Onity Group Inc. (ONIT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

ONIT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONIT stands at 309.9M. In comparison, RKT has a market cap of 35.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ONIT is priced at $36.83, while RKT trades at $12.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONIT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.87, whereas RKT's P/E ratio is -421.83. In terms of profitability, ONIT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to RKT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ONIT is less volatile compared to RKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONIT.Check RKT's competition here

ONIT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONIT stands at 309.9M. In comparison, COOP has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ONIT is priced at $36.83, while COOP trades at $210.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONIT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.87, whereas COOP's P/E ratio is 23.63. In terms of profitability, ONIT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to COOP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ONIT is more volatile compared to COOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONIT.Check COOP's competition here

ONIT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONIT stands at 309.9M. In comparison, MMAC has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ONIT is priced at $36.83, while MMAC trades at $27.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONIT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.87, whereas MMAC's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, ONIT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to MMAC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ONIT is more volatile compared to MMAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONIT.Check MMAC's competition here

ONIT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONIT stands at 309.9M. In comparison, PFSI has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ONIT is priced at $36.83, while PFSI trades at $81.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONIT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.87, whereas PFSI's P/E ratio is 8.63. In terms of profitability, ONIT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PFSI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ONIT is more volatile compared to PFSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONIT.Check PFSI's competition here

ONIT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONIT stands at 309.9M. In comparison, UWMC has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ONIT is priced at $36.83, while UWMC trades at $2.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONIT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.87, whereas UWMC's P/E ratio is 8.62. In terms of profitability, ONIT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to UWMC's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ONIT is less volatile compared to UWMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONIT.Check UWMC's competition here

ONIT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONIT stands at 309.9M. In comparison, ADAMG has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ONIT is priced at $36.83, while ADAMG trades at $25.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONIT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.87, whereas ADAMG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ONIT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ADAMG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ONIT is more volatile compared to ADAMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONIT.Check ADAMG's competition here

ONIT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONIT stands at 309.9M. In comparison, WD has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ONIT is priced at $36.83, while WD trades at $51.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONIT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.87, whereas WD's P/E ratio is 25.37. In terms of profitability, ONIT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to WD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ONIT is more volatile compared to WD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONIT.Check WD's competition here

ONIT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONIT stands at 309.9M. In comparison, ECPG has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ONIT is priced at $36.83, while ECPG trades at $81.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONIT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.87, whereas ECPG's P/E ratio is 6.34. In terms of profitability, ONIT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ECPG's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ONIT is more volatile compared to ECPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONIT.Check ECPG's competition here

ONIT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONIT stands at 309.9M. In comparison, ADAMZ has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ONIT is priced at $36.83, while ADAMZ trades at $18.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONIT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.87, whereas ADAMZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ONIT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ADAMZ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ONIT is more volatile compared to ADAMZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONIT.Check ADAMZ's competition here

ONIT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONIT stands at 309.9M. In comparison, LADR has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ONIT is priced at $36.83, while LADR trades at $10.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONIT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.87, whereas LADR's P/E ratio is 23.25. In terms of profitability, ONIT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to LADR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ONIT is more volatile compared to LADR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONIT.Check LADR's competition here

ONIT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONIT stands at 309.9M. In comparison, GHLD has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ONIT is priced at $36.83, while GHLD trades at $20.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONIT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.87, whereas GHLD's P/E ratio is 9.91. In terms of profitability, ONIT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to GHLD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ONIT is more volatile compared to GHLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONIT.Check GHLD's competition here

ONIT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONIT stands at 309.9M. In comparison, VEL has a market cap of 685.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ONIT is priced at $36.83, while VEL trades at $17.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONIT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.87, whereas VEL's P/E ratio is 6.22. In terms of profitability, ONIT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to VEL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ONIT is more volatile compared to VEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONIT.Check VEL's competition here

ONIT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONIT stands at 309.9M. In comparison, UWMC-WT has a market cap of 480.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ONIT is priced at $36.83, while UWMC-WT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONIT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.87, whereas UWMC-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ONIT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to UWMC-WT's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ONIT is less volatile compared to UWMC-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONIT.Check UWMC-WT's competition here

