The Swatch Group AG (SWGNF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SWGNF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Luxury Goods Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SWGNF | $45.63 | +0.00% | 11.9B | 4563.00 | $0.01 | +2.51% |
| LVMUY | $109.85 | -0.89% | 272.5B | 21.62 | $5.08 | +2.77% |
| LVMHF | $550.20 | +0.65% | 270.5B | 21.48 | $25.46 | +2.76% |
| HESAF | $1,861.59 | +0.84% | 195.1B | 37.12 | $50.15 | +2.49% |
| HESAY | $184.95 | +0.55% | 193.6B | 36.80 | $5.02 | +1.14% |
| CFRUY | $20.46 | -1.92% | 120.2B | 30.07 | $0.68 | +1.84% |
| CFRHF | $206.35 | -0.66% | 110.2B | 30.12 | $6.85 | +1.86% |
| CHDRF | $524.08 | +0.00% | 94.5B | 17.95 | $29.19 | +3.19% |
| CHDRY | $128.40 | -0.22% | 92.7B | 17.54 | $7.32 | +3.25% |
| PPRUF | $295.00 | +0.87% | 36.2B | -1134.62 | -$0.26 | +1.00% |
Stock Comparison
SWGNF vs LVMUY Comparison June 2026
SWGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGNF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, LVMUY has a market cap of 272.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SWGNF is priced at $45.63, while LVMUY trades at $109.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 4563.00, whereas LVMUY's P/E ratio is 21.62. In terms of profitability, SWGNF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LVMUY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGNF is more volatile compared to LVMUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGNF.Check LVMUY's competition here
SWGNF vs LVMHF Comparison June 2026
SWGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGNF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, LVMHF has a market cap of 270.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SWGNF is priced at $45.63, while LVMHF trades at $550.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 4563.00, whereas LVMHF's P/E ratio is 21.48. In terms of profitability, SWGNF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LVMHF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGNF is more volatile compared to LVMHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGNF.Check LVMHF's competition here
SWGNF vs HESAF Comparison June 2026
SWGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGNF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, HESAF has a market cap of 195.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SWGNF is priced at $45.63, while HESAF trades at $1,861.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 4563.00, whereas HESAF's P/E ratio is 37.12. In terms of profitability, SWGNF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HESAF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGNF is more volatile compared to HESAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGNF.Check HESAF's competition here
SWGNF vs HESAY Comparison June 2026
SWGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGNF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, HESAY has a market cap of 193.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SWGNF is priced at $45.63, while HESAY trades at $184.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 4563.00, whereas HESAY's P/E ratio is 36.80. In terms of profitability, SWGNF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HESAY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGNF is more volatile compared to HESAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGNF.Check HESAY's competition here
SWGNF vs CFRUY Comparison June 2026
SWGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGNF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, CFRUY has a market cap of 120.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SWGNF is priced at $45.63, while CFRUY trades at $20.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 4563.00, whereas CFRUY's P/E ratio is 30.07. In terms of profitability, SWGNF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CFRUY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGNF is more volatile compared to CFRUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGNF.Check CFRUY's competition here
SWGNF vs CFRHF Comparison June 2026
SWGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGNF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, CFRHF has a market cap of 110.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SWGNF is priced at $45.63, while CFRHF trades at $206.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 4563.00, whereas CFRHF's P/E ratio is 30.12. In terms of profitability, SWGNF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CFRHF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGNF is more volatile compared to CFRHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGNF.Check CFRHF's competition here
SWGNF vs CHDRF Comparison June 2026
SWGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGNF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, CHDRF has a market cap of 94.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SWGNF is priced at $45.63, while CHDRF trades at $524.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 4563.00, whereas CHDRF's P/E ratio is 17.95. In terms of profitability, SWGNF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CHDRF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGNF is more volatile compared to CHDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGNF.Check CHDRF's competition here
SWGNF vs CHDRY Comparison June 2026
SWGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGNF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, CHDRY has a market cap of 92.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SWGNF is priced at $45.63, while CHDRY trades at $128.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 4563.00, whereas CHDRY's P/E ratio is 17.54. In terms of profitability, SWGNF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CHDRY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGNF is more volatile compared to CHDRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGNF.Check CHDRY's competition here
SWGNF vs PPRUF Comparison June 2026
SWGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGNF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, PPRUF has a market cap of 36.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SWGNF is priced at $45.63, while PPRUF trades at $295.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 4563.00, whereas PPRUF's P/E ratio is -1134.62. In terms of profitability, SWGNF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PPRUF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGNF is more volatile compared to PPRUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGNF.Check PPRUF's competition here
SWGNF vs PPRUY Comparison June 2026
SWGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGNF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, PPRUY has a market cap of 34.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SWGNF is priced at $45.63, while PPRUY trades at $28.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 4563.00, whereas PPRUY's P/E ratio is -945.58. In terms of profitability, SWGNF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PPRUY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGNF is more volatile compared to PPRUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGNF.Check PPRUY's competition here
SWGNF vs CJEWF Comparison June 2026
SWGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGNF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, CJEWF has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SWGNF is priced at $45.63, while CJEWF trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 4563.00, whereas CJEWF's P/E ratio is 18.25. In terms of profitability, SWGNF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CJEWF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGNF is more volatile compared to CJEWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGNF.Check CJEWF's competition here
