Quebecor Inc. (QBCAF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (QBCAF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QBCAF | $41.52 | +0.00% | 9.5B | 16.16 | $2.57 | +2.61% |
| SFTBY | $28.68 | +21.27% | 327.8B | 10.54 | $2.73 | +0.10% |
| SFTBF | $57.67 | +18.91% | 327.4B | 10.50 | $5.47 | +0.13% |
| TIAIY | $8.85 | -2.43% | 188.1B | 38.48 | $0.23 | N/A |
| DTEGY | $33.57 | -0.03% | 164B | 16.00 | $2.10 | +3.40% |
| DTEGF | $33.50 | -0.68% | 162B | 15.95 | $2.10 | +3.42% |
| AMXOF | $1.36 | +0.00% | 84.2B | 17.50 | $0.08 | +2.13% |
| NPPXF | $0.92 | -3.16% | 78.2B | 12.00 | $0.08 | +3.70% |
| NTTYY | $23.24 | -1.19% | 75.7B | 11.74 | $1.98 | +3.19% |
| AMXVF | $1.05 | +7.14% | 73.6B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Stock Comparison
QBCAF vs SFTBY Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, SFTBY has a market cap of 327.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while SFTBY trades at $28.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas SFTBY's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SFTBY's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to SFTBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check SFTBY's competition here
QBCAF vs SFTBF Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, SFTBF has a market cap of 327.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while SFTBF trades at $57.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas SFTBF's P/E ratio is 10.50. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SFTBF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to SFTBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check SFTBF's competition here
QBCAF vs TIAIY Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, TIAIY has a market cap of 188.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while TIAIY trades at $8.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas TIAIY's P/E ratio is 38.48. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to TIAIY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF and TIAIY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TIAIY's competition here
QBCAF vs DTEGY Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, DTEGY has a market cap of 164B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while DTEGY trades at $33.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas DTEGY's P/E ratio is 16.00. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to DTEGY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to DTEGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check DTEGY's competition here
QBCAF vs DTEGF Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, DTEGF has a market cap of 162B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while DTEGF trades at $33.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas DTEGF's P/E ratio is 15.95. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to DTEGF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to DTEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check DTEGF's competition here
QBCAF vs AMXOF Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, AMXOF has a market cap of 84.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while AMXOF trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas AMXOF's P/E ratio is 17.50. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to AMXOF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to AMXOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check AMXOF's competition here
QBCAF vs NPPXF Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, NPPXF has a market cap of 78.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while NPPXF trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas NPPXF's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to NPPXF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to NPPXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check NPPXF's competition here
QBCAF vs NTTYY Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, NTTYY has a market cap of 75.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while NTTYY trades at $23.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas NTTYY's P/E ratio is 11.74. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to NTTYY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to NTTYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check NTTYY's competition here
QBCAF vs AMXVF Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, AMXVF has a market cap of 73.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while AMXVF trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas AMXVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to AMXVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to AMXVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check AMXVF's competition here
QBCAF vs AMOVF Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, AMOVF has a market cap of 66.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while AMOVF trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas AMOVF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to AMOVF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF and AMOVF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AMOVF's competition here
QBCAF vs KDDIY Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, KDDIY has a market cap of 66.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while KDDIY trades at $16.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas KDDIY's P/E ratio is 14.65. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to KDDIY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to KDDIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check KDDIY's competition here
QBCAF vs SOBKY Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, SOBKY has a market cap of 64.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while SOBKY trades at $13.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas SOBKY's P/E ratio is 19.04. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SOBKY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to SOBKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check SOBKY's competition here
QBCAF vs SFBQF Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, SFBQF has a market cap of 59.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while SFBQF trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas SFBQF's P/E ratio is 17.86. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SFBQF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to SFBQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check SFBQF's competition here
QBCAF vs KDDIF Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, KDDIF has a market cap of 57.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while KDDIF trades at $16.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas KDDIF's P/E ratio is 13.22. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to KDDIF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to KDDIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check KDDIF's competition here
QBCAF vs SGAPY Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, SGAPY has a market cap of 55.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while SGAPY trades at $33.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas SGAPY's P/E ratio is 12.81. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SGAPY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to SGAPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check SGAPY's competition here
QBCAF vs ORANY Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, ORANY has a market cap of 55.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while ORANY trades at $20.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas ORANY's P/E ratio is 148.39. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to ORANY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to ORANY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check ORANY's competition here
QBCAF vs FNCTF Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, FNCTF has a market cap of 53.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while FNCTF trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas FNCTF's P/E ratio is 144.64. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to FNCTF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to FNCTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check FNCTF's competition here
QBCAF vs SNGNF Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, SNGNF has a market cap of 53B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while SNGNF trades at $3.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas SNGNF's P/E ratio is 12.38. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SNGNF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to SNGNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check SNGNF's competition here
