U.S. Bancorp (USB) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (USB) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| USB | $55.46 | +4.37% | 86.1B | 11.63 | $4.77 | +3.72% |
| JPM | $310.89 | +3.34% | 833.2B | 14.89 | $20.89 | +1.90% |
| JPM-PC | $25.28 | +0.20% | 798.6B | 1.88 | $13.48 | +1.90% |
| JPM-PD | $23.93 | +0.34% | 768.6B | 1.77 | $13.48 | +1.90% |
| BAC-PL | $1,222.00 | +1.74% | 451.6B | 346.61 | $3.51 | +2.04% |
| BAC | $54.17 | +3.38% | 384B | 13.43 | $4.03 | +2.04% |
| BAC-PB | $24.90 | +0.16% | 348.2B | 7.09 | $3.51 | +2.04% |
| BAC-PK | $24.38 | -0.25% | 345.1B | 6.94 | $3.51 | +2.04% |
| BML-PL | $19.45 | -0.68% | 329.6B | 5.54 | $3.51 | +2.04% |
| BML-PH | $19.39 | +0.21% | 327.4B | 5.54 | $3.51 | +2.04% |
Stock Comparison
USB vs JPM Comparison June 2026
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 86.1B. In comparison, JPM has a market cap of 833.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.46, while JPM trades at $310.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas JPM's P/E ratio is 14.89. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JPM's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to JPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check JPM's competition here
USB vs JPM-PC Comparison June 2026
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 86.1B. In comparison, JPM-PC has a market cap of 798.6B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.46, while JPM-PC trades at $25.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas JPM-PC's P/E ratio is 1.88. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JPM-PC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to JPM-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check JPM-PC's competition here
USB vs JPM-PD Comparison June 2026
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 86.1B. In comparison, JPM-PD has a market cap of 768.6B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.46, while JPM-PD trades at $23.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas JPM-PD's P/E ratio is 1.77. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JPM-PD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to JPM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check JPM-PD's competition here
USB vs BAC-PL Comparison June 2026
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 86.1B. In comparison, BAC-PL has a market cap of 451.6B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.46, while BAC-PL trades at $1,222.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas BAC-PL's P/E ratio is 346.61. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAC-PL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to BAC-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check BAC-PL's competition here
USB vs BAC Comparison June 2026
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 86.1B. In comparison, BAC has a market cap of 384B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.46, while BAC trades at $54.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas BAC's P/E ratio is 13.43. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to BAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check BAC's competition here
USB vs BAC-PB Comparison June 2026
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 86.1B. In comparison, BAC-PB has a market cap of 348.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.46, while BAC-PB trades at $24.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas BAC-PB's P/E ratio is 7.09. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAC-PB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to BAC-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check BAC-PB's competition here
USB vs BAC-PK Comparison June 2026
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 86.1B. In comparison, BAC-PK has a market cap of 345.1B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.46, while BAC-PK trades at $24.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas BAC-PK's P/E ratio is 6.94. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAC-PK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to BAC-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check BAC-PK's competition here
USB vs BML-PL Comparison June 2026
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 86.1B. In comparison, BML-PL has a market cap of 329.6B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.46, while BML-PL trades at $19.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas BML-PL's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BML-PL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to BML-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check BML-PL's competition here
USB vs BML-PH Comparison June 2026
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 86.1B. In comparison, BML-PH has a market cap of 327.4B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.46, while BML-PH trades at $19.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas BML-PH's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BML-PH's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to BML-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check BML-PH's competition here
USB vs BML-PJ Comparison June 2026
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 86.1B. In comparison, BML-PJ has a market cap of 325.3B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.46, while BML-PJ trades at $19.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas BML-PJ's P/E ratio is 5.69. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BML-PJ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to BML-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check BML-PJ's competition here
USB vs BML-PG Comparison June 2026
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 86.1B. In comparison, BML-PG has a market cap of 322.1B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.46, while BML-PG trades at $19.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas BML-PG's P/E ratio is 5.48. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BML-PG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to BML-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check BML-PG's competition here
USB vs HSBC Comparison June 2026
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 86.1B. In comparison, HSBC has a market cap of 318.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.46, while HSBC trades at $92.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas HSBC's P/E ratio is 15.31. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HSBC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to HSBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check HSBC's competition here
USB vs BAC-PE Comparison June 2026
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 86.1B. In comparison, BAC-PE has a market cap of 312.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.46, while BAC-PE trades at $18.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas BAC-PE's P/E ratio is 5.38. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAC-PE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to BAC-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check BAC-PE's competition here
USB vs RY Comparison June 2026
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 86.1B. In comparison, RY has a market cap of 272.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.46, while RY trades at $194.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas RY's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to RY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check RY's competition here
USB vs WFC Comparison June 2026
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 86.1B. In comparison, WFC has a market cap of 249.7B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.46, while WFC trades at $81.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas WFC's P/E ratio is 12.61. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WFC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to WFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check WFC's competition here
