Nutrien Ltd. (NTR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 33.2B. In comparison, CTA-PB has a market cap of 59B. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $67.48, while CTA-PB trades at $67.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 14.05, whereas CTA-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CTA-PB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is more volatile compared to CTA-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check CTA-PB's competition here

NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 33.2B. In comparison, CTVA has a market cap of 51.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $67.48, while CTVA trades at $76.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 14.05, whereas CTVA's P/E ratio is 41.87. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CTVA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is more volatile compared to CTVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check CTVA's competition here

NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 33.2B. In comparison, CTA-PA has a market cap of 35.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $67.48, while CTA-PA trades at $53.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 14.05, whereas CTA-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CTA-PA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is more volatile compared to CTA-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check CTA-PA's competition here

NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 33.2B. In comparison, CF has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $67.48, while CF trades at $114.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 14.05, whereas CF's P/E ratio is 10.58. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is less volatile compared to CF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check CF's competition here

NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 33.2B. In comparison, ICL has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $67.48, while ICL trades at $5.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 14.05, whereas ICL's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ICL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is less volatile compared to ICL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check ICL's competition here

NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 33.2B. In comparison, MOS has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $67.48, while MOS trades at $22.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 14.05, whereas MOS's P/E ratio is 163.57. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MOS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is less volatile compared to MOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check MOS's competition here

NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 33.2B. In comparison, SMG has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $67.48, while SMG trades at $56.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 14.05, whereas SMG's P/E ratio is 16.34. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SMG's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is more volatile compared to SMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check SMG's competition here

NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 33.2B. In comparison, FMC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $67.48, while FMC trades at $11.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 14.05, whereas FMC's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FMC's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is less volatile compared to FMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check FMC's competition here

NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 33.2B. In comparison, PURR has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $67.48, while PURR trades at $8.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 14.05, whereas PURR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PURR's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is less volatile compared to PURR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check PURR's competition here

NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 33.2B. In comparison, UAN has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $67.48, while UAN trades at $119.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 14.05, whereas UAN's P/E ratio is 10.51. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to UAN's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is more volatile compared to UAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check UAN's competition here

NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 33.2B. In comparison, IPI has a market cap of 499.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $67.48, while IPI trades at $35.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 14.05, whereas IPI's P/E ratio is 33.50. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IPI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is less volatile compared to IPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check IPI's competition here

NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 33.2B. In comparison, AVD has a market cap of 72.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $67.48, while AVD trades at $2.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 14.05, whereas AVD's P/E ratio is -1.58. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AVD's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is less volatile compared to AVD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check AVD's competition here

NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 33.2B. In comparison, BHST has a market cap of 60.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $67.48, while BHST trades at $3.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 14.05, whereas BHST's P/E ratio is -6.03. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BHST's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is less volatile compared to BHST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check BHST's competition here

NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 33.2B. In comparison, MULG has a market cap of 49.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $67.48, while MULG trades at $2.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 14.05, whereas MULG's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MULG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is more volatile compared to MULG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check MULG's competition here

NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 33.2B. In comparison, BHIL-WT has a market cap of 49M. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $67.48, while BHIL-WT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 14.05, whereas BHIL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BHIL-WT's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is less volatile compared to BHIL-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check BHIL-WT's competition here

NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 33.2B. In comparison, CGA has a market cap of 29.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $67.48, while CGA trades at $1.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 14.05, whereas CGA's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CGA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is more volatile compared to CGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check CGA's competition here

NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 33.2B. In comparison, BIOX has a market cap of 28.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $67.48, while BIOX trades at $0.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 14.05, whereas BIOX's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BIOX's ROE of -1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is less volatile compared to BIOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check BIOX's competition here

NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 33.2B. In comparison, LVRO has a market cap of 15.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $67.48, while LVRO trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 14.05, whereas LVRO's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LVRO's ROE of +11.90%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is more volatile compared to LVRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check LVRO's competition here

NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 33.2B. In comparison, SEED has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $67.48, while SEED trades at $1.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 14.05, whereas SEED's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SEED's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is less volatile compared to SEED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check SEED's competition here

NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 33.2B. In comparison, AGRZ has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $67.48, while AGRZ trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 14.05, whereas AGRZ's P/E ratio is 3.33. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AGRZ's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is less volatile compared to AGRZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check AGRZ's competition here

NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 33.2B. In comparison, SVFD has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $67.48, while SVFD trades at $1.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 14.05, whereas SVFD's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SVFD's ROE of -367.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is less volatile compared to SVFD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check SVFD's competition here

NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 33.2B. In comparison, FMTO has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $67.48, while FMTO trades at $3.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 14.05, whereas FMTO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FMTO's ROE of +75.78%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is less volatile compared to FMTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check FMTO's competition here

NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 33.2B. In comparison, RKDA has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $67.48, while RKDA trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 14.05, whereas RKDA's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RKDA's ROE of -2.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is less volatile compared to RKDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check RKDA's competition here

NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 33.2B. In comparison, BHIL has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $67.48, while BHIL trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 14.05, whereas BHIL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BHIL's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is more volatile compared to BHIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check BHIL's competition here

NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 33.2B. In comparison, YTEN has a market cap of 345.5K. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $67.48, while YTEN trades at $0.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 14.05, whereas YTEN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to YTEN's ROE of -15.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is less volatile compared to YTEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check YTEN's competition here

NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 33.2B. In comparison, MBII has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $67.48, while MBII trades at $0.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 14.05, whereas MBII's P/E ratio is -6.82. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MBII's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is less volatile compared to MBII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check MBII's competition here

NTR plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NTR stands at 33.2B. In comparison, TNH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NTR is priced at $67.48, while TNH trades at $83.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NTR currently has a P/E ratio of 14.05, whereas TNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NTR's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TNH's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, NTR is more volatile compared to TNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NTR.Check TNH's competition here