Actelis Networks, Inc. (ASNS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ASNS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Communication Equipment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASNS | $0.09 | +1.36% | 82K | -0.02 | -$3.66 | N/A |
| CSCO | $128.00 | +5.50% | 504.5B | 42.67 | $3.00 | +1.29% |
| NOK | $16.85 | +3.69% | 90.9B | 105.19 | $0.16 | +0.97% |
| CIEN | $627.00 | +10.08% | 88.7B | 399.48 | $1.57 | N/A |
| LITE | $1,029.15 | +13.72% | 80.1B | 182.47 | $5.64 | N/A |
| MSI | $415.42 | +0.93% | 69B | 33.57 | $12.38 | +1.11% |
| ASTS | $118.17 | +11.85% | 48.1B | -65.65 | -$1.80 | N/A |
| ERIC | $13.74 | +3.15% | 45.7B | 16.96 | $0.81 | +2.29% |
| CRDO | $229.00 | +1.28% | 42.2B | 126.52 | $1.81 | N/A |
| UI | $588.57 | +2.28% | 35.6B | 37.90 | $15.53 | +0.54% |
Stock Comparison
ASNS vs CSCO Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, CSCO has a market cap of 504.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while CSCO trades at $128.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CSCO's P/E ratio is 42.67. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to CSCO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to CSCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check CSCO's competition here
ASNS vs NOK Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, NOK has a market cap of 90.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while NOK trades at $16.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NOK's P/E ratio is 105.19. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to NOK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to NOK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check NOK's competition here
ASNS vs CIEN Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, CIEN has a market cap of 88.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while CIEN trades at $627.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CIEN's P/E ratio is 399.48. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to CIEN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to CIEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check CIEN's competition here
ASNS vs LITE Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, LITE has a market cap of 80.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while LITE trades at $1,029.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas LITE's P/E ratio is 182.47. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to LITE's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to LITE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check LITE's competition here
ASNS vs MSI Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, MSI has a market cap of 69B. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while MSI trades at $415.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MSI's P/E ratio is 33.57. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to MSI's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to MSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check MSI's competition here
ASNS vs ASTS Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, ASTS has a market cap of 48.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while ASTS trades at $118.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ASTS's P/E ratio is -65.65. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to ASTS's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to ASTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check ASTS's competition here
ASNS vs ERIC Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, ERIC has a market cap of 45.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while ERIC trades at $13.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ERIC's P/E ratio is 16.96. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to ERIC's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to ERIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check ERIC's competition here
ASNS vs CRDO Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, CRDO has a market cap of 42.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while CRDO trades at $229.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CRDO's P/E ratio is 126.52. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to CRDO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to CRDO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check CRDO's competition here
ASNS vs UI Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, UI has a market cap of 35.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while UI trades at $588.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas UI's P/E ratio is 37.90. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to UI's ROE of +1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to UI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check UI's competition here
ASNS vs SATS Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, SATS has a market cap of 35.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while SATS trades at $123.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SATS's P/E ratio is -2.46. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to SATS's ROE of -1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to SATS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check SATS's competition here
ASNS vs JNPR Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, JNPR has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while JNPR trades at $39.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas JNPR's P/E ratio is 38.05. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to JNPR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to JNPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check JNPR's competition here
ASNS vs VIAV Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, VIAV has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while VIAV trades at $52.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas VIAV's P/E ratio is -211.52. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to VIAV's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to VIAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check VIAV's competition here
ASNS vs ZBRA Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, ZBRA has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while ZBRA trades at $254.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ZBRA's P/E ratio is 30.69. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to ZBRA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to ZBRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check ZBRA's competition here
ASNS vs VSAT Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, VSAT has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while VSAT trades at $72.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas VSAT's P/E ratio is -290.36. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to VSAT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to VSAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check VSAT's competition here
ASNS vs ONDS Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, ONDS has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while ONDS trades at $13.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ONDS's P/E ratio is 150.89. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to ONDS's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to ONDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check ONDS's competition here
ASNS vs BDC Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, BDC has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while BDC trades at $109.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BDC's P/E ratio is 18.42. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to BDC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to BDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check BDC's competition here
ASNS vs YSS Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, YSS has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while YSS trades at $31.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas YSS's P/E ratio is -15.41. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to YSS's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to YSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check YSS's competition here
ASNS vs MAXR Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, MAXR has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while MAXR trades at $52.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MAXR's P/E ratio is -26.10. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to MAXR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to MAXR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check MAXR's competition here
ASNS vs COMM Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, COMM has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while COMM trades at $17.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas COMM's P/E ratio is 15.23. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to COMM's ROE of +10.68%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to COMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check COMM's competition here
ASNS vs EXTR Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, EXTR has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while EXTR trades at $29.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas EXTR's P/E ratio is 245.67. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to EXTR's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to EXTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check EXTR's competition here
ASNS vs KN Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, KN has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while KN trades at $39.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas KN's P/E ratio is 55.23. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to KN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to KN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check KN's competition here
