EIDP, Inc. USD 4.50 Cum Pfd Registered Shs (CTA-PB) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CTA-PB) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural Inputs Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTA-PB | $67.25 | -0.07% | 58.4B | N/A | N/A | +0.92% |
| CTVA | $77.80 | +0.30% | 52B | 42.06 | $1.85 | +0.92% |
| CTA-PA | $53.64 | +0.81% | 35.9B | N/A | N/A | +0.92% |
| NTR | $68.81 | +0.45% | 33.1B | 14.02 | $4.91 | +3.16% |
| CF | $116.60 | +2.75% | 17.9B | 10.50 | $11.10 | +1.72% |
| ICL | $6.12 | -1.53% | 7.9B | 29.19 | $0.21 | +3.11% |
| MOS | $23.30 | +0.00% | 7.4B | 166.57 | $0.14 | +3.77% |
| SMG | $56.97 | +0.97% | 3.3B | 16.37 | $3.48 | +4.62% |
| FMC | $12.35 | -5.94% | 1.5B | -0.63 | -$19.62 | +10.60% |
| PURR | $10.37 | -5.47% | 1.4B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CTA-PB vs CTVA Comparison June 2026
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 58.4B. In comparison, CTVA has a market cap of 52B. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $67.25, while CTVA trades at $77.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTVA's P/E ratio is 42.06. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CTVA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to CTVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.Check CTVA's competition here
CTA-PB vs CTA-PA Comparison June 2026
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 58.4B. In comparison, CTA-PA has a market cap of 35.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $67.25, while CTA-PA trades at $53.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTA-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CTA-PA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to CTA-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.Check CTA-PA's competition here
CTA-PB vs NTR Comparison June 2026
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 58.4B. In comparison, NTR has a market cap of 33.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $67.25, while NTR trades at $68.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTR's P/E ratio is 14.02. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NTR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to NTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.Check NTR's competition here
CTA-PB vs CF Comparison June 2026
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 58.4B. In comparison, CF has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $67.25, while CF trades at $116.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CF's P/E ratio is 10.50. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to CF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.Check CF's competition here
CTA-PB vs ICL Comparison June 2026
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 58.4B. In comparison, ICL has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $67.25, while ICL trades at $6.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ICL's P/E ratio is 29.19. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ICL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to ICL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.Check ICL's competition here
CTA-PB vs MOS Comparison June 2026
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 58.4B. In comparison, MOS has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $67.25, while MOS trades at $23.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MOS's P/E ratio is 166.57. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MOS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to MOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.Check MOS's competition here
CTA-PB vs SMG Comparison June 2026
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 58.4B. In comparison, SMG has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $67.25, while SMG trades at $56.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMG's P/E ratio is 16.37. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SMG's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to SMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.Check SMG's competition here
CTA-PB vs FMC Comparison June 2026
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 58.4B. In comparison, FMC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $67.25, while FMC trades at $12.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMC's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FMC's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to FMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.Check FMC's competition here
CTA-PB vs PURR Comparison June 2026
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 58.4B. In comparison, PURR has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $67.25, while PURR trades at $10.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PURR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PURR's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to PURR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.Check PURR's competition here
CTA-PB vs UAN Comparison June 2026
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 58.4B. In comparison, UAN has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $67.25, while UAN trades at $121.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UAN's P/E ratio is 10.50. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UAN's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to UAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.Check UAN's competition here
CTA-PB vs IPI Comparison June 2026
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 58.4B. In comparison, IPI has a market cap of 487.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $67.25, while IPI trades at $36.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IPI's P/E ratio is 32.68. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IPI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to IPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.Check IPI's competition here
CTA-PB vs AVD Comparison June 2026
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 58.4B. In comparison, AVD has a market cap of 70.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $67.25, while AVD trades at $2.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVD's P/E ratio is -1.56. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AVD's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to AVD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.Check AVD's competition here
CTA-PB vs BHST Comparison June 2026
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 58.4B. In comparison, BHST has a market cap of 61.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $67.25, while BHST trades at $3.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHST's P/E ratio is -6.14. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BHST's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to BHST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.Check BHST's competition here
CTA-PB vs MULG Comparison June 2026
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 58.4B. In comparison, MULG has a market cap of 49.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $67.25, while MULG trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MULG's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MULG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is more volatile compared to MULG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.Check MULG's competition here
CTA-PB vs BHIL-WT Comparison June 2026
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 58.4B. In comparison, BHIL-WT has a market cap of 49M. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $67.25, while BHIL-WT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHIL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BHIL-WT's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to BHIL-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.Check BHIL-WT's competition here
CTA-PB vs CGA Comparison June 2026
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 58.4B. In comparison, CGA has a market cap of 29.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $67.25, while CGA trades at $1.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGA's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CGA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is more volatile compared to CGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.Check CGA's competition here
CTA-PB vs BIOX Comparison June 2026
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 58.4B. In comparison, BIOX has a market cap of 29M. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $67.25, while BIOX trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIOX's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BIOX's ROE of -1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to BIOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.Check BIOX's competition here
CTA-PB vs LVRO Comparison June 2026
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 58.4B. In comparison, LVRO has a market cap of 15.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $67.25, while LVRO trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LVRO's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LVRO's ROE of +11.90%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is more volatile compared to LVRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.Check LVRO's competition here
CTA-PB vs SEED Comparison June 2026
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 58.4B. In comparison, SEED has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $67.25, while SEED trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SEED's P/E ratio is -1.54. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SEED's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to SEED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.Check SEED's competition here
CTA-PB vs AGRZ Comparison June 2026
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 58.4B. In comparison, AGRZ has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $67.25, while AGRZ trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AGRZ's P/E ratio is 3.22. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AGRZ's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to AGRZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.Check AGRZ's competition here
CTA-PB vs SVFD Comparison June 2026
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 58.4B. In comparison, SVFD has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $67.25, while SVFD trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVFD's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SVFD's ROE of -367.30%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to SVFD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.Check SVFD's competition here
CTA-PB vs FMTO Comparison June 2026
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 58.4B. In comparison, FMTO has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $67.25, while FMTO trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FMTO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FMTO's ROE of +75.78%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to FMTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.Check FMTO's competition here
CTA-PB vs RKDA Comparison June 2026
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 58.4B. In comparison, RKDA has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $67.25, while RKDA trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RKDA's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RKDA's ROE of -2.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to RKDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.Check RKDA's competition here
CTA-PB vs BHIL Comparison June 2026
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 58.4B. In comparison, BHIL has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $67.25, while BHIL trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BHIL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BHIL's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is more volatile compared to BHIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.Check BHIL's competition here
CTA-PB vs YTEN Comparison June 2026
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 58.4B. In comparison, YTEN has a market cap of 345.5K. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $67.25, while YTEN trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YTEN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to YTEN's ROE of -15.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to YTEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.Check YTEN's competition here
CTA-PB vs TNH Comparison June 2026
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 58.4B. In comparison, TNH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $67.25, while TNH trades at $83.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TNH's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is more volatile compared to TNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.Check TNH's competition here
CTA-PB vs MBII Comparison June 2026
CTA-PB plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CTA-PB stands at 58.4B. In comparison, MBII has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CTA-PB is priced at $67.25, while MBII trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CTA-PB currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MBII's P/E ratio is -6.82. In terms of profitability, CTA-PB's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MBII's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, CTA-PB is less volatile compared to MBII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CTA-PB.Check MBII's competition here