USB vs WFC-PL Comparison June 2026
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 86.1B. In comparison, WFC-PL has a market cap of 238.5B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.46, while WFC-PL trades at $1,167.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas WFC-PL's P/E ratio is 241.63. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WFC-PL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to WFC-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check WFC-PL's competition here
USB vs C Comparison June 2026
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 86.1B. In comparison, C has a market cap of 230.5B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.46, while C trades at $135.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas C's P/E ratio is 16.70. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to C's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to C. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check C's competition here
USB vs MUFG Comparison June 2026
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 86.1B. In comparison, MUFG has a market cap of 226.4B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.46, while MUFG trades at $20.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas MUFG's P/E ratio is 15.08. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MUFG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to MUFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check MUFG's competition here
USB vs WFC-PQ Comparison June 2026
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 86.1B. In comparison, WFC-PQ has a market cap of 200.9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.46, while WFC-PQ trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas WFC-PQ's P/E ratio is 5.17. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WFC-PQ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to WFC-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check WFC-PQ's competition here
USB vs TD Comparison June 2026
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 86.1B. In comparison, TD has a market cap of 192.1B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.46, while TD trades at $113.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas TD's P/E ratio is 18.43. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to TD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check TD's competition here
USB vs WFC-PY Comparison June 2026
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 86.1B. In comparison, WFC-PY has a market cap of 191B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.46, while WFC-PY trades at $23.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas WFC-PY's P/E ratio is 4.84. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WFC-PY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to WFC-PY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check WFC-PY's competition here
USB vs WFC-PR Comparison June 2026
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 86.1B. In comparison, WFC-PR has a market cap of 184.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.46, while WFC-PR trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas WFC-PR's P/E ratio is 5.17. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WFC-PR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to WFC-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check WFC-PR's competition here
USB vs SAN Comparison June 2026
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 86.1B. In comparison, SAN has a market cap of 183B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.46, while SAN trades at $12.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas SAN's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SAN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to SAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check SAN's competition here
USB vs UBS Comparison June 2026
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 86.1B. In comparison, UBS has a market cap of 156.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.46, while UBS trades at $47.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas UBS's P/E ratio is 17.08. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UBS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to UBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check UBS's competition here
USB vs BAC-PM Comparison June 2026
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 86.1B. In comparison, BAC-PM has a market cap of 151.3B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.46, while BAC-PM trades at $21.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas BAC-PM's P/E ratio is 6.07. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAC-PM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to BAC-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check BAC-PM's competition here
USB vs BAC-PN Comparison June 2026
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 86.1B. In comparison, BAC-PN has a market cap of 140.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.46, while BAC-PN trades at $19.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas BAC-PN's P/E ratio is 5.62. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAC-PN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to BAC-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check BAC-PN's competition here
USB vs BAC-PS Comparison June 2026
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 86.1B. In comparison, BAC-PS has a market cap of 134B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.46, while BAC-PS trades at $18.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas BAC-PS's P/E ratio is 5.37. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAC-PS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to BAC-PS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check BAC-PS's competition here
USB vs BBVA Comparison June 2026
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 86.1B. In comparison, BBVA has a market cap of 127.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.46, while BBVA trades at $22.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas BBVA's P/E ratio is 10.76. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BBVA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to BBVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check BBVA's competition here
USB vs BAC-PO Comparison June 2026
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 86.1B. In comparison, BAC-PO has a market cap of 123.5B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.46, while BAC-PO trades at $17.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas BAC-PO's P/E ratio is 4.95. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAC-PO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to BAC-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check BAC-PO's competition here
USB vs C-PJ Comparison June 2026
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 86.1B. In comparison, C-PJ has a market cap of 122.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.46, while C-PJ trades at $25.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas C-PJ's P/E ratio is 2.95. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to C-PJ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to C-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check C-PJ's competition here
USB vs BAC-PQ Comparison June 2026
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 86.1B. In comparison, BAC-PQ has a market cap of 119.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.46, while BAC-PQ trades at $16.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas BAC-PQ's P/E ratio is 4.78. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAC-PQ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to BAC-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check BAC-PQ's competition here
