Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, AMZN has a market cap of 2.7T. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while AMZN trades at $249.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas AMZN's P/E ratio is 20.09. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AMZN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to AMZN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check AMZN's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, BABA has a market cap of 263.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while BABA trades at $109.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas BABA's P/E ratio is 29.11. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BABA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to BABA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check BABA's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, PDD has a market cap of 110.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while PDD trades at $77.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas PDD's P/E ratio is 7.98. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PDD's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to PDD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check PDD's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, MELI has a market cap of 88.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while MELI trades at $1,752.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas MELI's P/E ratio is 47.66. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MELI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to MELI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check MELI's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, ORLY has a market cap of 71.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while ORLY trades at $86.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas ORLY's P/E ratio is 28.14. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ORLY's ROE of -2.32%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to ORLY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check ORLY's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, SE has a market cap of 59.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while SE trades at $99.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas SE's P/E ratio is 31.81. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to SE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check SE's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, EBAY has a market cap of 47.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while EBAY trades at $107.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas EBAY's P/E ratio is 17.89. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EBAY's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to EBAY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check EBAY's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, AZO has a market cap of 46.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while AZO trades at $2,872.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas AZO's P/E ratio is 29.54. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AZO's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to AZO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check AZO's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, JD has a market cap of 37.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while JD trades at $26.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas JD's P/E ratio is 13.06. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to JD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to JD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check JD's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, WSM has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while WSM trades at $231.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas WSM's P/E ratio is 25.97. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to WSM's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to WSM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check WSM's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, CPNG has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while CPNG trades at $13.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas CPNG's P/E ratio is -32.28. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CPNG's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to CPNG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check CPNG's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, ULTA has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while ULTA trades at $545.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas ULTA's P/E ratio is 20.44. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ULTA's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to ULTA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check ULTA's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, CASY has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while CASY trades at $598.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas CASY's P/E ratio is 28.83. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CASY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to CASY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check CASY's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, BBY has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while BBY trades at $90.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas BBY's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BBY's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to BBY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check BBY's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, TSCO has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while TSCO trades at $32.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas TSCO's P/E ratio is 15.82. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TSCO's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to TSCO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check TSCO's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, W has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while W trades at $98.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas W's P/E ratio is 35.56. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to W's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to W. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check W's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, FIVE has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while FIVE trades at $222.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas FIVE's P/E ratio is 25.04. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FIVE's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to FIVE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check FIVE's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, DKS has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while DKS trades at $136.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas DKS's P/E ratio is 9.67. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DKS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to DKS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check DKS's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, GME has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while GME trades at $23.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas GME's P/E ratio is 18.28. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GME's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to GME. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check GME's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, MUSA has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while MUSA trades at $511.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas MUSA's P/E ratio is 15.35. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MUSA's ROE of +0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to MUSA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check MUSA's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, CHWY has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while CHWY trades at $18.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas CHWY's P/E ratio is 22.57. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CHWY's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to CHWY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check CHWY's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, GLBE has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while GLBE trades at $40.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas GLBE's P/E ratio is 46.71. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GLBE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to GLBE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check GLBE's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, ETSY has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while ETSY trades at $68.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas ETSY's P/E ratio is 24.46. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ETSY's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to ETSY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check ETSY's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, VIPS has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while VIPS trades at $12.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas VIPS's P/E ratio is 4.99. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to VIPS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to VIPS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check VIPS's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, BBWI has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while BBWI trades at $16.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas BBWI's P/E ratio is 5.32. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BBWI's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to BBWI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check BBWI's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, WRBY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while WRBY trades at $26.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas WRBY's P/E ratio is 83.47. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to WRBY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to WRBY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check WRBY's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, ASO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while ASO trades at $49.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas ASO's P/E ratio is 7.74. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ASO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to ASO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check ASO's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, MNSO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while MNSO trades at $8.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas MNSO's P/E ratio is 9.30. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MNSO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to MNSO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check MNSO's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, AAP has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while AAP trades at $41.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas AAP's P/E ratio is 12.88. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AAP's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to AAP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check AAP's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, OZON has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while OZON trades at $11.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas OZON's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to OZON's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to OZON. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check OZON's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, RH has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while RH trades at $124.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas RH's P/E ratio is 29.56. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to RH's ROE of +1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to RH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check RH's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, BOBS has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while BOBS trades at $13.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas BOBS's P/E ratio is 14.78. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BOBS's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to BOBS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check BOBS's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, SBH has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while SBH trades at $17.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas SBH's P/E ratio is 8.51. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SBH's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to SBH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check SBH's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, RVLV has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while RVLV trades at $21.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas RVLV's P/E ratio is 22.10. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to RVLV's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to RVLV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check RVLV's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, SVV has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while SVV trades at $9.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas SVV's P/E ratio is 20.77. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SVV's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to SVV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check SVV's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, RERE has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while RERE trades at $3.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas RERE's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to RERE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to RERE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check RERE's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, OLPX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while OLPX trades at $2.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas OLPX's P/E ratio is 51.75. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to OLPX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to OLPX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check OLPX's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, ARHS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while ARHS trades at $9.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas ARHS's P/E ratio is 19.42. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ARHS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to ARHS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check ARHS's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, LQDT has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while LQDT trades at $43.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas LQDT's P/E ratio is 27.96. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LQDT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to LQDT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check LQDT's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, EYE has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while EYE trades at $16.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas EYE's P/E ratio is 18.16. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EYE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to EYE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check EYE's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, TA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while TA trades at $86.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas TA's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to TA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check TA's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, HZO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while HZO trades at $52.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas HZO's P/E ratio is 187.21. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to HZO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to HZO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check HZO's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, WINA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while WINA trades at $296.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas WINA's P/E ratio is 26.70. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to WINA's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to WINA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check WINA's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, TANNI has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while TANNI trades at $25.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas TANNI's P/E ratio is 35.27. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TANNI's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to TANNI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check TANNI's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, ODP has a market cap of 843.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while ODP trades at $28.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas ODP's P/E ratio is 133.33. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ODP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to ODP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check ODP's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, HEPS has a market cap of 796.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while HEPS trades at $2.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas HEPS's P/E ratio is -6.23. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to HEPS's ROE of -8.42%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to HEPS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check HEPS's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, OSTK has a market cap of 768M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while OSTK trades at $16.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas OSTK's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to OSTK's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to OSTK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check OSTK's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, WOOF has a market cap of 648.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while WOOF trades at $2.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas WOOF's P/E ratio is 15.13. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to WOOF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to WOOF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check WOOF's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, BWMX has a market cap of 621.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while BWMX trades at $16.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas BWMX's P/E ratio is 9.12. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BWMX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to BWMX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check BWMX's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, BYON has a market cap of 567.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while BYON trades at $9.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas BYON's P/E ratio is -2.42. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BYON's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to BYON. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check BYON's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, DADA has a market cap of 506.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while DADA trades at $1.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas DADA's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DADA's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to DADA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check DADA's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, ARKO has a market cap of 480.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while ARKO trades at $4.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas ARKO's P/E ratio is 58.07. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ARKO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to ARKO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check ARKO's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, ZKH has a market cap of 463.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while ZKH trades at $2.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas ZKH's P/E ratio is -73.95. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ZKH's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to ZKH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check ZKH's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, EVGO has a market cap of 433.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while EVGO trades at $1.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas EVGO's P/E ratio is -3.45. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EVGO's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to EVGO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check EVGO's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, JMIA has a market cap of 425.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while JMIA trades at $6.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas JMIA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to JMIA's ROE of -3.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to JMIA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check JMIA's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, BNED has a market cap of 392.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while BNED trades at $11.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas BNED's P/E ratio is -14.24. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BNED's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to BNED. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check BNED's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, BBBY has a market cap of 324.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while BBBY trades at $4.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas BBBY's P/E ratio is -3.85. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BBBY's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to BBBY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check BBBY's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, ELA has a market cap of 324M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while ELA trades at $12.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas ELA's P/E ratio is 14.51. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ELA's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to ELA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check ELA's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, BBW has a market cap of 323.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while BBW trades at $25.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas BBW's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BBW's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to BBW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check BBW's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, TDUP has a market cap of 290.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while TDUP trades at $2.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas TDUP's P/E ratio is -13.24. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TDUP's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to TDUP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check TDUP's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, NEGG has a market cap of 283.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while NEGG trades at $13.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas NEGG's P/E ratio is -19.87. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NEGG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to NEGG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check NEGG's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, FTCH has a market cap of 254.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while FTCH trades at $0.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas FTCH's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FTCH's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to FTCH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check FTCH's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, CHPT has a market cap of 231.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while CHPT trades at $8.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas CHPT's P/E ratio is -1.41. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CHPT's ROE of -48.52%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to CHPT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check CHPT's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, NXH has a market cap of 222.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while NXH trades at $3.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas NXH's P/E ratio is -2.83. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NXH's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to NXH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check NXH's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, QRTEA has a market cap of 213.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while QRTEA trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas QRTEA's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to QRTEA's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to QRTEA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check QRTEA's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, FLWS has a market cap of 170.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while FLWS trades at $2.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas FLWS's P/E ratio is -2.46. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FLWS's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to FLWS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check FLWS's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, ONEW has a market cap of 164.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while ONEW trades at $9.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas ONEW's P/E ratio is -1.53. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ONEW's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to ONEW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check ONEW's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, HTLM has a market cap of 154.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while HTLM trades at $1.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas HTLM's P/E ratio is 14.33. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to HTLM's ROE of +0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to HTLM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check HTLM's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, VLTA has a market cap of 150M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while VLTA trades at $0.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas VLTA's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to VLTA's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to VLTA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check VLTA's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, DIBS has a market cap of 140.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while DIBS trades at $3.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas DIBS's P/E ratio is -18.05. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DIBS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to DIBS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check DIBS's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, JMG has a market cap of 134.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while JMG trades at $6.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas JMG's P/E ratio is 44.07. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to JMG's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to JMG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check JMG's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, QRTEP has a market cap of 130M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while QRTEP trades at $39.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas QRTEP's P/E ratio is 120.21. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to QRTEP's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to QRTEP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check QRTEP's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, GOED has a market cap of 129.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while GOED trades at $1.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas GOED's P/E ratio is 1.81. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GOED's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to GOED. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check GOED's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, PLBY has a market cap of 119.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while PLBY trades at $1.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas PLBY's P/E ratio is -51.50. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PLBY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to PLBY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check PLBY's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, APRN has a market cap of 100M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while APRN trades at $12.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas APRN's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to APRN's ROE of -1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to APRN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check APRN's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, GRWG has a market cap of 95.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while GRWG trades at $1.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas GRWG's P/E ratio is -3.37. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GRWG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to GRWG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check GRWG's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, BARK has a market cap of 73.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while BARK trades at $8.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas BARK's P/E ratio is -14.05. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BARK's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to BARK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check BARK's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, PRTS has a market cap of 69.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while PRTS trades at $8.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas PRTS's P/E ratio is -1.98. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PRTS's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to PRTS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check PRTS's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, ABLV has a market cap of 64.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while ABLV trades at $1.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas ABLV's P/E ratio is -26.00. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ABLV's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to ABLV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check ABLV's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, OTH has a market cap of 64.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while OTH trades at $2.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas OTH's P/E ratio is -11.17. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to OTH's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to OTH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check OTH's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, PEW has a market cap of 63.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while PEW trades at $2.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas PEW's P/E ratio is -7.17. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PEW's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to PEW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check PEW's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, HOUR has a market cap of 61.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while HOUR trades at $1.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas HOUR's P/E ratio is 43.75. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to HOUR's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to HOUR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check HOUR's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, PEW-WT has a market cap of 58.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while PEW-WT trades at $0.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas PEW-WT's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PEW-WT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to PEW-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check PEW-WT's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, QRTEB has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while QRTEB trades at $2.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas QRTEB's P/E ratio is -2.82. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to QRTEB's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to QRTEB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check QRTEB's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, BBBYW has a market cap of 50M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while BBBYW trades at $0.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas BBBYW's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BBBYW's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to BBBYW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check BBBYW's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, CTIB has a market cap of 48.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while CTIB trades at $2.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas CTIB's P/E ratio is -26.67. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CTIB's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to CTIB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check CTIB's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, SPWH has a market cap of 46M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while SPWH trades at $1.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas SPWH's P/E ratio is -2.23. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SPWH's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to SPWH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check SPWH's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, ABLVW has a market cap of 39M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while ABLVW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas ABLVW's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ABLVW's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to ABLVW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check ABLVW's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, KIRK has a market cap of 37.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while KIRK trades at $1.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas KIRK's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to KIRK's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to KIRK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check KIRK's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, SSU has a market cap of 36.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while SSU trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas SSU's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SSU's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to SSU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check SSU's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, BGFV has a market cap of 33M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while BGFV trades at $1.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas BGFV's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BGFV's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to BGFV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check BGFV's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, PETS has a market cap of 32.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while PETS trades at $1.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas PETS's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PETS's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to PETS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check PETS's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, DTC has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while DTC trades at $19.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas DTC's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DTC's ROE of -1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to DTC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check DTC's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, LITB has a market cap of 28M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while LITB trades at $3.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas LITB's P/E ratio is 7.66. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LITB's ROE of -2.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to LITB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check LITB's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, TLF has a market cap of 21.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while TLF trades at $2.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas TLF's P/E ratio is -10.87. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TLF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to TLF. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check TLF's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, QVCGP has a market cap of 20.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while QVCGP trades at $2.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas QVCGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to QVCGP's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to QVCGP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check QVCGP's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, MOGU has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while MOGU trades at $1.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas MOGU's P/E ratio is 192.78. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MOGU's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to MOGU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check MOGU's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, BOXD has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while BOXD trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas BOXD's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BOXD's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is less volatile compared to BOXD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check BOXD's competition here

Baozun Inc. (NASDAQ: BZUN) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, BZUN stands at 170.9M. In comparison, FRTT has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BZUN is priced at $2.94 on the NASDAQ, while FRTT trades at $0.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

BZUN currently has a P/E ratio of 12.72, whereas FRTT's P/E ratio is -1.89. In terms of profitability, BZUN's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FRTT's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, BZUN is more volatile compared to FRTT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BZUN.Check FRTT's competition here