Smartstop Self Storage REIT Inc (SMA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SMA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMA | $30.99 | +2.34% | 1.2B | 96.13 | $0.32 | +5.21% |
| EQIX | $1,082.39 | +0.50% | 107.4B | 75.11 | $14.50 | +1.81% |
| AMT | $194.38 | +6.66% | 90.4B | 31.28 | $6.20 | +2.65% |
| DLR | $187.54 | +2.20% | 66.3B | 50.20 | $3.76 | +2.61% |
| DLR-PK | $22.50 | -0.62% | 53.7B | 4.69 | $4.83 | +2.61% |
| CCI | $94.15 | +6.24% | 40.9B | 39.57 | $2.37 | +4.57% |
| IRM | $124.48 | -2.71% | 38.8B | 141.58 | $0.92 | +2.56% |
| VICI | $27.90 | +2.27% | 29.3B | 9.31 | $2.92 | +6.58% |
| SBAC | $208.27 | +5.94% | 22B | 21.86 | $9.51 | +2.29% |
| DLR-PJ | $20.35 | -0.68% | 22B | 4.25 | $4.83 | +2.61% |
Stock Comparison
SMA vs EQIX Comparison June 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EQIX has a market cap of 107.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $30.99, while EQIX trades at $1,082.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of 96.13, whereas EQIX's P/E ratio is 75.11. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EQIX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is more volatile compared to EQIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check EQIX's competition here
SMA vs AMT Comparison June 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AMT has a market cap of 90.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $30.99, while AMT trades at $194.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of 96.13, whereas AMT's P/E ratio is 31.28. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AMT's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is more volatile compared to AMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check AMT's competition here
SMA vs DLR Comparison June 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DLR has a market cap of 66.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $30.99, while DLR trades at $187.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of 96.13, whereas DLR's P/E ratio is 50.20. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DLR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is more volatile compared to DLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check DLR's competition here
SMA vs DLR-PK Comparison June 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DLR-PK has a market cap of 53.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $30.99, while DLR-PK trades at $22.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of 96.13, whereas DLR-PK's P/E ratio is 4.69. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DLR-PK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is more volatile compared to DLR-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check DLR-PK's competition here
SMA vs CCI Comparison June 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CCI has a market cap of 40.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $30.99, while CCI trades at $94.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of 96.13, whereas CCI's P/E ratio is 39.57. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CCI's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is more volatile compared to CCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check CCI's competition here
SMA vs IRM Comparison June 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, IRM has a market cap of 38.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $30.99, while IRM trades at $124.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of 96.13, whereas IRM's P/E ratio is 141.58. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IRM's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is less volatile compared to IRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check IRM's competition here
SMA vs VICI Comparison June 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, VICI has a market cap of 29.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $30.99, while VICI trades at $27.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of 96.13, whereas VICI's P/E ratio is 9.31. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VICI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is less volatile compared to VICI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check VICI's competition here
SMA vs SBAC Comparison June 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SBAC has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $30.99, while SBAC trades at $208.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of 96.13, whereas SBAC's P/E ratio is 21.86. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SBAC's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is less volatile compared to SBAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check SBAC's competition here
SMA vs DLR-PJ Comparison June 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DLR-PJ has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $30.99, while DLR-PJ trades at $20.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of 96.13, whereas DLR-PJ's P/E ratio is 4.25. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DLR-PJ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is more volatile compared to DLR-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check DLR-PJ's competition here
SMA vs LAMR Comparison June 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LAMR has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $30.99, while LAMR trades at $151.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of 96.13, whereas LAMR's P/E ratio is 27.85. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LAMR's ROE of +0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is more volatile compared to LAMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check LAMR's competition here
SMA vs GLPI Comparison June 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, GLPI has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $30.99, while GLPI trades at $47.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of 96.13, whereas GLPI's P/E ratio is 14.57. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GLPI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is less volatile compared to GLPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check GLPI's competition here
SMA vs DLR-PL Comparison June 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, DLR-PL has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $30.99, while DLR-PL trades at $20.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of 96.13, whereas DLR-PL's P/E ratio is 4.20. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DLR-PL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is more volatile compared to DLR-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check DLR-PL's competition here
SMA vs OUT Comparison June 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, OUT has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $30.99, while OUT trades at $31.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of 96.13, whereas OUT's P/E ratio is 29.28. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OUT's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is less volatile compared to OUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check OUT's competition here
SMA vs EPR Comparison June 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EPR has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $30.99, while EPR trades at $57.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of 96.13, whereas EPR's P/E ratio is 17.33. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EPR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is less volatile compared to EPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check EPR's competition here
SMA vs TIPRX Comparison June 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, TIPRX has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $30.99, while TIPRX trades at $24.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of 96.13, whereas TIPRX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TIPRX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is more volatile compared to TIPRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check TIPRX's competition here
SMA vs RYN Comparison June 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, RYN has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $30.99, while RYN trades at $21.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of 96.13, whereas RYN's P/E ratio is 45.70. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RYN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is more volatile compared to RYN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check RYN's competition here
SMA vs PCH Comparison June 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PCH has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $30.99, while PCH trades at $41.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of 96.13, whereas PCH's P/E ratio is 50.89. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PCH's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is more volatile compared to PCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check PCH's competition here