ASNS vs VISN Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, VISN has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while VISN trades at $12.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas VISN's P/E ratio is 18.29. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to VISN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to VISN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check VISN's competition here
ASNS vs DGII Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, DGII has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while DGII trades at $69.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas DGII's P/E ratio is 61.79. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to DGII's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to DGII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check DGII's competition here
ASNS vs HLIT Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, HLIT has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while HLIT trades at $15.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas HLIT's P/E ratio is 194.75. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to HLIT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to HLIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check HLIT's competition here
ASNS vs INFN Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, INFN has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while INFN trades at $6.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas INFN's P/E ratio is -10.38. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to INFN's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to INFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check INFN's competition here
ASNS vs ADTN Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, ADTN has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while ADTN trades at $18.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ADTN's P/E ratio is -46.82. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to ADTN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to ADTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check ADTN's competition here
ASNS vs ITRN Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, ITRN has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while ITRN trades at $66.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ITRN's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to ITRN's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to ITRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check ITRN's competition here
ASNS vs SWIR Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, SWIR has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while SWIR trades at $30.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SWIR's P/E ratio is -22.82. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to SWIR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to SWIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check SWIR's competition here
ASNS vs GILT Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, GILT has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while GILT trades at $16.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GILT's P/E ratio is 31.23. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to GILT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to GILT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check GILT's competition here
ASNS vs POLY Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, POLY has a market cap of 790.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while POLY trades at $39.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas POLY's P/E ratio is 75.13. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to POLY's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to POLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check POLY's competition here
ASNS vs TSAT Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, TSAT has a market cap of 741.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while TSAT trades at $50.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TSAT's P/E ratio is -5.52. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to TSAT's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to TSAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check TSAT's competition here
ASNS vs NTGR Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, NTGR has a market cap of 730.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while NTGR trades at $27.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NTGR's P/E ratio is -30.60. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to NTGR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to NTGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check NTGR's competition here
ASNS vs FEIM Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, FEIM has a market cap of 708.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while FEIM trades at $72.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas FEIM's P/E ratio is 98.63. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to FEIM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to FEIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check FEIM's competition here
ASNS vs CLFD Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, CLFD has a market cap of 654.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while CLFD trades at $48.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CLFD's P/E ratio is 209.52. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to CLFD's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to CLFD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check CLFD's competition here
ASNS vs AIOT Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, AIOT has a market cap of 524.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while AIOT trades at $3.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas AIOT's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to AIOT's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to AIOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check AIOT's competition here
ASNS vs PWFL Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, PWFL has a market cap of 490.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while PWFL trades at $4.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PWFL's P/E ratio is -9.33. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to PWFL's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to PWFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check PWFL's competition here
ASNS vs LTRX Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, LTRX has a market cap of 316.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while LTRX trades at $7.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas LTRX's P/E ratio is -49.62. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to LTRX's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to LTRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check LTRX's competition here
ASNS vs BKTI Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, BKTI has a market cap of 313.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while BKTI trades at $82.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BKTI's P/E ratio is 23.35. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to BKTI's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to BKTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check BKTI's competition here
ASNS vs ITI Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, ITI has a market cap of 309.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while ITI trades at $7.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ITI's P/E ratio is 239.67. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to ITI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to ITI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check ITI's competition here
ASNS vs CRNT Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, CRNT has a market cap of 285M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while CRNT trades at $3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CRNT's P/E ratio is -158.50. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to CRNT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to CRNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check CRNT's competition here
ASNS vs AUDC Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, AUDC has a market cap of 258.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while AUDC trades at $10.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas AUDC's P/E ratio is 42.29. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to AUDC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to AUDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check AUDC's competition here
ASNS vs SATX Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, SATX has a market cap of 256.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while SATX trades at $2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SATX's P/E ratio is -5.69. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to SATX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to SATX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check SATX's competition here
ASNS vs SILC Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, SILC has a market cap of 255.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while SILC trades at $44.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SILC's P/E ratio is -23.17. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to SILC's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to SILC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check SILC's competition here
