Wells Fargo & Company (WFC-PY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (WFC-PY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WFC-PY | $23.36 | -0.76% | 190.6B | 4.83 | $4.83 | +2.29% |
| JPM | $300.85 | -0.04% | 806.4B | 14.41 | $20.89 | +1.96% |
| JPM-PC | $25.23 | +0.00% | 796.4B | 1.87 | $13.48 | +1.96% |
| JPM-PD | $23.85 | -0.62% | 767.7B | 1.77 | $13.48 | +1.96% |
| BAC-PL | $1,201.10 | -0.32% | 445.7B | 342.06 | $3.51 | +2.10% |
| BAC | $52.40 | -0.15% | 372.1B | 13.01 | $4.03 | +2.10% |
| BAC-PB | $24.86 | -0.40% | 347.3B | 7.07 | $3.51 | +2.10% |
| BAC-PK | $24.44 | -0.10% | 345.9B | 6.96 | $3.51 | +2.10% |
| BML-PL | $19.58 | +0.00% | 331.8B | 5.57 | $3.51 | +2.10% |
| BML-PH | $19.35 | -0.57% | 325.5B | 5.51 | $3.51 | +2.10% |
Stock Comparison
WFC-PY vs JPM Comparison June 2026
WFC-PY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PY stands at 190.6B. In comparison, JPM has a market cap of 806.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PY is priced at $23.36, while JPM trades at $300.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.83, whereas JPM's P/E ratio is 14.41. In terms of profitability, WFC-PY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JPM's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PY is less volatile compared to JPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PY.Check JPM's competition here
WFC-PY vs JPM-PC Comparison June 2026
WFC-PY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PY stands at 190.6B. In comparison, JPM-PC has a market cap of 796.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PY is priced at $23.36, while JPM-PC trades at $25.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.83, whereas JPM-PC's P/E ratio is 1.87. In terms of profitability, WFC-PY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JPM-PC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PY is more volatile compared to JPM-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PY.Check JPM-PC's competition here
WFC-PY vs JPM-PD Comparison June 2026
WFC-PY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PY stands at 190.6B. In comparison, JPM-PD has a market cap of 767.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PY is priced at $23.36, while JPM-PD trades at $23.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.83, whereas JPM-PD's P/E ratio is 1.77. In terms of profitability, WFC-PY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JPM-PD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PY is less volatile compared to JPM-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PY.Check JPM-PD's competition here
WFC-PY vs BAC-PL Comparison June 2026
WFC-PY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PY stands at 190.6B. In comparison, BAC-PL has a market cap of 445.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PY is priced at $23.36, while BAC-PL trades at $1,201.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.83, whereas BAC-PL's P/E ratio is 342.06. In terms of profitability, WFC-PY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAC-PL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PY is more volatile compared to BAC-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PY.Check BAC-PL's competition here
WFC-PY vs BAC Comparison June 2026
WFC-PY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PY stands at 190.6B. In comparison, BAC has a market cap of 372.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PY is priced at $23.36, while BAC trades at $52.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.83, whereas BAC's P/E ratio is 13.01. In terms of profitability, WFC-PY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PY is less volatile compared to BAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PY.Check BAC's competition here
WFC-PY vs BAC-PB Comparison June 2026
WFC-PY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PY stands at 190.6B. In comparison, BAC-PB has a market cap of 347.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PY is priced at $23.36, while BAC-PB trades at $24.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.83, whereas BAC-PB's P/E ratio is 7.07. In terms of profitability, WFC-PY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAC-PB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PY is more volatile compared to BAC-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PY.Check BAC-PB's competition here
WFC-PY vs BAC-PK Comparison June 2026
WFC-PY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PY stands at 190.6B. In comparison, BAC-PK has a market cap of 345.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PY is priced at $23.36, while BAC-PK trades at $24.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.83, whereas BAC-PK's P/E ratio is 6.96. In terms of profitability, WFC-PY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAC-PK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PY is more volatile compared to BAC-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PY.Check BAC-PK's competition here
WFC-PY vs BML-PL Comparison June 2026
WFC-PY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PY stands at 190.6B. In comparison, BML-PL has a market cap of 331.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PY is priced at $23.36, while BML-PL trades at $19.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.83, whereas BML-PL's P/E ratio is 5.57. In terms of profitability, WFC-PY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BML-PL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PY is more volatile compared to BML-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PY.Check BML-PL's competition here
WFC-PY vs BML-PH Comparison June 2026
WFC-PY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PY stands at 190.6B. In comparison, BML-PH has a market cap of 325.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PY is priced at $23.36, while BML-PH trades at $19.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.83, whereas BML-PH's P/E ratio is 5.51. In terms of profitability, WFC-PY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BML-PH's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PY is less volatile compared to BML-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PY.Check BML-PH's competition here
WFC-PY vs BML-PJ Comparison June 2026
