Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See TEN-PE's competitors and their performance on the NYSE and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Marine Shipping Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for TEN-PE and its NYSE peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TEN-PE | $25.52 | -0.27% | 520.8M | 5.79 | $4.41 | +10.94% |
| FRO | $48.93 | +1.73% | 10.9B | 7.32 | $6.68 | +12.64% |
| KEX | $131.94 | +0.27% | 7.1B | 20.29 | $6.50 | N/A |
| MATX | $226.43 | +1.33% | 6.9B | 15.15 | $14.96 | +0.64% |
| CMBT | $18.95 | -0.52% | 5.5B | 6.51 | $2.91 | +4.51% |
| INSW | $110.24 | +1.78% | 5.5B | 12.95 | $8.52 | +11.48% |
| HAFN | $9.67 | +5.91% | 4.8B | 7.73 | $1.25 | +11.81% |
| STNG | $83.57 | +0.46% | 4.2B | 11.08 | $7.54 | +2.12% |
| BWLP | $24.68 | +0.08% | 3.7B | 8.39 | $2.94 | +10.53% |
| TRMD | $36.15 | +2.06% | 3.7B | 5.96 | $6.07 | +12.26% |
Stock Comparison
Frontline Plc (NYSE: FRO)
TEN-PE vs FRO Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, FRO has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while FRO trades at $48.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas FRO's P/E ratio is 7.32. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FRO's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to FRO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check FRO's competition here
Kirby Corporation (NYSE: KEX)
TEN-PE vs KEX Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, KEX has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while KEX trades at $131.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas KEX's P/E ratio is 20.29. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KEX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to KEX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check KEX's competition here
Matson, Inc. (NYSE: MATX)
TEN-PE vs MATX Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, MATX has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while MATX trades at $226.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas MATX's P/E ratio is 15.15. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MATX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to MATX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check MATX's competition here
Cmb.Tech N.V. (NYSE: CMBT)
TEN-PE vs CMBT Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, CMBT has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while CMBT trades at $18.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas CMBT's P/E ratio is 6.51. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMBT's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to CMBT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check CMBT's competition here
International Seaways, Inc. (NYSE: INSW)
TEN-PE vs INSW Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, INSW has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while INSW trades at $110.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas INSW's P/E ratio is 12.95. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to INSW's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to INSW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check INSW's competition here
Hafnia Limited (NYSE: HAFN)
TEN-PE vs HAFN Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, HAFN has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while HAFN trades at $9.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas HAFN's P/E ratio is 7.73. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HAFN's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to HAFN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check HAFN's competition here
Scorpio Tankers Inc. (NYSE: STNG)
TEN-PE vs STNG Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, STNG has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while STNG trades at $83.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas STNG's P/E ratio is 11.08. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to STNG's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to STNG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check STNG's competition here
BW LPG Limited (NYSE: BWLP)
TEN-PE vs BWLP Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, BWLP has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while BWLP trades at $24.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas BWLP's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BWLP's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to BWLP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check BWLP's competition here
TORM plc (NASDAQ: TRMD)
TEN-PE vs TRMD Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, TRMD has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while TRMD trades at $36.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas TRMD's P/E ratio is 5.96. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TRMD's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to TRMD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check TRMD's competition here
DHT Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: DHT)
TEN-PE vs DHT Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, DHT has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while DHT trades at $22.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas DHT's P/E ratio is 7.68. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DHT's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to DHT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check DHT's competition here
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (NYSE: ZIM)
TEN-PE vs ZIM Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, ZIM has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while ZIM trades at $28.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas ZIM's P/E ratio is -319.78. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ZIM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to ZIM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check ZIM's competition here
Teekay Tankers Ltd. (NYSE: TNK)
TEN-PE vs TNK Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, TNK has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while TNK trades at $96.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas TNK's P/E ratio is 10.25. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TNK's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to TNK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check TNK's competition here
Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (NASDAQ: SBLK)
TEN-PE vs SBLK Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, SBLK has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while SBLK trades at $29.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas SBLK's P/E ratio is 10.81. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SBLK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to SBLK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check SBLK's competition here
Danaos Corporation (NYSE: DAC)
TEN-PE vs DAC Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, DAC has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while DAC trades at $154.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas DAC's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DAC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to DAC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check DAC's competition here
Safe Bulkers, Inc. (NYSE: SB-PD)
TEN-PE vs SB-PD Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, SB-PD has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while SB-PD trades at $26.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas SB-PD's P/E ratio is 33.86. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SB-PD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to SB-PD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check SB-PD's competition here
Safe Bulkers, Inc. (NYSE: SB-PC)
TEN-PE vs SB-PC Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, SB-PC has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while SB-PC trades at $26.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas SB-PC's P/E ratio is 33.70. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SB-PC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to SB-PC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check SB-PC's competition here
Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. (NYSE: ECO)
TEN-PE vs ECO Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, ECO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while ECO trades at $80.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas ECO's P/E ratio is 7.44. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ECO's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to ECO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check ECO's competition here
Navios Maritime Partners L.P. (NYSE: NMM)
TEN-PE vs NMM Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, NMM has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while NMM trades at $90.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas NMM's P/E ratio is 6.39. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NMM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to NMM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check NMM's competition here
Costamare Inc. (NYSE: CMRE-PC)
TEN-PE vs CMRE-PC Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, CMRE-PC has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while CMRE-PC trades at $26.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas CMRE-PC's P/E ratio is 9.65. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMRE-PC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to CMRE-PC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check CMRE-PC's competition here
Costamare Inc. (NYSE: CMRE)
TEN-PE vs CMRE Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, CMRE has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while CMRE trades at $14.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas CMRE's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMRE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to CMRE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check CMRE's competition here
SFL Corporation Ltd (NYSE: SFL)
TEN-PE vs SFL Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, SFL has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while SFL trades at $13.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas SFL's P/E ratio is 28.10. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SFL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to SFL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check SFL's competition here
Nordic American Tankers Limited (NYSE: NAT)
TEN-PE vs NAT Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, NAT has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while NAT trades at $7.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas NAT's P/E ratio is 14.77. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NAT's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to NAT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check NAT's competition here
FLEX LNG Ltd (NYSE: FLNG)
TEN-PE vs FLNG Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, FLNG has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while FLNG trades at $30.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas FLNG's P/E ratio is 15.74. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FLNG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to FLNG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check FLNG's competition here
Global Ship Lease, Inc. (NYSE: GSL)
TEN-PE vs GSL Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, GSL has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while GSL trades at $44.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas GSL's P/E ratio is 4.41. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GSL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to GSL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check GSL's competition here
Global Ship Lease, Inc. (NYSE: GSL-PB)
TEN-PE vs GSL-PB Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, GSL-PB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while GSL-PB trades at $26.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas GSL-PB's P/E ratio is 2.60. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GSL-PB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to GSL-PB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check GSL-PB's competition here
Navigator Holdings Ltd. (NYSE: NVGS)
TEN-PE vs NVGS Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, NVGS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while NVGS trades at $22.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas NVGS's P/E ratio is 11.33. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NVGS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to NVGS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check NVGS's competition here
Costamare Inc. (NYSE: CMRE-PB)
TEN-PE vs CMRE-PB Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, CMRE-PB has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while CMRE-PB trades at $25.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas CMRE-PB's P/E ratio is 9.12. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMRE-PB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to CMRE-PB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check CMRE-PB's competition here
Costamare Inc. (NYSE: CMRE-PD)
TEN-PE vs CMRE-PD Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, CMRE-PD has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while CMRE-PD trades at $26.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas CMRE-PD's P/E ratio is 9.44. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMRE-PD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to CMRE-PD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check CMRE-PD's competition here
Scorpio Tankers Inc. 7.00% Seni (NYSE: SBBA)
TEN-PE vs SBBA Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, SBBA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while SBBA trades at $25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas SBBA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SBBA's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to SBBA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check SBBA's competition here
Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. (NASDAQ: CCEC)
TEN-PE vs CCEC Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, CCEC has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while CCEC trades at $21.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas CCEC's P/E ratio is 35.00. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CCEC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to CCEC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check CCEC's competition here
Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (NYSE: GNK)
TEN-PE vs GNK Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, GNK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while GNK trades at $25.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas GNK's P/E ratio is 20.14. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GNK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to GNK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check GNK's competition here
Costamare Inc. (NYSE: CMRE-PE)
TEN-PE vs CMRE-PE Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, CMRE-PE has a market cap of 983.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while CMRE-PE trades at $42.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas CMRE-PE's P/E ratio is 11.47. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMRE-PE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to CMRE-PE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check CMRE-PE's competition here
Capital Product Partners L.P. (NASDAQ: CPLP)
TEN-PE vs CPLP Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, CPLP has a market cap of 979.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while CPLP trades at $16.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas CPLP's P/E ratio is 6.63. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CPLP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to CPLP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check CPLP's competition here
