Z Squared Inc. (ZSQR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

ZSQR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZSQR stands at 67.8M. In comparison, VRSK has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ZSQR is priced at $10.87, while VRSK trades at $180.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZSQR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.87, whereas VRSK's P/E ratio is 27.44. In terms of profitability, ZSQR's ROE is -0.83%, compared to VRSK's ROE of -21.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ZSQR is more volatile compared to VRSK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZSQR.Check VRSK's competition here

ZSQR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZSQR stands at 67.8M. In comparison, NTSK has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ZSQR is priced at $10.87, while NTSK trades at $10.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZSQR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.87, whereas NTSK's P/E ratio is -5.70. In terms of profitability, ZSQR's ROE is -0.83%, compared to NTSK's ROE of +3.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ZSQR is less volatile compared to NTSK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZSQR.Check NTSK's competition here

ZSQR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZSQR stands at 67.8M. In comparison, TCGL has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ZSQR is priced at $10.87, while TCGL trades at $172.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZSQR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.87, whereas TCGL's P/E ratio is -5761.33. In terms of profitability, ZSQR's ROE is -0.83%, compared to TCGL's ROE of -1.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ZSQR is less volatile compared to TCGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZSQR.Check TCGL's competition here

ZSQR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZSQR stands at 67.8M. In comparison, ZTG has a market cap of 32.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ZSQR is priced at $10.87, while ZTG trades at $2.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZSQR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.87, whereas ZTG's P/E ratio is 27.60. In terms of profitability, ZSQR's ROE is -0.83%, compared to ZTG's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, ZSQR is less volatile compared to ZTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZSQR.Check ZTG's competition here

ZSQR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZSQR stands at 67.8M. In comparison, GIFT has a market cap of 28.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ZSQR is priced at $10.87, while GIFT trades at $0.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZSQR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.87, whereas GIFT's P/E ratio is -2.64. In terms of profitability, ZSQR's ROE is -0.83%, compared to GIFT's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ZSQR is more volatile compared to GIFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZSQR.Check GIFT's competition here

ZSQR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZSQR stands at 67.8M. In comparison, QCLS has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ZSQR is priced at $10.87, while QCLS trades at $3.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZSQR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.87, whereas QCLS's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, ZSQR's ROE is -0.83%, compared to QCLS's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ZSQR is more volatile compared to QCLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZSQR.Check QCLS's competition here

ZSQR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZSQR stands at 67.8M. In comparison, RPGL has a market cap of 3.1K. Regarding current trading prices, ZSQR is priced at $10.87, while RPGL trades at $2.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZSQR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.87, whereas RPGL's P/E ratio is 0.56. In terms of profitability, ZSQR's ROE is -0.83%, compared to RPGL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ZSQR is less volatile compared to RPGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZSQR.Check RPGL's competition here

ZSQR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZSQR stands at 67.8M. In comparison, DWRE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ZSQR is priced at $10.87, while DWRE trades at $74.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZSQR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.87, whereas DWRE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZSQR's ROE is -0.83%, compared to DWRE's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ZSQR is more volatile compared to DWRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZSQR.Check DWRE's competition here

ZSQR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZSQR stands at 67.8M. In comparison, HDP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ZSQR is priced at $10.87, while HDP trades at $14.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZSQR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.87, whereas HDP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZSQR's ROE is -0.83%, compared to HDP's ROE of +7.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ZSQR is more volatile compared to HDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZSQR.Check HDP's competition here

ZSQR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZSQR stands at 67.8M. In comparison, ACTA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ZSQR is priced at $10.87, while ACTA trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZSQR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.87, whereas ACTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZSQR's ROE is -0.83%, compared to ACTA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ZSQR is more volatile compared to ACTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZSQR.Check ACTA's competition here

ZSQR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZSQR stands at 67.8M. In comparison, PRGY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ZSQR is priced at $10.87, while PRGY trades at N/A.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZSQR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.87, whereas PRGY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZSQR's ROE is -0.83%, compared to PRGY's ROE of +3.63%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ZSQR has daily volatility of 8.55 and PRGY has daily volatility of N/A.Check PRGY's competition here

ZSQR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZSQR stands at 67.8M. In comparison, CRTN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ZSQR is priced at $10.87, while CRTN trades at $0.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZSQR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.87, whereas CRTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZSQR's ROE is -0.83%, compared to CRTN's ROE of -1.79%. Regarding short-term risk, ZSQR is more volatile compared to CRTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZSQR.Check CRTN's competition here

ZSQR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZSQR stands at 67.8M. In comparison, CSC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ZSQR is priced at $10.87, while CSC trades at $10.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZSQR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.87, whereas CSC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZSQR's ROE is -0.83%, compared to CSC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ZSQR is more volatile compared to CSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZSQR.Check CSC's competition here

ZSQR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZSQR stands at 67.8M. In comparison, DWCH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ZSQR is priced at $10.87, while DWCH trades at $13.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZSQR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.87, whereas DWCH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZSQR's ROE is -0.83%, compared to DWCH's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ZSQR is more volatile compared to DWCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZSQR.Check DWCH's competition here

ZSQR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZSQR stands at 67.8M. In comparison, DST has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ZSQR is priced at $10.87, while DST trades at $83.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZSQR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.87, whereas DST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZSQR's ROE is -0.83%, compared to DST's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ZSQR is more volatile compared to DST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZSQR.Check DST's competition here

ZSQR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZSQR stands at 67.8M. In comparison, CRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ZSQR is priced at $10.87, while CRA trades at N/A.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZSQR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.87, whereas CRA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZSQR's ROE is -0.83%, compared to CRA's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ZSQR has daily volatility of 8.55 and CRA has daily volatility of N/A.Check CRA's competition here

ZSQR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZSQR stands at 67.8M. In comparison, XTLY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ZSQR is priced at $10.87, while XTLY trades at $15.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZSQR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.87, whereas XTLY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZSQR's ROE is -0.83%, compared to XTLY's ROE of -2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ZSQR is more volatile compared to XTLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZSQR.Check XTLY's competition here

ZSQR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZSQR stands at 67.8M. In comparison, IMPV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ZSQR is priced at $10.87, while IMPV trades at $55.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZSQR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.87, whereas IMPV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZSQR's ROE is -0.83%, compared to IMPV's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZSQR is more volatile compared to IMPV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZSQR.Check IMPV's competition here

ZSQR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZSQR stands at 67.8M. In comparison, RMGN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ZSQR is priced at $10.87, while RMGN trades at $1.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZSQR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.87, whereas RMGN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZSQR's ROE is -0.83%, compared to RMGN's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, ZSQR is more volatile compared to RMGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZSQR.Check RMGN's competition here

ZSQR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZSQR stands at 67.8M. In comparison, CALD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ZSQR is priced at $10.87, while CALD trades at $36.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZSQR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.87, whereas CALD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZSQR's ROE is -0.83%, compared to CALD's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ZSQR is more volatile compared to CALD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZSQR.Check CALD's competition here

ZSQR plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ZSQR stands at 67.8M. In comparison, FUEL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ZSQR is priced at $10.87, while FUEL trades at $2.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ZSQR currently has a P/E ratio of -3.87, whereas FUEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ZSQR's ROE is -0.83%, compared to FUEL's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, ZSQR is more volatile compared to FUEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ZSQR.Check FUEL's competition here