Travelzoo (TZOO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TZOO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Advertising Agencies Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TZOO | $9.96 | +2.84% | 100.6M | 25.76 | $0.38 | N/A |
| OMC | $75.64 | +2.57% | 21.6B | -204.41 | -$0.37 | +3.97% |
| TTD | $20.52 | -0.18% | 9.9B | 23.90 | $0.88 | N/A |
| IPG | $24.57 | -1.96% | 8.9B | 16.83 | $1.46 | +1.34% |
| QMMM | $119.40 | +0.00% | 5.8B | -702.35 | -$0.17 | N/A |
| WPP | $17.82 | +1.25% | 4B | -13.87 | -$1.34 | +11.73% |
| MDCA | $5.42 | -3.39% | 2.5B | -1.65 | -$3.29 | N/A |
| CMPR | $95.24 | -0.81% | 2.3B | 52.99 | $1.83 | N/A |
| MGNI | $14.83 | +2.64% | 2.1B | 14.15 | $1.05 | N/A |
| ZD | $46.91 | +5.32% | 1.8B | 40.98 | $1.17 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TZOO vs OMC Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, OMC has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while OMC trades at $75.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas OMC's P/E ratio is -204.41. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to OMC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is more volatile compared to OMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check OMC's competition here
TZOO vs TTD Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, TTD has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while TTD trades at $20.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas TTD's P/E ratio is 23.90. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to TTD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is less volatile compared to TTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check TTD's competition here
TZOO vs IPG Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, IPG has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while IPG trades at $24.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas IPG's P/E ratio is 16.83. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to IPG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is less volatile compared to IPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check IPG's competition here
TZOO vs QMMM Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, QMMM has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while QMMM trades at $119.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas QMMM's P/E ratio is -702.35. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to QMMM's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is more volatile compared to QMMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check QMMM's competition here
TZOO vs WPP Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, WPP has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while WPP trades at $17.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas WPP's P/E ratio is -13.87. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to WPP's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is more volatile compared to WPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check WPP's competition here
TZOO vs MDCA Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, MDCA has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while MDCA trades at $5.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas MDCA's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to MDCA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is less volatile compared to MDCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check MDCA's competition here
TZOO vs CMPR Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, CMPR has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while CMPR trades at $95.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas CMPR's P/E ratio is 52.99. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to CMPR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is more volatile compared to CMPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check CMPR's competition here
TZOO vs MGNI Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, MGNI has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while MGNI trades at $14.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas MGNI's P/E ratio is 14.15. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to MGNI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is less volatile compared to MGNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check MGNI's competition here
TZOO vs ZD Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, ZD has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while ZD trades at $46.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas ZD's P/E ratio is 40.98. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to ZD's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is less volatile compared to ZD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check ZD's competition here
TZOO vs IAS Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, IAS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while IAS trades at $10.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas IAS's P/E ratio is 36.93. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to IAS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is more volatile compared to IAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check IAS's competition here
TZOO vs STGW Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, STGW has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while STGW trades at $6.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas STGW's P/E ratio is 95.57. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to STGW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is less volatile compared to STGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check STGW's competition here
TZOO vs CCO Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, CCO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while CCO trades at $2.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas CCO's P/E ratio is -11.48. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to CCO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is more volatile compared to CCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check CCO's competition here
TZOO vs DLX Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, DLX has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while DLX trades at $23.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas DLX's P/E ratio is 10.13. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to DLX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is more volatile compared to DLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check DLX's competition here
TZOO vs EEX Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, EEX has a market cap of 987.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while EEX trades at $4.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas EEX's P/E ratio is -26.26. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to EEX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is more volatile compared to EEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check EEX's competition here
TZOO vs CRTO Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, CRTO has a market cap of 869.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while CRTO trades at $17.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas CRTO's P/E ratio is 8.12. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to CRTO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is less volatile compared to CRTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check CRTO's competition here
TZOO vs BOMN Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, BOMN has a market cap of 765M. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while BOMN trades at $25.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas BOMN's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to BOMN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is less volatile compared to BOMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check BOMN's competition here
TZOO vs MNTN Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, MNTN has a market cap of 717.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while MNTN trades at $9.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas MNTN's P/E ratio is 6.99. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to MNTN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is less volatile compared to MNTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check MNTN's competition here
TZOO vs QNST Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, QNST has a market cap of 681.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while QNST trades at $12.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas QNST's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to QNST's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is more volatile compared to QNST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check QNST's competition here
