Seritage Growth Properties (SRG-PA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SRG-PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Retail Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRG-PA | $20.94 | -0.54% | 150.7M | -11.73 | -$1.79 | N/A |
| SPG | $210.31 | +1.98% | 68.2B | 14.64 | $14.37 | +4.11% |
| SPG-PJ | $55.00 | +1.01% | 56.8B | 8.12 | $6.78 | +4.11% |
| O | $60.84 | +1.82% | 56.7B | 49.88 | $1.22 | +5.30% |
| KIM-PN | $60.50 | +0.00% | 40.8B | N/A | N/A | +4.25% |
| KIM | $24.23 | +0.92% | 16.3B | 27.84 | $0.87 | +4.25% |
| REG | $77.72 | +1.36% | 14.2B | 26.70 | $2.91 | +3.75% |
| KIM-PM | $19.92 | -0.85% | 13.4B | 12.10 | $1.65 | +4.25% |
| KIM-PL | $19.59 | -0.81% | 13.2B | 11.93 | $1.65 | +4.25% |
| FRT | $122.56 | +1.45% | 10.6B | 21.21 | $5.78 | +3.65% |
Stock Comparison
SRG-PA vs SPG Comparison June 2026
SRG-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRG-PA stands at 150.7M. In comparison, SPG has a market cap of 68.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SRG-PA is priced at $20.94, while SPG trades at $210.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRG-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.73, whereas SPG's P/E ratio is 14.64. In terms of profitability, SRG-PA's ROE is -0.23%, compared to SPG's ROE of +1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SRG-PA is less volatile compared to SPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRG-PA.Check SPG's competition here
SRG-PA vs SPG-PJ Comparison June 2026
SRG-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRG-PA stands at 150.7M. In comparison, SPG-PJ has a market cap of 56.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SRG-PA is priced at $20.94, while SPG-PJ trades at $55.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRG-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.73, whereas SPG-PJ's P/E ratio is 8.12. In terms of profitability, SRG-PA's ROE is -0.23%, compared to SPG-PJ's ROE of +1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SRG-PA is less volatile compared to SPG-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRG-PA.Check SPG-PJ's competition here
SRG-PA vs O Comparison June 2026
SRG-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRG-PA stands at 150.7M. In comparison, O has a market cap of 56.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SRG-PA is priced at $20.94, while O trades at $60.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRG-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.73, whereas O's P/E ratio is 49.88. In terms of profitability, SRG-PA's ROE is -0.23%, compared to O's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SRG-PA is less volatile compared to O. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRG-PA.Check O's competition here
SRG-PA vs KIM-PN Comparison June 2026
SRG-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRG-PA stands at 150.7M. In comparison, KIM-PN has a market cap of 40.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SRG-PA is priced at $20.94, while KIM-PN trades at $60.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRG-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.73, whereas KIM-PN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRG-PA's ROE is -0.23%, compared to KIM-PN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SRG-PA is more volatile compared to KIM-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRG-PA.Check KIM-PN's competition here
SRG-PA vs KIM Comparison June 2026
SRG-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRG-PA stands at 150.7M. In comparison, KIM has a market cap of 16.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SRG-PA is priced at $20.94, while KIM trades at $24.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRG-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.73, whereas KIM's P/E ratio is 27.84. In terms of profitability, SRG-PA's ROE is -0.23%, compared to KIM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SRG-PA is less volatile compared to KIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRG-PA.Check KIM's competition here
SRG-PA vs REG Comparison June 2026
SRG-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRG-PA stands at 150.7M. In comparison, REG has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SRG-PA is priced at $20.94, while REG trades at $77.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRG-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.73, whereas REG's P/E ratio is 26.70. In terms of profitability, SRG-PA's ROE is -0.23%, compared to REG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SRG-PA is less volatile compared to REG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRG-PA.Check REG's competition here
SRG-PA vs KIM-PM Comparison June 2026
SRG-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRG-PA stands at 150.7M. In comparison, KIM-PM has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SRG-PA is priced at $20.94, while KIM-PM trades at $19.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRG-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.73, whereas KIM-PM's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, SRG-PA's ROE is -0.23%, compared to KIM-PM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SRG-PA is more volatile compared to KIM-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRG-PA.Check KIM-PM's competition here
SRG-PA vs KIM-PL Comparison June 2026
SRG-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRG-PA stands at 150.7M. In comparison, KIM-PL has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SRG-PA is priced at $20.94, while KIM-PL trades at $19.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRG-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.73, whereas KIM-PL's P/E ratio is 11.93. In terms of profitability, SRG-PA's ROE is -0.23%, compared to KIM-PL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SRG-PA is more volatile compared to KIM-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRG-PA.Check KIM-PL's competition here
