Huron Consulting Group Inc. (HURN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HURN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Consulting Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HURN | $110.00 | +2.63% | 1.8B | 18.80 | $5.85 | N/A |
| EFX | $172.13 | +0.67% | 20.8B | 30.32 | $5.68 | +1.24% |
| TRU | $70.66 | +0.07% | 13.6B | 19.57 | $3.61 | +0.68% |
| IT | $164.02 | -0.52% | 11B | 16.20 | $10.12 | N/A |
| BAH | $79.48 | -0.66% | 9.5B | 11.52 | $6.90 | +2.83% |
| FCN | $159.70 | +2.31% | 4.8B | 19.00 | $8.40 | N/A |
| EXPO | $59.66 | +0.30% | 2.9B | 27.88 | $2.14 | +2.05% |
| ICFI | $69.88 | +1.57% | 1.3B | 15.09 | $4.63 | +0.81% |
| CRAI | $145.71 | +2.20% | 941.7M | 20.24 | $7.20 | +1.51% |
| ROMA | $6.93 | -1.21% | 412.8M | -57.75 | -$0.12 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
HURN vs EFX Comparison June 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, EFX has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $110.00, while EFX trades at $172.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.80, whereas EFX's P/E ratio is 30.32. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.22%, compared to EFX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is more volatile compared to EFX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check EFX's competition here
HURN vs TRU Comparison June 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, TRU has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $110.00, while TRU trades at $70.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.80, whereas TRU's P/E ratio is 19.57. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.22%, compared to TRU's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is more volatile compared to TRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check TRU's competition here
HURN vs IT Comparison June 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, IT has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $110.00, while IT trades at $164.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.80, whereas IT's P/E ratio is 16.20. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.22%, compared to IT's ROE of +1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is less volatile compared to IT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check IT's competition here
HURN vs BAH Comparison June 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, BAH has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $110.00, while BAH trades at $79.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.80, whereas BAH's P/E ratio is 11.52. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.22%, compared to BAH's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is more volatile compared to BAH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check BAH's competition here
HURN vs FCN Comparison June 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, FCN has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $110.00, while FCN trades at $159.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.80, whereas FCN's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FCN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is more volatile compared to FCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check FCN's competition here
HURN vs EXPO Comparison June 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, EXPO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $110.00, while EXPO trades at $59.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.80, whereas EXPO's P/E ratio is 27.88. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.22%, compared to EXPO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is more volatile compared to EXPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check EXPO's competition here
HURN vs ICFI Comparison June 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ICFI has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $110.00, while ICFI trades at $69.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.80, whereas ICFI's P/E ratio is 15.09. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ICFI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is more volatile compared to ICFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check ICFI's competition here
HURN vs CRAI Comparison June 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, CRAI has a market cap of 941.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $110.00, while CRAI trades at $145.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.80, whereas CRAI's P/E ratio is 20.24. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.22%, compared to CRAI's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is more volatile compared to CRAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check CRAI's competition here
HURN vs ROMA Comparison June 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, ROMA has a market cap of 412.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $110.00, while ROMA trades at $6.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.80, whereas ROMA's P/E ratio is -57.75. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.22%, compared to ROMA's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is less volatile compared to ROMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check ROMA's competition here
HURN vs SBC Comparison June 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SBC has a market cap of 309.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $110.00, while SBC trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.80, whereas SBC's P/E ratio is 7.53. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SBC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is more volatile compared to SBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check SBC's competition here
HURN vs FC Comparison June 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, FC has a market cap of 270.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $110.00, while FC trades at $23.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.80, whereas FC's P/E ratio is -109.18. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FC's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is more volatile compared to FC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check FC's competition here
HURN vs EGG Comparison June 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, EGG has a market cap of 160M. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $110.00, while EGG trades at $5.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.80, whereas EGG's P/E ratio is 286.00. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.22%, compared to EGG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is less volatile compared to EGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check EGG's competition here
HURN vs RGP Comparison June 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, RGP has a market cap of 155.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $110.00, while RGP trades at $4.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.80, whereas RGP's P/E ratio is -1.53. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RGP's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is more volatile compared to RGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check RGP's competition here
HURN vs FORR Comparison June 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, FORR has a market cap of 135.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $110.00, while FORR trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.80, whereas FORR's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FORR's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is more volatile compared to FORR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check FORR's competition here
HURN vs SDH Comparison June 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SDH has a market cap of 53M. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $110.00, while SDH trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.80, whereas SDH's P/E ratio is -6.08. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SDH's ROE of +3.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is less volatile compared to SDH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check SDH's competition here
HURN vs AERT Comparison June 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, AERT has a market cap of 39.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $110.00, while AERT trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.80, whereas AERT's P/E ratio is -9.78. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AERT's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is less volatile compared to AERT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check AERT's competition here
HURN vs RYOJ Comparison June 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, RYOJ has a market cap of 38.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $110.00, while RYOJ trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.80, whereas RYOJ's P/E ratio is 331.00. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.22%, compared to RYOJ's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is less volatile compared to RYOJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check RYOJ's competition here
HURN vs EPOW Comparison June 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, EPOW has a market cap of 18M. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $110.00, while EPOW trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.80, whereas EPOW's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.22%, compared to EPOW's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is less volatile compared to EPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check EPOW's competition here
HURN vs SBCWW Comparison June 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, SBCWW has a market cap of 17.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $110.00, while SBCWW trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.80, whereas SBCWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.22%, compared to SBCWW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is less volatile compared to SBCWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check SBCWW's competition here
HURN vs GRNQ Comparison June 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, GRNQ has a market cap of 12.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $110.00, while GRNQ trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.80, whereas GRNQ's P/E ratio is -3.92. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.22%, compared to GRNQ's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is less volatile compared to GRNQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check GRNQ's competition here
HURN vs AERTW Comparison June 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, AERTW has a market cap of 969.8K. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $110.00, while AERTW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.80, whereas AERTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.22%, compared to AERTW's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is less volatile compared to AERTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check AERTW's competition here
HURN vs VCIG Comparison June 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, VCIG has a market cap of 773.2K. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $110.00, while VCIG trades at $7.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.80, whereas VCIG's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.22%, compared to VCIG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is less volatile compared to VCIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check VCIG's competition here
HURN vs INTJ Comparison June 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, INTJ has a market cap of 174.7K. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $110.00, while INTJ trades at $5.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.80, whereas INTJ's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.22%, compared to INTJ's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is less volatile compared to INTJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check INTJ's competition here
HURN vs FGO Comparison June 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, FGO has a market cap of 300. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $110.00, while FGO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.80, whereas FGO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.22%, compared to FGO's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. HURN has daily volatility of 4.30 and FGO has daily volatility of N/A.Check FGO's competition here
HURN vs NLSN Comparison June 2026
HURN plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HURN stands at 1.8B. In comparison, NLSN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HURN is priced at $110.00, while NLSN trades at $27.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HURN currently has a P/E ratio of 18.80, whereas NLSN's P/E ratio is 17.71. In terms of profitability, HURN's ROE is +0.22%, compared to NLSN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HURN is more volatile compared to NLSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HURN.Check NLSN's competition here