QTS Realty Trust, Inc. (QTS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (QTS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: REIT - Industrial Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QTS | $77.98 | +0.08% | 0 | N/A | N/A | +2.49% |
| PLD | $145.20 | +2.38% | 134.1B | 36.05 | $3.99 | +2.88% |
| PSA | $311.61 | +3.19% | 53.8B | 31.64 | $9.69 | +3.93% |
| PSA-PK | $18.47 | -0.70% | 47.1B | 1.81 | $10.29 | +3.93% |
| PSA-PH | $21.73 | -0.50% | 45.2B | 2.13 | $10.29 | +3.93% |
| EXR | $145.77 | +1.91% | 30.8B | 32.78 | $4.45 | +4.48% |
| LSI | $133.10 | -0.76% | 11.3B | 30.95 | $4.30 | +3.29% |
| EGP | $199.66 | +1.35% | 10.7B | 36.14 | $5.49 | +3.08% |
| LINE | $42.52 | +2.30% | 9.8B | -69.68 | -$0.62 | +4.91% |
| CUBE | $40.35 | +3.20% | 9.1B | 27.97 | $1.43 | +5.29% |
Stock Comparison
QTS vs PLD Comparison June 2026
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, PLD has a market cap of 134.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while PLD trades at $145.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLD's P/E ratio is 36.05. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PLD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to PLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.Check PLD's competition here
QTS vs PSA Comparison June 2026
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, PSA has a market cap of 53.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while PSA trades at $311.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSA's P/E ratio is 31.64. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PSA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to PSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.Check PSA's competition here
QTS vs PSA-PK Comparison June 2026
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, PSA-PK has a market cap of 47.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while PSA-PK trades at $18.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSA-PK's P/E ratio is 1.81. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PSA-PK's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to PSA-PK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.Check PSA-PK's competition here
QTS vs PSA-PH Comparison June 2026
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, PSA-PH has a market cap of 45.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while PSA-PH trades at $21.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSA-PH's P/E ratio is 2.13. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PSA-PH's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to PSA-PH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.Check PSA-PH's competition here
QTS vs EXR Comparison June 2026
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, EXR has a market cap of 30.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while EXR trades at $145.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXR's P/E ratio is 32.78. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EXR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to EXR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.Check EXR's competition here
QTS vs LSI Comparison June 2026
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, LSI has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while LSI trades at $133.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LSI's P/E ratio is 30.95. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LSI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to LSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.Check LSI's competition here
QTS vs EGP Comparison June 2026
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, EGP has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while EGP trades at $199.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGP's P/E ratio is 36.14. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EGP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to EGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.Check EGP's competition here
QTS vs LINE Comparison June 2026
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, LINE has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while LINE trades at $42.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LINE's P/E ratio is -69.68. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LINE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to LINE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.Check LINE's competition here
QTS vs CUBE Comparison June 2026
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, CUBE has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while CUBE trades at $40.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CUBE's P/E ratio is 27.97. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CUBE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to CUBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.Check CUBE's competition here
QTS vs REXR-PB Comparison June 2026
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, REXR-PB has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while REXR-PB trades at $22.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas REXR-PB's P/E ratio is 25.67. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to REXR-PB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to REXR-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.Check REXR-PB's competition here
QTS vs FR Comparison June 2026
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, FR has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while FR trades at $62.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FR's P/E ratio is 23.81. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to FR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.Check FR's competition here
QTS vs REXR Comparison June 2026
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, REXR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while REXR trades at $34.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas REXR's P/E ratio is 36.38. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to REXR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to REXR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.Check REXR's competition here
QTS vs STAG Comparison June 2026
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, STAG has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while STAG trades at $37.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STAG's P/E ratio is 28.68. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to STAG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to STAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.Check STAG's competition here
QTS vs TRNO Comparison June 2026
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, TRNO has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while TRNO trades at $64.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRNO's P/E ratio is 15.73. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TRNO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to TRNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.Check TRNO's competition here
QTS vs REXR-PC Comparison June 2026
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, REXR-PC has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while REXR-PC trades at $21.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas REXR-PC's P/E ratio is 24.29. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to REXR-PC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is more volatile compared to REXR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.Check REXR-PC's competition here
QTS vs JAN Comparison June 2026
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, JAN has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while JAN trades at $25.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas JAN's P/E ratio is -68.50. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to JAN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to JAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.Check JAN's competition here
QTS vs COLD Comparison June 2026
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, COLD has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while COLD trades at $14.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COLD's P/E ratio is -38.36. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to COLD's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to COLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.Check COLD's competition here
QTS vs RCC Comparison June 2026
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, RCC has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while RCC trades at $25.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RCC's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is more volatile compared to RCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.Check RCC's competition here
QTS vs GRP-UN Comparison June 2026
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, GRP-UN has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while GRP-UN trades at $59.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GRP-UN's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GRP-UN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to GRP-UN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.Check GRP-UN's competition here