ASNS vs INSG Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, INSG has a market cap of 236.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while INSG trades at $14.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas INSG's P/E ratio is 22.72. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to INSG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to INSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check INSG's competition here
ASNS vs AVNW Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, AVNW has a market cap of 234.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while AVNW trades at $18.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas AVNW's P/E ratio is 26.26. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to AVNW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to AVNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check AVNW's competition here
ASNS vs KVHI Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, KVHI has a market cap of 173.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while KVHI trades at $8.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas KVHI's P/E ratio is -34.15. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to KVHI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to KVHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check KVHI's competition here
ASNS vs CMTL Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, CMTL has a market cap of 172.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while CMTL trades at $5.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CMTL's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to CMTL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to CMTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check CMTL's competition here
ASNS vs OCC Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, OCC has a market cap of 138.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while OCC trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas OCC's P/E ratio is -173.33. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to OCC's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to OCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check OCC's competition here
ASNS vs PCTI Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, PCTI has a market cap of 135.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while PCTI trades at $6.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PCTI's P/E ratio is 30.39. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to PCTI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to PCTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check PCTI's competition here
ASNS vs AMPG Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, AMPG has a market cap of 105.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while AMPG trades at $5.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas AMPG's P/E ratio is -16.73. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to AMPG's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to AMPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check AMPG's competition here
ASNS vs AIRG Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, AIRG has a market cap of 93.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while AIRG trades at $7.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas AIRG's P/E ratio is -13.20. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to AIRG's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to AIRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check AIRG's competition here
ASNS vs MOB Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, MOB has a market cap of 88M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while MOB trades at $7.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MOB's P/E ratio is -2.75. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to MOB's ROE of -3.49%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to MOB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check MOB's competition here
ASNS vs TESS Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, TESS has a market cap of 83.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while TESS trades at $8.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas TESS's P/E ratio is -19.13. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to TESS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to TESS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check TESS's competition here
ASNS vs JCS Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, JCS has a market cap of 77M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while JCS trades at $8.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas JCS's P/E ratio is 6.60. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to JCS's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to JCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check JCS's competition here
ASNS vs WTT Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, WTT has a market cap of 45.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while WTT trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas WTT's P/E ratio is -19.32. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to WTT's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to WTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check WTT's competition here
ASNS vs MOBBW Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, MOBBW has a market cap of 41.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while MOBBW trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MOBBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to MOBBW's ROE of -3.49%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to MOBBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check MOBBW's competition here
ASNS vs SYTA Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, SYTA has a market cap of 38M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while SYTA trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SYTA's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to SYTA's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to SYTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check SYTA's competition here
ASNS vs FKWL Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, FKWL has a market cap of 34.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while FKWL trades at $2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas FKWL's P/E ratio is -48.67. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to FKWL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to FKWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check FKWL's competition here
ASNS vs BOSC Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, BOSC has a market cap of 30M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while BOSC trades at $4.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BOSC's P/E ratio is 9.26. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to BOSC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to BOSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check BOSC's competition here
ASNS vs UTSI Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, UTSI has a market cap of 25.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while UTSI trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas UTSI's P/E ratio is -3.11. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to UTSI's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to UTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check UTSI's competition here
ASNS vs FIEE Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, FIEE has a market cap of 19.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while FIEE trades at $5.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas FIEE's P/E ratio is 23.41. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to FIEE's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to FIEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check FIEE's competition here
ASNS vs MINM Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, MINM has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while MINM trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MINM's P/E ratio is -13.88. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to MINM's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to MINM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check MINM's competition here
ASNS vs IOTR Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, IOTR has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while IOTR trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas IOTR's P/E ratio is -20.60. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to IOTR's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to IOTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check IOTR's competition here
ASNS vs SYNX Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, SYNX has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while SYNX trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SYNX's P/E ratio is -2.51. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to SYNX's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to SYNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check SYNX's competition here
ASNS vs VISL Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, VISL has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while VISL trades at $2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas VISL's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to VISL's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to VISL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check VISL's competition here
ASNS vs MITQ Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, MITQ has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while MITQ trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MITQ's P/E ratio is -30.95. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to MITQ's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to MITQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check MITQ's competition here
