MillerKnoll, Inc. (MLKN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MLKN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MLKN | $14.78 | +0.20% | 1B | 98.53 | $0.15 | +5.09% |
| SN | $119.82 | -2.96% | 17B | 24.16 | $4.96 | N/A |
| MAS | $69.41 | -0.72% | 14B | 17.18 | $4.04 | +1.82% |
| TPX | $65.81 | +1.04% | 13.7B | 30.05 | $2.19 | +0.97% |
| MHK | $102.86 | -2.22% | 6.3B | 15.40 | $6.68 | N/A |
| ALH | $25.05 | +0.44% | 4.3B | 35.25 | $0.71 | N/A |
| PATK | $85.12 | -1.08% | 2.8B | 21.88 | $3.89 | +2.14% |
| WHR | $39.47 | -1.33% | 2.6B | 13.38 | $2.95 | +11.39% |
| TILE | $30.14 | +1.31% | 1.7B | 14.08 | $2.14 | +0.33% |
| LZB | $36.33 | -0.33% | 1.5B | 18.17 | $2.00 | +2.61% |
Stock Comparison
MLKN vs SN Comparison June 2026
MLKN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLKN stands at 1B. In comparison, SN has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, MLKN is priced at $14.78, while SN trades at $119.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLKN currently has a P/E ratio of 98.53, whereas SN's P/E ratio is 24.16. In terms of profitability, MLKN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SN's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MLKN is less volatile compared to SN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLKN.Check SN's competition here
MLKN vs MAS Comparison June 2026
MLKN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLKN stands at 1B. In comparison, MAS has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, MLKN is priced at $14.78, while MAS trades at $69.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLKN currently has a P/E ratio of 98.53, whereas MAS's P/E ratio is 17.18. In terms of profitability, MLKN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MAS's ROE of -5.66%. Regarding short-term risk, MLKN is more volatile compared to MAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLKN.Check MAS's competition here
MLKN vs TPX Comparison June 2026
MLKN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLKN stands at 1B. In comparison, TPX has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MLKN is priced at $14.78, while TPX trades at $65.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLKN currently has a P/E ratio of 98.53, whereas TPX's P/E ratio is 30.05. In terms of profitability, MLKN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TPX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MLKN is more volatile compared to TPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLKN.Check TPX's competition here
MLKN vs MHK Comparison June 2026
MLKN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLKN stands at 1B. In comparison, MHK has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MLKN is priced at $14.78, while MHK trades at $102.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLKN currently has a P/E ratio of 98.53, whereas MHK's P/E ratio is 15.40. In terms of profitability, MLKN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MHK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MLKN is less volatile compared to MHK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLKN.Check MHK's competition here
MLKN vs ALH Comparison June 2026
MLKN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLKN stands at 1B. In comparison, ALH has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MLKN is priced at $14.78, while ALH trades at $25.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLKN currently has a P/E ratio of 98.53, whereas ALH's P/E ratio is 35.25. In terms of profitability, MLKN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ALH's ROE of +1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MLKN is less volatile compared to ALH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLKN.Check ALH's competition here
MLKN vs PATK Comparison June 2026
MLKN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLKN stands at 1B. In comparison, PATK has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MLKN is priced at $14.78, while PATK trades at $85.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLKN currently has a P/E ratio of 98.53, whereas PATK's P/E ratio is 21.88. In terms of profitability, MLKN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PATK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MLKN is less volatile compared to PATK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLKN.Check PATK's competition here
MLKN vs WHR Comparison June 2026
MLKN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLKN stands at 1B. In comparison, WHR has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MLKN is priced at $14.78, while WHR trades at $39.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLKN currently has a P/E ratio of 98.53, whereas WHR's P/E ratio is 13.38. In terms of profitability, MLKN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WHR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MLKN is less volatile compared to WHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLKN.Check WHR's competition here
MLKN vs TILE Comparison June 2026
MLKN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLKN stands at 1B. In comparison, TILE has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MLKN is priced at $14.78, while TILE trades at $30.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLKN currently has a P/E ratio of 98.53, whereas TILE's P/E ratio is 14.08. In terms of profitability, MLKN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TILE's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MLKN is more volatile compared to TILE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLKN.Check TILE's competition here
MLKN vs LZB Comparison June 2026
MLKN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLKN stands at 1B. In comparison, LZB has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MLKN is priced at $14.78, while LZB trades at $36.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLKN currently has a P/E ratio of 98.53, whereas LZB's P/E ratio is 18.17. In terms of profitability, MLKN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LZB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MLKN is more volatile compared to LZB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLKN.Check LZB's competition here
MLKN vs LEG Comparison June 2026