WFC-PY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PY stands at 190.6B. In comparison, BML-PJ has a market cap of 324.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PY is priced at $23.36, while BML-PJ trades at $19.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.83, whereas BML-PJ's P/E ratio is 5.68. In terms of profitability, WFC-PY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BML-PJ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PY is more volatile compared to BML-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PY.Check BML-PJ's competition here
WFC-PY vs HSBC Comparison June 2026
WFC-PY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PY stands at 190.6B. In comparison, HSBC has a market cap of 321.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PY is priced at $23.36, while HSBC trades at $93.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.83, whereas HSBC's P/E ratio is 15.48. In terms of profitability, WFC-PY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HSBC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PY is less volatile compared to HSBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PY.Check HSBC's competition here
WFC-PY vs BML-PG Comparison June 2026
WFC-PY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PY stands at 190.6B. In comparison, BML-PG has a market cap of 321.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PY is priced at $23.36, while BML-PG trades at $19.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.83, whereas BML-PG's P/E ratio is 5.47. In terms of profitability, WFC-PY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BML-PG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PY is less volatile compared to BML-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PY.Check BML-PG's competition here
WFC-PY vs BAC-PE Comparison June 2026
WFC-PY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PY stands at 190.6B. In comparison, BAC-PE has a market cap of 311.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PY is priced at $23.36, while BAC-PE trades at $18.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.83, whereas BAC-PE's P/E ratio is 5.36. In terms of profitability, WFC-PY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAC-PE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PY is less volatile compared to BAC-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PY.Check BAC-PE's competition here
WFC-PY vs RY Comparison June 2026
WFC-PY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PY stands at 190.6B. In comparison, RY has a market cap of 266.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PY is priced at $23.36, while RY trades at $191.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.83, whereas RY's P/E ratio is 17.16. In terms of profitability, WFC-PY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PY is less volatile compared to RY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PY.Check RY's competition here
WFC-PY vs WFC Comparison June 2026
WFC-PY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PY stands at 190.6B. In comparison, WFC has a market cap of 240.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PY is priced at $23.36, while WFC trades at $78.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.83, whereas WFC's P/E ratio is 12.16. In terms of profitability, WFC-PY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WFC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PY is less volatile compared to WFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PY.Check WFC's competition here
WFC-PY vs WFC-PL Comparison June 2026
WFC-PY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PY stands at 190.6B. In comparison, WFC-PL has a market cap of 236.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PY is priced at $23.36, while WFC-PL trades at $1,157.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.83, whereas WFC-PL's P/E ratio is 239.45. In terms of profitability, WFC-PY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WFC-PL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PY is more volatile compared to WFC-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PY.Check WFC-PL's competition here
WFC-PY vs C Comparison June 2026
WFC-PY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PY stands at 190.6B. In comparison, C has a market cap of 221.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PY is priced at $23.36, while C trades at $129.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.83, whereas C's P/E ratio is 16.06. In terms of profitability, WFC-PY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to C's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PY is less volatile compared to C. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PY.Check C's competition here
WFC-PY vs MUFG Comparison June 2026
WFC-PY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PY stands at 190.6B. In comparison, MUFG has a market cap of 219.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PY is priced at $23.36, while MUFG trades at $19.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.83, whereas MUFG's P/E ratio is 14.62. In terms of profitability, WFC-PY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MUFG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PY is less volatile compared to MUFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PY.Check MUFG's competition here
WFC-PY vs WFC-PQ Comparison June 2026
WFC-PY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PY stands at 190.6B. In comparison, WFC-PQ has a market cap of 200.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PY is priced at $23.36, while WFC-PQ trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.83, whereas WFC-PQ's P/E ratio is 5.17. In terms of profitability, WFC-PY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WFC-PQ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PY is more volatile compared to WFC-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PY.Check WFC-PQ's competition here
WFC-PY vs TD Comparison June 2026
WFC-PY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PY stands at 190.6B. In comparison, TD has a market cap of 189.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PY is priced at $23.36, while TD trades at $112.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.83, whereas TD's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, WFC-PY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PY is less volatile compared to TD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PY.Check TD's competition here
WFC-PY vs WFC-PR Comparison June 2026