SRG-PA vs FRT Comparison June 2026
SRG-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRG-PA stands at 150.7M. In comparison, FRT has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SRG-PA is priced at $20.94, while FRT trades at $122.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRG-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.73, whereas FRT's P/E ratio is 21.21. In terms of profitability, SRG-PA's ROE is -0.23%, compared to FRT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SRG-PA is less volatile compared to FRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRG-PA.Check FRT's competition here
SRG-PA vs BRX Comparison June 2026
SRG-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRG-PA stands at 150.7M. In comparison, BRX has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SRG-PA is priced at $20.94, while BRX trades at $30.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRG-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.73, whereas BRX's P/E ratio is 21.65. In terms of profitability, SRG-PA's ROE is -0.23%, compared to BRX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SRG-PA is less volatile compared to BRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRG-PA.Check BRX's competition here
SRG-PA vs ADC Comparison June 2026
SRG-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRG-PA stands at 150.7M. In comparison, ADC has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SRG-PA is priced at $20.94, while ADC trades at $73.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRG-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.73, whereas ADC's P/E ratio is 39.68. In terms of profitability, SRG-PA's ROE is -0.23%, compared to ADC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SRG-PA is less volatile compared to ADC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRG-PA.Check ADC's competition here
SRG-PA vs NNN Comparison June 2026
SRG-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRG-PA stands at 150.7M. In comparison, NNN has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SRG-PA is priced at $20.94, while NNN trades at $44.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRG-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.73, whereas NNN's P/E ratio is 21.93. In terms of profitability, SRG-PA's ROE is -0.23%, compared to NNN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SRG-PA is less volatile compared to NNN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRG-PA.Check NNN's competition here
SRG-PA vs FRT-PC Comparison June 2026
SRG-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRG-PA stands at 150.7M. In comparison, FRT-PC has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SRG-PA is priced at $20.94, while FRT-PC trades at $19.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRG-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.73, whereas FRT-PC's P/E ratio is 5.92. In terms of profitability, SRG-PA's ROE is -0.23%, compared to FRT-PC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SRG-PA is more volatile compared to FRT-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRG-PA.Check FRT-PC's competition here
SRG-PA vs MAC Comparison June 2026
SRG-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRG-PA stands at 150.7M. In comparison, MAC has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SRG-PA is priced at $20.94, while MAC trades at $23.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRG-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.73, whereas MAC's P/E ratio is -32.84. In terms of profitability, SRG-PA's ROE is -0.23%, compared to MAC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SRG-PA is less volatile compared to MAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRG-PA.Check MAC's competition here
SRG-PA vs KRG Comparison June 2026
SRG-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRG-PA stands at 150.7M. In comparison, KRG has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SRG-PA is priced at $20.94, while KRG trades at $27.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRG-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.73, whereas KRG's P/E ratio is 20.97. In terms of profitability, SRG-PA's ROE is -0.23%, compared to KRG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SRG-PA is less volatile compared to KRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRG-PA.Check KRG's competition here
SRG-PA vs PECO Comparison June 2026
SRG-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRG-PA stands at 150.7M. In comparison, PECO has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SRG-PA is priced at $20.94, while PECO trades at $40.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRG-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.73, whereas PECO's P/E ratio is 43.82. In terms of profitability, SRG-PA's ROE is -0.23%, compared to PECO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SRG-PA is less volatile compared to PECO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRG-PA.Check PECO's competition here
SRG-PA vs SKT Comparison June 2026
SRG-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRG-PA stands at 150.7M. In comparison, SKT has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SRG-PA is priced at $20.94, while SKT trades at $37.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRG-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.73, whereas SKT's P/E ratio is 34.99. In terms of profitability, SRG-PA's ROE is -0.23%, compared to SKT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SRG-PA is less volatile compared to SKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRG-PA.Check SKT's competition here