MLKN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLKN stands at 1B. In comparison, LEG has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MLKN is priced at $14.78, while LEG trades at $10.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLKN currently has a P/E ratio of 98.53, whereas LEG's P/E ratio is 6.22. In terms of profitability, MLKN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LEG's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MLKN is more volatile compared to LEG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLKN.Check LEG's competition here
MLKN vs MBC Comparison June 2026
MLKN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLKN stands at 1B. In comparison, MBC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MLKN is priced at $14.78, while MBC trades at $8.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLKN currently has a P/E ratio of 98.53, whereas MBC's P/E ratio is -845.50. In terms of profitability, MLKN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MBC's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MLKN is less volatile compared to MBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLKN.Check MBC's competition here
MLKN vs AMWD Comparison June 2026
MLKN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLKN stands at 1B. In comparison, AMWD has a market cap of 700.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MLKN is priced at $14.78, while AMWD trades at $48.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLKN currently has a P/E ratio of 98.53, whereas AMWD's P/E ratio is 41.46. In terms of profitability, MLKN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AMWD's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MLKN is more volatile compared to AMWD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLKN.Check AMWD's competition here
MLKN vs ETD Comparison June 2026
MLKN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLKN stands at 1B. In comparison, ETD has a market cap of 526.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MLKN is priced at $14.78, while ETD trades at $20.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLKN currently has a P/E ratio of 98.53, whereas ETD's P/E ratio is 13.09. In terms of profitability, MLKN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ETD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MLKN is more volatile compared to ETD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLKN.Check ETD's competition here
MLKN vs XMAX Comparison June 2026
MLKN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLKN stands at 1B. In comparison, XMAX has a market cap of 519M. Regarding current trading prices, MLKN is priced at $14.78, while XMAX trades at $8.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLKN currently has a P/E ratio of 98.53, whereas XMAX's P/E ratio is -49.36. In terms of profitability, MLKN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to XMAX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MLKN is less volatile compared to XMAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLKN.Check XMAX's competition here
MLKN vs XWIN Comparison June 2026
MLKN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLKN stands at 1B. In comparison, XWIN has a market cap of 389.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MLKN is priced at $14.78, while XWIN trades at $8.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLKN currently has a P/E ratio of 98.53, whereas XWIN's P/E ratio is -58.86. In terms of profitability, MLKN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to XWIN's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MLKN is more volatile compared to XWIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLKN.Check XWIN's competition here
MLKN vs FLXS Comparison June 2026
MLKN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLKN stands at 1B. In comparison, FLXS has a market cap of 304.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MLKN is priced at $14.78, while FLXS trades at $56.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLKN currently has a P/E ratio of 98.53, whereas FLXS's P/E ratio is 10.39. In terms of profitability, MLKN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FLXS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MLKN is less volatile compared to FLXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLKN.Check FLXS's competition here
MLKN vs HBB Comparison June 2026
MLKN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLKN stands at 1B. In comparison, HBB has a market cap of 264.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MLKN is priced at $14.78, while HBB trades at $19.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLKN currently has a P/E ratio of 98.53, whereas HBB's P/E ratio is 9.41. In terms of profitability, MLKN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HBB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MLKN is less volatile compared to HBB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLKN.Check HBB's competition here
MLKN vs LOVE Comparison June 2026
MLKN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLKN stands at 1B. In comparison, LOVE has a market cap of 232.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MLKN is priced at $14.78, while LOVE trades at $15.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLKN currently has a P/E ratio of 98.53, whereas LOVE's P/E ratio is 56.18. In terms of profitability, MLKN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LOVE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MLKN is less volatile compared to LOVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLKN.Check LOVE's competition here
MLKN vs LCUT Comparison June 2026
MLKN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLKN stands at 1B. In comparison, LCUT has a market cap of 203.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MLKN is priced at $14.78, while LCUT trades at $8.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLKN currently has a P/E ratio of 98.53, whereas LCUT's P/E ratio is -7.02. In terms of profitability, MLKN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LCUT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MLKN is less volatile compared to LCUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLKN.Check LCUT's competition here
MLKN vs COOK Comparison June 2026