TZOO vs ADV Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, ADV has a market cap of 519M. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while ADV trades at $39.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas ADV's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to ADV's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is more volatile compared to ADV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check ADV's competition here
TZOO vs NEXN Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, NEXN has a market cap of 476.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while NEXN trades at $8.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas NEXN's P/E ratio is 28.52. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to NEXN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is more volatile compared to NEXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check NEXN's competition here
TZOO vs CTV Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, CTV has a market cap of 473.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while CTV trades at $3.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas CTV's P/E ratio is -34.89. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to CTV's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is more volatile compared to CTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check CTV's competition here
TZOO vs CTV-WT Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, CTV-WT has a market cap of 473.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while CTV-WT trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas CTV-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to CTV-WT's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is more volatile compared to CTV-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check CTV-WT's competition here
TZOO vs BOC Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, BOC has a market cap of 414.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while BOC trades at $13.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas BOC's P/E ratio is -30.31. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to BOC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is more volatile compared to BOC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check BOC's competition here
TZOO vs QUOT Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, QUOT has a market cap of 398.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while QUOT trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas QUOT's P/E ratio is -9.74. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to QUOT's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is more volatile compared to QUOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check QUOT's competition here
TZOO vs NCMI Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, NCMI has a market cap of 332.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while NCMI trades at $3.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas NCMI's P/E ratio is -35.50. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to NCMI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is more volatile compared to NCMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check NCMI's competition here
TZOO vs ADTH Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, ADTH has a market cap of 294.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while ADTH trades at $3.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas ADTH's P/E ratio is -64.10. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to ADTH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is more volatile compared to ADTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check ADTH's competition here
TZOO vs TRMR Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, TRMR has a market cap of 182.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while TRMR trades at $5.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas TRMR's P/E ratio is -17.93. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to TRMR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is more volatile compared to TRMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check TRMR's competition here
TZOO vs TSQ Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, TSQ has a market cap of 108.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while TSQ trades at $6.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas TSQ's P/E ratio is -15.14. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to TSQ's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is more volatile compared to TSQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check TSQ's competition here
TZOO vs ATY Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, ATY has a market cap of 90.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while ATY trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas ATY's P/E ratio is -160.00. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to ATY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is more volatile compared to ATY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check ATY's competition here
TZOO vs WIMI Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, WIMI has a market cap of 84M. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while WIMI trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas WIMI's P/E ratio is 0.73. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to WIMI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is less volatile compared to WIMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check WIMI's competition here
TZOO vs ICLK Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, ICLK has a market cap of 82M. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while ICLK trades at $9.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas ICLK's P/E ratio is -3.23. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to ICLK's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is less volatile compared to ICLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check ICLK's competition here
TZOO vs MNTN-WT Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, MNTN-WT has a market cap of 80.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while MNTN-WT trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas MNTN-WT's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to MNTN-WT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is less volatile compared to MNTN-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check MNTN-WT's competition here
TZOO vs STCN Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, STCN has a market cap of 77.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while STCN trades at $12.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas STCN's P/E ratio is 4.02. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to STCN's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is less volatile compared to STCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check STCN's competition here
TZOO vs CHR Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, CHR has a market cap of 72.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while CHR trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas CHR's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to CHR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is less volatile compared to CHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check CHR's competition here
TZOO vs MCHX Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, MCHX has a market cap of 69.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while MCHX trades at $1.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas MCHX's P/E ratio is -14.18. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to MCHX's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is less volatile compared to MCHX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check MCHX's competition here
TZOO vs XNET Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, XNET has a market cap of 62.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while XNET trades at $4.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas XNET's P/E ratio is 0.37. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to XNET's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is less volatile compared to XNET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check XNET's competition here
TZOO vs ABLV Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, ABLV has a market cap of 53.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while ABLV trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas ABLV's P/E ratio is -21.70. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to ABLV's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is less volatile compared to ABLV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check ABLV's competition here
TZOO vs SDM Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, SDM has a market cap of 49.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while SDM trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas SDM's P/E ratio is 26.43. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to SDM's ROE of -4.93%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is more volatile compared to SDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check SDM's competition here