Safe Bulkers, Inc. (NYSE: SB)
TEN-PE vs SB Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, SB has a market cap of 844.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while SB trades at $8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas SB's P/E ratio is 11.52. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to SB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check SB's competition here
Himalaya Shipping Ltd. (NYSE: HSHP)
TEN-PE vs HSHP Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, HSHP has a market cap of 813.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while HSHP trades at $17.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas HSHP's P/E ratio is 15.27. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HSHP's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to HSHP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check HSHP's competition here
Ardmore Shipping Corporation (NYSE: ASC)
TEN-PE vs ASC Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, ASC has a market cap of 752M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while ASC trades at $18.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas ASC's P/E ratio is 7.84. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ASC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to ASC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check ASC's competition here
Costamare Bulkers Holdings Limited (NYSE: CMDB)
TEN-PE vs CMDB Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, CMDB has a market cap of 542.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while CMDB trades at $22.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas CMDB's P/E ratio is 21.10. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CMDB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to CMDB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check CMDB's competition here
Pangaea Logistics Solutions, Ltd. (NASDAQ: PANL)
TEN-PE vs PANL Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, PANL has a market cap of 525.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while PANL trades at $8.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas PANL's P/E ratio is 11.47. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PANL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to PANL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check PANL's competition here
Cool Company Ltd. (NYSE: CLCO)
TEN-PE vs CLCO Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, CLCO has a market cap of 511.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while CLCO trades at $9.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas CLCO's P/E ratio is 9.21. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CLCO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to CLCO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check CLCO's competition here
Euroseas Ltd. (NASDAQ: ESEA)
TEN-PE vs ESEA Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, ESEA has a market cap of 498.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while ESEA trades at $70.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas ESEA's P/E ratio is 3.90. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ESEA's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to ESEA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check ESEA's competition here
Eneti Inc. (NYSE: NETI)
TEN-PE vs NETI Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, NETI has a market cap of 437.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while NETI trades at $11.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas NETI's P/E ratio is -11.44. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NETI's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to NETI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check NETI's competition here
KNOT Offshore Partners LP (NYSE: KNOP)
TEN-PE vs KNOP Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, KNOP has a market cap of 351.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while KNOP trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas KNOP's P/E ratio is 10.34. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KNOP's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to KNOP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check KNOP's competition here
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (NASDAQ: SHIP)
TEN-PE vs SHIP Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, SHIP has a market cap of 346.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while SHIP trades at $16.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas SHIP's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SHIP's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to SHIP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check SHIP's competition here
Diana Shipping Inc. (NYSE: DSX)
TEN-PE vs DSX Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, DSX has a market cap of 340.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while DSX trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas DSX's P/E ratio is 5.90. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DSX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to DSX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check DSX's competition here
StealthGas Inc. (NASDAQ: GASS)
TEN-PE vs GASS Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, GASS has a market cap of 330.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while GASS trades at $8.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas GASS's P/E ratio is 5.52. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GASS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to GASS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check GASS's competition here
SEACOR Marine Holdings Inc. (NYSE: SMHI)
TEN-PE vs SMHI Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, SMHI has a market cap of 224.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while SMHI trades at $8.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas SMHI's P/E ratio is -11.63. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SMHI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to SMHI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check SMHI's competition here
Euroseas Ltd. Ex-Distribution When Issued (NASDAQ: ESEAV)
TEN-PE vs ESEAV Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, ESEAV has a market cap of 194.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while ESEAV trades at $27.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas ESEAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ESEAV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to ESEAV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check ESEAV's competition here
Diana Shipping Inc. (NYSE: DSX-PB)
TEN-PE vs DSX-PB Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, DSX-PB has a market cap of 189.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while DSX-PB trades at $27.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas DSX-PB's P/E ratio is 90.95. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DSX-PB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to DSX-PB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check DSX-PB's competition here
OceanPal Inc. (NASDAQ: OP)
TEN-PE vs OP Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, OP has a market cap of 187M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while OP trades at $6.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas OP's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OP's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to OP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check OP's competition here
Toro Corp. (NASDAQ: TORO)
TEN-PE vs TORO Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, TORO has a market cap of 178M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while TORO trades at $5.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas TORO's P/E ratio is 113.19. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TORO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to TORO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check TORO's competition here
