Ocwen Financial Corporation (OCN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (OCN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Mortgages Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OCN | $25.08 | -0.75% | 195.9M | 33.89 | $0.74 | N/A |
| RKT | $12.65 | -4.38% | 35.7B | -421.83 | -$0.03 | N/A |
| COOP | $210.79 | -2.77% | 13.5B | 23.63 | $8.92 | +0.95% |
| MMAC | $27.77 | +0.00% | 11.3B | 23.08 | $1.20 | N/A |
| PFSI | $81.24 | -0.36% | 4.2B | 8.63 | $9.41 | +1.47% |
| UWMC | $2.59 | -1.15% | 3.9B | 8.62 | $0.30 | +15.44% |
| ADAMG | $25.30 | -0.26% | 2.3B | N/A | N/A | +9.91% |
| WD | $51.25 | -0.85% | 1.8B | 25.37 | $2.02 | +5.24% |
| ECPG | $81.46 | +1.07% | 1.7B | 6.34 | $12.84 | N/A |
| ADAMZ | $18.26 | -0.60% | 1.6B | N/A | N/A | +9.91% |
Stock Comparison
OCN vs RKT Comparison June 2026
OCN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCN stands at 195.9M. In comparison, RKT has a market cap of 35.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OCN is priced at $25.08, while RKT trades at $12.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.89, whereas RKT's P/E ratio is -421.83. In terms of profitability, OCN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to RKT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OCN is less volatile compared to RKT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCN.Check RKT's competition here
OCN vs COOP Comparison June 2026
OCN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCN stands at 195.9M. In comparison, COOP has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OCN is priced at $25.08, while COOP trades at $210.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.89, whereas COOP's P/E ratio is 23.63. In terms of profitability, OCN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to COOP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, OCN is more volatile compared to COOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCN.Check COOP's competition here
OCN vs MMAC Comparison June 2026
OCN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCN stands at 195.9M. In comparison, MMAC has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OCN is priced at $25.08, while MMAC trades at $27.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.89, whereas MMAC's P/E ratio is 23.08. In terms of profitability, OCN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to MMAC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OCN is more volatile compared to MMAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCN.Check MMAC's competition here
OCN vs PFSI Comparison June 2026
OCN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCN stands at 195.9M. In comparison, PFSI has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OCN is priced at $25.08, while PFSI trades at $81.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.89, whereas PFSI's P/E ratio is 8.63. In terms of profitability, OCN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PFSI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OCN is more volatile compared to PFSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCN.Check PFSI's competition here
OCN vs UWMC Comparison June 2026
OCN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCN stands at 195.9M. In comparison, UWMC has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OCN is priced at $25.08, while UWMC trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.89, whereas UWMC's P/E ratio is 8.62. In terms of profitability, OCN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to UWMC's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, OCN is less volatile compared to UWMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCN.Check UWMC's competition here
OCN vs ADAMG Comparison June 2026
OCN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCN stands at 195.9M. In comparison, ADAMG has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OCN is priced at $25.08, while ADAMG trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.89, whereas ADAMG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OCN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ADAMG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OCN is more volatile compared to ADAMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCN.Check ADAMG's competition here
OCN vs WD Comparison June 2026
OCN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCN stands at 195.9M. In comparison, WD has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OCN is priced at $25.08, while WD trades at $51.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.89, whereas WD's P/E ratio is 25.37. In terms of profitability, OCN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to WD's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OCN is more volatile compared to WD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCN.Check WD's competition here
OCN vs ECPG Comparison June 2026
OCN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCN stands at 195.9M. In comparison, ECPG has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OCN is priced at $25.08, while ECPG trades at $81.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.89, whereas ECPG's P/E ratio is 6.34. In terms of profitability, OCN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ECPG's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, OCN is more volatile compared to ECPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCN.Check ECPG's competition here
OCN vs ADAMZ Comparison June 2026
OCN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCN stands at 195.9M. In comparison, ADAMZ has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OCN is priced at $25.08, while ADAMZ trades at $18.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.89, whereas ADAMZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OCN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ADAMZ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OCN is more volatile compared to ADAMZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCN.Check ADAMZ's competition here
OCN vs LADR Comparison June 2026
OCN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCN stands at 195.9M. In comparison, LADR has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OCN is priced at $25.08, while LADR trades at $10.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.89, whereas LADR's P/E ratio is 23.25. In terms of profitability, OCN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to LADR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OCN is more volatile compared to LADR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCN.Check LADR's competition here
OCN vs GHLD Comparison June 2026
OCN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCN stands at 195.9M. In comparison, GHLD has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OCN is priced at $25.08, while GHLD trades at $20.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.89, whereas GHLD's P/E ratio is 9.91. In terms of profitability, OCN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to GHLD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, OCN is more volatile compared to GHLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCN.Check GHLD's competition here
OCN vs VEL Comparison June 2026
OCN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCN stands at 195.9M. In comparison, VEL has a market cap of 685.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OCN is priced at $25.08, while VEL trades at $17.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.89, whereas VEL's P/E ratio is 6.22. In terms of profitability, OCN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to VEL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, OCN is more volatile compared to VEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCN.Check VEL's competition here
OCN vs UWMC-WT Comparison June 2026
OCN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCN stands at 195.9M. In comparison, UWMC-WT has a market cap of 480.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OCN is priced at $25.08, while UWMC-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.89, whereas UWMC-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OCN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to UWMC-WT's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, OCN is less volatile compared to UWMC-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCN.Check UWMC-WT's competition here
