Viking Holdings Ltd (NYSE: VIK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Viking Holdings Ltd (NYSE: VIK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 35.7B. In comparison, BKNG has a market cap of 127B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $80.30 on the NYSE, while BKNG trades at $163.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.15, whereas BKNG's P/E ratio is 17.06. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.17%, compared to BKNG's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to BKNG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check BKNG's competition here

Viking Holdings Ltd (NYSE: VIK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 35.7B. In comparison, ABNB has a market cap of 93.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $80.30 on the NYSE, while ABNB trades at $157.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.15, whereas ABNB's P/E ratio is 35.79. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.17%, compared to ABNB's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to ABNB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check ABNB's competition here

Viking Holdings Ltd (NYSE: VIK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 35.7B. In comparison, RCL has a market cap of 65.1B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $80.30 on the NYSE, while RCL trades at $242.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.15, whereas RCL's P/E ratio is 14.69. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.17%, compared to RCL's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to RCL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check RCL's competition here

Viking Holdings Ltd (NYSE: VIK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 35.7B. In comparison, CCL has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $80.30 on the NYSE, while CCL trades at $22.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.15, whereas CCL's P/E ratio is 9.36. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.17%, compared to CCL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to CCL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check CCL's competition here

Viking Holdings Ltd (NYSE: VIK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 35.7B. In comparison, EXPE has a market cap of 30.2B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $80.30 on the NYSE, while EXPE trades at $264.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.15, whereas EXPE's P/E ratio is 13.85. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.17%, compared to EXPE's ROE of +1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to EXPE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check EXPE's competition here

Viking Holdings Ltd (NYSE: VIK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 35.7B. In comparison, TCOM has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $80.30 on the NYSE, while TCOM trades at $39.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.15, whereas TCOM's P/E ratio is 6.14. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.17%, compared to TCOM's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is more volatile compared to TCOM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check TCOM's competition here

Viking Holdings Ltd (NYSE: VIK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 35.7B. In comparison, SABRP has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $80.30 on the NYSE, while SABRP trades at $71.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.15, whereas SABRP's P/E ratio is -35.87. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.17%, compared to SABRP's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is more volatile compared to SABRP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check SABRP's competition here

Viking Holdings Ltd (NYSE: VIK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 35.7B. In comparison, NCLH has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $80.30 on the NYSE, while NCLH trades at $14.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.15, whereas NCLH's P/E ratio is 6.58. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.17%, compared to NCLH's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to NCLH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check NCLH's competition here

Viking Holdings Ltd (NYSE: VIK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 35.7B. In comparison, GBTG has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $80.30 on the NYSE, while GBTG trades at $9.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.15, whereas GBTG's P/E ratio is 63.33. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.17%, compared to GBTG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is more volatile compared to GBTG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check GBTG's competition here

Viking Holdings Ltd (NYSE: VIK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 35.7B. In comparison, MMYT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $80.30 on the NYSE, while MMYT trades at $46.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.15, whereas MMYT's P/E ratio is 130.15. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.17%, compared to MMYT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to MMYT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check MMYT's competition here

Viking Holdings Ltd (NYSE: VIK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 35.7B. In comparison, TNL has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $80.30 on the NYSE, while TNL trades at $63.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.15, whereas TNL's P/E ratio is 9.46. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.17%, compared to TNL's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is more volatile compared to TNL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check TNL's competition here

Viking Holdings Ltd (NYSE: VIK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 35.7B. In comparison, LIND has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $80.30 on the NYSE, while LIND trades at $28.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.15, whereas LIND's P/E ratio is -569.00. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.17%, compared to LIND's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to LIND. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check LIND's competition here

Viking Holdings Ltd (NYSE: VIK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 35.7B. In comparison, DESP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $80.30 on the NYSE, while DESP trades at $19.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.15, whereas DESP's P/E ratio is -650.00. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.17%, compared to DESP's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is more volatile compared to DESP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check DESP's competition here

Viking Holdings Ltd (NYSE: VIK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 35.7B. In comparison, PRSU has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $80.30 on the NYSE, while PRSU trades at $49.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.15, whereas PRSU's P/E ratio is 37.37. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.17%, compared to PRSU's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is more volatile compared to PRSU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check PRSU's competition here

Viking Holdings Ltd (NYSE: VIK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 35.7B. In comparison, TRIP has a market cap of 978.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $80.30 on the NYSE, while TRIP trades at $8.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.15, whereas TRIP's P/E ratio is 9.04. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.17%, compared to TRIP's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to TRIP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check TRIP's competition here

Viking Holdings Ltd (NYSE: VIK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 35.7B. In comparison, NUTR has a market cap of 628.3M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $80.30 on the NYSE, while NUTR trades at $41.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.15, whereas NUTR's P/E ratio is -836.00. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.17%, compared to NUTR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is more volatile compared to NUTR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check NUTR's competition here

Viking Holdings Ltd (NYSE: VIK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 35.7B. In comparison, YTRA has a market cap of 61.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $80.30 on the NYSE, while YTRA trades at $0.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.15, whereas YTRA's P/E ratio is -22.33. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.17%, compared to YTRA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is more volatile compared to YTRA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check YTRA's competition here

Viking Holdings Ltd (NYSE: VIK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 35.7B. In comparison, AHMA has a market cap of 40.7M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $80.30 on the NYSE, while AHMA trades at $1.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.15, whereas AHMA's P/E ratio is 34.25. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.17%, compared to AHMA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to AHMA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check AHMA's competition here

Viking Holdings Ltd (NYSE: VIK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 35.7B. In comparison, TOUR has a market cap of 18.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $80.30 on the NYSE, while TOUR trades at $5.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.15, whereas TOUR's P/E ratio is 11.65. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.17%, compared to TOUR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is more volatile compared to TOUR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check TOUR's competition here

Viking Holdings Ltd (NYSE: VIK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 35.7B. In comparison, NTRP has a market cap of 14.2M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $80.30 on the NYSE, while NTRP trades at $1.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.15, whereas NTRP's P/E ratio is -1.41. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.17%, compared to NTRP's ROE of -2.55%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to NTRP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check NTRP's competition here

Viking Holdings Ltd (NYSE: VIK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 35.7B. In comparison, MKGI has a market cap of 13.5M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $80.30 on the NYSE, while MKGI trades at $2.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.15, whereas MKGI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.17%, compared to MKGI's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to MKGI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check MKGI's competition here

Viking Holdings Ltd (NYSE: VIK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 35.7B. In comparison, JXG has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $80.30 on the NYSE, while JXG trades at $6.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.15, whereas JXG's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.17%, compared to JXG's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to JXG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check JXG's competition here

Viking Holdings Ltd (NYSE: VIK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 35.7B. In comparison, MONDW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $80.30 on the NYSE, while MONDW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.15, whereas MONDW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.17%, compared to MONDW's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to MONDW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check MONDW's competition here

Viking Holdings Ltd (NYSE: VIK) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, VIK stands at 35.7B. In comparison, SGLBW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, VIK is priced at $80.30 on the NYSE, while SGLBW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

VIK currently has a P/E ratio of 26.15, whereas SGLBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, VIK's ROE is +1.17%, compared to SGLBW's ROE of -2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, VIK is less volatile compared to SGLBW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for VIK.Check SGLBW's competition here