ONIT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONIT stands at 309.9M. In comparison, ATAX has a market cap of 419.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ONIT is priced at $36.83, while ATAX trades at $18.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONIT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.87, whereas ATAX's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, ONIT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to ATAX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ONIT is more volatile compared to ATAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONIT.Check ATAX's competition here

ONIT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONIT stands at 309.9M. In comparison, BETR has a market cap of 401.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ONIT is priced at $36.83, while BETR trades at $25.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONIT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.87, whereas BETR's P/E ratio is -2.38. In terms of profitability, ONIT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BETR's ROE of -4.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ONIT is less volatile compared to BETR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONIT.Check BETR's competition here

ONIT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONIT stands at 309.9M. In comparison, LDI has a market cap of 395.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ONIT is priced at $36.83, while LDI trades at $1.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONIT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.87, whereas LDI's P/E ratio is -3.37. In terms of profitability, ONIT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to LDI's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ONIT is less volatile compared to LDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONIT.Check LDI's competition here

ONIT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONIT stands at 309.9M. In comparison, HMPT has a market cap of 321.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ONIT is priced at $36.83, while HMPT trades at $2.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONIT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.87, whereas HMPT's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, ONIT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to HMPT's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ONIT is more volatile compared to HMPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONIT.Check HMPT's competition here

ONIT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONIT stands at 309.9M. In comparison, SNFCA has a market cap of 216.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ONIT is priced at $36.83, while SNFCA trades at $9.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONIT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.87, whereas SNFCA's P/E ratio is 7.53. In terms of profitability, ONIT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to SNFCA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ONIT is less volatile compared to SNFCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONIT.Check SNFCA's competition here

ONIT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONIT stands at 309.9M. In comparison, OCN has a market cap of 195.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ONIT is priced at $36.83, while OCN trades at $25.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONIT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.87, whereas OCN's P/E ratio is 33.89. In terms of profitability, ONIT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to OCN's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ONIT is less volatile compared to OCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONIT.Check OCN's competition here

ONIT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONIT stands at 309.9M. In comparison, GHI has a market cap of 122.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ONIT is priced at $36.83, while GHI trades at $5.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONIT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.87, whereas GHI's P/E ratio is -8.94. In terms of profitability, ONIT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to GHI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ONIT is more volatile compared to GHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONIT.Check GHI's competition here

ONIT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONIT stands at 309.9M. In comparison, IOR has a market cap of 72.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ONIT is priced at $36.83, while IOR trades at $17.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONIT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.87, whereas IOR's P/E ratio is 18.02. In terms of profitability, ONIT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to IOR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ONIT is more volatile compared to IOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONIT.Check IOR's competition here

ONIT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONIT stands at 309.9M. In comparison, CNF has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, ONIT is priced at $36.83, while CNF trades at $3.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONIT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.87, whereas CNF's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, ONIT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ONIT is less volatile compared to CNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONIT.Check CNF's competition here

ONIT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONIT stands at 309.9M. In comparison, IMH has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ONIT is priced at $36.83, while IMH trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONIT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.87, whereas IMH's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, ONIT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to IMH's ROE of +20.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ONIT is less volatile compared to IMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONIT.Check IMH's competition here

ONIT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONIT stands at 309.9M. In comparison, BETRW has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ONIT is priced at $36.83, while BETRW trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONIT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.87, whereas BETRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ONIT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to BETRW's ROE of -4.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ONIT is more volatile compared to BETRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONIT.Check BETRW's competition here

ONIT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONIT stands at 309.9M. In comparison, PAPL has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ONIT is priced at $36.83, while PAPL trades at $0.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONIT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.87, whereas PAPL's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, ONIT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to PAPL's ROE of -4.85%. Regarding short-term risk, ONIT is less volatile compared to PAPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONIT.Check PAPL's competition here

ONIT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONIT stands at 309.9M. In comparison, CSBK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ONIT is priced at $36.83, while CSBK trades at $15.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONIT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.87, whereas CSBK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ONIT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to CSBK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ONIT is more volatile compared to CSBK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONIT.Check CSBK's competition here

ONIT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ONIT stands at 309.9M. In comparison, NSM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ONIT is priced at $36.83, while NSM trades at $18.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ONIT currently has a P/E ratio of 1.87, whereas NSM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ONIT's ROE is +0.31%, compared to NSM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ONIT is more volatile compared to NSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ONIT.Check NSM's competition here