Ooma, Inc. (OOMA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (OOMA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Telecommunications Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OOMA | $17.44 | +3.32% | 475.3M | 52.42 | $0.33 | N/A |
| VZA | $25.55 | -0.43% | 241.3B | 3.27 | $7.82 | N/A |
| TMUS | $178.05 | -1.88% | 191.6B | 18.83 | $9.40 | +2.24% |
| VZ | $45.20 | -3.12% | 187.4B | 10.94 | $4.10 | +6.15% |
| TBC | $24.97 | -0.68% | 179.8B | N/A | N/A | +5.63% |
| T | $22.66 | -3.78% | 158.4B | 7.50 | $3.04 | +4.90% |
| T-PA | $19.19 | -1.16% | 137.3B | 8.11 | $2.38 | +4.90% |
| T-PC | $17.98 | -1.10% | 128.7B | 7.61 | $2.38 | +4.90% |
| TBB | $20.64 | -0.58% | 127B | 4.04 | $5.12 | +4.90% |
| CMCSA | $23.55 | +0.11% | 83.3B | 4.57 | $5.10 | +5.66% |
Stock Comparison
OOMA vs VZA Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, VZA has a market cap of 241.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while VZA trades at $25.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas VZA's P/E ratio is 3.27. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VZA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to VZA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check VZA's competition here
OOMA vs TMUS Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, TMUS has a market cap of 191.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while TMUS trades at $178.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas TMUS's P/E ratio is 18.83. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TMUS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to TMUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check TMUS's competition here
OOMA vs VZ Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, VZ has a market cap of 187.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while VZ trades at $45.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas VZ's P/E ratio is 10.94. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VZ's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to VZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check VZ's competition here
OOMA vs TBC Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, TBC has a market cap of 179.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while TBC trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas TBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TBC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to TBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check TBC's competition here
OOMA vs T Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, T has a market cap of 158.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while T trades at $22.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas T's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to T's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to T. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check T's competition here
OOMA vs T-PA Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, T-PA has a market cap of 137.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while T-PA trades at $19.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas T-PA's P/E ratio is 8.11. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to T-PA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to T-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check T-PA's competition here
OOMA vs T-PC Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, T-PC has a market cap of 128.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while T-PC trades at $17.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas T-PC's P/E ratio is 7.61. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to T-PC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to T-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check T-PC's competition here
OOMA vs TBB Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, TBB has a market cap of 127B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while TBB trades at $20.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas TBB's P/E ratio is 4.04. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TBB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to TBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check TBB's competition here
OOMA vs CMCSA Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, CMCSA has a market cap of 83.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while CMCSA trades at $23.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas CMCSA's P/E ratio is 4.57. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CMCSA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to CMCSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check CMCSA's competition here
OOMA vs AMX Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, AMX has a market cap of 76.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while AMX trades at $25.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas AMX's P/E ratio is 15.16. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AMX's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA and AMX have similar daily volatility (1.27).Check AMX's competition here
OOMA vs AMOV Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, AMOV has a market cap of 65.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while AMOV trades at $20.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas AMOV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AMOV's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to AMOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check AMOV's competition here
OOMA vs CHT Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, CHT has a market cap of 35.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while CHT trades at $44.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas CHT's P/E ratio is 28.42. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CHT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to CHT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check CHT's competition here
OOMA vs VOD Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, VOD has a market cap of 34.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while VOD trades at $14.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas VOD's P/E ratio is -107.86. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VOD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to VOD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check VOD's competition here
OOMA vs ORAN Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, ORAN has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while ORAN trades at $11.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas ORAN's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ORAN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to ORAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check ORAN's competition here
OOMA vs BCE Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, BCE has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while BCE trades at $24.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas BCE's P/E ratio is 4.91. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BCE's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to BCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check BCE's competition here
OOMA vs TEF Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, TEF has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while TEF trades at $3.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas TEF's P/E ratio is -17.32. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TEF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to TEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check TEF's competition here
OOMA vs VIV Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, VIV has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while VIV trades at $12.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas VIV's P/E ratio is 16.88. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VIV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to VIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check VIV's competition here
OOMA vs RCI Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, RCI has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while RCI trades at $37.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas RCI's P/E ratio is 4.03. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RCI's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to RCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check RCI's competition here
OOMA vs TU Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, TU has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while TU trades at $12.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas TU's P/E ratio is 28.59. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TU's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to TU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check TU's competition here
OOMA vs CHTR Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, CHTR has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while CHTR trades at $131.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas CHTR's P/E ratio is 3.49. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CHTR's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to CHTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check CHTR's competition here
OOMA vs SKM Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, SKM has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while SKM trades at $38.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas SKM's P/E ratio is 61.24. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SKM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to SKM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check SKM's competition here
OOMA vs TLK Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, TLK has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while TLK trades at $15.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas TLK's P/E ratio is 17.41. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TLK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to TLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check TLK's competition here
OOMA vs SJR Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, SJR has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while SJR trades at $30.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas SJR's P/E ratio is 27.69. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SJR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to SJR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check SJR's competition here