USB vs BAC-PP Comparison June 2026
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 86.1B. In comparison, BAC-PP has a market cap of 117.7B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.46, while BAC-PP trades at $16.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas BAC-PP's P/E ratio is 4.72. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAC-PP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to BAC-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check BAC-PP's competition here
USB vs WFC-PC Comparison June 2026
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 86.1B. In comparison, WFC-PC has a market cap of 116.3B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.46, while WFC-PC trades at $17.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas WFC-PC's P/E ratio is 61.32. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WFC-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to WFC-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check WFC-PC's competition here
USB vs BMO Comparison June 2026
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 86.1B. In comparison, BMO has a market cap of 115.7B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.46, while BMO trades at $165.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas BMO's P/E ratio is 17.56. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BMO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to BMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check BMO's competition here
USB vs CM Comparison June 2026
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 86.1B. In comparison, CM has a market cap of 101.1B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.46, while CM trades at $109.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas CM's P/E ratio is 14.95. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to CM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check CM's competition here
USB vs BNS Comparison June 2026
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 86.1B. In comparison, BNS has a market cap of 99.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.46, while BNS trades at $81.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas BNS's P/E ratio is 15.47. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BNS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to BNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check BNS's competition here
USB vs RY-PT Comparison June 2026
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 86.1B. In comparison, RY-PT has a market cap of 98.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.46, while RY-PT trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas RY-PT's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RY-PT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to RY-PT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check RY-PT's competition here
USB vs SMFG Comparison June 2026
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 86.1B. In comparison, SMFG has a market cap of 90B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.46, while SMFG trades at $23.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas SMFG's P/E ratio is 15.21. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SMFG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to SMFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check SMFG's competition here
USB vs ING Comparison June 2026
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 86.1B. In comparison, ING has a market cap of 88.1B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.46, while ING trades at $30.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas ING's P/E ratio is 12.01. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ING's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to ING. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check ING's competition here
USB vs BCS Comparison June 2026
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 86.1B. In comparison, BCS has a market cap of 85.8B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.46, while BCS trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas BCS's P/E ratio is 10.68. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BCS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to BCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check BCS's competition here
USB vs USB-PP Comparison June 2026
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 86.1B. In comparison, USB-PP has a market cap of 68.3B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.46, while USB-PP trades at $21.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas USB-PP's P/E ratio is 4.69. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB-PP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to USB-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check USB-PP's competition here
USB vs USB-PH Comparison June 2026
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 86.1B. In comparison, USB-PH has a market cap of 67.7B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.46, while USB-PH trades at $18.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas USB-PH's P/E ratio is 4.08. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB-PH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to USB-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check USB-PH's competition here
USB vs NU Comparison June 2026
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 86.1B. In comparison, NU has a market cap of 58.7B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.46, while NU trades at $12.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas NU's P/E ratio is 18.63. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NU's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to NU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check NU's competition here
USB vs WFC-PZ Comparison June 2026
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 86.1B. In comparison, WFC-PZ has a market cap of 58.5B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.46, while WFC-PZ trades at $18.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas WFC-PZ's P/E ratio is 3.84. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WFC-PZ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to WFC-PZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check WFC-PZ's competition here
USB vs WFC-PA Comparison June 2026
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 86.1B. In comparison, WFC-PA has a market cap of 58.1B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.46, while WFC-PA trades at $18.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas WFC-PA's P/E ratio is 3.82. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WFC-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to WFC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check WFC-PA's competition here
USB vs WFC-PD Comparison June 2026
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 86.1B. In comparison, WFC-PD has a market cap of 52.6B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.46, while WFC-PD trades at $16.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas WFC-PD's P/E ratio is 3.45. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WFC-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to WFC-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check WFC-PD's competition here
USB vs JPM-PJ Comparison June 2026
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 86.1B. In comparison, JPM-PJ has a market cap of 51.5B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.46, while JPM-PJ trades at $19.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas JPM-PJ's P/E ratio is 1.43. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JPM-PJ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to JPM-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check JPM-PJ's competition here
