ICL Group Ltd (ICL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ICL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Agricultural Inputs Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICL | $5.89 | -3.76% | 7.6B | 28.00 | $0.21 | +3.22% |
| CTA-PB | $67.35 | +0.15% | 59B | N/A | N/A | +0.93% |
| CTVA | $77.46 | -0.44% | 51.8B | 41.87 | $1.85 | +0.93% |
| CTA-PA | $53.10 | -1.01% | 35.6B | N/A | N/A | +0.93% |
| NTR | $69.00 | +0.28% | 33.2B | 14.05 | $4.91 | +3.17% |
| CF | $117.52 | +0.79% | 18B | 10.58 | $11.10 | +1.71% |
| MOS | $22.90 | -1.72% | 7.3B | 163.57 | $0.14 | +3.87% |
| SMG | $56.83 | -0.25% | 3.3B | 16.34 | $3.48 | +4.66% |
| FMC | $12.19 | -1.30% | 1.5B | -0.62 | -$19.62 | +10.75% |
| PURR | $9.49 | -8.49% | 1.3B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ICL vs CTA-PB Comparison June 2026
ICL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICL stands at 7.6B. In comparison, CTA-PB has a market cap of 59B. Regarding current trading prices, ICL is priced at $5.89, while CTA-PB trades at $67.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICL currently has a P/E ratio of 28.00, whereas CTA-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CTA-PB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ICL is more volatile compared to CTA-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICL.Check CTA-PB's competition here
ICL vs CTVA Comparison June 2026
ICL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICL stands at 7.6B. In comparison, CTVA has a market cap of 51.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ICL is priced at $5.89, while CTVA trades at $77.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICL currently has a P/E ratio of 28.00, whereas CTVA's P/E ratio is 41.87. In terms of profitability, ICL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CTVA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ICL is less volatile compared to CTVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICL.Check CTVA's competition here
ICL vs CTA-PA Comparison June 2026
ICL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICL stands at 7.6B. In comparison, CTA-PA has a market cap of 35.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ICL is priced at $5.89, while CTA-PA trades at $53.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICL currently has a P/E ratio of 28.00, whereas CTA-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CTA-PA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ICL is more volatile compared to CTA-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICL.Check CTA-PA's competition here
ICL vs NTR Comparison June 2026
ICL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICL stands at 7.6B. In comparison, NTR has a market cap of 33.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ICL is priced at $5.89, while NTR trades at $69.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICL currently has a P/E ratio of 28.00, whereas NTR's P/E ratio is 14.05. In terms of profitability, ICL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NTR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ICL is more volatile compared to NTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICL.Check NTR's competition here
ICL vs CF Comparison June 2026
ICL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICL stands at 7.6B. In comparison, CF has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, ICL is priced at $5.89, while CF trades at $117.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICL currently has a P/E ratio of 28.00, whereas CF's P/E ratio is 10.58. In terms of profitability, ICL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ICL is less volatile compared to CF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICL.Check CF's competition here
ICL vs MOS Comparison June 2026
ICL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICL stands at 7.6B. In comparison, MOS has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ICL is priced at $5.89, while MOS trades at $22.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICL currently has a P/E ratio of 28.00, whereas MOS's P/E ratio is 163.57. In terms of profitability, ICL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MOS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ICL is less volatile compared to MOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICL.Check MOS's competition here
ICL vs SMG Comparison June 2026
ICL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICL stands at 7.6B. In comparison, SMG has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ICL is priced at $5.89, while SMG trades at $56.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICL currently has a P/E ratio of 28.00, whereas SMG's P/E ratio is 16.34. In terms of profitability, ICL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SMG's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ICL is less volatile compared to SMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICL.Check SMG's competition here
ICL vs FMC Comparison June 2026
ICL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICL stands at 7.6B. In comparison, FMC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ICL is priced at $5.89, while FMC trades at $12.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICL currently has a P/E ratio of 28.00, whereas FMC's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, ICL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FMC's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, ICL is less volatile compared to FMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICL.Check FMC's competition here
ICL vs PURR Comparison June 2026
ICL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICL stands at 7.6B. In comparison, PURR has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ICL is priced at $5.89, while PURR trades at $9.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICL currently has a P/E ratio of 28.00, whereas PURR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PURR's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ICL is less volatile compared to PURR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICL.Check PURR's competition here
ICL vs UAN Comparison June 2026
ICL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICL stands at 7.6B. In comparison, UAN has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ICL is priced at $5.89, while UAN trades at $120.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICL currently has a P/E ratio of 28.00, whereas UAN's P/E ratio is 10.51. In terms of profitability, ICL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to UAN's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ICL is more volatile compared to UAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICL.Check UAN's competition here
ICL vs IPI Comparison June 2026
ICL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICL stands at 7.6B. In comparison, IPI has a market cap of 499.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ICL is priced at $5.89, while IPI trades at $37.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICL currently has a P/E ratio of 28.00, whereas IPI's P/E ratio is 33.50. In terms of profitability, ICL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IPI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ICL is less volatile compared to IPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICL.Check IPI's competition here
ICL vs AVD Comparison June 2026
ICL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICL stands at 7.6B. In comparison, AVD has a market cap of 72.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ICL is priced at $5.89, while AVD trades at $2.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICL currently has a P/E ratio of 28.00, whereas AVD's P/E ratio is -1.58. In terms of profitability, ICL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AVD's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ICL is less volatile compared to AVD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICL.Check AVD's competition here
ICL vs BHST Comparison June 2026
ICL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICL stands at 7.6B. In comparison, BHST has a market cap of 60.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ICL is priced at $5.89, while BHST trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICL currently has a P/E ratio of 28.00, whereas BHST's P/E ratio is -6.03. In terms of profitability, ICL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BHST's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, ICL is less volatile compared to BHST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICL.Check BHST's competition here