QBCAF vs CLLNY Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, CLLNY has a market cap of 44B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while CLLNY trades at $16.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas CLLNY's P/E ratio is -54.43. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CLLNY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to CLLNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check CLLNY's competition here
QBCAF vs SCMWY Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, SCMWY has a market cap of 43.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while SCMWY trades at $84.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas SCMWY's P/E ratio is 27.99. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SCMWY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to SCMWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check SCMWY's competition here
QBCAF vs SWZCF Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, SWZCF has a market cap of 43.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while SWZCF trades at $840.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas SWZCF's P/E ratio is 27.74. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SWZCF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to SWZCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check SWZCF's competition here
QBCAF vs TTRAF Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, TTRAF has a market cap of 42.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while TTRAF trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas TTRAF's P/E ratio is 27.14. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to TTRAF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to TTRAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check TTRAF's competition here
QBCAF vs TLGPY Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, TLGPY has a market cap of 42B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while TLGPY trades at $18.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas TLGPY's P/E ratio is 25.94. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to TLGPY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to TLGPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check TLGPY's competition here
QBCAF vs VODPF Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, VODPF has a market cap of 37.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while VODPF trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas VODPF's P/E ratio is -162.40. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to VODPF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to VODPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check VODPF's competition here
QBCAF vs AVIKF Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, AVIKF has a market cap of 35.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while AVIKF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas AVIKF's P/E ratio is 22.64. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to AVIKF's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF and AVIKF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AVIKF's competition here
QBCAF vs AVIFY Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, AVIFY has a market cap of 35.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while AVIFY trades at $10.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas AVIFY's P/E ratio is 22.69. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to AVIFY's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to AVIFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check AVIFY's competition here
QBCAF vs CHWRF Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, CHWRF has a market cap of 30.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while CHWRF trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas CHWRF's P/E ratio is 17.40. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CHWRF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to CHWRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check CHWRF's competition here
QBCAF vs AVIVF Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, AVIVF has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while AVIVF trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas AVIVF's P/E ratio is 17.98. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to AVIVF's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to AVIVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check AVIVF's competition here
QBCAF vs CTOWY Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, CTOWY has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while CTOWY trades at $14.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas CTOWY's P/E ratio is 15.23. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CTOWY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF and CTOWY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CTOWY's competition here
QBCAF vs TEFOF Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, TEFOF has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while TEFOF trades at $4.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas TEFOF's P/E ratio is -9.24. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to TEFOF's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to TEFOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check TEFOF's competition here
QBCAF vs BTGOF Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, BTGOF has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while BTGOF trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas BTGOF's P/E ratio is 18.57. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BTGOF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to BTGOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check BTGOF's competition here
QBCAF vs MTNOY Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, MTNOY has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while MTNOY trades at $13.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas MTNOY's P/E ratio is 19.72. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to MTNOY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to MTNOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check MTNOY's competition here
QBCAF vs TELNF Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, TELNF has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while TELNF trades at $16.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas TELNF's P/E ratio is 12.52. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to TELNF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to TELNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check TELNF's competition here
QBCAF vs CLNXF Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, CLNXF has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while CLNXF trades at $33.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas CLNXF's P/E ratio is -55.90. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CLNXF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to CLNXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check CLNXF's competition here
QBCAF vs TELNY Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, TELNY has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while TELNY trades at $16.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas TELNY's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to TELNY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to TELNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check TELNY's competition here
QBCAF vs MTNOF Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, MTNOF has a market cap of 20.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while MTNOF trades at $11.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas MTNOF's P/E ratio is 17.01. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to MTNOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to MTNOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check MTNOF's competition here
QBCAF vs TLSNF Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, TLSNF has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while TLSNF trades at $5.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas TLSNF's P/E ratio is 40.77. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to TLSNF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to TLSNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check TLSNF's competition here
QBCAF vs TLSNY Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, TLSNY has a market cap of 20.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while TLSNY trades at $10.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas TLSNY's P/E ratio is 42.10. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to TLSNY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to TLSNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check TLSNY's competition here