SWGNF vs CJEWY Comparison June 2026
SWGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGNF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, CJEWY has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SWGNF is priced at $45.63, while CJEWY trades at $14.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 4563.00, whereas CJEWY's P/E ratio is 19.01. In terms of profitability, SWGNF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CJEWY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGNF is more volatile compared to CJEWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGNF.Check CJEWY's competition here
SWGNF vs SWGAF Comparison June 2026
SWGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGNF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, SWGAF has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SWGNF is priced at $45.63, while SWGAF trades at $263.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 4563.00, whereas SWGAF's P/E ratio is 5277.00. In terms of profitability, SWGNF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SWGAF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGNF is more volatile compared to SWGAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGNF.Check SWGAF's competition here
SWGNF vs SWGAY Comparison June 2026
SWGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGNF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, SWGAY has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SWGNF is priced at $45.63, while SWGAY trades at $12.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 4563.00, whereas SWGAY's P/E ratio is 180.71. In terms of profitability, SWGNF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SWGAY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGNF is more volatile compared to SWGAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGNF.Check SWGAY's competition here
SWGNF vs PRDSF Comparison June 2026
SWGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGNF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, PRDSF has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SWGNF is priced at $45.63, while PRDSF trades at $4.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 4563.00, whereas PRDSF's P/E ratio is 12.08. In terms of profitability, SWGNF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRDSF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGNF is more volatile compared to PRDSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGNF.Check PRDSF's competition here
SWGNF vs PRDSY Comparison June 2026
SWGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGNF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, PRDSY has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SWGNF is priced at $45.63, while PRDSY trades at $9.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 4563.00, whereas PRDSY's P/E ratio is 12.06. In terms of profitability, SWGNF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PRDSY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGNF is more volatile compared to PRDSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGNF.Check PRDSY's competition here
SWGNF vs BCUCF Comparison June 2026
SWGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGNF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, BCUCF has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SWGNF is priced at $45.63, while BCUCF trades at $95.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 4563.00, whereas BCUCF's P/E ratio is 42.11. In terms of profitability, SWGNF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BCUCF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGNF is more volatile compared to BCUCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGNF.Check BCUCF's competition here
SWGNF vs BCUCY Comparison June 2026
SWGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGNF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, BCUCY has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SWGNF is priced at $45.63, while BCUCY trades at $9.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 4563.00, whereas BCUCY's P/E ratio is 41.30. In terms of profitability, SWGNF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BCUCY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGNF is more volatile compared to BCUCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGNF.Check BCUCY's competition here
SWGNF vs PNDZF Comparison June 2026
SWGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGNF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, PNDZF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SWGNF is priced at $45.63, while PNDZF trades at $75.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 4563.00, whereas PNDZF's P/E ratio is 7.25. In terms of profitability, SWGNF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PNDZF's ROE of +1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGNF is more volatile compared to PNDZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGNF.Check PNDZF's competition here
SWGNF vs BBRYF Comparison June 2026
SWGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGNF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, BBRYF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SWGNF is priced at $45.63, while BBRYF trades at $15.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 4563.00, whereas BBRYF's P/E ratio is 194.25. In terms of profitability, SWGNF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BBRYF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGNF is more volatile compared to BBRYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGNF.Check BBRYF's competition here
SWGNF vs BURBY Comparison June 2026
SWGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGNF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, BURBY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SWGNF is priced at $45.63, while BURBY trades at $14.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 4563.00, whereas BURBY's P/E ratio is 185.25. In terms of profitability, SWGNF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BURBY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGNF is more volatile compared to BURBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGNF.Check BURBY's competition here
SWGNF vs WOSGF Comparison June 2026
SWGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGNF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, WOSGF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SWGNF is priced at $45.63, while WOSGF trades at $9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 4563.00, whereas WOSGF's P/E ratio is 23.75. In terms of profitability, SWGNF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to WOSGF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGNF is more volatile compared to WOSGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGNF.Check WOSGF's competition here
SWGNF vs SFRGY Comparison June 2026
SWGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGNF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, SFRGY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SWGNF is priced at $45.63, while SFRGY trades at $5.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 4563.00, whereas SFRGY's P/E ratio is -11.85. In terms of profitability, SWGNF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SFRGY's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGNF is more volatile compared to SFRGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGNF.Check SFRGY's competition here