OOMA vs TIGO Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, TIGO has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while TIGO trades at $83.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas TIGO's P/E ratio is 11.86. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TIGO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to TIGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check TIGO's competition here
OOMA vs LBDAV Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, LBDAV has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while LBDAV trades at $91.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas LBDAV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LBDAV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to LBDAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check LBDAV's competition here
OOMA vs LBDKV Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, LBDKV has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while LBDKV trades at $90.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas LBDKV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LBDKV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to LBDKV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check LBDKV's competition here
OOMA vs GSAT Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, GSAT has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while GSAT trades at $82.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas GSAT's P/E ratio is -551.00. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GSAT's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to GSAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check GSAT's competition here
OOMA vs TIMB Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, TIMB has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while TIMB trades at $21.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas TIMB's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TIMB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to TIMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check TIMB's competition here
OOMA vs LUMN Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, LUMN has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while LUMN trades at $9.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas LUMN's P/E ratio is -5.66. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LUMN's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to LUMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check LUMN's competition here
OOMA vs FYBR Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, FYBR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while FYBR trades at $38.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas FYBR's P/E ratio is -25.16. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FYBR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to FYBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check FYBR's competition here
OOMA vs MBT Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, MBT has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while MBT trades at $5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas MBT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MBT's ROE of -7.54%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to MBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check MBT's competition here
OOMA vs KT Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, KT has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while KT trades at $17.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas KT's P/E ratio is 8.68. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to KT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check KT's competition here
OOMA vs CTDD Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, CTDD has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while CTDD trades at $19.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas CTDD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CTDD's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to CTDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check CTDD's competition here
OOMA vs USM Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, USM has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while USM trades at $77.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas USM's P/E ratio is -265.55. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to USM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to USM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check USM's competition here
OOMA vs UZE Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, UZE has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while UZE trades at $16.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas UZE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UZE's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to UZE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check UZE's competition here
OOMA vs UZF Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, UZF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while UZF trades at $16.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas UZF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UZF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to UZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check UZF's competition here
OOMA vs UZD Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, UZD has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while UZD trades at $18.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas UZD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UZD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to UZD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check UZD's competition here
OOMA vs TEO Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, TEO has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while TEO trades at $13.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas TEO's P/E ratio is 23.28. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TEO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to TEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check TEO's competition here
OOMA vs IRDM Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, IRDM has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while IRDM trades at $49.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas IRDM's P/E ratio is 52.60. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IRDM's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to IRDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check IRDM's competition here
OOMA vs TKC Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, TKC has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while TKC trades at $5.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas TKC's P/E ratio is 12.87. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TKC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to TKC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check TKC's competition here
OOMA vs AD Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, AD has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while AD trades at $51.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas AD's P/E ratio is 13.10. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to AD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check AD's competition here
OOMA vs LBTYB Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, LBTYB has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while LBTYB trades at $12.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas LBTYB's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LBTYB's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to LBTYB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check LBTYB's competition here
OOMA vs TDS-PV Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, TDS-PV has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while TDS-PV trades at $19.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas TDS-PV's P/E ratio is 22.05. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TDS-PV's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to TDS-PV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check TDS-PV's competition here
OOMA vs LBRDK Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, LBRDK has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while LBRDK trades at $30.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas LBRDK's P/E ratio is -1.83. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LBRDK's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to LBRDK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check LBRDK's competition here
OOMA vs LBRDA Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, LBRDA has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while LBRDA trades at $30.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas LBRDA's P/E ratio is -1.82. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LBRDA's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to LBRDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check LBRDA's competition here
OOMA vs TDS-PU Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, TDS-PU has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while TDS-PU trades at $21.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas TDS-PU's P/E ratio is 24.38. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TDS-PU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to TDS-PU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check TDS-PU's competition here
OOMA vs LBYKV Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, LBYKV has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while LBYKV trades at $11.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas LBYKV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LBYKV's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to LBYKV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check LBYKV's competition here
OOMA vs TDS Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, TDS has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while TDS trades at $38.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas TDS's P/E ratio is 23.33. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TDS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to TDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check TDS's competition here
OOMA vs SNRE Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, SNRE has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while SNRE trades at $55.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas SNRE's P/E ratio is -13.50. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SNRE's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to SNRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check SNRE's competition here
OOMA vs CTBB Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, CTBB has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while CTBB trades at $19.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas CTBB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CTBB's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to CTBB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check CTBB's competition here