QBCAF vs RCIAF Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, RCIAF has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while RCIAF trades at $36.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas RCIAF's P/E ratio is 3.97. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to RCIAF's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to RCIAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check RCIAF's competition here
QBCAF vs TIAJF Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, TIAJF has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while TIAJF trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas TIAJF's P/E ratio is 93.50. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to TIAJF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to TIAJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check TIAJF's competition here
QBCAF vs KKPNF Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, KKPNF has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while KKPNF trades at $5.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas KKPNF's P/E ratio is 21.93. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to KKPNF's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to KKPNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check KKPNF's competition here
QBCAF vs KKPNY Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, KKPNY has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while KKPNY trades at $5.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas KKPNY's P/E ratio is 21.19. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to KKPNY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to KKPNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check KKPNY's competition here
QBCAF vs VDMCY Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, VDMCY has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while VDMCY trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas VDMCY's P/E ratio is 14.84. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to VDMCY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to VDMCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check VDMCY's competition here
QBCAF vs AARTY Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, AARTY has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while AARTY trades at $48.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas AARTY's P/E ratio is 26.21. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to AARTY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF and AARTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AARTY's competition here
QBCAF vs TLKMF Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, TLKMF has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while TLKMF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas TLKMF's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to TLKMF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to TLKMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check TLKMF's competition here
QBCAF vs HLTOY Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, HLTOY has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while HLTOY trades at $10.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas HLTOY's P/E ratio is 10.34. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to HLTOY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to HLTOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check HLTOY's competition here
QBCAF vs VODAF Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, VODAF has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while VODAF trades at $8.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas VODAF's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to VODAF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF and VODAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check VODAF's competition here
QBCAF vs ELMUY Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, ELMUY has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while ELMUY trades at $26.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas ELMUY's P/E ratio is 21.15. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to ELMUY's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to ELMUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check ELMUY's competition here
QBCAF vs AAFRF Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, AAFRF has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while AAFRF trades at $4.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas AAFRF's P/E ratio is 23.68. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to AAFRF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to AAFRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check AAFRF's competition here
QBCAF vs TIAOF Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, TIAOF has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while TIAOF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas TIAOF's P/E ratio is 76.00. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to TIAOF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to TIAOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check TIAOF's competition here
QBCAF vs SJRWF Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, SJRWF has a market cap of 14.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while SJRWF trades at $30.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas SJRWF's P/E ratio is 18.87. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SJRWF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF and SJRWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check SJRWF's competition here
QBCAF vs TLTZF Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, TLTZF has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while TLTZF trades at $20.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas TLTZF's P/E ratio is 28.74. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to TLTZF's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF and TLTZF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TLTZF's competition here
QBCAF vs BCEPF Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, BCEPF has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while BCEPF trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas BCEPF's P/E ratio is 5.87. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BCEPF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to BCEPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check BCEPF's competition here
QBCAF vs TLTZY Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, TLTZY has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while TLTZY trades at $9.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas TLTZY's P/E ratio is 12.15. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to TLTZY's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to TLTZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check TLTZY's competition here
QBCAF vs HKTTY Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, HKTTY has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while HKTTY trades at $15.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas HKTTY's P/E ratio is 17.98. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to HKTTY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to HKTTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check HKTTY's competition here
QBCAF vs BCPPF Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, BCPPF has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while BCPPF trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas BCPPF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BCPPF's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF and BCPPF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BCPPF's competition here
QBCAF vs QBCRF Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, QBCRF has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while QBCRF trades at $48.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas QBCRF's P/E ratio is 19.10. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to QBCRF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to QBCRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check QBCRF's competition here
QBCAF vs BECEF Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, BECEF has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while BECEF trades at $15.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas BECEF's P/E ratio is 4.64. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BECEF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to BECEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check BECEF's competition here
