Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (EAT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Restaurants Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EAT | $141.57 | +0.93% | 5.9B | 13.33 | $10.25 | N/A |
| MCD | $280.07 | +2.48% | 193.8B | 22.50 | $12.12 | +2.69% |
| SBUX | $95.76 | -0.14% | 107.3B | 71.85 | $1.31 | +2.62% |
| YUM | $151.21 | +1.87% | 40.8B | 23.89 | $6.20 | +1.97% |
| CMG | $29.56 | +2.85% | 36.1B | 25.84 | $1.09 | N/A |
| QSR | $72.45 | -0.43% | 24.9B | 23.10 | $3.11 | +3.48% |
| DRI | $198.15 | -0.06% | 22.2B | 20.37 | $9.50 | +3.11% |
| YUMC | $42.82 | -0.28% | 15B | 17.08 | $2.51 | +2.47% |
| TXRH | $170.70 | +2.71% | 10.6B | 25.72 | $6.27 | +1.76% |
| DPZ | $315.59 | +2.88% | 10.2B | 17.69 | $17.38 | +2.36% |
Stock Comparison
EAT vs MCD Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, MCD has a market cap of 193.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while MCD trades at $280.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas MCD's P/E ratio is 22.50. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to MCD's ROE of -4.34%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to MCD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check MCD's competition here
EAT vs SBUX Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, SBUX has a market cap of 107.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while SBUX trades at $95.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas SBUX's P/E ratio is 71.85. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to SBUX's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to SBUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check SBUX's competition here
EAT vs YUM Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, YUM has a market cap of 40.8B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while YUM trades at $151.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas YUM's P/E ratio is 23.89. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to YUM's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to YUM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check YUM's competition here
EAT vs CMG Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, CMG has a market cap of 36.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while CMG trades at $29.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas CMG's P/E ratio is 25.84. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to CMG's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to CMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check CMG's competition here
EAT vs QSR Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, QSR has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while QSR trades at $72.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas QSR's P/E ratio is 23.10. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to QSR's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to QSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check QSR's competition here
EAT vs DRI Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, DRI has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while DRI trades at $198.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas DRI's P/E ratio is 20.37. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to DRI's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to DRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check DRI's competition here
EAT vs YUMC Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, YUMC has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while YUMC trades at $42.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas YUMC's P/E ratio is 17.08. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to YUMC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to YUMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check YUMC's competition here
EAT vs TXRH Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, TXRH has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while TXRH trades at $170.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas TXRH's P/E ratio is 25.72. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to TXRH's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to TXRH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check TXRH's competition here
EAT vs DPZ Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, DPZ has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while DPZ trades at $315.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas DPZ's P/E ratio is 17.69. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to DPZ's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to DPZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check DPZ's competition here
EAT vs BROS Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, BROS has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while BROS trades at $54.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas BROS's P/E ratio is 87.38. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to BROS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to BROS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BROS's competition here
EAT vs CAVA Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, CAVA has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while CAVA trades at $72.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas CAVA's P/E ratio is 137.96. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to CAVA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to CAVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check CAVA's competition here
EAT vs WING Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, WING has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while WING trades at $143.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas WING's P/E ratio is 35.65. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to WING's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to WING. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check WING's competition here
EAT vs CAKE Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, CAKE has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while CAKE trades at $66.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas CAKE's P/E ratio is 18.72. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to CAKE's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to CAKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check CAKE's competition here
EAT vs SHAK Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, SHAK has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while SHAK trades at $52.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas SHAK's P/E ratio is 54.47. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to SHAK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to SHAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check SHAK's competition here
EAT vs ARCO Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ARCO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while ARCO trades at $8.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas ARCO's P/E ratio is 7.44. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to ARCO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to ARCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check ARCO's competition here
EAT vs WEN Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, WEN has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while WEN trades at $6.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas WEN's P/E ratio is 8.77. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to WEN's ROE of +1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to WEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check WEN's competition here
EAT vs PZZA Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, PZZA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while PZZA trades at $32.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas PZZA's P/E ratio is 38.87. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to PZZA's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to PZZA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check PZZA's competition here
EAT vs BH-A Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, BH-A has a market cap of 969.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while BH-A trades at $1,570.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas BH-A's P/E ratio is -21.11. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to BH-A's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to BH-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BH-A's competition here
EAT vs BH Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, BH has a market cap of 929M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while BH trades at $294.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas BH's P/E ratio is -20.20. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to BH's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to BH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BH's competition here
EAT vs BJRI Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, BJRI has a market cap of 902.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while BJRI trades at $43.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas BJRI's P/E ratio is 21.58. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to BJRI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to BJRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BJRI's competition here
