Ubiquiti Inc. (UI) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (UI) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Communication Equipment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UI | $565.36 | -1.87% | 35.2B | 37.40 | $15.54 | +0.55% |
| CSCO | $124.89 | -1.27% | 512.4B | 43.33 | $3.00 | +1.27% |
| NOK | $15.21 | -9.09% | 89.7B | 103.75 | $0.16 | +1.00% |
| CIEN | $507.30 | -18.23% | 75.7B | 345.33 | $1.55 | N/A |
| LITE | $923.34 | -1.56% | 73.5B | 166.98 | $5.66 | N/A |
| MSI | $409.90 | +0.37% | 68.2B | 33.16 | $12.39 | +1.12% |
| ERIC | $12.87 | -2.20% | 44.4B | 16.48 | $0.81 | +2.36% |
| ASTS | $98.40 | -8.66% | 43.7B | -59.61 | -$1.80 | N/A |
| CRDO | $225.60 | +5.13% | 40.1B | 119.51 | $1.82 | N/A |
| SATS | $117.10 | -3.16% | 35.9B | -2.48 | -$50.21 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
UI vs CSCO Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, CSCO has a market cap of 512.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while CSCO trades at $124.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas CSCO's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to CSCO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to CSCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check CSCO's competition here
UI vs NOK Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, NOK has a market cap of 89.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while NOK trades at $15.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas NOK's P/E ratio is 103.75. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to NOK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to NOK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check NOK's competition here
UI vs CIEN Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, CIEN has a market cap of 75.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while CIEN trades at $507.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas CIEN's P/E ratio is 345.33. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to CIEN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to CIEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check CIEN's competition here
UI vs LITE Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, LITE has a market cap of 73.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while LITE trades at $923.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas LITE's P/E ratio is 166.98. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to LITE's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to LITE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check LITE's competition here
UI vs MSI Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, MSI has a market cap of 68.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while MSI trades at $409.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas MSI's P/E ratio is 33.16. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to MSI's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to MSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check MSI's competition here
UI vs ERIC Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, ERIC has a market cap of 44.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while ERIC trades at $12.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas ERIC's P/E ratio is 16.48. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to ERIC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to ERIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check ERIC's competition here
UI vs ASTS Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, ASTS has a market cap of 43.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while ASTS trades at $98.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas ASTS's P/E ratio is -59.61. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to ASTS's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to ASTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check ASTS's competition here
UI vs CRDO Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, CRDO has a market cap of 40.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while CRDO trades at $225.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas CRDO's P/E ratio is 119.51. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to CRDO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to CRDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check CRDO's competition here
UI vs SATS Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, SATS has a market cap of 35.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while SATS trades at $117.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas SATS's P/E ratio is -2.48. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to SATS's ROE of -1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to SATS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check SATS's competition here
UI vs JNPR Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, JNPR has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while JNPR trades at $39.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas JNPR's P/E ratio is 38.05. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to JNPR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to JNPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check JNPR's competition here
UI vs VIAV Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, VIAV has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while VIAV trades at $50.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas VIAV's P/E ratio is -212.84. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to VIAV's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to VIAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check VIAV's competition here
UI vs ZBRA Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, ZBRA has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while ZBRA trades at $237.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas ZBRA's P/E ratio is 29.68. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to ZBRA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to ZBRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check ZBRA's competition here
UI vs VSAT Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, VSAT has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while VSAT trades at $68.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas VSAT's P/E ratio is -291.72. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to VSAT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to VSAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check VSAT's competition here
UI vs ONDS Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, ONDS has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while ONDS trades at $10.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas ONDS's P/E ratio is 132.89. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to ONDS's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to ONDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check ONDS's competition here
UI vs BDC Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, BDC has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while BDC trades at $109.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas BDC's P/E ratio is 18.63. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to BDC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to BDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check BDC's competition here
UI vs MAXR Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, MAXR has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while MAXR trades at $52.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas MAXR's P/E ratio is -26.10. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to MAXR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to MAXR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check MAXR's competition here
UI vs COMM Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, COMM has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while COMM trades at $17.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas COMM's P/E ratio is 15.23. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to COMM's ROE of +10.68%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to COMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check COMM's competition here
UI vs EXTR Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, EXTR has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while EXTR trades at $28.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas EXTR's P/E ratio is 246.75. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to EXTR's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to EXTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check EXTR's competition here
UI vs YSS Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, YSS has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while YSS trades at $28.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas YSS's P/E ratio is -14.33. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to YSS's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to YSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check YSS's competition here
UI vs KN Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, KN has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while KN trades at $38.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas KN's P/E ratio is 55.45. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to KN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to KN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check KN's competition here
UI vs VISN Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, VISN has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while VISN trades at $12.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas VISN's P/E ratio is 18.26. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to VISN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to VISN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check VISN's competition here
