Nuverra Environmental Solutions, Inc. (NES) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NES) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Waste Management Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NES | $2.15 | +11.35% | 0 | -1.32 | -$1.63 | N/A |
| WM | $216.11 | +1.69% | 85.1B | 30.67 | $6.91 | +1.62% |
| RSG | $203.96 | +1.56% | 62B | 28.89 | $6.98 | +1.22% |
| WCN | $151.19 | +1.12% | 37.9B | 36.38 | $4.10 | +0.92% |
| GFLU | $70.30 | +4.32% | 25B | -91.90 | -$0.77 | N/A |
| CLH | $281.92 | +0.33% | 14.6B | 37.33 | $7.39 | N/A |
| GFL | $34.41 | +0.25% | 11.7B | 91.27 | $0.37 | +0.19% |
| SRCL | $61.98 | +0.83% | 5.8B | 158.92 | $0.39 | N/A |
| CWST | $85.23 | +0.16% | 5.2B | 754.91 | $0.11 | N/A |
| NVRI | $17.94 | -13.57% | 1.6B | -9.37 | -$2.05 | +77.52% |
Stock Comparison
NES vs WM Comparison June 2026
NES plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NES stands at 0. In comparison, WM has a market cap of 85.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NES is priced at $2.15, while WM trades at $216.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas WM's P/E ratio is 30.67. In terms of profitability, NES's ROE is -0.29%, compared to WM's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NES is more volatile compared to WM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NES.Check WM's competition here
NES vs RSG Comparison June 2026
NES plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NES stands at 0. In comparison, RSG has a market cap of 62B. Regarding current trading prices, NES is priced at $2.15, while RSG trades at $203.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas RSG's P/E ratio is 28.89. In terms of profitability, NES's ROE is -0.29%, compared to RSG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NES is more volatile compared to RSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NES.Check RSG's competition here
NES vs WCN Comparison June 2026
NES plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NES stands at 0. In comparison, WCN has a market cap of 37.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NES is priced at $2.15, while WCN trades at $151.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas WCN's P/E ratio is 36.38. In terms of profitability, NES's ROE is -0.29%, compared to WCN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NES is more volatile compared to WCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NES.Check WCN's competition here
NES vs GFLU Comparison June 2026
NES plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NES stands at 0. In comparison, GFLU has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, NES is priced at $2.15, while GFLU trades at $70.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas GFLU's P/E ratio is -91.90. In terms of profitability, NES's ROE is -0.29%, compared to GFLU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NES is more volatile compared to GFLU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NES.Check GFLU's competition here
NES vs CLH Comparison June 2026
NES plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NES stands at 0. In comparison, CLH has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NES is priced at $2.15, while CLH trades at $281.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas CLH's P/E ratio is 37.33. In terms of profitability, NES's ROE is -0.29%, compared to CLH's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NES is more volatile compared to CLH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NES.Check CLH's competition here
NES vs GFL Comparison June 2026
NES plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NES stands at 0. In comparison, GFL has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NES is priced at $2.15, while GFL trades at $34.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas GFL's P/E ratio is 91.27. In terms of profitability, NES's ROE is -0.29%, compared to GFL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NES is more volatile compared to GFL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NES.Check GFL's competition here
NES vs SRCL Comparison June 2026
NES plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NES stands at 0. In comparison, SRCL has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NES is priced at $2.15, while SRCL trades at $61.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas SRCL's P/E ratio is 158.92. In terms of profitability, NES's ROE is -0.29%, compared to SRCL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NES is more volatile compared to SRCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NES.Check SRCL's competition here
NES vs CWST Comparison June 2026
NES plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NES stands at 0. In comparison, CWST has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NES is priced at $2.15, while CWST trades at $85.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas CWST's P/E ratio is 754.91. In terms of profitability, NES's ROE is -0.29%, compared to CWST's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NES is more volatile compared to CWST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NES.Check CWST's competition here
NES vs NVRI Comparison June 2026
NES plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NES stands at 0. In comparison, NVRI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NES is priced at $2.15, while NVRI trades at $17.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas NVRI's P/E ratio is -9.37. In terms of profitability, NES's ROE is -0.29%, compared to NVRI's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, NES is more volatile compared to NVRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NES.Check NVRI's competition here
NES vs HCCI Comparison June 2026
NES plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NES stands at 0. In comparison, HCCI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NES is priced at $2.15, while HCCI trades at $45.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas HCCI's P/E ratio is 14.22. In terms of profitability, NES's ROE is -0.29%, compared to HCCI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NES is more volatile compared to HCCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NES.Check HCCI's competition here
NES vs HSC Comparison June 2026
NES plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NES stands at 0. In comparison, HSC has a market cap of 729.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NES is priced at $2.15, while HSC trades at $9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas HSC's P/E ratio is -5.08. In terms of profitability, NES's ROE is -0.29%, compared to HSC's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, NES is more volatile compared to HSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NES.Check HSC's competition here
NES vs MEG Comparison June 2026
NES plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NES stands at 0. In comparison, MEG has a market cap of 565.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NES is priced at $2.15, while MEG trades at $15.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas MEG's P/E ratio is -120.31. In terms of profitability, NES's ROE is -0.29%, compared to MEG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NES is more volatile compared to MEG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NES.Check MEG's competition here
NES vs PESI Comparison June 2026
NES plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NES stands at 0. In comparison, PESI has a market cap of 189M. Regarding current trading prices, NES is priced at $2.15, while PESI trades at $9.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas PESI's P/E ratio is -12.89. In terms of profitability, NES's ROE is -0.29%, compared to PESI's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, NES is more volatile compared to PESI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NES.Check PESI's competition here
NES vs YDDL Comparison June 2026
NES plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NES stands at 0. In comparison, YDDL has a market cap of 148.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NES is priced at $2.15, while YDDL trades at $3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas YDDL's P/E ratio is 14.65. In terms of profitability, NES's ROE is -0.29%, compared to YDDL's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, NES is more volatile compared to YDDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NES.Check YDDL's competition here
NES vs ESGL Comparison June 2026
NES plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NES stands at 0. In comparison, ESGL has a market cap of 80.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NES is priced at $2.15, while ESGL trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas ESGL's P/E ratio is -31.50. In terms of profitability, NES's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ESGL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NES is more volatile compared to ESGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NES.Check ESGL's competition here