EAT vs SG Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, SG has a market cap of 875.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while SG trades at $7.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas SG's P/E ratio is 61.38. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to SG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to SG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check SG's competition here
EAT vs TWNPV Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, TWNPV has a market cap of 857.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while TWNPV trades at $17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas TWNPV's P/E ratio is -36.38. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to TWNPV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to TWNPV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check TWNPV's competition here
EAT vs HDL Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, HDL has a market cap of 798.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while HDL trades at $13.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas HDL's P/E ratio is 27.14. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to HDL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to HDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check HDL's competition here
EAT vs CNNE Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, CNNE has a market cap of 756.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while CNNE trades at $14.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas CNNE's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to CNNE's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to CNNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check CNNE's competition here
EAT vs CBRL Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, CBRL has a market cap of 737.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while CBRL trades at $32.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas CBRL's P/E ratio is -165.00. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to CBRL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to CBRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check CBRL's competition here
EAT vs RUTH Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, RUTH has a market cap of 690.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while RUTH trades at $21.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas RUTH's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to RUTH's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to RUTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check RUTH's competition here
EAT vs CHUY Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, CHUY has a market cap of 645.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while CHUY trades at $37.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas CHUY's P/E ratio is 24.18. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to CHUY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to CHUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check CHUY's competition here
EAT vs FWRG Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, FWRG has a market cap of 631.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while FWRG trades at $10.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas FWRG's P/E ratio is 36.57. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to FWRG's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to FWRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check FWRG's competition here
EAT vs BLMN Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, BLMN has a market cap of 611.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while BLMN trades at $7.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas BLMN's P/E ratio is 29.75. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to BLMN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to BLMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BLMN's competition here
EAT vs KRUS Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, KRUS has a market cap of 556M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while KRUS trades at $45.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas KRUS's P/E ratio is -305.13. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to KRUS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to KRUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check KRUS's competition here
EAT vs PBPB Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, PBPB has a market cap of 518M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while PBPB trades at $17.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas PBPB's P/E ratio is 48.91. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to PBPB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to PBPB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check PBPB's competition here
EAT vs TAST Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, TAST has a market cap of 502M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while TAST trades at $9.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas TAST's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to TAST's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to TAST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check TAST's competition here
EAT vs LOCO Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, LOCO has a market cap of 421.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while LOCO trades at $13.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas LOCO's P/E ratio is 14.12. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to LOCO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to LOCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check LOCO's competition here
EAT vs NATH Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, NATH has a market cap of 414.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while NATH trades at $102.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas NATH's P/E ratio is 19.48. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to NATH's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to NATH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check NATH's competition here
EAT vs DIN Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, DIN has a market cap of 368.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while DIN trades at $29.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas DIN's P/E ratio is 25.28. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to DIN's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to DIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check DIN's competition here
EAT vs DENN Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, DENN has a market cap of 321.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while DENN trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas DENN's P/E ratio is 31.25. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to DENN's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to DENN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check DENN's competition here
EAT vs PTLO Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, PTLO has a market cap of 275.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while PTLO trades at $3.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas PTLO's P/E ratio is 18.14. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to PTLO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to PTLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check PTLO's competition here
EAT vs FRGI Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, FRGI has a market cap of 222.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while FRGI trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas FRGI's P/E ratio is -33.98. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to FRGI's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to FRGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check FRGI's competition here
EAT vs JACK Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, JACK has a market cap of 222.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while JACK trades at $11.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas JACK's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to JACK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to JACK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check JACK's competition here
EAT vs RICK Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, RICK has a market cap of 191.9M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while RICK trades at $24.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas RICK's P/E ratio is -32.19. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to RICK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to RICK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check RICK's competition here
EAT vs BBQ Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, BBQ has a market cap of 185.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while BBQ trades at $17.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas BBQ's P/E ratio is 15.53. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to BBQ's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to BBQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BBQ's competition here