QTS vs PSA-PF Comparison June 2026
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, PSA-PF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while PSA-PF trades at $20.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSA-PF's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PSA-PF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to PSA-PF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.Check PSA-PF's competition here
QTS vs PSA-PG Comparison June 2026
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, PSA-PG has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while PSA-PG trades at $20.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSA-PG's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PSA-PG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to PSA-PG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.Check PSA-PG's competition here
QTS vs PSA-PI Comparison June 2026
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, PSA-PI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while PSA-PI trades at $18.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSA-PI's P/E ratio is 1.86. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PSA-PI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to PSA-PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.Check PSA-PI's competition here
QTS vs NSA Comparison June 2026
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, NSA has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while NSA trades at $43.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSA's P/E ratio is 57.25. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NSA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to NSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.Check NSA's competition here
QTS vs PSA-PJ Comparison June 2026
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, PSA-PJ has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while PSA-PJ trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSA-PJ's P/E ratio is 1.78. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PSA-PJ's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to PSA-PJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.Check PSA-PJ's competition here
QTS vs PSA-PL Comparison June 2026
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, PSA-PL has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while PSA-PL trades at $18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSA-PL's P/E ratio is 1.77. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PSA-PL's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to PSA-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.Check PSA-PL's competition here
QTS vs LXP Comparison June 2026
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, LXP has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while LXP trades at $52.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LXP's P/E ratio is 34.69. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LXP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to LXP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.Check LXP's competition here
QTS vs PSA-PM Comparison June 2026
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, PSA-PM has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while PSA-PM trades at $15.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSA-PM's P/E ratio is 1.56. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PSA-PM's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to PSA-PM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.Check PSA-PM's competition here
QTS vs PSA-PS Comparison June 2026
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, PSA-PS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while PSA-PS trades at $15.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSA-PS's P/E ratio is 1.55. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PSA-PS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to PSA-PS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.Check PSA-PS's competition here
QTS vs PSA-PR Comparison June 2026
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, PSA-PR has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while PSA-PR trades at $15.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSA-PR's P/E ratio is 1.53. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PSA-PR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to PSA-PR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.Check PSA-PR's competition here
QTS vs PSA-PQ Comparison June 2026
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, PSA-PQ has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while PSA-PQ trades at $15.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSA-PQ's P/E ratio is 1.48. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PSA-PQ's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to PSA-PQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.Check PSA-PQ's competition here
QTS vs LXP-PC Comparison June 2026
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, LXP-PC has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while LXP-PC trades at $45.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LXP-PC's P/E ratio is 37.59. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LXP-PC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to LXP-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.Check LXP-PC's competition here
QTS vs PSA-PO Comparison June 2026
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, PSA-PO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while PSA-PO trades at $15.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSA-PO's P/E ratio is 1.47. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PSA-PO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to PSA-PO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.Check PSA-PO's competition here
QTS vs PSA-PN Comparison June 2026
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, PSA-PN has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while PSA-PN trades at $14.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSA-PN's P/E ratio is 1.46. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PSA-PN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to PSA-PN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.Check PSA-PN's competition here
QTS vs NSA-PA Comparison June 2026
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, NSA-PA has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while NSA-PA trades at $22.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NSA-PA's P/E ratio is 22.24. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NSA-PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to NSA-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.Check NSA-PA's competition here
QTS vs NYMTI Comparison June 2026
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, NYMTI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while NYMTI trades at $25.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NYMTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NYMTI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to NYMTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.Check NYMTI's competition here
QTS vs IIPR Comparison June 2026
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, IIPR has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while IIPR trades at $58.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IIPR's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IIPR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to IIPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.Check IIPR's competition here
QTS vs SCCF Comparison June 2026
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, SCCF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while SCCF trades at $24.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SCCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to SCCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.Check SCCF's competition here
QTS vs SCCD Comparison June 2026
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, SCCD has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while SCCD trades at $24.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCCD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SCCD's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to SCCD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.Check SCCD's competition here
QTS vs SCCE Comparison June 2026
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, SCCE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while SCCE trades at $24.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCCE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SCCE's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to SCCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.Check SCCE's competition here
QTS vs PLYM Comparison June 2026
