Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See TUSK's competitors and their performance on the NASDAQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Conglomerates Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for TUSK and its NASDAQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TUSK | $2.85 | -4.36% | 140.2M | -6.77 | -$0.43 | N/A |
| MMM | $168.47 | -0.64% | 87.4B | 20.37 | $8.32 | +1.81% |
| HONIV | $256.01 | +0.00% | 81.1B | 24.88 | $10.29 | +44.60% |
| HON | $209.74 | -1.32% | 67B | 13.66 | $15.49 | +2.10% |
| VMI | $468.11 | +0.27% | 9B | 23.05 | $20.29 | +0.64% |
| BBUC | $25.01 | -1.79% | 5.2B | -3.66 | -$6.91 | +0.99% |
| GHC | $1,129.41 | -2.21% | 4.9B | 20.16 | $56.65 | +0.65% |
| SEB | $4,066.12 | +2.44% | 3.9B | 34.55 | $119.19 | +0.22% |
| OTTR | $88.75 | -0.67% | 3.7B | 13.66 | $6.48 | +2.55% |
| BBU | $31.46 | -2.09% | 2.8B | -104.87 | -$0.30 | +0.79% |
Stock Comparison
3M Company (NYSE: MMM)
TUSK vs MMM Comparison September 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 140.2M. In comparison, MMM has a market cap of 87.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while MMM trades at $168.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.77, whereas MMM's P/E ratio is 20.37. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MMM's ROE of +0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is less volatile compared to MMM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check MMM's competition here
Honeywell International Inc. Common Stock Ex Distribution When Issued (NASDAQ: HONIV)
TUSK vs HONIV Comparison September 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 140.2M. In comparison, HONIV has a market cap of 81.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while HONIV trades at $256.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.77, whereas HONIV's P/E ratio is 24.88. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HONIV's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is less volatile compared to HONIV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check HONIV's competition here
Honeywell International Inc. (NASDAQ: HON)
TUSK vs HON Comparison September 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 140.2M. In comparison, HON has a market cap of 67B. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while HON trades at $209.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.77, whereas HON's P/E ratio is 13.66. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HON's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is less volatile compared to HON. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check HON's competition here
Valmont Industries, Inc. (NYSE: VMI)
TUSK vs VMI Comparison September 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 140.2M. In comparison, VMI has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while VMI trades at $468.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.77, whereas VMI's P/E ratio is 23.05. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VMI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is less volatile compared to VMI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check VMI's competition here
Brookfield Business Corporation (NYSE: BBUC)
TUSK vs BBUC Comparison September 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 140.2M. In comparison, BBUC has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while BBUC trades at $25.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.77, whereas BBUC's P/E ratio is -3.66. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BBUC's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is less volatile compared to BBUC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check BBUC's competition here
Graham Holdings Company (NYSE: GHC)
TUSK vs GHC Comparison September 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 140.2M. In comparison, GHC has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while GHC trades at $1,129.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.77, whereas GHC's P/E ratio is 20.16. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GHC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is more volatile compared to GHC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check GHC's competition here
Seaboard Corporation (AMEX: SEB)
TUSK vs SEB Comparison September 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 140.2M. In comparison, SEB has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while SEB trades at $4,066.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.77, whereas SEB's P/E ratio is 34.55. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SEB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is less volatile compared to SEB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check SEB's competition here
Otter Tail Corporation (NASDAQ: OTTR)
TUSK vs OTTR Comparison September 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 140.2M. In comparison, OTTR has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while OTTR trades at $88.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.77, whereas OTTR's P/E ratio is 13.66. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OTTR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is more volatile compared to OTTR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check OTTR's competition here
Brookfield Business Partners L.P. (NYSE: BBU)
TUSK vs BBU Comparison September 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 140.2M. In comparison, BBU has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while BBU trades at $31.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.77, whereas BBU's P/E ratio is -104.87. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BBU's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is less volatile compared to BBU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check BBU's competition here
Veritiv Corporation (NYSE: VRTV)
TUSK vs VRTV Comparison September 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 140.2M. In comparison, VRTV has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while VRTV trades at $169.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.77, whereas VRTV's P/E ratio is 8.58. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to VRTV's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is more volatile compared to VRTV. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check VRTV's competition here
Compass Diversified (NYSE: CODI)
TUSK vs CODI Comparison September 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 140.2M. In comparison, CODI has a market cap of 843M. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while CODI trades at $11.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.77, whereas CODI's P/E ratio is 26.68. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CODI's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is less volatile compared to CODI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check CODI's competition here
Cresud S.A. Sponsored ADR (NASDAQ: CRESY)
TUSK vs CRESY Comparison September 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 140.2M. In comparison, CRESY has a market cap of 773.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while CRESY trades at $11.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.77, whereas CRESY's P/E ratio is 6.66. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CRESY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is less volatile compared to CRESY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check CRESY's competition here
