
Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. (FND) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FND) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Home Improvement Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FND | $50.56 | -0.12% | 5.5B | 27.50 | $1.84 | N/A |
| HD | $311.52 | +0.27% | 310.7B | 22.14 | $14.07 | +2.96% |
| LOW | $206.64 | -0.51% | 115.9B | 17.47 | $11.83 | +2.33% |
| MLHR | $38.66 | +0.08% | 2.9B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ARHS | $6.53 | -1.21% | 924.3M | 13.89 | $0.47 | +5.30% |
| HVT-A | $23.74 | +1.32% | 382.1M | 19.46 | $1.22 | +5.69% |
| HVT | $22.84 | +0.26% | 367.6M | 18.72 | $1.22 | +5.69% |
| EMPG | $17.36 | +0.00% | 143M | 192.89 | $0.09 | N/A |
| TTSH | $2.85 | -1.04% | 113.5M | -28.50 | -$0.10 | N/A |
| PFAI | $3.83 | -0.78% | 43M | -21.53 | -$0.17 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FND vs HD Comparison June 2026
FND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FND stands at 5.5B. In comparison, HD has a market cap of 310.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FND is priced at $50.56, while HD trades at $311.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FND currently has a P/E ratio of 27.50, whereas HD's P/E ratio is 22.14. In terms of profitability, FND's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HD's ROE of +1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FND is more volatile compared to HD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FND.Check HD's competition here
FND vs LOW Comparison June 2026
FND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FND stands at 5.5B. In comparison, LOW has a market cap of 115.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FND is priced at $50.56, while LOW trades at $206.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FND currently has a P/E ratio of 27.50, whereas LOW's P/E ratio is 17.47. In terms of profitability, FND's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LOW's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, FND is more volatile compared to LOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FND.Check LOW's competition here
FND vs MLHR Comparison June 2026
FND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FND stands at 5.5B. In comparison, MLHR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FND is priced at $50.56, while MLHR trades at $38.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FND currently has a P/E ratio of 27.50, whereas MLHR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FND's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MLHR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FND is more volatile compared to MLHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FND.Check MLHR's competition here
FND vs ARHS Comparison June 2026
FND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FND stands at 5.5B. In comparison, ARHS has a market cap of 924.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FND is priced at $50.56, while ARHS trades at $6.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FND currently has a P/E ratio of 27.50, whereas ARHS's P/E ratio is 13.89. In terms of profitability, FND's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ARHS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FND is less volatile compared to ARHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FND.Check ARHS's competition here
FND vs HVT-A Comparison June 2026
FND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FND stands at 5.5B. In comparison, HVT-A has a market cap of 382.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FND is priced at $50.56, while HVT-A trades at $23.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FND currently has a P/E ratio of 27.50, whereas HVT-A's P/E ratio is 19.46. In terms of profitability, FND's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HVT-A's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FND is less volatile compared to HVT-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FND.Check HVT-A's competition here
FND vs HVT Comparison June 2026
FND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FND stands at 5.5B. In comparison, HVT has a market cap of 367.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FND is priced at $50.56, while HVT trades at $22.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FND currently has a P/E ratio of 27.50, whereas HVT's P/E ratio is 18.72. In terms of profitability, FND's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HVT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FND is less volatile compared to HVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FND.Check HVT's competition here
FND vs EMPG Comparison June 2026
FND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FND stands at 5.5B. In comparison, EMPG has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, FND is priced at $50.56, while EMPG trades at $17.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FND currently has a P/E ratio of 27.50, whereas EMPG's P/E ratio is 192.89. In terms of profitability, FND's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EMPG's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, FND is more volatile compared to EMPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FND.Check EMPG's competition here
FND vs TTSH Comparison June 2026
FND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FND stands at 5.5B. In comparison, TTSH has a market cap of 113.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FND is priced at $50.56, while TTSH trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FND currently has a P/E ratio of 27.50, whereas TTSH's P/E ratio is -28.50. In terms of profitability, FND's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TTSH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FND is more volatile compared to TTSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FND.Check TTSH's competition here
FND vs PFAI Comparison June 2026
FND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FND stands at 5.5B. In comparison, PFAI has a market cap of 43M. Regarding current trading prices, FND is priced at $50.56, while PFAI trades at $3.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FND currently has a P/E ratio of 27.50, whereas PFAI's P/E ratio is -21.53. In terms of profitability, FND's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PFAI's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FND is less volatile compared to PFAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FND.Check PFAI's competition here
FND vs LESL Comparison June 2026
FND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FND stands at 5.5B. In comparison, LESL has a market cap of 37M. Regarding current trading prices, FND is priced at $50.56, while LESL trades at $3.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FND currently has a P/E ratio of 27.50, whereas LESL's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, FND's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LESL's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, FND is less volatile compared to LESL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FND.Check LESL's competition here
FND vs LIVE Comparison June 2026
FND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FND stands at 5.5B. In comparison, LIVE has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FND is priced at $50.56, while LIVE trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FND currently has a P/E ratio of 27.50, whereas LIVE's P/E ratio is -8.81. In terms of profitability, FND's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LIVE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FND is more volatile compared to LIVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FND.Check LIVE's competition here
FND vs LL Comparison June 2026
FND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FND stands at 5.5B. In comparison, LL has a market cap of 25.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FND is priced at $50.56, while LL trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FND currently has a P/E ratio of 27.50, whereas LL's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, FND's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LL's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, FND is less volatile compared to LL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FND.Check LL's competition here
FND vs HBP Comparison June 2026
FND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FND stands at 5.5B. In comparison, HBP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FND is priced at $50.56, while HBP trades at $10.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FND currently has a P/E ratio of 27.50, whereas HBP's P/E ratio is 6.07. In terms of profitability, FND's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HBP's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, FND is more volatile compared to HBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FND.Check HBP's competition here
FND vs FLE Comparison June 2026
FND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FND stands at 5.5B. In comparison, FLE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FND is priced at $50.56, while FLE trades at $15,400.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FND currently has a P/E ratio of 27.50, whereas FLE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FND's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FLE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FND is more volatile compared to FLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FND.Check FLE's competition here
FND vs CAA Comparison June 2026
FND plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FND stands at 5.5B. In comparison, CAA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FND is priced at $50.56, while CAA trades at $53.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FND currently has a P/E ratio of 27.50, whereas CAA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FND's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CAA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FND is less volatile compared to CAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FND.Check CAA's competition here