OOMA vs PHI Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, PHI has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while PHI trades at $18.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas PHI's P/E ratio is 8.55. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PHI's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to PHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check PHI's competition here
OOMA vs LBTYA Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, LBTYA has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while LBTYA trades at $11.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas LBTYA's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LBTYA's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to LBTYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check LBTYA's competition here
OOMA vs LBTYK Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, LBTYK has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while LBTYK trades at $11.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas LBTYK's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LBTYK's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to LBTYK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check LBTYK's competition here
OOMA vs VEON Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, VEON has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while VEON trades at $49.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas VEON's P/E ratio is 6.91. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VEON's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to VEON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check VEON's competition here
OOMA vs KYIV Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, KYIV has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while KYIV trades at $13.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas KYIV's P/E ratio is 19.36. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KYIV's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to KYIV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check KYIV's competition here
OOMA vs LBRDP Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, LBRDP has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while LBRDP trades at $21.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas LBRDP's P/E ratio is 3.97. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LBRDP's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to LBRDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check LBRDP's competition here
OOMA vs DISH Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, DISH has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while DISH trades at $5.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas DISH's P/E ratio is 3.04. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DISH's ROE of -7555.70%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to DISH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check DISH's competition here
OOMA vs UNIT Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, UNIT has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while UNIT trades at $11.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas UNIT's P/E ratio is 2.65. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UNIT's ROE of -4.46%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to UNIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check UNIT's competition here
OOMA vs IHS Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, IHS has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while IHS trades at $8.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas IHS's P/E ratio is 4.54. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IHS's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to IHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check IHS's competition here
OOMA vs ASTSW Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, ASTSW has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while ASTSW trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas ASTSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ASTSW's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to ASTSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check ASTSW's competition here
OOMA vs LILAK Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, LILAK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while LILAK trades at $7.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas LILAK's P/E ratio is -3.05. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LILAK's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to LILAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check LILAK's competition here
OOMA vs LILA Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, LILA has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while LILA trades at $7.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas LILA's P/E ratio is -3.02. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LILA's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to LILA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check LILA's competition here
OOMA vs RADI Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, RADI has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while RADI trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas RADI's P/E ratio is -8.67. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RADI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to RADI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check RADI's competition here
OOMA vs TV Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, TV has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while TV trades at $2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas TV's P/E ratio is -2.90. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TV's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to TV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check TV's competition here
OOMA vs IDT Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, IDT has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while IDT trades at $56.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas IDT's P/E ratio is 17.09. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IDT's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to IDT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check IDT's competition here
OOMA vs ATEX Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, ATEX has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while ATEX trades at $66.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas ATEX's P/E ratio is 15.62. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ATEX's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to ATEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check ATEX's competition here
OOMA vs SIFY Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, SIFY has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while SIFY trades at $16.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas SIFY's P/E ratio is -85.45. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SIFY's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to SIFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check SIFY's competition here
OOMA vs SHEN Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, SHEN has a market cap of 880.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while SHEN trades at $15.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas SHEN's P/E ratio is -19.17. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SHEN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to SHEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check SHEN's competition here
OOMA vs CCOI Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, CCOI has a market cap of 865.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while CCOI trades at $16.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas CCOI's P/E ratio is -4.88. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CCOI's ROE of +4.23%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to CCOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check CCOI's competition here
OOMA vs ATUS Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, ATUS has a market cap of 838.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while ATUS trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas ATUS's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ATUS's ROE of +1.81%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to ATUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check ATUS's competition here
OOMA vs GLIBA Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, GLIBA has a market cap of 690.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while GLIBA trades at $21.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas GLIBA's P/E ratio is -2.54. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GLIBA's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to GLIBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check GLIBA's competition here
OOMA vs GLIBK Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, GLIBK has a market cap of 688.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while GLIBK trades at $21.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas GLIBK's P/E ratio is -2.53. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GLIBK's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to GLIBK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check GLIBK's competition here
OOMA vs GOGO Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, GOGO has a market cap of 557.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while GOGO trades at $4.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas GOGO's P/E ratio is 41.20. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GOGO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to GOGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check GOGO's competition here
OOMA vs CNSL Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, CNSL has a market cap of 549.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while CNSL trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas CNSL's P/E ratio is -2.27. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNSL's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to CNSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check CNSL's competition here
OOMA vs RBBN Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, RBBN has a market cap of 540.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while RBBN trades at $3.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas RBBN's P/E ratio is 18.06. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RBBN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to RBBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check RBBN's competition here