MLKN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLKN stands at 1B. In comparison, COOK has a market cap of 178.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MLKN is priced at $14.78, while COOK trades at $63.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLKN currently has a P/E ratio of 98.53, whereas COOK's P/E ratio is -1.53. In terms of profitability, MLKN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to COOK's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, MLKN is less volatile compared to COOK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLKN.Check COOK's competition here
MLKN vs HOFT Comparison June 2026
MLKN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLKN stands at 1B. In comparison, HOFT has a market cap of 138.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MLKN is priced at $14.78, while HOFT trades at $12.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLKN currently has a P/E ratio of 98.53, whereas HOFT's P/E ratio is -10.71. In terms of profitability, MLKN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HOFT's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MLKN is less volatile compared to HOFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLKN.Check HOFT's competition here
MLKN vs BSET Comparison June 2026
MLKN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLKN stands at 1B. In comparison, BSET has a market cap of 123M. Regarding current trading prices, MLKN is priced at $14.78, while BSET trades at $14.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLKN currently has a P/E ratio of 98.53, whereas BSET's P/E ratio is 22.94. In terms of profitability, MLKN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BSET's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MLKN is more volatile compared to BSET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLKN.Check BSET's competition here
MLKN vs KEQU Comparison June 2026
MLKN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLKN stands at 1B. In comparison, KEQU has a market cap of 107.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MLKN is priced at $14.78, while KEQU trades at $37.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLKN currently has a P/E ratio of 98.53, whereas KEQU's P/E ratio is 10.07. In terms of profitability, MLKN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KEQU's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MLKN is more volatile compared to KEQU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLKN.Check KEQU's competition here
MLKN vs VIRC Comparison June 2026
MLKN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLKN stands at 1B. In comparison, VIRC has a market cap of 91.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MLKN is priced at $14.78, while VIRC trades at $5.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLKN currently has a P/E ratio of 98.53, whereas VIRC's P/E ratio is -83.29. In terms of profitability, MLKN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VIRC's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MLKN is less volatile compared to VIRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLKN.Check VIRC's competition here
MLKN vs NVFY Comparison June 2026
MLKN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLKN stands at 1B. In comparison, NVFY has a market cap of 85.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MLKN is priced at $14.78, while NVFY trades at $6.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLKN currently has a P/E ratio of 98.53, whereas NVFY's P/E ratio is -9.09. In terms of profitability, MLKN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NVFY's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MLKN is more volatile compared to NVFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLKN.Check NVFY's competition here
MLKN vs VIOT Comparison June 2026
MLKN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLKN stands at 1B. In comparison, VIOT has a market cap of 62.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MLKN is priced at $14.78, while VIOT trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLKN currently has a P/E ratio of 98.53, whereas VIOT's P/E ratio is 3.07. In terms of profitability, MLKN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VIOT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MLKN is less volatile compared to VIOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLKN.Check VIOT's competition here
MLKN vs PRPL Comparison June 2026
MLKN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLKN stands at 1B. In comparison, PRPL has a market cap of 42.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MLKN is priced at $14.78, while PRPL trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLKN currently has a P/E ratio of 98.53, whereas PRPL's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, MLKN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PRPL's ROE of +1.90%. Regarding short-term risk, MLKN is less volatile compared to PRPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLKN.Check PRPL's competition here
MLKN vs CRWS Comparison June 2026
MLKN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLKN stands at 1B. In comparison, CRWS has a market cap of 29.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MLKN is priced at $14.78, while CRWS trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLKN currently has a P/E ratio of 98.53, whereas CRWS's P/E ratio is -3.09. In terms of profitability, MLKN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CRWS's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MLKN is less volatile compared to CRWS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLKN.Check CRWS's competition here
MLKN vs NTZ Comparison June 2026
MLKN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLKN stands at 1B. In comparison, NTZ has a market cap of 24.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MLKN is priced at $14.78, while NTZ trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLKN currently has a P/E ratio of 98.53, whereas NTZ's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, MLKN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NTZ's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, MLKN is less volatile compared to NTZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLKN.Check NTZ's competition here
MLKN vs EFOI Comparison June 2026
MLKN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLKN stands at 1B. In comparison, EFOI has a market cap of 22.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MLKN is priced at $14.78, while EFOI trades at $3.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLKN currently has a P/E ratio of 98.53, whereas EFOI's P/E ratio is -23.87. In terms of profitability, MLKN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to EFOI's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MLKN is less volatile compared to EFOI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLKN.Check EFOI's competition here