SWGNF vs PANDY Comparison June 2026
SWGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGNF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, PANDY has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SWGNF is priced at $45.63, while PANDY trades at $21.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 4563.00, whereas PANDY's P/E ratio is 10.75. In terms of profitability, SWGNF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to PANDY's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGNF is less volatile compared to PANDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGNF.Check PANDY's competition here
SWGNF vs LKFLF Comparison June 2026
SWGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGNF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, LKFLF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SWGNF is priced at $45.63, while LKFLF trades at $2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 4563.00, whereas LKFLF's P/E ratio is 9.55. In terms of profitability, SWGNF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to LKFLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGNF is more volatile compared to LKFLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGNF.Check LKFLF's competition here
SWGNF vs SFRGF Comparison June 2026
SWGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGNF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, SFRGF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SWGNF is priced at $45.63, while SFRGF trades at $8.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 4563.00, whereas SFRGF's P/E ratio is -9.67. In terms of profitability, SWGNF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SFRGF's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGNF is more volatile compared to SFRGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGNF.Check SFRGF's competition here
SWGNF vs CHOWF Comparison June 2026
SWGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGNF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, CHOWF has a market cap of 375.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SWGNF is priced at $45.63, while CHOWF trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 4563.00, whereas CHOWF's P/E ratio is 2.43. In terms of profitability, SWGNF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CHOWF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGNF is more volatile compared to CHOWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGNF.Check CHOWF's competition here
SWGNF vs EPRJF Comparison June 2026
SWGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGNF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, EPRJF has a market cap of 307.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SWGNF is priced at $45.63, while EPRJF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 4563.00, whereas EPRJF's P/E ratio is 4.24. In terms of profitability, SWGNF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EPRJF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGNF is more volatile compared to EPRJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGNF.Check EPRJF's competition here
SWGNF vs DCOHF Comparison June 2026
SWGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGNF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, DCOHF has a market cap of 289.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SWGNF is priced at $45.63, while DCOHF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 4563.00, whereas DCOHF's P/E ratio is 10.71. In terms of profitability, SWGNF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to DCOHF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGNF is more volatile compared to DCOHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGNF.Check DCOHF's competition here
SWGNF vs TSSJF Comparison June 2026
SWGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGNF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, TSSJF has a market cap of 269.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SWGNF is priced at $45.63, while TSSJF trades at $17.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 4563.00, whereas TSSJF's P/E ratio is 24.60. In terms of profitability, SWGNF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to TSSJF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGNF is more volatile compared to TSSJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGNF.Check TSSJF's competition here
SWGNF vs ZAPNF Comparison June 2026
SWGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGNF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, ZAPNF has a market cap of 254.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SWGNF is priced at $45.63, while ZAPNF trades at $39.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 4563.00, whereas ZAPNF's P/E ratio is 25.27. In terms of profitability, SWGNF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ZAPNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SWGNF is more volatile compared to ZAPNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGNF.Check ZAPNF's competition here
SWGNF vs ORWHF Comparison June 2026
SWGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGNF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, ORWHF has a market cap of 224M. Regarding current trading prices, SWGNF is priced at $45.63, while ORWHF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 4563.00, whereas ORWHF's P/E ratio is 9.19. In terms of profitability, SWGNF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to ORWHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGNF is more volatile compared to ORWHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGNF.Check ORWHF's competition here
SWGNF vs HENGY Comparison June 2026
SWGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGNF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, HENGY has a market cap of 156.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SWGNF is priced at $45.63, while HENGY trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 4563.00, whereas HENGY's P/E ratio is -44.50. In terms of profitability, SWGNF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HENGY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGNF is more volatile compared to HENGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGNF.Check HENGY's competition here
SWGNF vs FLLIY Comparison June 2026
SWGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGNF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, FLLIY has a market cap of 139.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SWGNF is priced at $45.63, while FLLIY trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 4563.00, whereas FLLIY's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, SWGNF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to FLLIY's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGNF is less volatile compared to FLLIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGNF.Check FLLIY's competition here
SWGNF vs HENGF Comparison June 2026
SWGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGNF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, HENGF has a market cap of 88.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SWGNF is priced at $45.63, while HENGF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 4563.00, whereas HENGF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWGNF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to HENGF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGNF is more volatile compared to HENGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGNF.Check HENGF's competition here