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, PLYM has a market cap of 979.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while PLYM trades at $21.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLYM's P/E ratio is 10.88. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PLYM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is more volatile compared to PLYM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.Check PLYM's competition here
QTS vs DHCNI Comparison June 2026
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, DHCNI has a market cap of 915.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while DHCNI trades at $18.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DHCNI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DHCNI's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to DHCNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.Check DHCNI's competition here
QTS vs ILPT Comparison June 2026
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, ILPT has a market cap of 589.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while ILPT trades at $8.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ILPT's P/E ratio is -10.91. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ILPT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to ILPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.Check ILPT's competition here
QTS vs TPTA Comparison June 2026
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, TPTA has a market cap of 525.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while TPTA trades at $20.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TPTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TPTA's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to TPTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.Check TPTA's competition here
QTS vs PSA-PP Comparison June 2026
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, PSA-PP has a market cap of 381.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while PSA-PP trades at $15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSA-PP's P/E ratio is 1.54. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PSA-PP's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to PSA-PP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.Check PSA-PP's competition here
QTS vs TFSA Comparison June 2026
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, TFSA has a market cap of 371.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while TFSA trades at $15.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TFSA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TFSA's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to TFSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.Check TFSA's competition here
QTS vs MDV Comparison June 2026
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, MDV has a market cap of 188.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while MDV trades at $18.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDV's P/E ratio is -44.63. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MDV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to MDV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.Check MDV's competition here
QTS vs PLYM-PA Comparison June 2026
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, PLYM-PA has a market cap of 186.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while PLYM-PA trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PLYM-PA's P/E ratio is -27.36. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PLYM-PA's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is more volatile compared to PLYM-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.Check PLYM-PA's competition here
QTS vs AJXA Comparison June 2026
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, AJXA has a market cap of 140.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while AJXA trades at $25.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AJXA's P/E ratio is 17.28. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AJXA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to AJXA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.Check AJXA's competition here
QTS vs SCCB Comparison June 2026
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, SCCB has a market cap of 116.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while SCCB trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCCB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SCCB's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is more volatile compared to SCCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.Check SCCB's competition here
QTS vs SACC Comparison June 2026
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, SACC has a market cap of 99M. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while SACC trades at $24.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SACC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SACC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is more volatile compared to SACC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.Check SACC's competition here
QTS vs LPA Comparison June 2026
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, LPA has a market cap of 91.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while LPA trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LPA's P/E ratio is 28.90. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LPA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to LPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.Check LPA's competition here
QTS vs SELF Comparison June 2026
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, SELF has a market cap of 58.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while SELF trades at $5.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SELF's P/E ratio is 30.00. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SELF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to SELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.Check SELF's competition here
QTS vs IIPR-PA Comparison June 2026
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, IIPR-PA has a market cap of 47.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while IIPR-PA trades at $23.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IIPR-PA's P/E ratio is 4.94. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IIPR-PA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to IIPR-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.Check IIPR-PA's competition here
QTS vs PW-PA Comparison June 2026
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, PW-PA has a market cap of 38.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while PW-PA trades at $10.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PW-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PW-PA's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to PW-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.Check PW-PA's competition here
QTS vs CONE Comparison June 2026
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, CONE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while CONE trades at $90.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CONE's P/E ratio is 451.80. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CONE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is more volatile compared to CONE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.Check CONE's competition here
QTS vs QTS-PB Comparison June 2026
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, QTS-PB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while QTS-PB trades at $172.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QTS-PB's P/E ratio is -387.38. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to QTS-PB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to QTS-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.Check QTS-PB's competition here
QTS vs MNR-PC Comparison June 2026
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, MNR-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while MNR-PC trades at $25.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNR-PC's P/E ratio is 81.65. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MNR-PC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to MNR-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.Check MNR-PC's competition here
QTS vs QTS-PA Comparison June 2026
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, QTS-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while QTS-PA trades at $25.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QTS-PA's P/E ratio is -48.33. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to QTS-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to QTS-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.Check QTS-PA's competition here
QTS vs DRE Comparison June 2026
QTS plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QTS stands at 0. In comparison, DRE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QTS is priced at $77.98, while DRE trades at $48.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QTS currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DRE's P/E ratio is 19.44. In terms of profitability, QTS's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DRE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QTS is less volatile compared to DRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QTS.Check DRE's competition here