UI vs DGII Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, DGII has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while DGII trades at $67.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas DGII's P/E ratio is 61.28. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to DGII's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to DGII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check DGII's competition here
UI vs HLIT Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, HLIT has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while HLIT trades at $13.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas HLIT's P/E ratio is 182.63. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to HLIT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to HLIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check HLIT's competition here
UI vs INFN Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, INFN has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while INFN trades at $6.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas INFN's P/E ratio is -10.38. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to INFN's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to INFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check INFN's competition here
UI vs ADTN Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, ADTN has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while ADTN trades at $16.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas ADTN's P/E ratio is -44.28. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to ADTN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to ADTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check ADTN's competition here
UI vs ITRN Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, ITRN has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while ITRN trades at $64.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas ITRN's P/E ratio is 21.47. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to ITRN's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to ITRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check ITRN's competition here
UI vs SWIR Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, SWIR has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while SWIR trades at $30.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas SWIR's P/E ratio is -22.82. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to SWIR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to SWIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check SWIR's competition here
UI vs GILT Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, GILT has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while GILT trades at $14.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas GILT's P/E ratio is 30.71. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to GILT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to GILT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check GILT's competition here
UI vs TSAT Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, TSAT has a market cap of 812.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while TSAT trades at $48.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas TSAT's P/E ratio is -6.03. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to TSAT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to TSAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check TSAT's competition here
UI vs POLY Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, POLY has a market cap of 790.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while POLY trades at $39.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas POLY's P/E ratio is 75.13. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to POLY's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to POLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check POLY's competition here
UI vs FEIM Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, FEIM has a market cap of 712.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while FEIM trades at $71.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas FEIM's P/E ratio is 99.21. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to FEIM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to FEIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check FEIM's competition here
UI vs NTGR Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, NTGR has a market cap of 690.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while NTGR trades at $25.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas NTGR's P/E ratio is -28.92. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to NTGR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to NTGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check NTGR's competition here
UI vs CLFD Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, CLFD has a market cap of 604.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while CLFD trades at $41.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas CLFD's P/E ratio is 193.43. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to CLFD's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to CLFD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check CLFD's competition here
UI vs AIOT Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, AIOT has a market cap of 567.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while AIOT trades at $4.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas AIOT's P/E ratio is -18.39. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to AIOT's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to AIOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check AIOT's competition here
UI vs PWFL Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, PWFL has a market cap of 490.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while PWFL trades at $4.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas PWFL's P/E ratio is -9.33. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to PWFL's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to PWFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check PWFL's competition here
UI vs ITI Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, ITI has a market cap of 309.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while ITI trades at $7.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas ITI's P/E ratio is 239.67. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to ITI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to ITI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check ITI's competition here
UI vs BKTI Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, BKTI has a market cap of 308.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while BKTI trades at $81.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas BKTI's P/E ratio is 23.04. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to BKTI's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to BKTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check BKTI's competition here
UI vs LTRX Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, LTRX has a market cap of 296.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while LTRX trades at $6.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas LTRX's P/E ratio is -46.56. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to LTRX's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to LTRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check LTRX's competition here
UI vs CRNT Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, CRNT has a market cap of 287.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while CRNT trades at $3.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas CRNT's P/E ratio is -160.00. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to CRNT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to CRNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check CRNT's competition here
UI vs AUDC Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, AUDC has a market cap of 258.9M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while AUDC trades at $9.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas AUDC's P/E ratio is 42.38. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to AUDC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to AUDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check AUDC's competition here
UI vs SATX Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, SATX has a market cap of 256.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while SATX trades at $2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas SATX's P/E ratio is -5.69. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to SATX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to SATX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check SATX's competition here
UI vs AVNW Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, AVNW has a market cap of 250.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while AVNW trades at $18.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas AVNW's P/E ratio is 28.04. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to AVNW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to AVNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check AVNW's competition here
UI vs SILC Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, SILC has a market cap of 245.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while SILC trades at $39.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas SILC's P/E ratio is -22.27. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to SILC's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to SILC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check SILC's competition here