Compass Diversified (NYSE: CODI-PC)
TUSK vs CODI-PC Comparison September 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 140.2M. In comparison, CODI-PC has a market cap of 732.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while CODI-PC trades at $21.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.77, whereas CODI-PC's P/E ratio is -22.79. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CODI-PC's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is less volatile compared to CODI-PC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check CODI-PC's competition here
Compass Diversified (NYSE: CODI-PB)
TUSK vs CODI-PB Comparison September 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 140.2M. In comparison, CODI-PB has a market cap of 646.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while CODI-PB trades at $22.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.77, whereas CODI-PB's P/E ratio is -225.99. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CODI-PB's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is more volatile compared to CODI-PB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check CODI-PB's competition here
Compass Diversified (NYSE: CODI-PA)
TUSK vs CODI-PA Comparison September 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 140.2M. In comparison, CODI-PA has a market cap of 612.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while CODI-PA trades at $18.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.77, whereas CODI-PA's P/E ratio is -194.72. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CODI-PA's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is more volatile compared to CODI-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check CODI-PA's competition here
Matthews International Corporation (NASDAQ: MATW)
TUSK vs MATW Comparison September 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 140.2M. In comparison, MATW has a market cap of 609.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while MATW trades at $19.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.77, whereas MATW's P/E ratio is 20.33. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MATW's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is less volatile compared to MATW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check MATW's competition here
Tejon Ranch Co. (NYSE: TRC)
TUSK vs TRC Comparison September 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 140.2M. In comparison, TRC has a market cap of 443.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while TRC trades at $16.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.77, whereas TRC's P/E ratio is 71.48. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TRC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is more volatile compared to TRC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check TRC's competition here
Falcon's Beyond Global, Inc. Class A Common Stock (NASDAQ: FBYD)
TUSK vs FBYD Comparison September 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 140.2M. In comparison, FBYD has a market cap of 409.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while FBYD trades at $8.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.77, whereas FBYD's P/E ratio is -836.00. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FBYD's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is less volatile compared to FBYD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check FBYD's competition here
Steel Partners Holdings L.P. (NYSE: SPLP-PA)
TUSK vs SPLP-PA Comparison September 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 140.2M. In comparison, SPLP-PA has a market cap of 369.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while SPLP-PA trades at $23.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.77, whereas SPLP-PA's P/E ratio is 6.46. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SPLP-PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is less volatile compared to SPLP-PA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check SPLP-PA's competition here
FTAI Infrastructure Inc. (NASDAQ: FIP)
TUSK vs FIP Comparison September 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 140.2M. In comparison, FIP has a market cap of 341.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while FIP trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.77, whereas FIP's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FIP's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is less volatile compared to FIP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check FIP's competition here
FTAI Infrastructure Inc. (NASDAQ: FIPWV)
TUSK vs FIPWV Comparison September 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 140.2M. In comparison, FIPWV has a market cap of 328.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while FIPWV trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.77, whereas FIPWV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FIPWV's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is less volatile compared to FIPWV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check FIPWV's competition here
NN, Inc. (NASDAQ: NNBR)
TUSK vs NNBR Comparison September 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 140.2M. In comparison, NNBR has a market cap of 307.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while NNBR trades at $3.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.77, whereas NNBR's P/E ratio is -15.50. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to NNBR's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is less volatile compared to NNBR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check NNBR's competition here
RCM Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: RCMT)
TUSK vs RCMT Comparison September 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 140.2M. In comparison, RCMT has a market cap of 288.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while RCMT trades at $40.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.77, whereas RCMT's P/E ratio is 15.82. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to RCMT's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is more volatile compared to RCMT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check RCMT's competition here
Falcon's Beyond Global, Inc. Warrants (NASDAQ: FBYDW)
TUSK vs FBYDW Comparison September 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 140.2M. In comparison, FBYDW has a market cap of 267.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while FBYDW trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.77, whereas FBYDW's P/E ratio is -7.61. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FBYDW's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is less volatile compared to FBYDW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check FBYDW's competition here
AIAI Holdings Corporation Class A Common Stock (NASDAQ: AIAI)
TUSK vs AIAI Comparison September 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 140.2M. In comparison, AIAI has a market cap of 263M. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while AIAI trades at $3.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.77, whereas AIAI's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AIAI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is less volatile compared to AIAI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check AIAI's competition here