WFC-PY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PY stands at 190.6B. In comparison, WFC-PR has a market cap of 184.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PY is priced at $23.36, while WFC-PR trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.83, whereas WFC-PR's P/E ratio is 5.17. In terms of profitability, WFC-PY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WFC-PR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PY is more volatile compared to WFC-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PY.Check WFC-PR's competition here
WFC-PY vs SAN Comparison June 2026
WFC-PY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PY stands at 190.6B. In comparison, SAN has a market cap of 178.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PY is priced at $23.36, while SAN trades at $12.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.83, whereas SAN's P/E ratio is 11.81. In terms of profitability, WFC-PY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SAN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PY is less volatile compared to SAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PY.Check SAN's competition here
WFC-PY vs UBS Comparison June 2026
WFC-PY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PY stands at 190.6B. In comparison, UBS has a market cap of 155.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PY is priced at $23.36, while UBS trades at $47.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.83, whereas UBS's P/E ratio is 16.96. In terms of profitability, WFC-PY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UBS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PY is less volatile compared to UBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PY.Check UBS's competition here
WFC-PY vs BAC-PM Comparison June 2026
WFC-PY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PY stands at 190.6B. In comparison, BAC-PM has a market cap of 151.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PY is priced at $23.36, while BAC-PM trades at $21.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.83, whereas BAC-PM's P/E ratio is 6.07. In terms of profitability, WFC-PY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAC-PM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PY is more volatile compared to BAC-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PY.Check BAC-PM's competition here
WFC-PY vs BAC-PN Comparison June 2026
WFC-PY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PY stands at 190.6B. In comparison, BAC-PN has a market cap of 139.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PY is priced at $23.36, while BAC-PN trades at $19.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.83, whereas BAC-PN's P/E ratio is 5.60. In terms of profitability, WFC-PY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAC-PN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PY is more volatile compared to BAC-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PY.Check BAC-PN's competition here
WFC-PY vs BAC-PS Comparison June 2026
WFC-PY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PY stands at 190.6B. In comparison, BAC-PS has a market cap of 133.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PY is priced at $23.36, while BAC-PS trades at $18.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.83, whereas BAC-PS's P/E ratio is 5.37. In terms of profitability, WFC-PY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAC-PS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PY is more volatile compared to BAC-PS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PY.Check BAC-PS's competition here
WFC-PY vs BBVA Comparison June 2026
WFC-PY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PY stands at 190.6B. In comparison, BBVA has a market cap of 126.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PY is priced at $23.36, while BBVA trades at $22.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.83, whereas BBVA's P/E ratio is 10.67. In terms of profitability, WFC-PY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BBVA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PY is less volatile compared to BBVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PY.Check BBVA's competition here
WFC-PY vs BAC-PO Comparison June 2026
WFC-PY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PY stands at 190.6B. In comparison, BAC-PO has a market cap of 123.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PY is priced at $23.36, while BAC-PO trades at $17.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.83, whereas BAC-PO's P/E ratio is 4.94. In terms of profitability, WFC-PY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAC-PO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PY is more volatile compared to BAC-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PY.Check BAC-PO's competition here
WFC-PY vs C-PJ Comparison June 2026
WFC-PY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PY stands at 190.6B. In comparison, C-PJ has a market cap of 122.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PY is priced at $23.36, while C-PJ trades at $25.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.83, whereas C-PJ's P/E ratio is 2.95. In terms of profitability, WFC-PY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to C-PJ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PY is more volatile compared to C-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PY.Check C-PJ's competition here
WFC-PY vs BAC-PQ Comparison June 2026
WFC-PY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PY stands at 190.6B. In comparison, BAC-PQ has a market cap of 118.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PY is priced at $23.36, while BAC-PQ trades at $16.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.83, whereas BAC-PQ's P/E ratio is 4.76. In terms of profitability, WFC-PY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAC-PQ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PY is more volatile compared to BAC-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PY.Check BAC-PQ's competition here
WFC-PY vs BAC-PP Comparison June 2026
WFC-PY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PY stands at 190.6B. In comparison, BAC-PP has a market cap of 117.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PY is priced at $23.36, while BAC-PP trades at $16.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.83, whereas BAC-PP's P/E ratio is 4.71. In terms of profitability, WFC-PY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAC-PP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PY is more volatile compared to BAC-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PY.Check BAC-PP's competition here