EuroDry Ltd. (NASDAQ: EDRY)
TEN-PE vs EDRY Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, EDRY has a market cap of 152.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while EDRY trades at $52.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas EDRY's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EDRY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to EDRY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check EDRY's competition here
Dynagas LNG Partners LP (NYSE: DLNG)
TEN-PE vs DLNG Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, DLNG has a market cap of 140.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while DLNG trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas DLNG's P/E ratio is 3.11. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DLNG's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to DLNG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check DLNG's competition here
Dynagas LNG Partners LP (NYSE: DLNG-PA)
TEN-PE vs DLNG-PA Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, DLNG-PA has a market cap of 126.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while DLNG-PA trades at $25.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas DLNG-PA's P/E ratio is 20.94. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DLNG-PA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to DLNG-PA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check DLNG-PA's competition here
SVRN, Inc. (NASDAQ: SVRN)
TEN-PE vs SVRN Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, SVRN has a market cap of 126.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while SVRN trades at $67.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas SVRN's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SVRN's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to SVRN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check SVRN's competition here
Heidmar Maritime Holdings Corp. (NASDAQ: HMR)
TEN-PE vs HMR Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, HMR has a market cap of 98.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while HMR trades at $1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas HMR's P/E ratio is 41.75. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HMR's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to HMR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check HMR's competition here
Globus Maritime Limited (NASDAQ: GLBS)
TEN-PE vs GLBS Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, GLBS has a market cap of 76.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while GLBS trades at $3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas GLBS's P/E ratio is 10.70. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GLBS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to GLBS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check GLBS's competition here
Pyxis Tankers Inc. (NASDAQ: PXS)
TEN-PE vs PXS Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, PXS has a market cap of 65.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while PXS trades at $6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas PXS's P/E ratio is 7.95. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PXS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to PXS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check PXS's competition here
Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. (NYSE: NM)
TEN-PE vs NM Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, NM has a market cap of 51.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while NM trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas NM's P/E ratio is -3.39. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NM's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to NM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check NM's competition here
Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. (NYSE: NM-PH)
TEN-PE vs NM-PH Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, NM-PH has a market cap of 51.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while NM-PH trades at $3.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas NM-PH's P/E ratio is 0.58. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NM-PH's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to NM-PH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check NM-PH's competition here
Pyxis Tankers Inc. (NASDAQ: PXSAP)
TEN-PE vs PXSAP Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, PXSAP has a market cap of 46.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while PXSAP trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas PXSAP's P/E ratio is -16.95. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PXSAP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to PXSAP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check PXSAP's competition here
Euroholdings Ltd (NASDAQ: EHLDV)
TEN-PE vs EHLDV Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, EHLDV has a market cap of 44.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while EHLDV trades at $15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas EHLDV's P/E ratio is 224.29. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EHLDV's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to EHLDV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check EHLDV's competition here
Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. (NYSE: NM-PG)
TEN-PE vs NM-PG Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, NM-PG has a market cap of 31.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while NM-PG trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas NM-PG's P/E ratio is 0.89. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NM-PG's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to NM-PG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check NM-PG's competition here
Toro Corp. Common Stock Ex-distribution When Issued (NASDAQ: TOROV)
TEN-PE vs TOROV Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, TOROV has a market cap of 31.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while TOROV trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas TOROV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TOROV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to TOROV. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check TOROV's competition here
Euroholdings Ltd. (NASDAQ: EHLD)
TEN-PE vs EHLD Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, EHLD has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while EHLD trades at $11.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas EHLD's P/E ratio is 3.30. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EHLD's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to EHLD. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check EHLD's competition here
Caravelle International Group (NASDAQ: CACO)
TEN-PE vs CACO Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, CACO has a market cap of 24.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while CACO trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas CACO's P/E ratio is -2.44. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CACO's ROE of -1.84%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to CACO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check CACO's competition here
United Maritime Corporation (NASDAQ: USEA)
TEN-PE vs USEA Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, USEA has a market cap of 24M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while USEA trades at $2.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas USEA's P/E ratio is 50.40. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to USEA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to USEA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check USEA's competition here
Vantage Corp (AMEX: VNTG)
