is 47.47. In terms of profitability, CHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PRMW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CHA is more volatile compared to PRMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHA.Check PRMW's competition here
CHA vs AKO-A Comparison June 2026
CHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHA stands at 2.3B. In comparison, AKO-A has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CHA is priced at $11.83, while AKO-A trades at $23.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.99, whereas AKO-A's P/E ratio is 11.53. In terms of profitability, CHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AKO-A's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, CHA is more volatile compared to AKO-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHA.Check AKO-A's competition here
CHA vs FIZZ Comparison June 2026
CHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHA stands at 2.3B. In comparison, FIZZ has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CHA is priced at $11.83, while FIZZ trades at $35.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.99, whereas FIZZ's P/E ratio is 17.97. In terms of profitability, CHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FIZZ's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CHA is more volatile compared to FIZZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHA.Check FIZZ's competition here
CHA vs SUJA Comparison June 2026
CHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHA stands at 2.3B. In comparison, SUJA has a market cap of 311.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CHA is priced at $11.83, while SUJA trades at $12.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.99, whereas SUJA's P/E ratio is -14.24. In terms of profitability, CHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SUJA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CHA is less volatile compared to SUJA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHA.Check SUJA's competition here
CHA vs OTLY Comparison June 2026
CHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHA stands at 2.3B. In comparison, OTLY has a market cap of 268.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CHA is priced at $11.83, while OTLY trades at $8.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.99, whereas OTLY's P/E ratio is -1.72. In terms of profitability, CHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OTLY's ROE of -4.48%. Regarding short-term risk, CHA is more volatile compared to OTLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHA.Check OTLY's competition here
CHA vs BUDA Comparison June 2026
CHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHA stands at 2.3B. In comparison, BUDA has a market cap of 105.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CHA is priced at $11.83, while BUDA trades at $8.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.99, whereas BUDA's P/E ratio is 33.60. In terms of profitability, CHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BUDA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CHA is more volatile compared to BUDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHA.Check BUDA's competition here
CHA vs ZVIA Comparison June 2026
CHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHA stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ZVIA has a market cap of 98.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CHA is priced at $11.83, while ZVIA trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.99, whereas ZVIA's P/E ratio is -13.75. In terms of profitability, CHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZVIA's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, CHA is more volatile compared to ZVIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHA.Check ZVIA's competition here
CHA vs SHOT Comparison June 2026
CHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHA stands at 2.3B. In comparison, SHOT has a market cap of 47.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CHA is priced at $11.83, while SHOT trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.99, whereas SHOT's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, CHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SHOT's ROE of -1.94%. Regarding short-term risk, CHA is less volatile compared to SHOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHA.Check SHOT's competition here
CHA vs BRFH Comparison June 2026
CHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHA stands at 2.3B. In comparison, BRFH has a market cap of 36.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CHA is priced at $11.83, while BRFH trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.99, whereas BRFH's P/E ratio is -14.19. In terms of profitability, CHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BRFH's ROE of -1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CHA is more volatile compared to BRFH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHA.Check BRFH's competition here
CHA vs REED Comparison June 2026
CHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHA stands at 2.3B. In comparison, REED has a market cap of 17.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CHA is priced at $11.83, while REED trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.99, whereas REED's P/E ratio is -0.87. In terms of profitability, CHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to REED's ROE of -4.96%. Regarding short-term risk, CHA is more volatile compared to REED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHA.Check REED's competition here
CHA vs BNKK Comparison June 2026
CHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHA stands at 2.3B. In comparison, BNKK has a market cap of 9.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CHA is priced at $11.83, while BNKK trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.99, whereas BNKK's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, CHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BNKK's ROE of -1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CHA is less volatile compared to BNKK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHA.Check BNKK's competition here
CHA vs BNKKW Comparison June 2026
CHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHA stands at 2.3B. In comparison, BNKKW has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, CHA is priced at $11.83, while BNKKW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.99, whereas BNKKW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BNKKW's ROE of -1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, CHA is less volatile compared to BNKKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHA.Check BNKKW's competition here
CHA vs GMCR Comparison June 2026
CHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHA stands at 2.3B. In comparison, GMCR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CHA is priced at $11.83, while GMCR trades at $91.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.99, whereas GMCR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GMCR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CHA is more volatile compared to GMCR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHA.Check GMCR's competition here
CHA vs CRVP Comparison June 2026
CHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHA stands at 2.3B. In comparison, CRVP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CHA is priced at $11.83, while CRVP trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.99, whereas CRVP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CRVP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CHA is more volatile compared to CRVP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHA.Check CRVP's competition here
CHA vs NBEV Comparison June 2026
CHA plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CHA stands at 2.3B. In comparison, NBEV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CHA is priced at $11.83, while NBEV trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CHA currently has a P/E ratio of 15.99, whereas NBEV's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, CHA's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NBEV's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, CHA is less volatile compared to NBEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CHA.Check NBEV's competition here