TZOO vs FLNT Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, FLNT has a market cap of 47.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while FLNT trades at $2.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas FLNT's P/E ratio is -2.95. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to FLNT's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is less volatile compared to FLNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check FLNT's competition here
TZOO vs ADTHW Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, ADTHW has a market cap of 43.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while ADTHW trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas ADTHW's P/E ratio is 1.51. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to ADTHW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is less volatile compared to ADTHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check ADTHW's competition here
TZOO vs TZUP Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, TZUP has a market cap of 42.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while TZUP trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas TZUP's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to TZUP's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is less volatile compared to TZUP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check TZUP's competition here
TZOO vs GSMG Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, GSMG has a market cap of 40.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while GSMG trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas GSMG's P/E ratio is 1.16. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to GSMG's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is less volatile compared to GSMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check GSMG's competition here
TZOO vs SWAG Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, SWAG has a market cap of 39.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while SWAG trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas SWAG's P/E ratio is 105.00. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to SWAG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is less volatile compared to SWAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check SWAG's competition here
TZOO vs MOXC Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, MOXC has a market cap of 35.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while MOXC trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas MOXC's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to MOXC's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is less volatile compared to MOXC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check MOXC's competition here
TZOO vs CDLX Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, CDLX has a market cap of 35.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while CDLX trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas CDLX's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to CDLX's ROE of -8.71%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is less volatile compared to CDLX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check CDLX's competition here
TZOO vs TJGC Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, TJGC has a market cap of 33.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while TJGC trades at $6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas TJGC's P/E ratio is -6.14. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to TJGC's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is less volatile compared to TJGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check TJGC's competition here
TZOO vs ACCS Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, ACCS has a market cap of 24.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while ACCS trades at $6.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas ACCS's P/E ratio is -17.47. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to ACCS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is less volatile compared to ACCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check ACCS's competition here
TZOO vs INUV Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, INUV has a market cap of 22.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while INUV trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas INUV's P/E ratio is -11.46. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to INUV's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is less volatile compared to INUV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check INUV's competition here
TZOO vs HHS Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, HHS has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while HHS trades at $2.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas HHS's P/E ratio is -17.64. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to HHS's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is more volatile compared to HHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check HHS's competition here
TZOO vs MCTR Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, MCTR has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while MCTR trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas MCTR's P/E ratio is -3.76. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to MCTR's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is more volatile compared to MCTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check MCTR's competition here
TZOO vs MOBQ Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, MOBQ has a market cap of 14.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while MOBQ trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas MOBQ's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to MOBQ's ROE of -7.43%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is less volatile compared to MOBQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check MOBQ's competition here
TZOO vs ISIG Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, ISIG has a market cap of 13.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while ISIG trades at $7.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas ISIG's P/E ratio is 1.19. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to ISIG's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is less volatile compared to ISIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check ISIG's competition here
TZOO vs FTRK Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, FTRK has a market cap of 10.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while FTRK trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas FTRK's P/E ratio is -6.19. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to FTRK's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is less volatile compared to FTRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check FTRK's competition here
TZOO vs DMS Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, DMS has a market cap of 7.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while DMS trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas DMS's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to DMS's ROE of +2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is less volatile compared to DMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check DMS's competition here
TZOO vs LDWY Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, LDWY has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while LDWY trades at $3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas LDWY's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to LDWY's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is more volatile compared to LDWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check LDWY's competition here
TZOO vs EDHL Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, EDHL has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while EDHL trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas EDHL's P/E ratio is -3.06. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to EDHL's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is less volatile compared to EDHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check EDHL's competition here
TZOO vs DRCTW Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, DRCTW has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while DRCTW trades at $0.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas DRCTW's P/E ratio is 0.16. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to DRCTW's ROE of +4.79%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is more volatile compared to DRCTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check DRCTW's competition here
TZOO vs YDKG Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, YDKG has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while YDKG trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas YDKG's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to YDKG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is less volatile compared to YDKG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check YDKG's competition here
