Urstadt Biddle Properties Inc. (UBA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (UBA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UBA | $21.14 | -1.81% | 832.2M | 34.66 | $0.61 | +4.47% |
| SPG | $209.56 | +2.95% | 66.9B | 14.35 | $14.37 | +4.22% |
| SPG-PJ | $54.64 | +0.77% | 56.2B | 8.03 | $6.78 | +4.22% |
| O | $61.15 | +2.39% | 55.7B | 48.97 | $1.22 | +5.43% |
| KIM-PN | $60.50 | +0.00% | 40.8B | N/A | N/A | +4.29% |
| KIM | $24.23 | +1.94% | 16.2B | 27.59 | $0.87 | +4.29% |
| REG | $77.78 | +1.93% | 14B | 26.35 | $2.91 | +3.83% |
| KIM-PM | $19.95 | -0.32% | 13.6B | 12.24 | $1.65 | +4.29% |
| KIM-PL | $19.61 | -0.51% | 13.3B | 11.99 | $1.65 | +4.29% |
| FRT | $123.05 | +3.04% | 10.4B | 20.90 | $5.78 | +3.73% |
Stock Comparison
UBA vs SPG Comparison June 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, SPG has a market cap of 66.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while SPG trades at $209.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas SPG's P/E ratio is 14.35. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SPG's ROE of +1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to SPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check SPG's competition here
UBA vs SPG-PJ Comparison June 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, SPG-PJ has a market cap of 56.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while SPG-PJ trades at $54.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas SPG-PJ's P/E ratio is 8.03. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SPG-PJ's ROE of +1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to SPG-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check SPG-PJ's competition here
UBA vs O Comparison June 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, O has a market cap of 55.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while O trades at $61.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas O's P/E ratio is 48.97. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to O's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to O. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check O's competition here
UBA vs KIM-PN Comparison June 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, KIM-PN has a market cap of 40.8B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while KIM-PN trades at $60.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas KIM-PN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KIM-PN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to KIM-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check KIM-PN's competition here
UBA vs KIM Comparison June 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, KIM has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while KIM trades at $24.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas KIM's P/E ratio is 27.59. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KIM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to KIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check KIM's competition here
UBA vs REG Comparison June 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, REG has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while REG trades at $77.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas REG's P/E ratio is 26.35. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to REG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to REG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check REG's competition here
UBA vs KIM-PM Comparison June 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, KIM-PM has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while KIM-PM trades at $19.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas KIM-PM's P/E ratio is 12.24. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KIM-PM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to KIM-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check KIM-PM's competition here
UBA vs KIM-PL Comparison June 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, KIM-PL has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while KIM-PL trades at $19.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas KIM-PL's P/E ratio is 11.99. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KIM-PL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to KIM-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check KIM-PL's competition here
UBA vs FRT Comparison June 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, FRT has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while FRT trades at $123.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas FRT's P/E ratio is 20.90. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FRT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to FRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check FRT's competition here
UBA vs BRX Comparison June 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, BRX has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while BRX trades at $30.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas BRX's P/E ratio is 21.22. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BRX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to BRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check BRX's competition here
UBA vs ADC Comparison June 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, ADC has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while ADC trades at $73.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas ADC's P/E ratio is 39.03. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ADC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to ADC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check ADC's competition here
UBA vs NNN Comparison June 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, NNN has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while NNN trades at $45.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas NNN's P/E ratio is 21.45. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NNN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is less volatile compared to NNN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check NNN's competition here
UBA vs FRT-PC Comparison June 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, FRT-PC has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while FRT-PC trades at $19.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas FRT-PC's P/E ratio is 5.95. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FRT-PC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to FRT-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check FRT-PC's competition here
UBA vs MAC Comparison June 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, MAC has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while MAC trades at $23.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas MAC's P/E ratio is -32.24. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MAC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to MAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check MAC's competition here
UBA vs KRG Comparison June 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, KRG has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while KRG trades at $27.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas KRG's P/E ratio is 20.67. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to KRG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to KRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check KRG's competition here
UBA vs PECO Comparison June 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, PECO has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while PECO trades at $40.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas PECO's P/E ratio is 42.59. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PECO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to PECO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check PECO's competition here
UBA vs SKT Comparison June 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, SKT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while SKT trades at $37.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas SKT's P/E ratio is 34.31. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SKT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to SKT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check SKT's competition here
UBA vs REGCP Comparison June 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, REGCP has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while REGCP trades at $23.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas REGCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to REGCP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to REGCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check REGCP's competition here
UBA vs REGCO Comparison June 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, REGCO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while REGCO trades at $21.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas REGCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to REGCO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to REGCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check REGCO's competition here
UBA vs CURB Comparison June 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, CURB has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while CURB trades at $29.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas CURB's P/E ratio is 96.57. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CURB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to CURB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check CURB's competition here