SRG-PA vs REGCP Comparison June 2026
SRG-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRG-PA stands at 150.7M. In comparison, REGCP has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SRG-PA is priced at $20.94, while REGCP trades at $22.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRG-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.73, whereas REGCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRG-PA's ROE is -0.23%, compared to REGCP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SRG-PA is less volatile compared to REGCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRG-PA.Check REGCP's competition here
SRG-PA vs REGCO Comparison June 2026
SRG-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRG-PA stands at 150.7M. In comparison, REGCO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, SRG-PA is priced at $20.94, while REGCO trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRG-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.73, whereas REGCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRG-PA's ROE is -0.23%, compared to REGCO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SRG-PA is less volatile compared to REGCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRG-PA.Check REGCO's competition here
SRG-PA vs CURB Comparison June 2026
SRG-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRG-PA stands at 150.7M. In comparison, CURB has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SRG-PA is priced at $20.94, while CURB trades at $29.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRG-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.73, whereas CURB's P/E ratio is 97.57. In terms of profitability, SRG-PA's ROE is -0.23%, compared to CURB's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SRG-PA is less volatile compared to CURB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRG-PA.Check CURB's competition here
SRG-PA vs AKR Comparison June 2026
SRG-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRG-PA stands at 150.7M. In comparison, AKR has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SRG-PA is priced at $20.94, while AKR trades at $22.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRG-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.73, whereas AKR's P/E ratio is 72.23. In terms of profitability, SRG-PA's ROE is -0.23%, compared to AKR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SRG-PA is less volatile compared to AKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRG-PA.Check AKR's competition here
SRG-PA vs FCPT Comparison June 2026
SRG-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRG-PA stands at 150.7M. In comparison, FCPT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SRG-PA is priced at $20.94, while FCPT trades at $24.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRG-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.73, whereas FCPT's P/E ratio is 22.23. In terms of profitability, SRG-PA's ROE is -0.23%, compared to FCPT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SRG-PA is less volatile compared to FCPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRG-PA.Check FCPT's competition here
SRG-PA vs IVT Comparison June 2026
SRG-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRG-PA stands at 150.7M. In comparison, IVT has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SRG-PA is priced at $20.94, while IVT trades at $33.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRG-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.73, whereas IVT's P/E ratio is 23.89. In terms of profitability, SRG-PA's ROE is -0.23%, compared to IVT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SRG-PA is less volatile compared to IVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRG-PA.Check IVT's competition here
SRG-PA vs ROIC Comparison June 2026
SRG-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRG-PA stands at 150.7M. In comparison, ROIC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SRG-PA is priced at $20.94, while ROIC trades at $17.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRG-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.73, whereas ROIC's P/E ratio is 38.87. In terms of profitability, SRG-PA's ROE is -0.23%, compared to ROIC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SRG-PA is more volatile compared to ROIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRG-PA.Check ROIC's competition here
SRG-PA vs GTY Comparison June 2026
SRG-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRG-PA stands at 150.7M. In comparison, GTY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SRG-PA is priced at $20.94, while GTY trades at $32.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRG-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.73, whereas GTY's P/E ratio is 21.55. In terms of profitability, SRG-PA's ROE is -0.23%, compared to GTY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SRG-PA is less volatile compared to GTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRG-PA.Check GTY's competition here
SRG-PA vs ADC-PA Comparison June 2026
SRG-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRG-PA stands at 150.7M. In comparison, ADC-PA has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SRG-PA is priced at $20.94, while ADC-PA trades at $17.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRG-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.73, whereas ADC-PA's P/E ratio is 9.55. In terms of profitability, SRG-PA's ROE is -0.23%, compared to ADC-PA's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SRG-PA is more volatile compared to ADC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRG-PA.Check ADC-PA's competition here