OOMA vs OPTU Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, OPTU has a market cap of 525.1M. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while OPTU trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas OPTU's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OPTU's ROE of +1.80%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to OPTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check OPTU's competition here
OOMA vs WOW Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, WOW has a market cap of 445.7M. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while WOW trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas WOW's P/E ratio is -5.47. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WOW's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to WOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check WOW's competition here
OOMA vs ATNI Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, ATNI has a market cap of 398.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while ATNI trades at $25.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas ATNI's P/E ratio is -26.42. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ATNI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to ATNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check ATNI's competition here
OOMA vs CXDO Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, CXDO has a market cap of 289.3M. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while CXDO trades at $8.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas CXDO's P/E ratio is 63.75. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CXDO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to CXDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check CXDO's competition here
OOMA vs HCHC Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, HCHC has a market cap of 288.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while HCHC trades at $3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas HCHC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HCHC's ROE of -4.80%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to HCHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check HCHC's competition here
OOMA vs CABO Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, CABO has a market cap of 263.5M. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while CABO trades at $45.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas CABO's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CABO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to CABO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check CABO's competition here
OOMA vs RDCM Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, RDCM has a market cap of 241.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while RDCM trades at $13.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas RDCM's P/E ratio is 19.52. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RDCM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to RDCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check RDCM's competition here
OOMA vs KORE Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, KORE has a market cap of 161.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while KORE trades at $9.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas KORE's P/E ratio is -2.39. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KORE's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to KORE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check KORE's competition here
OOMA vs GLBKV Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, GLBKV has a market cap of 123.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while GLBKV trades at $30.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas GLBKV's P/E ratio is 10.42. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GLBKV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to GLBKV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check GLBKV's competition here
OOMA vs GLBAV Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, GLBAV has a market cap of 123.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while GLBAV trades at $30.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas GLBAV's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GLBAV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to GLBAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check GLBAV's competition here
OOMA vs MTSL Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, MTSL has a market cap of 92M. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while MTSL trades at $3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas MTSL's P/E ratio is -11.05. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MTSL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to MTSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check MTSL's competition here
OOMA vs KORE-WT Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, KORE-WT has a market cap of 76.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while KORE-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas KORE-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KORE-WT's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to KORE-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check KORE-WT's competition here
OOMA vs KYIVW Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, KYIVW has a market cap of 70.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while KYIVW trades at $5.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas KYIVW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KYIVW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to KYIVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check KYIVW's competition here
OOMA vs FNGR Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, FNGR has a market cap of 49.6M. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while FNGR trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas FNGR's P/E ratio is -6.75. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FNGR's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to FNGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check FNGR's competition here
OOMA vs UCL Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, UCL has a market cap of 38.8M. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while UCL trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas UCL's P/E ratio is 10.20. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UCL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to UCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check UCL's competition here
OOMA vs ELWT Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, ELWT has a market cap of 37.2M. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while ELWT trades at $7.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas ELWT's P/E ratio is -7.86. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ELWT's ROE of +7.55%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA and ELWT have similar daily volatility (1.27).Check ELWT's competition here
OOMA vs ANTE Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, ANTE has a market cap of 28M. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while ANTE trades at $3.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas ANTE's P/E ratio is -3.66. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ANTE's ROE of -2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to ANTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check ANTE's competition here
OOMA vs MIMO Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, MIMO has a market cap of 8.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while MIMO trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas MIMO's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MIMO's ROE of +1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to MIMO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check MIMO's competition here
OOMA vs PCLA Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, PCLA has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while PCLA trades at $7.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas PCLA's P/E ratio is -1.87. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PCLA's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to PCLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check PCLA's competition here
OOMA vs QTEK Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, QTEK has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while QTEK trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas QTEK's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to QTEK's ROE of +2.56%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to QTEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check QTEK's competition here
OOMA vs QTEKW Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, QTEKW has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while QTEKW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas QTEKW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to QTEKW's ROE of +2.56%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to QTEKW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check QTEKW's competition here
OOMA vs IQST Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, IQST has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while IQST trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas IQST's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IQST's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is less volatile compared to IQST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check IQST's competition here
OOMA vs COMSP Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, COMSP has a market cap of 539. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while COMSP trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas COMSP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to COMSP's ROE of -4.81%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to COMSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check COMSP's competition here
OOMA vs COMSW Comparison June 2026
OOMA plays a significant role within the Communication Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, OOMA stands at 475.3M. In comparison, COMSW has a market cap of 270. Regarding current trading prices, OOMA is priced at $17.44, while COMSW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
OOMA currently has a P/E ratio of 52.42, whereas COMSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, OOMA's ROE is +0.10%, compared to COMSW's ROE of -4.81%. Regarding short-term risk, OOMA is more volatile compared to COMSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for OOMA.Check COMSW's competition here