UBA vs AKR Comparison June 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, AKR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while AKR trades at $22.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas AKR's P/E ratio is 70.77. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AKR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to AKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check AKR's competition here
UBA vs FCPT Comparison June 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, FCPT has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while FCPT trades at $24.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas FCPT's P/E ratio is 21.58. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FCPT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is less volatile compared to FCPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check FCPT's competition here
UBA vs IVT Comparison June 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, IVT has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while IVT trades at $33.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas IVT's P/E ratio is 23.54. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IVT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to IVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check IVT's competition here
UBA vs ROIC Comparison June 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, ROIC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while ROIC trades at $17.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas ROIC's P/E ratio is 38.87. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ROIC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to ROIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check ROIC's competition here
UBA vs GTY Comparison June 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, GTY has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while GTY trades at $33.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas GTY's P/E ratio is 21.06. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GTY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is less volatile compared to GTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check GTY's competition here
UBA vs ADC-PA Comparison June 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, ADC-PA has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while ADC-PA trades at $17.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas ADC-PA's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ADC-PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to ADC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check ADC-PA's competition here
UBA vs NTST Comparison June 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, NTST has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while NTST trades at $20.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas NTST's P/E ratio is 162.63. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NTST's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is less volatile compared to NTST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check NTST's competition here
UBA vs ALEX Comparison June 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, ALEX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while ALEX trades at $20.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas ALEX's P/E ratio is 23.42. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ALEX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to ALEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check ALEX's competition here
UBA vs CBL Comparison June 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, CBL has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while CBL trades at $48.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas CBL's P/E ratio is 8.57. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CBL's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is less volatile compared to CBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check CBL's competition here
UBA vs ALX Comparison June 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, ALX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while ALX trades at $259.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas ALX's P/E ratio is 64.14. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ALX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is less volatile compared to ALX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check ALX's competition here
UBA vs RPT-PD Comparison June 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, RPT-PD has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while RPT-PD trades at $57.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas RPT-PD's P/E ratio is 69.33. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RPT-PD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to RPT-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check RPT-PD's competition here
UBA vs WSR Comparison June 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, WSR has a market cap of 979.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while WSR trades at $19.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas WSR's P/E ratio is 19.84. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WSR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to WSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check WSR's competition here
UBA vs BFS Comparison June 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, BFS has a market cap of 894.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while BFS trades at $37.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas BFS's P/E ratio is 34.39. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BFS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to BFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check BFS's competition here
UBA vs UBP Comparison June 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, UBP has a market cap of 832.2M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while UBP trades at $21.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas UBP's P/E ratio is 34.77. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UBP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to UBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check UBP's competition here
UBA vs UBP-PK Comparison June 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, UBP-PK has a market cap of 812.7M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while UBP-PK trades at $21.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas UBP-PK's P/E ratio is 22.85. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UBP-PK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to UBP-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check UBP-PK's competition here
UBA vs BFS-PD Comparison June 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, BFS-PD has a market cap of 778.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while BFS-PD trades at $20.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas BFS-PD's P/E ratio is 12.43. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BFS-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to BFS-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check BFS-PD's competition here
UBA vs UBP-PH Comparison June 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, UBP-PH has a market cap of 670.4M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while UBP-PH trades at $22.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas UBP-PH's P/E ratio is 24.35. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to UBP-PH's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to UBP-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check UBP-PH's competition here
UBA vs BFS-PE Comparison June 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, BFS-PE has a market cap of 547M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while BFS-PE trades at $22.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas BFS-PE's P/E ratio is 13.20. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BFS-PE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to BFS-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check BFS-PE's competition here
UBA vs RVI Comparison June 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, RVI has a market cap of 524.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while RVI trades at $38.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas RVI's P/E ratio is -49.45. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RVI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is less volatile compared to RVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check RVI's competition here
UBA vs SITC-PA Comparison June 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, SITC-PA has a market cap of 373M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while SITC-PA trades at $11.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas SITC-PA's P/E ratio is 22.75. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SITC-PA's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to SITC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check SITC-PA's competition here
UBA vs PINE Comparison June 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, PINE has a market cap of 318.6M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while PINE trades at $19.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas PINE's P/E ratio is -241.00. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PINE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to PINE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check PINE's competition here
