Quest Resource Holding Corporation (QRHC) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (QRHC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Waste Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QRHC | $1.18 | -0.84% | 24.8M | -3.47 | -$0.34 | N/A |
| WM | $211.46 | -1.37% | 84.9B | 30.55 | $6.92 | +1.62% |
| RSG | $200.44 | -1.60% | 61.7B | 28.76 | $6.97 | +1.22% |
| WCN | $149.02 | -1.34% | 37.9B | 36.45 | $4.09 | +0.91% |
| GFLU | $70.30 | +4.32% | 25B | -91.90 | -$0.77 | N/A |
| CLH | $281.03 | +0.11% | 14.9B | 38.13 | $7.38 | N/A |
| GFL | $33.54 | -2.16% | 11.6B | 90.59 | $0.37 | +0.19% |
| SRCL | $61.98 | +0.83% | 5.8B | 158.92 | $0.39 | N/A |
| CWST | $82.17 | -2.43% | 5.1B | 747.09 | $0.11 | N/A |
| NVRI | $20.75 | -2.21% | 1.7B | -10.12 | -$2.05 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
QRHC vs WM Comparison June 2026
QRHC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRHC stands at 24.8M. In comparison, WM has a market cap of 84.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QRHC is priced at $1.18, while WM trades at $211.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRHC currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas WM's P/E ratio is 30.55. In terms of profitability, QRHC's ROE is -0.18%, compared to WM's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, QRHC is more volatile compared to WM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRHC.Check WM's competition here
QRHC vs RSG Comparison June 2026
QRHC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRHC stands at 24.8M. In comparison, RSG has a market cap of 61.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QRHC is priced at $1.18, while RSG trades at $200.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRHC currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas RSG's P/E ratio is 28.76. In terms of profitability, QRHC's ROE is -0.18%, compared to RSG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QRHC is more volatile compared to RSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRHC.Check RSG's competition here
QRHC vs WCN Comparison June 2026
QRHC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRHC stands at 24.8M. In comparison, WCN has a market cap of 37.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QRHC is priced at $1.18, while WCN trades at $149.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRHC currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas WCN's P/E ratio is 36.45. In terms of profitability, QRHC's ROE is -0.18%, compared to WCN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QRHC is more volatile compared to WCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRHC.Check WCN's competition here
QRHC vs GFLU Comparison June 2026
QRHC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRHC stands at 24.8M. In comparison, GFLU has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, QRHC is priced at $1.18, while GFLU trades at $70.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRHC currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas GFLU's P/E ratio is -91.90. In terms of profitability, QRHC's ROE is -0.18%, compared to GFLU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QRHC is less volatile compared to GFLU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRHC.Check GFLU's competition here
QRHC vs CLH Comparison June 2026
QRHC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRHC stands at 24.8M. In comparison, CLH has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QRHC is priced at $1.18, while CLH trades at $281.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRHC currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas CLH's P/E ratio is 38.13. In terms of profitability, QRHC's ROE is -0.18%, compared to CLH's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QRHC is more volatile compared to CLH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRHC.Check CLH's competition here
QRHC vs GFL Comparison June 2026
QRHC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRHC stands at 24.8M. In comparison, GFL has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QRHC is priced at $1.18, while GFL trades at $33.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRHC currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas GFL's P/E ratio is 90.59. In terms of profitability, QRHC's ROE is -0.18%, compared to GFL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QRHC is less volatile compared to GFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRHC.Check GFL's competition here
QRHC vs SRCL Comparison June 2026
QRHC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRHC stands at 24.8M. In comparison, SRCL has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QRHC is priced at $1.18, while SRCL trades at $61.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRHC currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas SRCL's P/E ratio is 158.92. In terms of profitability, QRHC's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SRCL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QRHC is more volatile compared to SRCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRHC.Check SRCL's competition here
QRHC vs CWST Comparison June 2026
QRHC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRHC stands at 24.8M. In comparison, CWST has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QRHC is priced at $1.18, while CWST trades at $82.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRHC currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas CWST's P/E ratio is 747.09. In terms of profitability, QRHC's ROE is -0.18%, compared to CWST's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QRHC is less volatile compared to CWST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRHC.Check CWST's competition here
QRHC vs NVRI Comparison June 2026
QRHC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRHC stands at 24.8M. In comparison, NVRI has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QRHC is priced at $1.18, while NVRI trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRHC currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas NVRI's P/E ratio is -10.12. In terms of profitability, QRHC's ROE is -0.18%, compared to NVRI's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, QRHC is less volatile compared to NVRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRHC.Check NVRI's competition here
QRHC vs HCCI Comparison June 2026