MLKN vs NCL Comparison June 2026
MLKN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLKN stands at 1B. In comparison, NCL has a market cap of 15M. Regarding current trading prices, MLKN is priced at $14.78, while NCL trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLKN currently has a P/E ratio of 98.53, whereas NCL's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, MLKN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NCL's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MLKN is less volatile compared to NCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLKN.Check NCL's competition here
MLKN vs FGI Comparison June 2026
MLKN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLKN stands at 1B. In comparison, FGI has a market cap of 11.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MLKN is priced at $14.78, while FGI trades at $5.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLKN currently has a P/E ratio of 98.53, whereas FGI's P/E ratio is -1.76. In terms of profitability, MLKN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FGI's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MLKN is less volatile compared to FGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLKN.Check FGI's competition here
MLKN vs ATER Comparison June 2026
MLKN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLKN stands at 1B. In comparison, ATER has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MLKN is priced at $14.78, while ATER trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLKN currently has a P/E ratio of 98.53, whereas ATER's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, MLKN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ATER's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MLKN is less volatile compared to ATER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLKN.Check ATER's competition here
MLKN vs SNBR Comparison June 2026
MLKN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLKN stands at 1B. In comparison, SNBR has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, MLKN is priced at $14.78, while SNBR trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLKN currently has a P/E ratio of 98.53, whereas SNBR's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, MLKN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SNBR's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MLKN is less volatile compared to SNBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLKN.Check SNBR's competition here
MLKN vs IRBT Comparison June 2026
MLKN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLKN stands at 1B. In comparison, IRBT has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MLKN is priced at $14.78, while IRBT trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLKN currently has a P/E ratio of 98.53, whereas IRBT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MLKN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IRBT's ROE of -32.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MLKN is more volatile compared to IRBT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLKN.Check IRBT's competition here
MLKN vs AUVI Comparison June 2026
MLKN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLKN stands at 1B. In comparison, AUVI has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MLKN is priced at $14.78, while AUVI trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLKN currently has a P/E ratio of 98.53, whereas AUVI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MLKN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AUVI's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, MLKN is more volatile compared to AUVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLKN.Check AUVI's competition here
MLKN vs AUVIP Comparison June 2026
MLKN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLKN stands at 1B. In comparison, AUVIP has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MLKN is priced at $14.78, while AUVIP trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLKN currently has a P/E ratio of 98.53, whereas AUVIP's P/E ratio is -0.90. In terms of profitability, MLKN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AUVIP's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, MLKN is less volatile compared to AUVIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLKN.Check AUVIP's competition here
MLKN vs FGIWW Comparison June 2026
MLKN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLKN stands at 1B. In comparison, FGIWW has a market cap of 77.1K. Regarding current trading prices, MLKN is priced at $14.78, while FGIWW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLKN currently has a P/E ratio of 98.53, whereas FGIWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MLKN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FGIWW's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MLKN is more volatile compared to FGIWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLKN.Check FGIWW's competition here
MLKN vs WEBR Comparison June 2026
MLKN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLKN stands at 1B. In comparison, WEBR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MLKN is priced at $14.78, while WEBR trades at $8.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLKN currently has a P/E ratio of 98.53, whereas WEBR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MLKN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WEBR's ROE of +7.54%. Regarding short-term risk, MLKN is more volatile compared to WEBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLKN.Check WEBR's competition here
MLKN vs KBAL Comparison June 2026
MLKN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLKN stands at 1B. In comparison, KBAL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MLKN is priced at $14.78, while KBAL trades at $12.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLKN currently has a P/E ratio of 98.53, whereas KBAL's P/E ratio is -23.21. In terms of profitability, MLKN's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KBAL's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MLKN is more volatile compared to KBAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLKN.Check KBAL's competition here