ASNS vs SONM Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, SONM has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while SONM trades at $5.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SONM's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to SONM's ROE of +6.68%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to SONM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check SONM's competition here
ASNS vs CLRO Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, CLRO has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while CLRO trades at $3.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CLRO's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to CLRO's ROE of -5.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to CLRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check CLRO's competition here
ASNS vs CMBM Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, CMBM has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while CMBM trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CMBM's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to CMBM's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to CMBM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check CMBM's competition here
ASNS vs CASA Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, CASA has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while CASA trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CASA's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to CASA's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to CASA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check CASA's competition here
ASNS vs MYNA Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, MYNA has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while MYNA trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MYNA's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to MYNA's ROE of +8.70%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to MYNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check MYNA's competition here
ASNS vs AMPGW Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, AMPGW has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while AMPGW trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas AMPGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to AMPGW's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to AMPGW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check AMPGW's competition here
ASNS vs DZSI Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, DZSI has a market cap of 810.7K. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while DZSI trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas DZSI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to DZSI's ROE of -1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to DZSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check DZSI's competition here
ASNS vs SYTAW Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, SYTAW has a market cap of 55.8K. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while SYTAW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SYTAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to SYTAW's ROE of -3.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to SYTAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check SYTAW's competition here
ASNS vs RKUS Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, RKUS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while RKUS trades at $12.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas RKUS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to RKUS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to RKUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check RKUS's competition here
ASNS vs ORBC Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, ORBC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while ORBC trades at $11.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ORBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to ORBC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to ORBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check ORBC's competition here
ASNS vs PLCM Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, PLCM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while PLCM trades at $12.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas PLCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to PLCM's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to PLCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check PLCM's competition here
ASNS vs GIMO Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, GIMO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while GIMO trades at $38.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas GIMO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to GIMO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to GIMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check GIMO's competition here
ASNS vs BRCD Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, BRCD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while BRCD trades at $12.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BRCD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to BRCD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to BRCD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check BRCD's competition here
ASNS vs NMRX Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, NMRX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while NMRX trades at $3.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas NMRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to NMRX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to NMRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check NMRX's competition here
ASNS vs CALL Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, CALL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while CALL trades at $10.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas CALL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to CALL's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to CALL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check CALL's competition here
ASNS vs OCLR Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, OCLR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while OCLR trades at $8.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas OCLR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to OCLR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to OCLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check OCLR's competition here
ASNS vs ZXZZT Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, ZXZZT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while ZXZZT trades at $8.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas ZXZZT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to ZXZZT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to ZXZZT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check ZXZZT's competition here
ASNS vs MITL Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, MITL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while MITL trades at $11.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas MITL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to MITL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to MITL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check MITL's competition here
ASNS vs XXIA Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, XXIA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while XXIA trades at $19.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas XXIA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to XXIA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to XXIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check XXIA's competition here
ASNS vs SATX-WTA Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, SATX-WTA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while SATX-WTA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SATX-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to SATX-WTA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to SATX-WTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check SATX-WTA's competition here
ASNS vs BDR Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, BDR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while BDR trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas BDR's P/E ratio is -5.87. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to BDR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to BDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check BDR's competition here
ASNS vs SSNI Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, SSNI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while SSNI trades at $16.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas SSNI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to SSNI's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to SSNI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check SSNI's competition here
ASNS vs EXFO Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, EXFO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while EXFO trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas EXFO's P/E ratio is -56.31. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to EXFO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to EXFO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check EXFO's competition here
ASNS vs VCRA Comparison June 2026
ASNS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ASNS stands at 82K. In comparison, VCRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ASNS is priced at $0.09, while VCRA trades at $79.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ASNS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.02, whereas VCRA's P/E ratio is -316.52. In terms of profitability, ASNS's ROE is -1.48%, compared to VCRA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ASNS is more volatile compared to VCRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ASNS.Check VCRA's competition here