WFC-PY vs WFC-PC Comparison June 2026
WFC-PY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PY stands at 190.6B. In comparison, WFC-PC has a market cap of 115.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PY is priced at $23.36, while WFC-PC trades at $17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.83, whereas WFC-PC's P/E ratio is 58.97. In terms of profitability, WFC-PY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WFC-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PY is less volatile compared to WFC-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PY.Check WFC-PC's competition here
WFC-PY vs BMO Comparison June 2026
WFC-PY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PY stands at 190.6B. In comparison, BMO has a market cap of 114.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PY is priced at $23.36, while BMO trades at $162.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.83, whereas BMO's P/E ratio is 17.27. In terms of profitability, WFC-PY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BMO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PY is less volatile compared to BMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PY.Check BMO's competition here
WFC-PY vs CM Comparison June 2026
WFC-PY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PY stands at 190.6B. In comparison, CM has a market cap of 99.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PY is priced at $23.36, while CM trades at $107.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.83, whereas CM's P/E ratio is 14.71. In terms of profitability, WFC-PY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PY is less volatile compared to CM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PY.Check CM's competition here
WFC-PY vs BNS Comparison June 2026
WFC-PY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PY stands at 190.6B. In comparison, BNS has a market cap of 98.9B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PY is priced at $23.36, while BNS trades at $80.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.83, whereas BNS's P/E ratio is 15.31. In terms of profitability, WFC-PY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BNS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PY is less volatile compared to BNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PY.Check BNS's competition here
WFC-PY vs RY-PT Comparison June 2026
WFC-PY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PY stands at 190.6B. In comparison, RY-PT has a market cap of 98.8B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PY is priced at $23.36, while RY-PT trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.83, whereas RY-PT's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, WFC-PY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RY-PT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PY is more volatile compared to RY-PT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PY.Check RY-PT's competition here
WFC-PY vs SMFG Comparison June 2026
WFC-PY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PY stands at 190.6B. In comparison, SMFG has a market cap of 87.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PY is priced at $23.36, while SMFG trades at $22.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.83, whereas SMFG's P/E ratio is 14.82. In terms of profitability, WFC-PY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SMFG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PY is less volatile compared to SMFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PY.Check SMFG's competition here
WFC-PY vs ING Comparison June 2026
WFC-PY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PY stands at 190.6B. In comparison, ING has a market cap of 87.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PY is priced at $23.36, while ING trades at $30.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.83, whereas ING's P/E ratio is 11.94. In terms of profitability, WFC-PY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ING's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PY is less volatile compared to ING. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PY.Check ING's competition here
WFC-PY vs BCS Comparison June 2026
WFC-PY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PY stands at 190.6B. In comparison, BCS has a market cap of 84.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PY is priced at $23.36, while BCS trades at $24.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.83, whereas BCS's P/E ratio is 10.60. In terms of profitability, WFC-PY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BCS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PY is less volatile compared to BCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PY.Check BCS's competition here
WFC-PY vs USB Comparison June 2026
WFC-PY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PY stands at 190.6B. In comparison, USB has a market cap of 82.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PY is priced at $23.36, while USB trades at $53.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.83, whereas USB's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, WFC-PY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PY is less volatile compared to USB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PY.Check USB's competition here
WFC-PY vs USB-PP Comparison June 2026
WFC-PY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PY stands at 190.6B. In comparison, USB-PP has a market cap of 68.4B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PY is priced at $23.36, while USB-PP trades at $21.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.83, whereas USB-PP's P/E ratio is 4.70. In terms of profitability, WFC-PY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB-PP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PY is less volatile compared to USB-PP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PY.Check USB-PP's competition here
WFC-PY vs USB-PH Comparison June 2026
WFC-PY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PY stands at 190.6B. In comparison, USB-PH has a market cap of 67.7B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PY is priced at $23.36, while USB-PH trades at $18.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.83, whereas USB-PH's P/E ratio is 4.08. In terms of profitability, WFC-PY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB-PH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PY is less volatile compared to USB-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PY.Check USB-PH's competition here