NES vs LICY Comparison June 2026
NES plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NES stands at 0. In comparison, LICY has a market cap of 29.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NES is priced at $2.15, while LICY trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas LICY's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, NES's ROE is -0.29%, compared to LICY's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, NES is more volatile compared to LICY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NES.Check LICY's competition here
NES vs QRHC Comparison June 2026
NES plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NES stands at 0. In comparison, QRHC has a market cap of 28.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NES is priced at $2.15, while QRHC trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas QRHC's P/E ratio is -3.94. In terms of profitability, NES's ROE is -0.29%, compared to QRHC's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NES is more volatile compared to QRHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NES.Check QRHC's competition here
NES vs AMBI Comparison June 2026
NES plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NES stands at 0. In comparison, AMBI has a market cap of 24.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NES is priced at $2.15, while AMBI trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas AMBI's P/E ratio is -44.00. In terms of profitability, NES's ROE is -0.29%, compared to AMBI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NES is less volatile compared to AMBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NES.Check AMBI's competition here
NES vs ENGS Comparison June 2026
NES plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NES stands at 0. In comparison, ENGS has a market cap of 23M. Regarding current trading prices, NES is priced at $2.15, while ENGS trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas ENGS's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, NES's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ENGS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, NES is more volatile compared to ENGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NES.Check ENGS's competition here
NES vs CHRA Comparison June 2026
NES plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NES stands at 0. In comparison, CHRA has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NES is priced at $2.15, while CHRA trades at $5.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas CHRA's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, NES's ROE is -0.29%, compared to CHRA's ROE of +20.59%. Regarding short-term risk, NES is more volatile compared to CHRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NES.Check CHRA's competition here
NES vs LNZA Comparison June 2026
NES plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NES stands at 0. In comparison, LNZA has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NES is priced at $2.15, while LNZA trades at $5.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas LNZA's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, NES's ROE is -0.29%, compared to LNZA's ROE of -12.68%. Regarding short-term risk, NES is more volatile compared to LNZA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NES.Check LNZA's competition here
NES vs AQMS Comparison June 2026
NES plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NES stands at 0. In comparison, AQMS has a market cap of 13M. Regarding current trading prices, NES is priced at $2.15, while AQMS trades at $3.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas AQMS's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, NES's ROE is -0.29%, compared to AQMS's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, NES is more volatile compared to AQMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NES.Check AQMS's competition here
NES vs AWX Comparison June 2026
NES plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NES stands at 0. In comparison, AWX has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NES is priced at $2.15, while AWX trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas AWX's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, NES's ROE is -0.29%, compared to AWX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NES is more volatile compared to AWX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NES.Check AWX's competition here
NES vs CHNR Comparison June 2026
NES plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NES stands at 0. In comparison, CHNR has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NES is priced at $2.15, while CHNR trades at $4.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas CHNR's P/E ratio is -29.29. In terms of profitability, NES's ROE is -0.29%, compared to CHNR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NES is more volatile compared to CHNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NES.Check CHNR's competition here
NES vs CDTG Comparison June 2026
NES plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NES stands at 0. In comparison, CDTG has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NES is priced at $2.15, while CDTG trades at $7.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas CDTG's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, NES's ROE is -0.29%, compared to CDTG's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NES is more volatile compared to CDTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NES.Check CDTG's competition here
NES vs DXST Comparison June 2026
NES plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NES stands at 0. In comparison, DXST has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NES is priced at $2.15, while DXST trades at $4.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas DXST's P/E ratio is -9.90. In terms of profitability, NES's ROE is -0.29%, compared to DXST's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NES is less volatile compared to DXST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NES.Check DXST's competition here
NES vs GWAV Comparison June 2026
NES plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NES stands at 0. In comparison, GWAV has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, NES is priced at $2.15, while GWAV trades at $3.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas GWAV's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, NES's ROE is -0.29%, compared to GWAV's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, NES is more volatile compared to GWAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NES.Check GWAV's competition here
NES vs ECOLW Comparison June 2026
NES plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NES stands at 0. In comparison, ECOLW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NES is priced at $2.15, while ECOLW trades at $5.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas ECOLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NES's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ECOLW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NES is more volatile compared to ECOLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NES.Check ECOLW's competition here
NES vs ECOL Comparison June 2026
NES plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NES stands at 0. In comparison, ECOL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NES is priced at $2.15, while ECOL trades at $47.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas ECOL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NES's ROE is -0.29%, compared to ECOL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NES is more volatile compared to ECOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NES.Check ECOL's competition here
NES vs SMED Comparison June 2026
NES plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NES stands at 0. In comparison, SMED has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NES is priced at $2.15, while SMED trades at $8.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas SMED's P/E ratio is 36.46. In terms of profitability, NES's ROE is -0.29%, compared to SMED's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, NES is more volatile compared to SMED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NES.Check SMED's competition here
NES vs CVA Comparison June 2026
NES plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NES stands at 0. In comparison, CVA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NES is priced at $2.15, while CVA trades at $20.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NES currently has a P/E ratio of -1.32, whereas CVA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NES's ROE is -0.29%, compared to CVA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NES is more volatile compared to CVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NES.Check CVA's competition here