TZOO vs BAOS Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, BAOS has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while BAOS trades at $2.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas BAOS's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to BAOS's ROE of -1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is less volatile compared to BAOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check BAOS's competition here
TZOO vs STFS Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, STFS has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while STFS trades at $11.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas STFS's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to STFS's ROE of -1.86%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is less volatile compared to STFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check STFS's competition here
TZOO vs MGOL Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, MGOL has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while MGOL trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas MGOL's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to MGOL's ROE of -21.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is less volatile compared to MGOL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check MGOL's competition here
TZOO vs KUST Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, KUST has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while KUST trades at $1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas KUST's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to KUST's ROE of -2.54%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is less volatile compared to KUST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check KUST's competition here
TZOO vs STRNW Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, STRNW has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while STRNW trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas STRNW's P/E ratio is -39.93. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to STRNW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is less volatile compared to STRNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check STRNW's competition here
TZOO vs VSME Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, VSME has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while VSME trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas VSME's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to VSME's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is less volatile compared to VSME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check VSME's competition here
TZOO vs CNET Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, CNET has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while CNET trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas CNET's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to CNET's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is less volatile compared to CNET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check CNET's competition here
TZOO vs ADVWW Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, ADVWW has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while ADVWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas ADVWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to ADVWW's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is less volatile compared to ADVWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check ADVWW's competition here
TZOO vs ABLVW Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, ABLVW has a market cap of 906K. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while ABLVW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas ABLVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to ABLVW's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is less volatile compared to ABLVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check ABLVW's competition here
TZOO vs SWAGW Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, SWAGW has a market cap of 572.4K. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while SWAGW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas SWAGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to SWAGW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is less volatile compared to SWAGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check SWAGW's competition here
TZOO vs TRKAW Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, TRKAW has a market cap of 529.8K. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while TRKAW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas TRKAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to TRKAW's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is less volatile compared to TRKAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check TRKAW's competition here
TZOO vs DRCT Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, DRCT has a market cap of 437.9K. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while DRCT trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas DRCT's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to DRCT's ROE of +4.79%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is less volatile compared to DRCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check DRCT's competition here
TZOO vs HAO Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, HAO has a market cap of 67.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while HAO trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas HAO's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to HAO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is less volatile compared to HAO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check HAO's competition here
TZOO vs MOBQW Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, MOBQW has a market cap of 44.2K. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while MOBQW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas MOBQW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to MOBQW's ROE of -7.43%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is more volatile compared to MOBQW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check MOBQW's competition here
TZOO vs SRAX Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, SRAX has a market cap of 14.7K. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while SRAX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas SRAX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to SRAX's ROE of -5.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is less volatile compared to SRAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check SRAX's competition here
TZOO vs GSMGW Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, GSMGW has a market cap of 9.3K. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while GSMGW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas GSMGW's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to GSMGW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is less volatile compared to GSMGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check GSMGW's competition here
TZOO vs ZDVSV Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, ZDVSV has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while ZDVSV trades at $123.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas ZDVSV's P/E ratio is 27.03. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to ZDVSV's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is more volatile compared to ZDVSV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check ZDVSV's competition here
TZOO vs TRKA Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, TRKA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while TRKA trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas TRKA's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to TRKA's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is less volatile compared to TRKA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check TRKA's competition here
TZOO vs SZMK Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, SZMK has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while SZMK trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas SZMK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to SZMK's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is more volatile compared to SZMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check SZMK's competition here
TZOO vs DMS-WT Comparison June 2026
TZOO plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TZOO stands at 100.6M. In comparison, DMS-WT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TZOO is priced at $9.96, while DMS-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TZOO currently has a P/E ratio of 25.76, whereas DMS-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TZOO's ROE is -0.52%, compared to DMS-WT's ROE of +2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TZOO is more volatile compared to DMS-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TZOO.Check DMS-WT's competition here