Air T, Inc. (NASDAQ: AIRTP)
TUSK vs AIRTP Comparison September 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 140.2M. In comparison, AIRTP has a market cap of 78.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while AIRTP trades at $18.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.77, whereas AIRTP's P/E ratio is 0.67. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AIRTP's ROE of +1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is more volatile compared to AIRTP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check AIRTP's competition here
Air T, Inc. (NASDAQ: AIRT)
TUSK vs AIRT Comparison September 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 140.2M. In comparison, AIRT has a market cap of 77.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while AIRT trades at $28.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.77, whereas AIRT's P/E ratio is 1.22. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AIRT's ROE of +1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is less volatile compared to AIRT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check AIRT's competition here
Star Equity Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: STRRP)
TUSK vs STRRP Comparison September 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 140.2M. In comparison, STRRP has a market cap of 38.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while STRRP trades at $9.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.77, whereas STRRP's P/E ratio is -17.15. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STRRP's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is less volatile compared to STRRP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check STRRP's competition here
Star Equity Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: STRR)
TUSK vs STRR Comparison September 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 140.2M. In comparison, STRR has a market cap of 37.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while STRR trades at $10.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.77, whereas STRR's P/E ratio is -10.61. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STRR's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is less volatile compared to STRR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check STRR's competition here
Cresud Sociedad Anónima, Comercial, Inmobiliaria, Financiera y Agropecuaria (NASDAQ: CRESW)
TUSK vs CRESW Comparison September 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 140.2M. In comparison, CRESW has a market cap of 18.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while CRESW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.77, whereas CRESW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CRESW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is more volatile compared to CRESW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check CRESW's competition here
Hyperscale Data, Inc. (AMEX: GPUS)
TUSK vs GPUS Comparison September 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 140.2M. In comparison, GPUS has a market cap of 16.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while GPUS trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.77, whereas GPUS's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to GPUS's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is less volatile compared to GPUS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check GPUS's competition here
Planet Green Holdings Corp. (AMEX: PLAG)
TUSK vs PLAG Comparison September 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 140.2M. In comparison, PLAG has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while PLAG trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.77, whereas PLAG's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PLAG's ROE of +14.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is less volatile compared to PLAG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check PLAG's competition here
1847 Holdings LLC (AMEX: EFSH)
TUSK vs EFSH Comparison September 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 140.2M. In comparison, EFSH has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while EFSH trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.77, whereas EFSH's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EFSH's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is less volatile compared to EFSH. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check EFSH's competition here
Draper Oakwood Technology Acquisition, Inc. Units (NASDAQ: DOTAU)
TUSK vs DOTAU Comparison September 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 140.2M. In comparison, DOTAU has a market cap of 851. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while DOTAU trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.77, whereas DOTAU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DOTAU's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is more volatile compared to DOTAU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check DOTAU's competition here
FinTech Acquisition Corp. II Units (NASDAQ: FNTEU)
TUSK vs FNTEU Comparison September 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 140.2M. In comparison, FNTEU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while FNTEU trades at $10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.77, whereas FNTEU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FNTEU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is more volatile compared to FNTEU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check FNTEU's competition here
Electrum Special Acquisition Corporation Unit (NASDAQ: ELECU)
TUSK vs ELECU Comparison September 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 140.2M. In comparison, ELECU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while ELECU trades at $10.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.77, whereas ELECU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ELECU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is more volatile compared to ELECU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check ELECU's competition here
Ocean Bio-Chem, Inc. (NASDAQ: OBCI)
TUSK vs OBCI Comparison September 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 140.2M. In comparison, OBCI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while OBCI trades at $13.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.77, whereas OBCI's P/E ratio is 25.55. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to OBCI's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is more volatile compared to OBCI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check OBCI's competition here
Stellar Acquisition III Inc. Units (NASDAQ: STLRU)
TUSK vs STLRU Comparison September 2026
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (NASDAQ: TUSK) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TUSK stands at 140.2M. In comparison, STLRU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TUSK is priced at $2.85 on the NASDAQ, while STLRU trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TUSK currently has a P/E ratio of -6.77, whereas STLRU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TUSK's ROE is +0.00%, compared to STLRU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TUSK is more volatile compared to STLRU. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TUSK.Check STLRU's competition here