SRG-PA vs NTST Comparison June 2026
SRG-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRG-PA stands at 150.7M. In comparison, NTST has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SRG-PA is priced at $20.94, while NTST trades at $19.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRG-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.73, whereas NTST's P/E ratio is 166.50. In terms of profitability, SRG-PA's ROE is -0.23%, compared to NTST's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SRG-PA is less volatile compared to NTST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRG-PA.Check NTST's competition here
SRG-PA vs ALEX Comparison June 2026
SRG-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRG-PA stands at 150.7M. In comparison, ALEX has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SRG-PA is priced at $20.94, while ALEX trades at $20.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRG-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.73, whereas ALEX's P/E ratio is 23.42. In terms of profitability, SRG-PA's ROE is -0.23%, compared to ALEX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SRG-PA is more volatile compared to ALEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRG-PA.Check ALEX's competition here
SRG-PA vs CBL Comparison June 2026
SRG-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRG-PA stands at 150.7M. In comparison, CBL has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SRG-PA is priced at $20.94, while CBL trades at $48.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRG-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.73, whereas CBL's P/E ratio is 8.72. In terms of profitability, SRG-PA's ROE is -0.23%, compared to CBL's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SRG-PA is less volatile compared to CBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRG-PA.Check CBL's competition here
SRG-PA vs ALX Comparison June 2026
SRG-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRG-PA stands at 150.7M. In comparison, ALX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SRG-PA is priced at $20.94, while ALX trades at $258.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRG-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.73, whereas ALX's P/E ratio is 64.50. In terms of profitability, SRG-PA's ROE is -0.23%, compared to ALX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SRG-PA is less volatile compared to ALX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRG-PA.Check ALX's competition here
SRG-PA vs RPT-PD Comparison June 2026
SRG-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRG-PA stands at 150.7M. In comparison, RPT-PD has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SRG-PA is priced at $20.94, while RPT-PD trades at $57.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRG-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.73, whereas RPT-PD's P/E ratio is 69.33. In terms of profitability, SRG-PA's ROE is -0.23%, compared to RPT-PD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SRG-PA is more volatile compared to RPT-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRG-PA.Check RPT-PD's competition here
SRG-PA vs WSR Comparison June 2026
SRG-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRG-PA stands at 150.7M. In comparison, WSR has a market cap of 978M. Regarding current trading prices, SRG-PA is priced at $20.94, while WSR trades at $19.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRG-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.73, whereas WSR's P/E ratio is 19.82. In terms of profitability, SRG-PA's ROE is -0.23%, compared to WSR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SRG-PA is more volatile compared to WSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRG-PA.Check WSR's competition here
SRG-PA vs BFS Comparison June 2026
SRG-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRG-PA stands at 150.7M. In comparison, BFS has a market cap of 899.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SRG-PA is priced at $20.94, while BFS trades at $36.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRG-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.73, whereas BFS's P/E ratio is 34.59. In terms of profitability, SRG-PA's ROE is -0.23%, compared to BFS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SRG-PA is less volatile compared to BFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRG-PA.Check BFS's competition here
SRG-PA vs UBP Comparison June 2026
SRG-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRG-PA stands at 150.7M. In comparison, UBP has a market cap of 832.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SRG-PA is priced at $20.94, while UBP trades at $21.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRG-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.73, whereas UBP's P/E ratio is 34.77. In terms of profitability, SRG-PA's ROE is -0.23%, compared to UBP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SRG-PA and UBP have similar daily volatility (1.57).Check UBP's competition here
SRG-PA vs UBA Comparison June 2026
SRG-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRG-PA stands at 150.7M. In comparison, UBA has a market cap of 832.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SRG-PA is priced at $20.94, while UBA trades at $21.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRG-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.73, whereas UBA's P/E ratio is 34.66. In terms of profitability, SRG-PA's ROE is -0.23%, compared to UBA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SRG-PA is less volatile compared to UBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRG-PA.Check UBA's competition here
SRG-PA vs UBP-PK Comparison June 2026