USB vs JPM-PL Comparison June 2026
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 86.1B. In comparison, JPM-PL has a market cap of 50.1B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.46, while JPM-PL trades at $18.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas JPM-PL's P/E ratio is 1.39. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JPM-PL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to JPM-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check JPM-PL's competition here
USB vs JPM-PK Comparison June 2026
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 86.1B. In comparison, JPM-PK has a market cap of 49.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.46, while JPM-PK trades at $18.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas JPM-PK's P/E ratio is 1.36. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JPM-PK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to JPM-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check JPM-PK's competition here
USB vs C-PK Comparison June 2026
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 86.1B. In comparison, C-PK has a market cap of 48.1B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.46, while C-PK trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas C-PK's P/E ratio is 2.94. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to C-PK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to C-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check C-PK's competition here
USB vs JPM-PM Comparison June 2026
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 86.1B. In comparison, JPM-PM has a market cap of 46B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.46, while JPM-PM trades at $17.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas JPM-PM's P/E ratio is 1.27. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JPM-PM's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to JPM-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check JPM-PM's competition here
USB vs NWG Comparison June 2026
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 86.1B. In comparison, NWG has a market cap of 32.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.46, while NWG trades at $16.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas NWG's P/E ratio is 8.61. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NWG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to NWG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check NWG's competition here
USB vs NTRS Comparison June 2026
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 86.1B. In comparison, NTRS has a market cap of 32B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.46, while NTRS trades at $173.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas NTRS's P/E ratio is 18.12. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NTRS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to NTRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check NTRS's competition here
USB vs BAP Comparison June 2026
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 86.1B. In comparison, BAP has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.46, while BAP trades at $326.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas BAP's P/E ratio is 12.49. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BAP's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to BAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check BAP's competition here
USB vs USB-PR Comparison June 2026
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 86.1B. In comparison, USB-PR has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.46, while USB-PR trades at $15.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas USB-PR's P/E ratio is 3.35. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB-PR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to USB-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check USB-PR's competition here
USB vs USB-PQ Comparison June 2026
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 86.1B. In comparison, USB-PQ has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.46, while USB-PQ trades at $14.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas USB-PQ's P/E ratio is 3.19. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USB-PQ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to USB-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check USB-PQ's competition here
USB vs EWBC Comparison June 2026
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 86.1B. In comparison, EWBC has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.46, while EWBC trades at $125.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas EWBC's P/E ratio is 12.51. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EWBC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to EWBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check EWBC's competition here
USB vs NTRSO Comparison June 2026
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 86.1B. In comparison, NTRSO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.46, while NTRSO trades at $18.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas NTRSO's P/E ratio is 2.60. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NTRSO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to NTRSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check NTRSO's competition here
USB vs CS Comparison June 2026
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 86.1B. In comparison, CS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.46, while CS trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas CS's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CS's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to CS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check CS's competition here
USB vs NTB Comparison June 2026
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 86.1B. In comparison, NTB has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.46, while NTB trades at $57.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas NTB's P/E ratio is 9.98. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NTB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to NTB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check NTB's competition here
USB vs TANNL Comparison June 2026
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 86.1B. In comparison, TANNL has a market cap of 989.3M. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.46, while TANNL trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas TANNL's P/E ratio is 34.88. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TANNL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to TANNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check TANNL's competition here
USB vs FRC-PL Comparison June 2026
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 86.1B. In comparison, FRC-PL has a market cap of 312.2M. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.46, while FRC-PL trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas FRC-PL's P/E ratio is 0.22. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FRC-PL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is less volatile compared to FRC-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check FRC-PL's competition here
USB vs WBK Comparison June 2026
USB plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, USB stands at 86.1B. In comparison, WBK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, USB is priced at $55.46, while WBK trades at $14.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
USB currently has a P/E ratio of 11.63, whereas WBK's P/E ratio is 14.31. In terms of profitability, USB's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WBK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, USB is more volatile compared to WBK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for USB.Check WBK's competition here