WFC-PY vs WFC-PZ Comparison June 2026
WFC-PY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PY stands at 190.6B. In comparison, WFC-PZ has a market cap of 58.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PY is priced at $23.36, while WFC-PZ trades at $18.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.83, whereas WFC-PZ's P/E ratio is 3.82. In terms of profitability, WFC-PY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WFC-PZ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PY is more volatile compared to WFC-PZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PY.Check WFC-PZ's competition here
WFC-PY vs WFC-PA Comparison June 2026
WFC-PY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PY stands at 190.6B. In comparison, WFC-PA has a market cap of 57.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PY is priced at $23.36, while WFC-PA trades at $18.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.83, whereas WFC-PA's P/E ratio is 3.78. In terms of profitability, WFC-PY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WFC-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PY is more volatile compared to WFC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PY.Check WFC-PA's competition here
WFC-PY vs NU Comparison June 2026
WFC-PY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PY stands at 190.6B. In comparison, NU has a market cap of 56.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PY is priced at $23.36, while NU trades at $11.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.83, whereas NU's P/E ratio is 17.89. In terms of profitability, WFC-PY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NU's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PY is less volatile compared to NU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PY.Check NU's competition here
WFC-PY vs WFC-PD Comparison June 2026
WFC-PY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PY stands at 190.6B. In comparison, WFC-PD has a market cap of 52.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PY is priced at $23.36, while WFC-PD trades at $16.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.83, whereas WFC-PD's P/E ratio is 3.43. In terms of profitability, WFC-PY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WFC-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PY is less volatile compared to WFC-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PY.Check WFC-PD's competition here
WFC-PY vs JPM-PJ Comparison June 2026
WFC-PY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PY stands at 190.6B. In comparison, JPM-PJ has a market cap of 51.3B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PY is priced at $23.36, while JPM-PJ trades at $19.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.83, whereas JPM-PJ's P/E ratio is 1.42. In terms of profitability, WFC-PY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JPM-PJ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PY is more volatile compared to JPM-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PY.Check JPM-PJ's competition here
WFC-PY vs JPM-PL Comparison June 2026
WFC-PY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PY stands at 190.6B. In comparison, JPM-PL has a market cap of 50.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PY is priced at $23.36, while JPM-PL trades at $18.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.83, whereas JPM-PL's P/E ratio is 1.39. In terms of profitability, WFC-PY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JPM-PL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PY is more volatile compared to JPM-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PY.Check JPM-PL's competition here
WFC-PY vs JPM-PK Comparison June 2026
WFC-PY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PY stands at 190.6B. In comparison, JPM-PK has a market cap of 49.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PY is priced at $23.36, while JPM-PK trades at $18.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.83, whereas JPM-PK's P/E ratio is 1.36. In terms of profitability, WFC-PY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JPM-PK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PY is more volatile compared to JPM-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PY.Check JPM-PK's competition here
WFC-PY vs C-PK Comparison June 2026
WFC-PY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PY stands at 190.6B. In comparison, C-PK has a market cap of 48.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PY is priced at $23.36, while C-PK trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.83, whereas C-PK's P/E ratio is 2.94. In terms of profitability, WFC-PY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to C-PK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PY is more volatile compared to C-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PY.Check C-PK's competition here
WFC-PY vs JPM-PM Comparison June 2026
WFC-PY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PY stands at 190.6B. In comparison, JPM-PM has a market cap of 46.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PY is priced at $23.36, while JPM-PM trades at $17.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.83, whereas JPM-PM's P/E ratio is 1.28. In terms of profitability, WFC-PY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JPM-PM's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PY is less volatile compared to JPM-PM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PY.Check JPM-PM's competition here
WFC-PY vs NWG Comparison June 2026
WFC-PY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PY stands at 190.6B. In comparison, NWG has a market cap of 31.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PY is priced at $23.36, while NWG trades at $15.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.83, whereas NWG's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, WFC-PY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NWG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PY is less volatile compared to NWG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PY.Check NWG's competition here
WFC-PY vs NTRS Comparison June 2026
