Arhaus, Inc. (ARHS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ARHS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Home Improvement Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARHS | $6.33 | -4.67% | 895.9M | 13.47 | $0.47 | +5.59% |
| HD | $310.78 | +0.27% | 309.8B | 22.07 | $14.08 | +3.00% |
| LOW | $210.74 | +1.55% | 118.1B | 17.81 | $11.83 | +2.29% |
| FND | $47.41 | -3.05% | 5.1B | 25.76 | $1.84 | N/A |
| MLHR | $38.66 | +0.08% | 2.9B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| HVT-A | $24.01 | -1.32% | 386.5M | 19.68 | $1.22 | +5.82% |
| HVT | $22.63 | -0.79% | 364.4M | 18.56 | $1.22 | +5.82% |
| EMPG | $17.36 | +0.00% | 143M | 192.89 | $0.09 | N/A |
| TTSH | $2.88 | +1.05% | 113.5M | -28.50 | -$0.10 | N/A |
| PFAI | $3.95 | +5.81% | 45.8M | -22.94 | -$0.17 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ARHS vs HD Comparison June 2026
ARHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHS stands at 895.9M. In comparison, HD has a market cap of 309.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHS is priced at $6.33, while HD trades at $310.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.47, whereas HD's P/E ratio is 22.07. In terms of profitability, ARHS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HD's ROE of +1.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHS is more volatile compared to HD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHS.Check HD's competition here
ARHS vs LOW Comparison June 2026
ARHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHS stands at 895.9M. In comparison, LOW has a market cap of 118.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHS is priced at $6.33, while LOW trades at $210.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.47, whereas LOW's P/E ratio is 17.81. In terms of profitability, ARHS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LOW's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHS is more volatile compared to LOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHS.Check LOW's competition here
ARHS vs FND Comparison June 2026
ARHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHS stands at 895.9M. In comparison, FND has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHS is priced at $6.33, while FND trades at $47.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.47, whereas FND's P/E ratio is 25.76. In terms of profitability, ARHS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FND's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHS is more volatile compared to FND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHS.Check FND's competition here
ARHS vs MLHR Comparison June 2026
ARHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHS stands at 895.9M. In comparison, MLHR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ARHS is priced at $6.33, while MLHR trades at $38.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.47, whereas MLHR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARHS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to MLHR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHS is more volatile compared to MLHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHS.Check MLHR's competition here
ARHS vs HVT-A Comparison June 2026
ARHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHS stands at 895.9M. In comparison, HVT-A has a market cap of 386.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHS is priced at $6.33, while HVT-A trades at $24.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.47, whereas HVT-A's P/E ratio is 19.68. In terms of profitability, ARHS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HVT-A's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHS is more volatile compared to HVT-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHS.Check HVT-A's competition here
ARHS vs HVT Comparison June 2026
ARHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHS stands at 895.9M. In comparison, HVT has a market cap of 364.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHS is priced at $6.33, while HVT trades at $22.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.47, whereas HVT's P/E ratio is 18.56. In terms of profitability, ARHS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HVT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHS is more volatile compared to HVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHS.Check HVT's competition here
ARHS vs EMPG Comparison June 2026
ARHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHS stands at 895.9M. In comparison, EMPG has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHS is priced at $6.33, while EMPG trades at $17.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.47, whereas EMPG's P/E ratio is 192.89. In terms of profitability, ARHS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to EMPG's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHS is more volatile compared to EMPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHS.Check EMPG's competition here
ARHS vs TTSH Comparison June 2026
ARHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHS stands at 895.9M. In comparison, TTSH has a market cap of 113.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHS is priced at $6.33, while TTSH trades at $2.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.47, whereas TTSH's P/E ratio is -28.50. In terms of profitability, ARHS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to TTSH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHS is more volatile compared to TTSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHS.Check TTSH's competition here
ARHS vs PFAI Comparison June 2026
ARHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHS stands at 895.9M. In comparison, PFAI has a market cap of 45.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHS is priced at $6.33, while PFAI trades at $3.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.47, whereas PFAI's P/E ratio is -22.94. In terms of profitability, ARHS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to PFAI's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHS is more volatile compared to PFAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHS.Check PFAI's competition here
ARHS vs LESL Comparison June 2026
ARHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHS stands at 895.9M. In comparison, LESL has a market cap of 43.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHS is priced at $6.33, while LESL trades at $4.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.47, whereas LESL's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, ARHS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LESL's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHS is less volatile compared to LESL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHS.Check LESL's competition here
ARHS vs LIVE Comparison June 2026
ARHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHS stands at 895.9M. In comparison, LIVE has a market cap of 27.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHS is priced at $6.33, while LIVE trades at $9.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.47, whereas LIVE's P/E ratio is -8.26. In terms of profitability, ARHS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LIVE's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHS is more volatile compared to LIVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHS.Check LIVE's competition here
ARHS vs LL Comparison June 2026
ARHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHS stands at 895.9M. In comparison, LL has a market cap of 25.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ARHS is priced at $6.33, while LL trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.47, whereas LL's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, ARHS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to LL's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHS is less volatile compared to LL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHS.Check LL's competition here
ARHS vs FLE Comparison June 2026
ARHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHS stands at 895.9M. In comparison, FLE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ARHS is priced at $6.33, while FLE trades at $15,400.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.47, whereas FLE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARHS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to FLE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ARHS is more volatile compared to FLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHS.Check FLE's competition here
ARHS vs CAA Comparison June 2026
ARHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHS stands at 895.9M. In comparison, CAA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ARHS is priced at $6.33, while CAA trades at $53.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.47, whereas CAA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ARHS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to CAA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHS is more volatile compared to CAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHS.Check CAA's competition here
ARHS vs HBP Comparison June 2026
ARHS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ARHS stands at 895.9M. In comparison, HBP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ARHS is priced at $6.33, while HBP trades at $10.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ARHS currently has a P/E ratio of 13.47, whereas HBP's P/E ratio is 6.07. In terms of profitability, ARHS's ROE is +0.16%, compared to HBP's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, ARHS is more volatile compared to HBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ARHS.Check HBP's competition here