SRG-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRG-PA stands at 150.7M. In comparison, UBP-PK has a market cap of 812.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SRG-PA is priced at $20.94, while UBP-PK trades at $21.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRG-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.73, whereas UBP-PK's P/E ratio is 22.85. In terms of profitability, SRG-PA's ROE is -0.23%, compared to UBP-PK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SRG-PA is more volatile compared to UBP-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRG-PA.Check UBP-PK's competition here
SRG-PA vs BFS-PD Comparison June 2026
SRG-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRG-PA stands at 150.7M. In comparison, BFS-PD has a market cap of 774.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SRG-PA is priced at $20.94, while BFS-PD trades at $20.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRG-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.73, whereas BFS-PD's P/E ratio is 12.37. In terms of profitability, SRG-PA's ROE is -0.23%, compared to BFS-PD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SRG-PA is more volatile compared to BFS-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRG-PA.Check BFS-PD's competition here
SRG-PA vs UBP-PH Comparison June 2026
SRG-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRG-PA stands at 150.7M. In comparison, UBP-PH has a market cap of 670.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SRG-PA is priced at $20.94, while UBP-PH trades at $22.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRG-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.73, whereas UBP-PH's P/E ratio is 24.35. In terms of profitability, SRG-PA's ROE is -0.23%, compared to UBP-PH's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SRG-PA is more volatile compared to UBP-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRG-PA.Check UBP-PH's competition here
SRG-PA vs BFS-PE Comparison June 2026
SRG-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRG-PA stands at 150.7M. In comparison, BFS-PE has a market cap of 544.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SRG-PA is priced at $20.94, while BFS-PE trades at $22.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRG-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.73, whereas BFS-PE's P/E ratio is 13.14. In terms of profitability, SRG-PA's ROE is -0.23%, compared to BFS-PE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SRG-PA is more volatile compared to BFS-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRG-PA.Check BFS-PE's competition here
SRG-PA vs RVI Comparison June 2026
SRG-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRG-PA stands at 150.7M. In comparison, RVI has a market cap of 476.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SRG-PA is priced at $20.94, while RVI trades at $37.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRG-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.73, whereas RVI's P/E ratio is -44.93. In terms of profitability, SRG-PA's ROE is -0.23%, compared to RVI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SRG-PA is less volatile compared to RVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRG-PA.Check RVI's competition here
SRG-PA vs SITC-PA Comparison June 2026
SRG-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRG-PA stands at 150.7M. In comparison, SITC-PA has a market cap of 373M. Regarding current trading prices, SRG-PA is priced at $20.94, while SITC-PA trades at $11.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRG-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.73, whereas SITC-PA's P/E ratio is 22.75. In terms of profitability, SRG-PA's ROE is -0.23%, compared to SITC-PA's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SRG-PA is more volatile compared to SITC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRG-PA.Check SITC-PA's competition here
SRG-PA vs PINE Comparison June 2026
SRG-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRG-PA stands at 150.7M. In comparison, PINE has a market cap of 324.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SRG-PA is priced at $20.94, while PINE trades at $19.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRG-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.73, whereas PINE's P/E ratio is -245.62. In terms of profitability, SRG-PA's ROE is -0.23%, compared to PINE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SRG-PA is less volatile compared to PINE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRG-PA.Check PINE's competition here
SRG-PA vs CDR-PB Comparison June 2026
SRG-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRG-PA stands at 150.7M. In comparison, CDR-PB has a market cap of 268.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SRG-PA is priced at $20.94, while CDR-PB trades at $19.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRG-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.73, whereas CDR-PB's P/E ratio is -4.47. In terms of profitability, SRG-PA's ROE is -0.23%, compared to CDR-PB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SRG-PA is more volatile compared to CDR-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRG-PA.Check CDR-PB's competition here
SRG-PA vs SITC Comparison June 2026
SRG-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRG-PA stands at 150.7M. In comparison, SITC has a market cap of 262.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SRG-PA is priced at $20.94, while SITC trades at $4.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRG-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.73, whereas SITC's P/E ratio is 1.51. In terms of profitability, SRG-PA's ROE is -0.23%, compared to SITC's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SRG-PA is less volatile compared to SITC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRG-PA.Check SITC's competition here
