Franklin Covey Co. (FC) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Consulting Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FC | $23.93 | +2.70% | 269.3M | -108.59 | -$0.22 | N/A |
| EFX | $170.99 | +0.49% | 20.6B | 30.11 | $5.68 | +1.24% |
| TRU | $70.61 | +1.76% | 13.6B | 19.56 | $3.61 | +0.68% |
| IT | $164.87 | +0.07% | 11B | 16.30 | $10.12 | N/A |
| BAH | $80.01 | +1.92% | 9.6B | 11.59 | $6.90 | +2.81% |
| FCN | $156.10 | +0.93% | 4.7B | 18.58 | $8.40 | N/A |
| EXPO | $59.48 | +2.01% | 2.9B | 27.80 | $2.14 | +2.04% |
| HURN | $107.18 | +2.27% | 1.7B | 18.32 | $5.85 | N/A |
| ICFI | $68.80 | +0.69% | 1.2B | 14.86 | $4.63 | +0.82% |
| CRAI | $142.58 | +0.73% | 921.5M | 19.80 | $7.20 | +1.54% |
Stock Comparison
FC vs EFX Comparison June 2026
FC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 269.3M. In comparison, EFX has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $23.93, while EFX trades at $170.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FC currently has a P/E ratio of -108.59, whereas EFX's P/E ratio is 30.11. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EFX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is less volatile compared to EFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check EFX's competition here
FC vs TRU Comparison June 2026
FC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 269.3M. In comparison, TRU has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $23.93, while TRU trades at $70.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FC currently has a P/E ratio of -108.59, whereas TRU's P/E ratio is 19.56. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TRU's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is more volatile compared to TRU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check TRU's competition here
FC vs IT Comparison June 2026
FC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 269.3M. In comparison, IT has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $23.93, while IT trades at $164.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FC currently has a P/E ratio of -108.59, whereas IT's P/E ratio is 16.30. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is -0.04%, compared to IT's ROE of +1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is more volatile compared to IT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check IT's competition here
FC vs BAH Comparison June 2026
FC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 269.3M. In comparison, BAH has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $23.93, while BAH trades at $80.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FC currently has a P/E ratio of -108.59, whereas BAH's P/E ratio is 11.59. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BAH's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is more volatile compared to BAH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check BAH's competition here
FC vs FCN Comparison June 2026
FC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 269.3M. In comparison, FCN has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $23.93, while FCN trades at $156.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FC currently has a P/E ratio of -108.59, whereas FCN's P/E ratio is 18.58. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FCN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is more volatile compared to FCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check FCN's competition here
FC vs EXPO Comparison June 2026
FC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 269.3M. In comparison, EXPO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $23.93, while EXPO trades at $59.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FC currently has a P/E ratio of -108.59, whereas EXPO's P/E ratio is 27.80. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EXPO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is more volatile compared to EXPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check EXPO's competition here
FC vs HURN Comparison June 2026
FC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 269.3M. In comparison, HURN has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $23.93, while HURN trades at $107.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FC currently has a P/E ratio of -108.59, whereas HURN's P/E ratio is 18.32. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is -0.04%, compared to HURN's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is more volatile compared to HURN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check HURN's competition here
FC vs ICFI Comparison June 2026
FC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 269.3M. In comparison, ICFI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $23.93, while ICFI trades at $68.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FC currently has a P/E ratio of -108.59, whereas ICFI's P/E ratio is 14.86. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ICFI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is more volatile compared to ICFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check ICFI's competition here
FC vs CRAI Comparison June 2026
FC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 269.3M. In comparison, CRAI has a market cap of 921.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $23.93, while CRAI trades at $142.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FC currently has a P/E ratio of -108.59, whereas CRAI's P/E ratio is 19.80. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CRAI's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is more volatile compared to CRAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check CRAI's competition here
FC vs ROMA Comparison June 2026
FC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 269.3M. In comparison, ROMA has a market cap of 400.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $23.93, while ROMA trades at $6.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FC currently has a P/E ratio of -108.59, whereas ROMA's P/E ratio is -56.08. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ROMA's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is less volatile compared to ROMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check ROMA's competition here
FC vs SBC Comparison June 2026
FC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 269.3M. In comparison, SBC has a market cap of 314.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $23.93, while SBC trades at $3.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FC currently has a P/E ratio of -108.59, whereas SBC's P/E ratio is 7.65. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SBC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is more volatile compared to SBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check SBC's competition here
FC vs EGG Comparison June 2026
FC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 269.3M. In comparison, EGG has a market cap of 303.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $23.93, while EGG trades at $10.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FC currently has a P/E ratio of -108.59, whereas EGG's P/E ratio is 542.50. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EGG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is less volatile compared to EGG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check EGG's competition here