QRHC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRHC stands at 24.8M. In comparison, HCCI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QRHC is priced at $1.18, while HCCI trades at $45.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRHC currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas HCCI's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, QRHC's ROE is -0.18%, compared to HCCI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, QRHC is more volatile compared to HCCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRHC.Check HCCI's competition here
QRHC vs HSC Comparison June 2026
QRHC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRHC stands at 24.8M. In comparison, HSC has a market cap of 729.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QRHC is priced at $1.18, while HSC trades at $9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRHC currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas HSC's P/E ratio is -5.08. In terms of profitability, QRHC's ROE is -0.18%, compared to HSC's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, QRHC is less volatile compared to HSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRHC.Check HSC's competition here
QRHC vs MEG Comparison June 2026
QRHC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRHC stands at 24.8M. In comparison, MEG has a market cap of 565.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QRHC is priced at $1.18, while MEG trades at $15.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRHC currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas MEG's P/E ratio is -120.31. In terms of profitability, QRHC's ROE is -0.18%, compared to MEG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QRHC is less volatile compared to MEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRHC.Check MEG's competition here
QRHC vs PESI Comparison June 2026
QRHC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRHC stands at 24.8M. In comparison, PESI has a market cap of 182.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QRHC is priced at $1.18, while PESI trades at $9.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRHC currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas PESI's P/E ratio is -12.43. In terms of profitability, QRHC's ROE is -0.18%, compared to PESI's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, QRHC is less volatile compared to PESI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRHC.Check PESI's competition here
QRHC vs YDDL Comparison June 2026
QRHC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRHC stands at 24.8M. In comparison, YDDL has a market cap of 147.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QRHC is priced at $1.18, while YDDL trades at $3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRHC currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas YDDL's P/E ratio is 14.57. In terms of profitability, QRHC's ROE is -0.18%, compared to YDDL's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, QRHC is less volatile compared to YDDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRHC.Check YDDL's competition here
QRHC vs ESGL Comparison June 2026
QRHC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRHC stands at 24.8M. In comparison, ESGL has a market cap of 80.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QRHC is priced at $1.18, while ESGL trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRHC currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas ESGL's P/E ratio is -31.50. In terms of profitability, QRHC's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ESGL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QRHC is more volatile compared to ESGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRHC.Check ESGL's competition here
QRHC vs LICY Comparison June 2026
QRHC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRHC stands at 24.8M. In comparison, LICY has a market cap of 29.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QRHC is priced at $1.18, while LICY trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRHC currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas LICY's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, QRHC's ROE is -0.18%, compared to LICY's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, QRHC is less volatile compared to LICY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRHC.Check LICY's competition here
QRHC vs AMBI Comparison June 2026
QRHC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRHC stands at 24.8M. In comparison, AMBI has a market cap of 24.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QRHC is priced at $1.18, while AMBI trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRHC currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas AMBI's P/E ratio is -44.00. In terms of profitability, QRHC's ROE is -0.18%, compared to AMBI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QRHC is less volatile compared to AMBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRHC.Check AMBI's competition here
QRHC vs ENGS Comparison June 2026
QRHC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRHC stands at 24.8M. In comparison, ENGS has a market cap of 22.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QRHC is priced at $1.18, while ENGS trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRHC currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas ENGS's P/E ratio is -6.78. In terms of profitability, QRHC's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ENGS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, QRHC is less volatile compared to ENGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRHC.Check ENGS's competition here
QRHC vs CHRA Comparison June 2026
QRHC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRHC stands at 24.8M. In comparison, CHRA has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QRHC is priced at $1.18, while CHRA trades at $5.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRHC currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas CHRA's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, QRHC's ROE is -0.18%, compared to CHRA's ROE of +20.59%. Regarding short-term risk, QRHC is more volatile compared to CHRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRHC.Check CHRA's competition here
QRHC vs AQMS Comparison June 2026
QRHC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRHC stands at 24.8M. In comparison, AQMS has a market cap of 14.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QRHC is priced at $1.18, while AQMS trades at $4.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRHC currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas AQMS's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, QRHC's ROE is -0.18%, compared to AQMS's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, QRHC is less volatile compared to AQMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRHC.Check AQMS's competition here
QRHC vs LNZA Comparison June 2026