SMA vs EPR-PE Comparison June 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EPR-PE has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $30.99, while EPR-PE trades at $32.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of 96.13, whereas EPR-PE's P/E ratio is 21.16. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EPR-PE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is more volatile compared to EPR-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check EPR-PE's competition here
SMA vs CXW Comparison June 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CXW has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $30.99, while CXW trades at $23.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of 96.13, whereas CXW's P/E ratio is 18.74. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CXW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is less volatile compared to CXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check CXW's competition here
SMA vs BXDC Comparison June 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, BXDC has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $30.99, while BXDC trades at $21.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of 96.13, whereas BXDC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BXDC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is less volatile compared to BXDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check BXDC's competition here
SMA vs EPR-PC Comparison June 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EPR-PC has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $30.99, while EPR-PC trades at $25.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of 96.13, whereas EPR-PC's P/E ratio is 16.66. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EPR-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is more volatile compared to EPR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check EPR-PC's competition here
SMA vs EPR-PG Comparison June 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, EPR-PG has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $30.99, while EPR-PG trades at $20.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of 96.13, whereas EPR-PG's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EPR-PG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is more volatile compared to EPR-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check EPR-PG's competition here
SMA vs LANDO Comparison June 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LANDO has a market cap of 758.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $30.99, while LANDO trades at $20.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of 96.13, whereas LANDO's P/E ratio is -72.81. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LANDO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is more volatile compared to LANDO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check LANDO's competition here
SMA vs LANDP Comparison June 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LANDP has a market cap of 740.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $30.99, while LANDP trades at $20.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of 96.13, whereas LANDP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LANDP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is more volatile compared to LANDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check LANDP's competition here
SMA vs FPI Comparison June 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FPI has a market cap of 448.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $30.99, while FPI trades at $10.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of 96.13, whereas FPI's P/E ratio is 17.43. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FPI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is less volatile compared to FPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check FPI's competition here
SMA vs LAND Comparison June 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LAND has a market cap of 402.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $30.99, while LAND trades at $9.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of 96.13, whereas LAND's P/E ratio is -11.96. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LAND's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is more volatile compared to LAND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check LAND's competition here
SMA vs LANDM Comparison June 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, LANDM has a market cap of 327.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $30.99, while LANDM trades at $25.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of 96.13, whereas LANDM's P/E ratio is -208.93. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LANDM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is more volatile compared to LANDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check LANDM's competition here
SMA vs KRSOX Comparison June 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, KRSOX has a market cap of 302.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $30.99, while KRSOX trades at $23.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of 96.13, whereas KRSOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KRSOX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is more volatile compared to KRSOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check KRSOX's competition here
SMA vs AFCG Comparison June 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, AFCG has a market cap of 86.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $30.99, while AFCG trades at $3.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of 96.13, whereas AFCG's P/E ratio is -5.72. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AFCG's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is less volatile compared to AFCG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check AFCG's competition here
SMA vs PW Comparison June 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, PW has a market cap of 340.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $30.99, while PW trades at $8.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of 96.13, whereas PW's P/E ratio is -1.43. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PW's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is less volatile compared to PW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check PW's competition here
SMA vs SIR Comparison June 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SIR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $30.99, while SIR trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of 96.13, whereas SIR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SIR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is less volatile compared to SIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check SIR's competition here
SMA vs SFC Comparison June 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, SFC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $30.99, while SFC trades at $91.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of 96.13, whereas SFC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SFC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is more volatile compared to SFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check SFC's competition here
SMA vs FUR Comparison June 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FUR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $30.99, while FUR trades at $9.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of 96.13, whereas FUR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FUR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is less volatile compared to FUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check FUR's competition here
SMA vs CTT Comparison June 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, CTT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $30.99, while CTT trades at $10.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of 96.13, whereas CTT's P/E ratio is 9.02. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CTT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is less volatile compared to CTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check CTT's competition here
SMA vs FPO Comparison June 2026
SMA plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMA stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FPO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SMA is priced at $30.99, while FPO trades at $11.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMA currently has a P/E ratio of 96.13, whereas FPO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SMA's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FPO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMA is more volatile compared to FPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMA.Check FPO's competition here