OCN vs ATAX Comparison June 2026
OCN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCN stands at 195.9M. In comparison, ATAX has a market cap of 419.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OCN is priced at $25.08, while ATAX trades at $18.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.89, whereas ATAX's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, OCN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ATAX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OCN is more volatile compared to ATAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCN.Check ATAX's competition here
OCN vs BETR Comparison June 2026
OCN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCN stands at 195.9M. In comparison, BETR has a market cap of 401.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OCN is priced at $25.08, while BETR trades at $25.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.89, whereas BETR's P/E ratio is -2.38. In terms of profitability, OCN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BETR's ROE of -4.28%. Regarding short-term risk, OCN is less volatile compared to BETR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCN.Check BETR's competition here
OCN vs LDI Comparison June 2026
OCN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCN stands at 195.9M. In comparison, LDI has a market cap of 395.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OCN is priced at $25.08, while LDI trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.89, whereas LDI's P/E ratio is -3.37. In terms of profitability, OCN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to LDI's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, OCN is less volatile compared to LDI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCN.Check LDI's competition here
OCN vs HMPT Comparison June 2026
OCN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCN stands at 195.9M. In comparison, HMPT has a market cap of 321.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OCN is priced at $25.08, while HMPT trades at $2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.89, whereas HMPT's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, OCN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to HMPT's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, OCN is more volatile compared to HMPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCN.Check HMPT's competition here
OCN vs ONIT Comparison June 2026
OCN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCN stands at 195.9M. In comparison, ONIT has a market cap of 309.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OCN is priced at $25.08, while ONIT trades at $36.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.89, whereas ONIT's P/E ratio is 1.87. In terms of profitability, OCN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to ONIT's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, OCN is more volatile compared to ONIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCN.Check ONIT's competition here
OCN vs SNFCA Comparison June 2026
OCN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCN stands at 195.9M. In comparison, SNFCA has a market cap of 216.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OCN is priced at $25.08, while SNFCA trades at $9.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.89, whereas SNFCA's P/E ratio is 7.53. In terms of profitability, OCN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to SNFCA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OCN is less volatile compared to SNFCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCN.Check SNFCA's competition here
OCN vs GHI Comparison June 2026
OCN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCN stands at 195.9M. In comparison, GHI has a market cap of 122.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OCN is priced at $25.08, while GHI trades at $5.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.89, whereas GHI's P/E ratio is -8.94. In terms of profitability, OCN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to GHI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OCN is more volatile compared to GHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCN.Check GHI's competition here
OCN vs IOR Comparison June 2026
OCN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCN stands at 195.9M. In comparison, IOR has a market cap of 72.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OCN is priced at $25.08, while IOR trades at $17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.89, whereas IOR's P/E ratio is 18.02. In terms of profitability, OCN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to IOR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OCN is more volatile compared to IOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCN.Check IOR's competition here
OCN vs CNF Comparison June 2026
OCN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCN stands at 195.9M. In comparison, CNF has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, OCN is priced at $25.08, while CNF trades at $3.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.89, whereas CNF's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, OCN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OCN is less volatile compared to CNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCN.Check CNF's competition here
OCN vs IMH Comparison June 2026
OCN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCN stands at 195.9M. In comparison, IMH has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OCN is priced at $25.08, while IMH trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.89, whereas IMH's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, OCN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to IMH's ROE of +20.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OCN is less volatile compared to IMH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCN.Check IMH's competition here
OCN vs BETRW Comparison June 2026
OCN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCN stands at 195.9M. In comparison, BETRW has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OCN is priced at $25.08, while BETRW trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.89, whereas BETRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OCN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to BETRW's ROE of -4.28%. Regarding short-term risk, OCN is more volatile compared to BETRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCN.Check BETRW's competition here
OCN vs PAPL Comparison June 2026
OCN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCN stands at 195.9M. In comparison, PAPL has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OCN is priced at $25.08, while PAPL trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.89, whereas PAPL's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, OCN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to PAPL's ROE of -4.85%. Regarding short-term risk, OCN is less volatile compared to PAPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCN.Check PAPL's competition here
OCN vs CSBK Comparison June 2026
OCN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCN stands at 195.9M. In comparison, CSBK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, OCN is priced at $25.08, while CSBK trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.89, whereas CSBK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OCN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to CSBK's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OCN is more volatile compared to CSBK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCN.Check CSBK's competition here
OCN vs NSM Comparison June 2026
OCN plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OCN stands at 195.9M. In comparison, NSM has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, OCN is priced at $25.08, while NSM trades at $18.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OCN currently has a P/E ratio of 33.89, whereas NSM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OCN's ROE is +0.29%, compared to NSM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OCN is more volatile compared to NSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OCN.Check NSM's competition here