SRG-PA vs CDR-PC Comparison June 2026
SRG-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRG-PA stands at 150.7M. In comparison, CDR-PC has a market cap of 257.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SRG-PA is priced at $20.94, while CDR-PC trades at $18.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRG-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.73, whereas CDR-PC's P/E ratio is -4.28. In terms of profitability, SRG-PA's ROE is -0.23%, compared to CDR-PC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SRG-PA is less volatile compared to CDR-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRG-PA.Check CDR-PC's competition here
SRG-PA vs SRG Comparison June 2026
SRG-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRG-PA stands at 150.7M. In comparison, SRG has a market cap of 152.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SRG-PA is priced at $20.94, while SRG trades at $2.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRG-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.73, whereas SRG's P/E ratio is -1.88. In terms of profitability, SRG-PA's ROE is -0.23%, compared to SRG's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SRG-PA is less volatile compared to SRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRG-PA.Check SRG's competition here
SRG-PA vs WHLRL Comparison June 2026
SRG-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRG-PA stands at 150.7M. In comparison, WHLRL has a market cap of 86M. Regarding current trading prices, SRG-PA is priced at $20.94, while WHLRL trades at $82.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRG-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.73, whereas WHLRL's P/E ratio is -44.16. In terms of profitability, SRG-PA's ROE is -0.23%, compared to WHLRL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SRG-PA is less volatile compared to WHLRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRG-PA.Check WHLRL's competition here
SRG-PA vs WHLRP Comparison June 2026
SRG-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRG-PA stands at 150.7M. In comparison, WHLRP has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SRG-PA is priced at $20.94, while WHLRP trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRG-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.73, whereas WHLRP's P/E ratio is -4.55. In terms of profitability, SRG-PA's ROE is -0.23%, compared to WHLRP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SRG-PA is less volatile compared to WHLRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRG-PA.Check WHLRP's competition here
SRG-PA vs WHLRD Comparison June 2026
SRG-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRG-PA stands at 150.7M. In comparison, WHLRD has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SRG-PA is priced at $20.94, while WHLRD trades at $36.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRG-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.73, whereas WHLRD's P/E ratio is -19.72. In terms of profitability, SRG-PA's ROE is -0.23%, compared to WHLRD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SRG-PA is more volatile compared to WHLRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRG-PA.Check WHLRD's competition here
SRG-PA vs WHLR Comparison June 2026
SRG-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRG-PA stands at 150.7M. In comparison, WHLR has a market cap of 54.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SRG-PA is priced at $20.94, while WHLR trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRG-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.73, whereas WHLR's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, SRG-PA's ROE is -0.23%, compared to WHLR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SRG-PA is less volatile compared to WHLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRG-PA.Check WHLR's competition here
SRG-PA vs PEI-PC Comparison June 2026
SRG-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRG-PA stands at 150.7M. In comparison, PEI-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SRG-PA is priced at $20.94, while PEI-PC trades at $3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRG-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.73, whereas PEI-PC's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, SRG-PA's ROE is -0.23%, compared to PEI-PC's ROE of +11.91%. Regarding short-term risk, SRG-PA is less volatile compared to PEI-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRG-PA.Check PEI-PC's competition here
SRG-PA vs WRI Comparison June 2026
SRG-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRG-PA stands at 150.7M. In comparison, WRI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SRG-PA is priced at $20.94, while WRI trades at $31.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRG-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.73, whereas WRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRG-PA's ROE is -0.23%, compared to WRI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SRG-PA is less volatile compared to WRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRG-PA.Check WRI's competition here
SRG-PA vs PEI Comparison June 2026
SRG-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRG-PA stands at 150.7M. In comparison, PEI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SRG-PA is priced at $20.94, while PEI trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRG-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.73, whereas PEI's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, SRG-PA's ROE is -0.23%, compared to PEI's ROE of +11.91%. Regarding short-term risk, SRG-PA is less volatile compared to PEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRG-PA.Check PEI's competition here