EAT vs VENU Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, VENU has a market cap of 148.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while VENU trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas VENU's P/E ratio is -3.82. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to VENU's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to VENU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check VENU's competition here
EAT vs BYN-WT Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, BYN-WT has a market cap of 122.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while BYN-WT trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas BYN-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to BYN-WT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to BYN-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BYN-WT's competition here
EAT vs MB Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, MB has a market cap of 122.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while MB trades at $6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas MB's P/E ratio is -17.80. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to MB's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to MB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check MB's competition here
EAT vs THCHW Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, THCHW has a market cap of 99.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while THCHW trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas THCHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to THCHW's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to THCHW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check THCHW's competition here
EAT vs RRGB Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, RRGB has a market cap of 82M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while RRGB trades at $4.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas RRGB's P/E ratio is -2.95. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to RRGB's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to RRGB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check RRGB's competition here
EAT vs NDLS Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, NDLS has a market cap of 77M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while NDLS trades at $12.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas NDLS's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to NDLS's ROE of +0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to NDLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check NDLS's competition here
EAT vs HCHL Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, HCHL has a market cap of 71.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while HCHL trades at $4.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas HCHL's P/E ratio is -28.62. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to HCHL's ROE of -1.73%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to HCHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check HCHL's competition here
EAT vs GENK Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, GENK has a market cap of 68.6M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while GENK trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas GENK's P/E ratio is -2.77. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to GENK's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to GENK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check GENK's competition here
EAT vs BDL Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, BDL has a market cap of 61.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while BDL trades at $33.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas BDL's P/E ratio is 10.28. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to BDL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to BDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BDL's competition here
EAT vs THCH Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, THCH has a market cap of 57.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while THCH trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas THCH's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to THCH's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to THCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check THCH's competition here
EAT vs STKS Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, STKS has a market cap of 57.3M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while STKS trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas STKS's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to STKS's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to STKS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check STKS's competition here
EAT vs GRIL Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, GRIL has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while GRIL trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas GRIL's P/E ratio is -5.28. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to GRIL's ROE of +6.12%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to GRIL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check GRIL's competition here
EAT vs FATAV Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, FATAV has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while FATAV trades at $3.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas FATAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to FATAV's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to FATAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check FATAV's competition here
EAT vs RAVE Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, RAVE has a market cap of 40.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while RAVE trades at $2.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas RAVE's P/E ratio is 13.52. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to RAVE's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to RAVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check RAVE's competition here
EAT vs FATBW Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, FATBW has a market cap of 37.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while FATBW trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas FATBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to FATBW's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to FATBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check FATBW's competition here
EAT vs PC Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, PC has a market cap of 30.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while PC trades at $9.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas PC's P/E ratio is -12.70. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to PC's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check PC's competition here
EAT vs ARKR Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ARKR has a market cap of 22.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while ARKR trades at $6.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas ARKR's P/E ratio is -3.58. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to ARKR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to ARKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check ARKR's competition here
EAT vs MYT Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, MYT has a market cap of 22.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while MYT trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas MYT's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to MYT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to MYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check MYT's competition here
EAT vs FATBB Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, FATBB has a market cap of 20M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while FATBB trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas FATBB's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to FATBB's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to FATBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check FATBB's competition here
EAT vs GTIM Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, GTIM has a market cap of 13.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while GTIM trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas GTIM's P/E ratio is 7.71. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to GTIM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to GTIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check GTIM's competition here
EAT vs YOSH Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, YOSH has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while YOSH trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas YOSH's P/E ratio is -2.71. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to YOSH's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to YOSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check YOSH's competition here
EAT vs REBN Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, REBN has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while REBN trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas REBN's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to REBN's ROE of -16.24%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to REBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check REBN's competition here