WFC-PY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PY stands at 190.6B. In comparison, NTRS has a market cap of 31.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PY is priced at $23.36, while NTRS trades at $168.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.83, whereas NTRS's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, WFC-PY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NTRS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PY is less volatile compared to NTRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PY.Check NTRS's competition here
WFC-PY vs BAP Comparison June 2026
WFC-PY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PY stands at 190.6B. In comparison, BAP has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PY is priced at $23.36, while BAP trades at $327.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.83, whereas BAP's P/E ratio is 12.57. In terms of profitability, WFC-PY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAP's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PY is less volatile compared to BAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PY.Check BAP's competition here
WFC-PY vs USB-PR Comparison June 2026
WFC-PY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PY stands at 190.6B. In comparison, USB-PR has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PY is priced at $23.36, while USB-PR trades at $15.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.83, whereas USB-PR's P/E ratio is 3.33. In terms of profitability, WFC-PY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB-PR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PY is less volatile compared to USB-PR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PY.Check USB-PR's competition here
WFC-PY vs USB-PQ Comparison June 2026
WFC-PY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PY stands at 190.6B. In comparison, USB-PQ has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PY is priced at $23.36, while USB-PQ trades at $14.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.83, whereas USB-PQ's P/E ratio is 3.18. In terms of profitability, WFC-PY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB-PQ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PY is less volatile compared to USB-PQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PY.Check USB-PQ's competition here
WFC-PY vs EWBC Comparison June 2026
WFC-PY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PY stands at 190.6B. In comparison, EWBC has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PY is priced at $23.36, while EWBC trades at $121.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.83, whereas EWBC's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, WFC-PY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EWBC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PY is less volatile compared to EWBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PY.Check EWBC's competition here
WFC-PY vs NTRSO Comparison June 2026
WFC-PY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PY stands at 190.6B. In comparison, NTRSO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PY is priced at $23.36, while NTRSO trades at $18.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.83, whereas NTRSO's P/E ratio is 2.60. In terms of profitability, WFC-PY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NTRSO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PY is less volatile compared to NTRSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PY.Check NTRSO's competition here
WFC-PY vs CS Comparison June 2026
WFC-PY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PY stands at 190.6B. In comparison, CS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PY is priced at $23.36, while CS trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.83, whereas CS's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, WFC-PY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CS's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PY is less volatile compared to CS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PY.Check CS's competition here
WFC-PY vs NTB Comparison June 2026
WFC-PY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PY stands at 190.6B. In comparison, NTB has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PY is priced at $23.36, while NTB trades at $55.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.83, whereas NTB's P/E ratio is 9.65. In terms of profitability, WFC-PY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NTB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PY is less volatile compared to NTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PY.Check NTB's competition here
WFC-PY vs TANNL Comparison June 2026
WFC-PY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PY stands at 190.6B. In comparison, TANNL has a market cap of 989.3M. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PY is priced at $23.36, while TANNL trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.83, whereas TANNL's P/E ratio is 34.88. In terms of profitability, WFC-PY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TANNL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PY is more volatile compared to TANNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PY.Check TANNL's competition here
WFC-PY vs FRC-PL Comparison June 2026
WFC-PY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PY stands at 190.6B. In comparison, FRC-PL has a market cap of 312.2M. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PY is priced at $23.36, while FRC-PL trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.83, whereas FRC-PL's P/E ratio is 0.22. In terms of profitability, WFC-PY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FRC-PL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PY is less volatile compared to FRC-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PY.Check FRC-PL's competition here
WFC-PY vs WBK Comparison June 2026
WFC-PY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, WFC-PY stands at 190.6B. In comparison, WBK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, WFC-PY is priced at $23.36, while WBK trades at $14.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
WFC-PY currently has a P/E ratio of 4.83, whereas WBK's P/E ratio is 14.31. In terms of profitability, WFC-PY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WBK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, WFC-PY is less volatile compared to WBK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for WFC-PY.Check WBK's competition here