FC vs RGP Comparison June 2026
FC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 269.3M. In comparison, RGP has a market cap of 153.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $23.93, while RGP trades at $4.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FC currently has a P/E ratio of -108.59, whereas RGP's P/E ratio is -1.51. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is -0.04%, compared to RGP's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is less volatile compared to RGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check RGP's competition here
FC vs FORR Comparison June 2026
FC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 269.3M. In comparison, FORR has a market cap of 137.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $23.93, while FORR trades at $7.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FC currently has a P/E ratio of -108.59, whereas FORR's P/E ratio is -2.53. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FORR's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is less volatile compared to FORR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check FORR's competition here
FC vs SDH Comparison June 2026
FC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 269.3M. In comparison, SDH has a market cap of 53M. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $23.93, while SDH trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FC currently has a P/E ratio of -108.59, whereas SDH's P/E ratio is -6.08. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SDH's ROE of +3.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is less volatile compared to SDH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check SDH's competition here
FC vs AERT Comparison June 2026
FC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 269.3M. In comparison, AERT has a market cap of 42.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $23.93, while AERT trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FC currently has a P/E ratio of -108.59, whereas AERT's P/E ratio is -10.47. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AERT's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is less volatile compared to AERT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check AERT's competition here
FC vs RYOJ Comparison June 2026
FC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 269.3M. In comparison, RYOJ has a market cap of 38.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $23.93, while RYOJ trades at $3.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FC currently has a P/E ratio of -108.59, whereas RYOJ's P/E ratio is 330.00. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is -0.04%, compared to RYOJ's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is less volatile compared to RYOJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check RYOJ's competition here
FC vs SBCWW Comparison June 2026
FC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 269.3M. In comparison, SBCWW has a market cap of 21.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $23.93, while SBCWW trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FC currently has a P/E ratio of -108.59, whereas SBCWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SBCWW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is less volatile compared to SBCWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check SBCWW's competition here
FC vs EPOW Comparison June 2026
FC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 269.3M. In comparison, EPOW has a market cap of 18.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $23.93, while EPOW trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FC currently has a P/E ratio of -108.59, whereas EPOW's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EPOW's ROE of +1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is less volatile compared to EPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check EPOW's competition here
FC vs GRNQ Comparison June 2026
FC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 269.3M. In comparison, GRNQ has a market cap of 13.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $23.93, while GRNQ trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FC currently has a P/E ratio of -108.59, whereas GRNQ's P/E ratio is -4.10. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GRNQ's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is less volatile compared to GRNQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check GRNQ's competition here
FC vs AERTW Comparison June 2026
FC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 269.3M. In comparison, AERTW has a market cap of 969.8K. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $23.93, while AERTW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FC currently has a P/E ratio of -108.59, whereas AERTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AERTW's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is less volatile compared to AERTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check AERTW's competition here
FC vs VCIG Comparison June 2026
FC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 269.3M. In comparison, VCIG has a market cap of 899.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $23.93, while VCIG trades at $8.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FC currently has a P/E ratio of -108.59, whereas VCIG's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is -0.04%, compared to VCIG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is less volatile compared to VCIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check VCIG's competition here
FC vs INTJ Comparison June 2026
FC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 269.3M. In comparison, INTJ has a market cap of 194.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $23.93, while INTJ trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FC currently has a P/E ratio of -108.59, whereas INTJ's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is -0.04%, compared to INTJ's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is less volatile compared to INTJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check INTJ's competition here
FC vs FGO Comparison June 2026
FC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 269.3M. In comparison, FGO has a market cap of 300. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $23.93, while FGO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FC currently has a P/E ratio of -108.59, whereas FGO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FGO's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. FC has daily volatility of 4.33 and FGO has daily volatility of N/A.Check FGO's competition here
FC vs NLSN Comparison June 2026
FC plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FC stands at 269.3M. In comparison, NLSN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FC is priced at $23.93, while NLSN trades at $27.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FC currently has a P/E ratio of -108.59, whereas NLSN's P/E ratio is 17.71. In terms of profitability, FC's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NLSN's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FC is more volatile compared to NLSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FC.Check NLSN's competition here