TEN-PE vs VNTG Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, VNTG has a market cap of 23.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while VNTG trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas VNTG's P/E ratio is -16.97. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VNTG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to VNTG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check VNTG's competition here
Performance Shipping Inc. (NASDAQ: PSHG)
TEN-PE vs PSHG Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, PSHG has a market cap of 21.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while PSHG trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas PSHG's P/E ratio is 1.91. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PSHG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to PSHG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check PSHG's competition here
Castor Maritime Inc. (NASDAQ: CTRM)
TEN-PE vs CTRM Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, CTRM has a market cap of 19.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while CTRM trades at $2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas CTRM's P/E ratio is 0.43. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CTRM's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to CTRM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check CTRM's competition here
High-Trend International Group (NASDAQ: HTCO)
TEN-PE vs HTCO Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, HTCO has a market cap of 18.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while HTCO trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas HTCO's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HTCO's ROE of -1.84%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to HTCO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check HTCO's competition here
Uni-Fuels Holdings Limited (NASDAQ: UFG)
TEN-PE vs UFG Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, UFG has a market cap of 15M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while UFG trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas UFG's P/E ratio is -8.16. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to UFG's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to UFG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check UFG's competition here
Rubico Inc. (NASDAQ: RUBI)
TEN-PE vs RUBI Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, RUBI has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while RUBI trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas RUBI's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RUBI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to RUBI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check RUBI's competition here
Top Ships Inc. (AMEX: TOPS)
TEN-PE vs TOPS Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, TOPS has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while TOPS trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas TOPS's P/E ratio is 0.92. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TOPS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to TOPS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check TOPS's competition here
Icon Energy Corp. (NASDAQ: ICON)
TEN-PE vs ICON Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, ICON has a market cap of 366K. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while ICON trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas ICON's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ICON's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to ICON. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check ICON's competition here
C3is Inc. (NASDAQ: CISS)
TEN-PE vs CISS Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, CISS has a market cap of 260.7K. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while CISS trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas CISS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CISS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to CISS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check CISS's competition here
Pyxis Tankers Inc. (NASDAQ: PXSAW)
TEN-PE vs PXSAW Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, PXSAW has a market cap of 217.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while PXSAW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas PXSAW's P/E ratio is 0.03. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PXSAW's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to PXSAW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check PXSAW's competition here
Intercont (Cayman) Limited Ordinary shares (NASDAQ: NCT)
TEN-PE vs NCT Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, NCT has a market cap of 79.7K. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while NCT trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas NCT's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NCT's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to NCT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check NCT's competition here
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (NASDAQ: SHIPW)
TEN-PE vs SHIPW Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, SHIPW has a market cap of 75.6K. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while SHIPW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas SHIPW's P/E ratio is 0.21. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SHIPW's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to SHIPW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check SHIPW's competition here
Star Bulk Carriers Corp. 8.30% SR NT 22 (NASDAQ: SBLKZ)
TEN-PE vs SBLKZ Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, SBLKZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while SBLKZ trades at $25.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas SBLKZ's P/E ratio is 104.92. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SBLKZ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to SBLKZ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check SBLKZ's competition here
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (NASDAQ: SHIPZ)
TEN-PE vs SHIPZ Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, SHIPZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while SHIPZ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas SHIPZ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SHIPZ's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to SHIPZ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check SHIPZ's competition here
Gener8 Maritime, Inc. (NASDAQ: GNRT)
TEN-PE vs GNRT Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, GNRT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while GNRT trades at $6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas GNRT's P/E ratio is -2.38. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GNRT's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to GNRT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check GNRT's competition here
Global Ship Lease, Inc. 8.00% S (NYSE: GSLD)
TEN-PE vs GSLD Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, GSLD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while GSLD trades at $25.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas GSLD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GSLD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is more volatile compared to GSLD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check GSLD's competition here
Rand Logistics Inc (NASDAQ: RLOG)
TEN-PE vs RLOG Comparison September 2026
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (NYSE: TEN-PE) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TEN-PE stands at 520.8M. In comparison, RLOG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TEN-PE is priced at $25.52 on the NYSE, while RLOG trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TEN-PE currently has a P/E ratio of 5.79, whereas RLOG's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, TEN-PE's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RLOG's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, TEN-PE is less volatile compared to RLOG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TEN-PE.Check RLOG's competition here