ICL vs MULG Comparison June 2026
ICL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICL stands at 7.6B. In comparison, MULG has a market cap of 49.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ICL is priced at $5.89, while MULG trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICL currently has a P/E ratio of 28.00, whereas MULG's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, ICL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MULG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ICL is more volatile compared to MULG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICL.Check MULG's competition here
ICL vs BHIL-WT Comparison June 2026
ICL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICL stands at 7.6B. In comparison, BHIL-WT has a market cap of 49M. Regarding current trading prices, ICL is priced at $5.89, while BHIL-WT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICL currently has a P/E ratio of 28.00, whereas BHIL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BHIL-WT's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, ICL is less volatile compared to BHIL-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICL.Check BHIL-WT's competition here
ICL vs CGA Comparison June 2026
ICL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICL stands at 7.6B. In comparison, CGA has a market cap of 29.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ICL is priced at $5.89, while CGA trades at $1.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICL currently has a P/E ratio of 28.00, whereas CGA's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, ICL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CGA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ICL is more volatile compared to CGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICL.Check CGA's competition here
ICL vs BIOX Comparison June 2026
ICL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICL stands at 7.6B. In comparison, BIOX has a market cap of 28.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ICL is priced at $5.89, while BIOX trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICL currently has a P/E ratio of 28.00, whereas BIOX's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, ICL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BIOX's ROE of -1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, ICL is less volatile compared to BIOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICL.Check BIOX's competition here
ICL vs LVRO Comparison June 2026
ICL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICL stands at 7.6B. In comparison, LVRO has a market cap of 15.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ICL is priced at $5.89, while LVRO trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICL currently has a P/E ratio of 28.00, whereas LVRO's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, ICL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LVRO's ROE of +11.90%. Regarding short-term risk, ICL is more volatile compared to LVRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICL.Check LVRO's competition here
ICL vs SEED Comparison June 2026
ICL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICL stands at 7.6B. In comparison, SEED has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ICL is priced at $5.89, while SEED trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICL currently has a P/E ratio of 28.00, whereas SEED's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, ICL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SEED's ROE of +1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ICL is less volatile compared to SEED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICL.Check SEED's competition here
ICL vs AGRZ Comparison June 2026
ICL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICL stands at 7.6B. In comparison, AGRZ has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ICL is priced at $5.89, while AGRZ trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICL currently has a P/E ratio of 28.00, whereas AGRZ's P/E ratio is 3.33. In terms of profitability, ICL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AGRZ's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ICL is less volatile compared to AGRZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICL.Check AGRZ's competition here
ICL vs SVFD Comparison June 2026
ICL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICL stands at 7.6B. In comparison, SVFD has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ICL is priced at $5.89, while SVFD trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICL currently has a P/E ratio of 28.00, whereas SVFD's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, ICL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SVFD's ROE of -367.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ICL is less volatile compared to SVFD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICL.Check SVFD's competition here
ICL vs FMTO Comparison June 2026
ICL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICL stands at 7.6B. In comparison, FMTO has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ICL is priced at $5.89, while FMTO trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICL currently has a P/E ratio of 28.00, whereas FMTO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ICL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FMTO's ROE of +75.78%. Regarding short-term risk, ICL is less volatile compared to FMTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICL.Check FMTO's competition here
ICL vs RKDA Comparison June 2026
ICL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICL stands at 7.6B. In comparison, RKDA has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ICL is priced at $5.89, while RKDA trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICL currently has a P/E ratio of 28.00, whereas RKDA's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, ICL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RKDA's ROE of -2.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ICL is less volatile compared to RKDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICL.Check RKDA's competition here
ICL vs BHIL Comparison June 2026
ICL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICL stands at 7.6B. In comparison, BHIL has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ICL is priced at $5.89, while BHIL trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICL currently has a P/E ratio of 28.00, whereas BHIL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ICL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BHIL's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, ICL is more volatile compared to BHIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICL.Check BHIL's competition here
ICL vs YTEN Comparison June 2026
ICL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICL stands at 7.6B. In comparison, YTEN has a market cap of 345.5K. Regarding current trading prices, ICL is priced at $5.89, while YTEN trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICL currently has a P/E ratio of 28.00, whereas YTEN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ICL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to YTEN's ROE of -15.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ICL is less volatile compared to YTEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICL.Check YTEN's competition here
ICL vs MBII Comparison June 2026
ICL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICL stands at 7.6B. In comparison, MBII has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ICL is priced at $5.89, while MBII trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICL currently has a P/E ratio of 28.00, whereas MBII's P/E ratio is -6.82. In terms of profitability, ICL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MBII's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, ICL is less volatile compared to MBII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICL.Check MBII's competition here
ICL vs TNH Comparison June 2026
ICL plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ICL stands at 7.6B. In comparison, TNH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ICL is priced at $5.89, while TNH trades at $83.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ICL currently has a P/E ratio of 28.00, whereas TNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ICL's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TNH's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ICL is more volatile compared to TNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ICL.Check TNH's competition here