EAT vs BTBD Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, BTBD has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while BTBD trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas BTBD's P/E ratio is -6.72. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to BTBD's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to BTBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BTBD's competition here
EAT vs BTB Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, BTB has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while BTB trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas BTB's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to BTB's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to BTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BTB's competition here
EAT vs FATBV Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, FATBV has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while FATBV trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas FATBV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to FATBV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to FATBV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check FATBV's competition here
EAT vs TWNP Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, TWNP has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while TWNP trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas TWNP's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to TWNP's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to TWNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check TWNP's competition here
EAT vs FAT Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, FAT has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while FAT trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas FAT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to FAT's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to FAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check FAT's competition here
EAT vs BFI Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, BFI has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while BFI trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas BFI's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to BFI's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to BFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BFI's competition here
EAT vs PNST Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, PNST has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while PNST trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas PNST's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to PNST's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to PNST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check PNST's competition here
EAT vs FATBP Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, FATBP has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while FATBP trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas FATBP's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to FATBP's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to FATBP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check FATBP's competition here
EAT vs BTBDW Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, BTBDW has a market cap of 432.9K. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while BTBDW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas BTBDW's P/E ratio is 0.51. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to BTBDW's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to BTBDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BTBDW's competition here
EAT vs BFIIW Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, BFIIW has a market cap of 242.3K. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while BFIIW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas BFIIW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to BFIIW's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to BFIIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BFIIW's competition here
EAT vs CHSN Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, CHSN has a market cap of 13.6K. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while CHSN trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas CHSN's P/E ratio is 0.42. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to CHSN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to CHSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check CHSN's competition here
EAT vs ONDR Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ONDR has a market cap of 81. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while ONDR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas ONDR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to ONDR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to ONDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check ONDR's competition here
EAT vs JMBA Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, JMBA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while JMBA trades at $13.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas JMBA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to JMBA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to JMBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check JMBA's competition here
EAT vs PLKI Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, PLKI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while PLKI trades at $79.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas PLKI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to PLKI's ROE of +1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to PLKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check PLKI's competition here
EAT vs BOJA Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, BOJA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while BOJA trades at $16.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas BOJA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to BOJA's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to BOJA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BOJA's competition here
EAT vs SONC Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, SONC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while SONC trades at $43.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas SONC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to SONC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to SONC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check SONC's competition here
EAT vs PNRA Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, PNRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while PNRA trades at $314.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas PNRA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to PNRA's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to PNRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check PNRA's competition here
EAT vs BOBE Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, BOBE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while BOBE trades at $77.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas BOBE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to BOBE's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to BOBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BOBE's competition here
EAT vs ZOES Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ZOES has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while ZOES trades at $12.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas ZOES's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to ZOES's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to ZOES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check ZOES's competition here
EAT vs COSI Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, COSI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while COSI trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas COSI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to COSI's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is less volatile compared to COSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check COSI's competition here
EAT vs BWLD Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, BWLD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while BWLD trades at $156.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas BWLD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to BWLD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to BWLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check BWLD's competition here
EAT vs LUB Comparison June 2026
EAT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, EAT stands at 5.9B. In comparison, LUB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, EAT is priced at $141.57, while LUB trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
EAT currently has a P/E ratio of 13.33, whereas LUB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, EAT's ROE is +1.23%, compared to LUB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, EAT is more volatile compared to LUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for EAT.Check LUB's competition here