SWGNF vs CTTLF Comparison June 2026
SWGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGNF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, CTTLF has a market cap of 85.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SWGNF is priced at $45.63, while CTTLF trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 4563.00, whereas CTTLF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWGNF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CTTLF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGNF is more volatile compared to CTTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGNF.Check CTTLF's competition here
SWGNF vs CEBTF Comparison June 2026
SWGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGNF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, CEBTF has a market cap of 43.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SWGNF is priced at $45.63, while CEBTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 4563.00, whereas CEBTF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, SWGNF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to CEBTF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGNF is more volatile compared to CEBTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGNF.Check CEBTF's competition here
SWGNF vs MENEF Comparison June 2026
SWGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGNF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, MENEF has a market cap of 37.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SWGNF is priced at $45.63, while MENEF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 4563.00, whereas MENEF's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, SWGNF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MENEF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGNF is more volatile compared to MENEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGNF.Check MENEF's competition here
SWGNF vs MDNL Comparison June 2026
SWGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGNF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, MDNL has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SWGNF is priced at $45.63, while MDNL trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 4563.00, whereas MDNL's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, SWGNF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MDNL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SWGNF is more volatile compared to MDNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGNF.Check MDNL's competition here
SWGNF vs MAJJ Comparison June 2026
SWGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGNF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, MAJJ has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SWGNF is priced at $45.63, while MAJJ trades at $1,800.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 4563.00, whereas MAJJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWGNF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MAJJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SWGNF is more volatile compared to MAJJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGNF.Check MAJJ's competition here
SWGNF vs BANI Comparison June 2026
SWGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGNF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, BANI has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SWGNF is priced at $45.63, while BANI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 4563.00, whereas BANI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWGNF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BANI's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGNF is more volatile compared to BANI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGNF.Check BANI's competition here
SWGNF vs EATR Comparison June 2026
SWGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGNF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, EATR has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SWGNF is priced at $45.63, while EATR trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 4563.00, whereas EATR's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, SWGNF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to EATR's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGNF is more volatile compared to EATR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGNF.Check EATR's competition here
SWGNF vs BRGO Comparison June 2026
SWGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGNF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, BRGO has a market cap of 289.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SWGNF is priced at $45.63, while BRGO trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 4563.00, whereas BRGO's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, SWGNF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BRGO's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGNF is more volatile compared to BRGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGNF.Check BRGO's competition here
SWGNF vs MASN Comparison June 2026
SWGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGNF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, MASN has a market cap of 122.7K. Regarding current trading prices, SWGNF is priced at $45.63, while MASN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 4563.00, whereas MASN's P/E ratio is 0.05. In terms of profitability, SWGNF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to MASN's ROE of +11.81%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGNF is more volatile compared to MASN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGNF.Check MASN's competition here
SWGNF vs SSOK Comparison June 2026
SWGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGNF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, SSOK has a market cap of 110.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SWGNF is priced at $45.63, while SSOK trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 4563.00, whereas SSOK's P/E ratio is 0.13. In terms of profitability, SWGNF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to SSOK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGNF is less volatile compared to SSOK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGNF.Check SSOK's competition here
SWGNF vs BRGOD Comparison June 2026
SWGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGNF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, BRGOD has a market cap of 78.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SWGNF is priced at $45.63, while BRGOD trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 4563.00, whereas BRGOD's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, SWGNF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to BRGOD's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SWGNF is more volatile compared to BRGOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGNF.Check BRGOD's competition here
SWGNF vs AVEW Comparison June 2026
SWGNF plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SWGNF stands at 11.9B. In comparison, AVEW has a market cap of 50K. Regarding current trading prices, SWGNF is priced at $45.63, while AVEW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SWGNF currently has a P/E ratio of 4563.00, whereas AVEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SWGNF's ROE is +0.00%, compared to AVEW's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SWGNF is less volatile compared to AVEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SWGNF.Check AVEW's competition here