UBA vs CDR-PC Comparison June 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, CDR-PC has a market cap of 273M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while CDR-PC trades at $18.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas CDR-PC's P/E ratio is -4.54. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CDR-PC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is less volatile compared to CDR-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check CDR-PC's competition here
UBA vs CDR-PB Comparison June 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, CDR-PB has a market cap of 272.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while CDR-PB trades at $19.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas CDR-PB's P/E ratio is -4.53. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CDR-PB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to CDR-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check CDR-PB's competition here
UBA vs SITC Comparison June 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, SITC has a market cap of 260.3M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while SITC trades at $5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas SITC's P/E ratio is 1.49. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SITC's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to SITC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check SITC's competition here
UBA vs SRG Comparison June 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, SRG has a market cap of 157.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while SRG trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas SRG's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SRG's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to SRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check SRG's competition here
UBA vs SRG-PA Comparison June 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, SRG-PA has a market cap of 151.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while SRG-PA trades at $21.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas SRG-PA's P/E ratio is -11.79. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SRG-PA's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to SRG-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check SRG-PA's competition here
UBA vs WHLRL Comparison June 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, WHLRL has a market cap of 86M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while WHLRL trades at $82.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas WHLRL's P/E ratio is -44.16. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WHLRL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is less volatile compared to WHLRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check WHLRL's competition here
UBA vs WHLRP Comparison June 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, WHLRP has a market cap of 6.5M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while WHLRP trades at $8.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas WHLRP's P/E ratio is -4.38. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WHLRP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is less volatile compared to WHLRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check WHLRP's competition here
UBA vs WHLRD Comparison June 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, WHLRD has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while WHLRD trades at $37.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas WHLRD's P/E ratio is -20.09. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WHLRD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to WHLRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check WHLRD's competition here
UBA vs WHLR Comparison June 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, WHLR has a market cap of 58.3K. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while WHLR trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas WHLR's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WHLR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is less volatile compared to WHLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check WHLR's competition here
UBA vs WRI Comparison June 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, WRI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while WRI trades at $31.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas WRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WRI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is less volatile compared to WRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check WRI's competition here
UBA vs CDR Comparison June 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, CDR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while CDR trades at $29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas CDR's P/E ratio is -6.61. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CDR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to CDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check CDR's competition here
UBA vs BPYUP Comparison June 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, BPYUP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while BPYUP trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas BPYUP's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BPYUP's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to BPYUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check BPYUP's competition here
UBA vs EQY Comparison June 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, EQY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while EQY trades at $30.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas EQY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EQY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is less volatile compared to EQY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check EQY's competition here
UBA vs PEI-PD Comparison June 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, PEI-PD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while PEI-PD trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas PEI-PD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PEI-PD's ROE of +11.91%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is less volatile compared to PEI-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check PEI-PD's competition here
UBA vs BPYU Comparison June 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, BPYU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while BPYU trades at $18.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas BPYU's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BPYU's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to BPYU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check BPYU's competition here
UBA vs WPG Comparison June 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, WPG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while WPG trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas WPG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WPG's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is less volatile compared to WPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check WPG's competition here
UBA vs PEI Comparison June 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, PEI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while PEI trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas PEI's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PEI's ROE of +11.91%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is less volatile compared to PEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check PEI's competition here
UBA vs NNN-PF Comparison June 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, NNN-PF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while NNN-PF trades at $25.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas NNN-PF's P/E ratio is 21.56. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NNN-PF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to NNN-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check NNN-PF's competition here
UBA vs PEI-PB Comparison June 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, PEI-PB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while PEI-PB trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas PEI-PB's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PEI-PB's ROE of +11.91%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is less volatile compared to PEI-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check PEI-PB's competition here
UBA vs HMG Comparison June 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, HMG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while HMG trades at $22.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas HMG's P/E ratio is -41.53. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HMG's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is less volatile compared to HMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check HMG's competition here
UBA vs PEI-PC Comparison June 2026
UBA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, UBA stands at 832.2M. In comparison, PEI-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, UBA is priced at $21.14, while PEI-PC trades at $3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
UBA currently has a P/E ratio of 34.66, whereas PEI-PC's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, UBA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PEI-PC's ROE of +11.91%. Regarding short-term risk, UBA is more volatile compared to PEI-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for UBA.Check PEI-PC's competition here