QBCAF vs BCEXF Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, BCEXF has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while BCEXF trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas BCEXF's P/E ratio is 4.01. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BCEXF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF and BCEXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BCEXF's competition here
QBCAF vs TELDY Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, TELDY has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while TELDY trades at $11.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas TELDY's P/E ratio is 43.94. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to TELDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to TELDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check TELDY's competition here
QBCAF vs DIGBF Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, DIGBF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while DIGBF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas DIGBF's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to DIGBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF and DIGBF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check DIGBF's competition here
QBCAF vs ELMUF Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, ELMUF has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while ELMUF trades at $48.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas ELMUF's P/E ratio is 21.79. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to ELMUF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to ELMUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check ELMUF's competition here
QBCAF vs HKTTF Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, HKTTF has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while HKTTF trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas HKTTF's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to HKTTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to HKTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check HKTTF's competition here
QBCAF vs TELDF Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, TELDF has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while TELDF trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas TELDF's P/E ratio is 39.29. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to TELDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to TELDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check TELDF's competition here
QBCAF vs FRTAY Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, FRTAY has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while FRTAY trades at $15.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas FRTAY's P/E ratio is 13.02. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to FRTAY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to FRTAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check FRTAY's competition here
QBCAF vs SHNUF Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, SHNUF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while SHNUF trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas SHNUF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SHNUF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to SHNUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check SHNUF's competition here
QBCAF vs BZQIY Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, BZQIY has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while BZQIY trades at $14.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas BZQIY's P/E ratio is 15.61. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BZQIY's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to BZQIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check BZQIY's competition here
QBCAF vs BZQIF Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, BZQIF has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while BZQIF trades at $2.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas BZQIF's P/E ratio is 14.17. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BZQIF's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to BZQIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check BZQIF's competition here
QBCAF vs MYTEF Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, MYTEF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while MYTEF trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas MYTEF's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to MYTEF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to MYTEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check MYTEF's competition here
QBCAF vs HLTOF Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, HLTOF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while HLTOF trades at $20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas HLTOF's P/E ratio is 7.39. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to HLTOF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to HLTOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check HLTOF's competition here
QBCAF vs PCWLF Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, PCWLF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while PCWLF trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas PCWLF's P/E ratio is -75.81. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to PCWLF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to PCWLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check PCWLF's competition here
QBCAF vs PCCWY Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, PCCWY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while PCCWY trades at $7.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas PCCWY's P/E ratio is -182.25. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to PCCWY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to PCCWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check PCCWY's competition here
QBCAF vs TCPFF Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, TCPFF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while TCPFF trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas TCPFF's P/E ratio is 16.25. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to TCPFF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to TCPFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check TCPFF's competition here
QBCAF vs MAXSF Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, MAXSF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while MAXSF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas MAXSF's P/E ratio is 23.67. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to MAXSF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF and MAXSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MAXSF's competition here
QBCAF vs LBRDB Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, LBRDB has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while LBRDB trades at $38.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas LBRDB's P/E ratio is -2.33. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to LBRDB's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to LBRDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check LBRDB's competition here
QBCAF vs AXXTF Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, AXXTF has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while AXXTF trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas AXXTF's P/E ratio is 59.05. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to AXXTF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to AXXTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check AXXTF's competition here
QBCAF vs TRKNY Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, TRKNY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while TRKNY trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas TRKNY's P/E ratio is 9.21. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to TRKNY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to TRKNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check TRKNY's competition here
QBCAF vs TKAGY Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, TKAGY has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while TKAGY trades at $15.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas TKAGY's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to TKAGY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF and TKAGY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TKAGY's competition here
QBCAF vs PHTCF Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, PHTCF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while PHTCF trades at $20.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas PHTCF's P/E ratio is 8.24. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to PHTCF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF and PHTCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PHTCF's competition here