SRG-PA vs BPYUP Comparison June 2026
SRG-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRG-PA stands at 150.7M. In comparison, BPYUP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SRG-PA is priced at $20.94, while BPYUP trades at $25.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRG-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.73, whereas BPYUP's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, SRG-PA's ROE is -0.23%, compared to BPYUP's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SRG-PA is more volatile compared to BPYUP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRG-PA.Check BPYUP's competition here
SRG-PA vs EQY Comparison June 2026
SRG-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRG-PA stands at 150.7M. In comparison, EQY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SRG-PA is priced at $20.94, while EQY trades at $30.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRG-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.73, whereas EQY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRG-PA's ROE is -0.23%, compared to EQY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SRG-PA is less volatile compared to EQY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRG-PA.Check EQY's competition here
SRG-PA vs PEI-PD Comparison June 2026
SRG-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRG-PA stands at 150.7M. In comparison, PEI-PD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SRG-PA is priced at $20.94, while PEI-PD trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRG-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.73, whereas PEI-PD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, SRG-PA's ROE is -0.23%, compared to PEI-PD's ROE of +11.91%. Regarding short-term risk, SRG-PA is less volatile compared to PEI-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRG-PA.Check PEI-PD's competition here
SRG-PA vs BPYU Comparison June 2026
SRG-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRG-PA stands at 150.7M. In comparison, BPYU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SRG-PA is priced at $20.94, while BPYU trades at $18.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRG-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.73, whereas BPYU's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, SRG-PA's ROE is -0.23%, compared to BPYU's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SRG-PA is more volatile compared to BPYU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRG-PA.Check BPYU's competition here
SRG-PA vs WPG Comparison June 2026
SRG-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRG-PA stands at 150.7M. In comparison, WPG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SRG-PA is priced at $20.94, while WPG trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRG-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.73, whereas WPG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRG-PA's ROE is -0.23%, compared to WPG's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SRG-PA is less volatile compared to WPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRG-PA.Check WPG's competition here
SRG-PA vs HMG Comparison June 2026
SRG-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRG-PA stands at 150.7M. In comparison, HMG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SRG-PA is priced at $20.94, while HMG trades at $22.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRG-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.73, whereas HMG's P/E ratio is -41.53. In terms of profitability, SRG-PA's ROE is -0.23%, compared to HMG's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SRG-PA is less volatile compared to HMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRG-PA.Check HMG's competition here
SRG-PA vs CDR Comparison June 2026
SRG-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRG-PA stands at 150.7M. In comparison, CDR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SRG-PA is priced at $20.94, while CDR trades at $29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRG-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.73, whereas CDR's P/E ratio is -6.61. In terms of profitability, SRG-PA's ROE is -0.23%, compared to CDR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SRG-PA is more volatile compared to CDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRG-PA.Check CDR's competition here
SRG-PA vs NNN-PF Comparison June 2026
SRG-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRG-PA stands at 150.7M. In comparison, NNN-PF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SRG-PA is priced at $20.94, while NNN-PF trades at $25.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRG-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.73, whereas NNN-PF's P/E ratio is 21.56. In terms of profitability, SRG-PA's ROE is -0.23%, compared to NNN-PF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SRG-PA is more volatile compared to NNN-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRG-PA.Check NNN-PF's competition here
SRG-PA vs PEI-PB Comparison June 2026
SRG-PA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRG-PA stands at 150.7M. In comparison, PEI-PB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SRG-PA is priced at $20.94, while PEI-PB trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRG-PA currently has a P/E ratio of -11.73, whereas PEI-PB's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, SRG-PA's ROE is -0.23%, compared to PEI-PB's ROE of +11.91%. Regarding short-term risk, SRG-PA is less volatile compared to PEI-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRG-PA.Check PEI-PB's competition here