QRHC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRHC stands at 24.8M. In comparison, LNZA has a market cap of 13.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QRHC is priced at $1.18, while LNZA trades at $6.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRHC currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas LNZA's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, QRHC's ROE is -0.18%, compared to LNZA's ROE of -12.68%. Regarding short-term risk, QRHC is less volatile compared to LNZA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRHC.Check LNZA's competition here
QRHC vs AWX Comparison June 2026
QRHC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRHC stands at 24.8M. In comparison, AWX has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QRHC is priced at $1.18, while AWX trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRHC currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas AWX's P/E ratio is 18.14. In terms of profitability, QRHC's ROE is -0.18%, compared to AWX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QRHC is more volatile compared to AWX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRHC.Check AWX's competition here
QRHC vs CHNR Comparison June 2026
QRHC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRHC stands at 24.8M. In comparison, CHNR has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QRHC is priced at $1.18, while CHNR trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRHC currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas CHNR's P/E ratio is -29.18. In terms of profitability, QRHC's ROE is -0.18%, compared to CHNR's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QRHC is less volatile compared to CHNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRHC.Check CHNR's competition here
QRHC vs CDTG Comparison June 2026
QRHC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRHC stands at 24.8M. In comparison, CDTG has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, QRHC is priced at $1.18, while CDTG trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRHC currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas CDTG's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, QRHC's ROE is -0.18%, compared to CDTG's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, QRHC is less volatile compared to CDTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRHC.Check CDTG's competition here
QRHC vs GWAV Comparison June 2026
QRHC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRHC stands at 24.8M. In comparison, GWAV has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, QRHC is priced at $1.18, while GWAV trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRHC currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas GWAV's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, QRHC's ROE is -0.18%, compared to GWAV's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, QRHC is less volatile compared to GWAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRHC.Check GWAV's competition here
QRHC vs DXST Comparison June 2026
QRHC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRHC stands at 24.8M. In comparison, DXST has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, QRHC is priced at $1.18, while DXST trades at $1.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRHC currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas DXST's P/E ratio is -3.12. In terms of profitability, QRHC's ROE is -0.18%, compared to DXST's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QRHC is less volatile compared to DXST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRHC.Check DXST's competition here
QRHC vs NES Comparison June 2026
QRHC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRHC stands at 24.8M. In comparison, NES has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QRHC is priced at $1.18, while NES trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRHC currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas NES's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, QRHC's ROE is -0.18%, compared to NES's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, QRHC is less volatile compared to NES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRHC.Check NES's competition here
QRHC vs ECOL Comparison June 2026
QRHC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRHC stands at 24.8M. In comparison, ECOL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QRHC is priced at $1.18, while ECOL trades at $47.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRHC currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas ECOL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QRHC's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ECOL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QRHC is more volatile compared to ECOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRHC.Check ECOL's competition here
QRHC vs ECOLW Comparison June 2026
QRHC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRHC stands at 24.8M. In comparison, ECOLW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QRHC is priced at $1.18, while ECOLW trades at $5.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRHC currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas ECOLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QRHC's ROE is -0.18%, compared to ECOLW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QRHC is more volatile compared to ECOLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRHC.Check ECOLW's competition here
QRHC vs CVA Comparison June 2026
QRHC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRHC stands at 24.8M. In comparison, CVA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QRHC is priced at $1.18, while CVA trades at $20.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRHC currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas CVA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QRHC's ROE is -0.18%, compared to CVA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QRHC is more volatile compared to CVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRHC.Check CVA's competition here
QRHC vs SMED Comparison June 2026
QRHC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QRHC stands at 24.8M. In comparison, SMED has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QRHC is priced at $1.18, while SMED trades at $8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QRHC currently has a P/E ratio of -3.47, whereas SMED's P/E ratio is 36.46. In terms of profitability, QRHC's ROE is -0.18%, compared to SMED's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, QRHC is more volatile compared to SMED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRHC.Check SMED's competition here