QBCAF vs PTITF Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, PTITF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while PTITF trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas PTITF's P/E ratio is 13.44. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to PTITF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF and PTITF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PTITF's competition here
QBCAF vs GTMEY Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, GTMEY has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while GTMEY trades at $23.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas GTMEY's P/E ratio is 10.04. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to GTMEY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to GTMEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check GTMEY's competition here
QBCAF vs SNNRF Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, SNNRF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while SNNRF trades at $54.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas SNNRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SNNRF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to SNNRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check SNNRF's competition here
QBCAF vs CUCSF Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, CUCSF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while CUCSF trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas CUCSF's P/E ratio is 6.75. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CUCSF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF and CUCSF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CUCSF's competition here
QBCAF vs CUCSY Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, CUCSY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while CUCSY trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas CUCSY's P/E ratio is 7.03. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CUCSY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF and CUCSY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CUCSY's competition here
QBCAF vs TFAOF Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, TFAOF has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while TFAOF trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas TFAOF's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to TFAOF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF and TFAOF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TFAOF's competition here
QBCAF vs IIJIY Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, IIJIY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while IIJIY trades at $40.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas IIJIY's P/E ratio is 23.53. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to IIJIY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to IIJIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check IIJIY's competition here
QBCAF vs FRTAF Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, FRTAF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while FRTAF trades at $29.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas FRTAF's P/E ratio is 11.33. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to FRTAF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF and FRTAF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check FRTAF's competition here
QBCAF vs UDIRF Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, UDIRF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while UDIRF trades at $27.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas UDIRF's P/E ratio is 23.78. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to UDIRF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to UDIRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check UDIRF's competition here
QBCAF vs IIJIF Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, IIJIF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while IIJIF trades at $18.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas IIJIF's P/E ratio is 22.24. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to IIJIF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to IIJIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check IIJIF's competition here
QBCAF vs HTWSF Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, HTWSF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while HTWSF trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas HTWSF's P/E ratio is 106.67. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to HTWSF's ROE of +1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to HTWSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check HTWSF's competition here
QBCAF vs TCMFF Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, TCMFF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while TCMFF trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas TCMFF's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to TCMFF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to TCMFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check TCMFF's competition here
QBCAF vs MICCF Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, MICCF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while MICCF trades at $18.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas MICCF's P/E ratio is 70.96. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to MICCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF and MICCF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MICCF's competition here
QBCAF vs CLCMF Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, CLCMF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while CLCMF trades at $4.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas CLCMF's P/E ratio is 86.40. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to CLCMF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF and CLCMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CLCMF's competition here
QBCAF vs PTXKY Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, PTXKY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while PTXKY trades at $3.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas PTXKY's P/E ratio is -8.95. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to PTXKY's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF is less volatile compared to PTXKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QBCAF.Check PTXKY's competition here
QBCAF vs ZONNF Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, ZONNF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while ZONNF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas ZONNF's P/E ratio is 10.71. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to ZONNF's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF and ZONNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ZONNF's competition here
QBCAF vs TACYY Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, TACYY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while TACYY trades at $6.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas TACYY's P/E ratio is 32.18. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to TACYY's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF and TACYY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TACYY's competition here
QBCAF vs TRKNF Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, TRKNF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while TRKNF trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas TRKNF's P/E ratio is 39.94. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to TRKNF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF and TRKNF have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TRKNF's competition here
QBCAF vs TLGHY Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, TLGHY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while TLGHY trades at $11.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas TLGHY's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to TLGHY's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF and TLGHY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check TLGHY's competition here
QBCAF vs BGAOY Comparison June 2026
QBCAF plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QBCAF stands at 9.5B. In comparison, BGAOY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QBCAF is priced at $41.52, while BGAOY trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QBCAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.16, whereas BGAOY's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, QBCAF's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BGAOY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QBCAF and BGAOY have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BGAOY's competition here