UI vs INSG Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, INSG has a market cap of 228M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while INSG trades at $12.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas INSG's P/E ratio is 21.89. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to INSG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to INSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check INSG's competition here
UI vs KVHI Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, KVHI has a market cap of 164M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while KVHI trades at $8.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas KVHI's P/E ratio is -32.35. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to KVHI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to KVHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check KVHI's competition here
UI vs CMTL Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, CMTL has a market cap of 160.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while CMTL trades at $5.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas CMTL's P/E ratio is -2.42. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to CMTL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to CMTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check CMTL's competition here
UI vs PCTI Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, PCTI has a market cap of 135.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while PCTI trades at $6.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas PCTI's P/E ratio is 30.39. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to PCTI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to PCTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check PCTI's competition here
UI vs OCC Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, OCC has a market cap of 125.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while OCC trades at $12.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas OCC's P/E ratio is -157.00. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to OCC's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to OCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check OCC's competition here
UI vs AMPG Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, AMPG has a market cap of 123.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while AMPG trades at $5.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas AMPG's P/E ratio is -19.60. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to AMPG's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to AMPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check AMPG's competition here
UI vs AIRG Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, AIRG has a market cap of 91.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while AIRG trades at $6.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas AIRG's P/E ratio is -12.89. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to AIRG's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to AIRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check AIRG's competition here
UI vs MOB Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, MOB has a market cap of 83.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while MOB trades at $6.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas MOB's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to MOB's ROE of -3.49%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to MOB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check MOB's competition here
UI vs TESS Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, TESS has a market cap of 83.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while TESS trades at $8.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas TESS's P/E ratio is -19.13. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to TESS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to TESS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check TESS's competition here
UI vs JCS Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, JCS has a market cap of 77M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while JCS trades at $8.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas JCS's P/E ratio is 6.60. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to JCS's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to JCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check JCS's competition here
UI vs WTT Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, WTT has a market cap of 45.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while WTT trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas WTT's P/E ratio is -19.32. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to WTT's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to WTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check WTT's competition here
UI vs SYTA Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, SYTA has a market cap of 38M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while SYTA trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas SYTA's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to SYTA's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to SYTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check SYTA's competition here
UI vs MOBBW Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, MOBBW has a market cap of 36M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while MOBBW trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas MOBBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to MOBBW's ROE of -3.49%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to MOBBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check MOBBW's competition here
UI vs FKWL Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, FKWL has a market cap of 33M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while FKWL trades at $2.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas FKWL's P/E ratio is -46.67. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to FKWL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to FKWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check FKWL's competition here
UI vs BOSC Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, BOSC has a market cap of 29.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while BOSC trades at $4.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas BOSC's P/E ratio is 9.15. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to BOSC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to BOSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check BOSC's competition here
UI vs UTSI Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, UTSI has a market cap of 26.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while UTSI trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas UTSI's P/E ratio is -3.23. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to UTSI's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to UTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check UTSI's competition here
UI vs FIEE Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, FIEE has a market cap of 17.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while FIEE trades at $4.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas FIEE's P/E ratio is 21.18. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to FIEE's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to FIEE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check FIEE's competition here
UI vs MINM Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, MINM has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while MINM trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas MINM's P/E ratio is -13.88. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to MINM's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to MINM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check MINM's competition here
UI vs IOTR Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, IOTR has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while IOTR trades at $3.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas IOTR's P/E ratio is -20.15. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to IOTR's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to IOTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check IOTR's competition here
UI vs SYNX Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, SYNX has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while SYNX trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas SYNX's P/E ratio is -2.35. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to SYNX's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to SYNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check SYNX's competition here
UI vs VISL Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, VISL has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while VISL trades at $2.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas VISL's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to VISL's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to VISL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check VISL's competition here
UI vs MITQ Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, MITQ has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while MITQ trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas MITQ's P/E ratio is -30.10. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to MITQ's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to MITQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check MITQ's competition here
UI vs CLRO Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, CLRO has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while CLRO trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas CLRO's P/E ratio is -1.34. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to CLRO's ROE of -5.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to CLRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check CLRO's competition here
UI vs SONM Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, SONM has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while SONM trades at $4.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas SONM's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to SONM's ROE of +6.68%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to SONM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check SONM's competition here
UI vs CMBM Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, CMBM has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while CMBM trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas CMBM's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to CMBM's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to CMBM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check CMBM's competition here
UI vs CASA Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, CASA has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while CASA trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas CASA's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to CASA's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to CASA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check CASA's competition here
UI vs MYNA Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, MYNA has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while MYNA trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas MYNA's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to MYNA's ROE of +8.70%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to MYNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check MYNA's competition here
UI vs AMPGW Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, AMPGW has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while AMPGW trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas AMPGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to AMPGW's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to AMPGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check AMPGW's competition here
UI vs DZSI Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, DZSI has a market cap of 810.7K. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while DZSI trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas DZSI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to DZSI's ROE of -1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to DZSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check DZSI's competition here
UI vs ASNS Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, ASNS has a market cap of 82K. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while ASNS trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas ASNS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to ASNS's ROE of -1.48%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to ASNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check ASNS's competition here
UI vs SYTAW Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, SYTAW has a market cap of 55.8K. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while SYTAW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas SYTAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to SYTAW's ROE of -3.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to SYTAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check SYTAW's competition here
UI vs ORBC Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, ORBC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while ORBC trades at $11.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas ORBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to ORBC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to ORBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check ORBC's competition here
UI vs PLCM Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, PLCM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while PLCM trades at $12.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas PLCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to PLCM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to PLCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check PLCM's competition here
UI vs GIMO Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, GIMO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while GIMO trades at $38.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas GIMO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to GIMO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to GIMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check GIMO's competition here
UI vs BRCD Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, BRCD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while BRCD trades at $12.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas BRCD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to BRCD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to BRCD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check BRCD's competition here
UI vs NMRX Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, NMRX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while NMRX trades at $3.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas NMRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to NMRX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to NMRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check NMRX's competition here
UI vs CALL Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, CALL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while CALL trades at $10.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas CALL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to CALL's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to CALL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check CALL's competition here
UI vs OCLR Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, OCLR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while OCLR trades at $8.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas OCLR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to OCLR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to OCLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check OCLR's competition here
UI vs ZXZZT Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, ZXZZT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while ZXZZT trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas ZXZZT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to ZXZZT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to ZXZZT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check ZXZZT's competition here
UI vs MITL Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, MITL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while MITL trades at $11.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas MITL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to MITL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to MITL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check MITL's competition here
UI vs XXIA Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, XXIA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while XXIA trades at $19.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas XXIA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to XXIA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to XXIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check XXIA's competition here
UI vs SATX-WTA Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, SATX-WTA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while SATX-WTA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas SATX-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to SATX-WTA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to SATX-WTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check SATX-WTA's competition here
UI vs BDR Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, BDR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while BDR trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas BDR's P/E ratio is -5.87. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to BDR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is less volatile compared to BDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check BDR's competition here
UI vs SSNI Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, SSNI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while SSNI trades at $16.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas SSNI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to SSNI's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to SSNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check SSNI's competition here
UI vs EXFO Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, EXFO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while EXFO trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas EXFO's P/E ratio is -56.31. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to EXFO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to EXFO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check EXFO's competition here
UI vs VCRA Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, VCRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while VCRA trades at $79.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas VCRA's P/E ratio is -316.52. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to VCRA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to VCRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check VCRA's competition here
UI vs RKUS Comparison June 2026
UI plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UI stands at 35.2B. In comparison, RKUS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UI is priced at $565.36, while RKUS trades at $12.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UI currently has a P/E ratio of 37.40, whereas RKUS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UI's ROE is +1.01%, compared to RKUS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UI is more volatile compared to RKUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UI.Check RKUS's competition here