The Singing Machine Company, Inc. (MICS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MICS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Consumer Electronics Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MICS | $0.74 | +1.89% | 7.2M | -0.50 | -$1.49 | N/A |
| AAPL | $314.09 | +1.23% | 4.6T | 37.59 | $8.28 | +0.34% |
| SONY | $22.25 | +0.23% | 131.4B | 20.59 | $1.08 | +0.72% |
| NXT | $139.51 | -4.75% | 22.6B | 39.15 | $3.84 | N/A |
| LPL | $4.99 | -13.44% | 5.5B | -109.70 | -$0.05 | N/A |
| BWSN | $25.18 | +0.00% | 2.8B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| VZIO | $11.35 | N/A | 2.3B | 162.14 | $0.07 | N/A |
| SONO | $16.30 | +3.69% | 1.9B | 95.59 | $0.17 | N/A |
| KOPN | $5.93 | -4.20% | 1.2B | 640.00 | $0.01 | N/A |
| HEAR | $17.80 | +2.48% | 357.4M | 57.42 | $0.31 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MICS vs AAPL Comparison June 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, AAPL has a market cap of 4.6T. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while AAPL trades at $314.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas AAPL's P/E ratio is 37.59. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to AAPL's ROE of +1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is more volatile compared to AAPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check AAPL's competition here
MICS vs SONY Comparison June 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, SONY has a market cap of 131.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while SONY trades at $22.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas SONY's P/E ratio is 20.59. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to SONY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is more volatile compared to SONY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check SONY's competition here
MICS vs NXT Comparison June 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, NXT has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while NXT trades at $139.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas NXT's P/E ratio is 39.15. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to NXT's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is more volatile compared to NXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check NXT's competition here
MICS vs LPL Comparison June 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, LPL has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while LPL trades at $4.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas LPL's P/E ratio is -109.70. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to LPL's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is more volatile compared to LPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check LPL's competition here
MICS vs BWSN Comparison June 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, BWSN has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while BWSN trades at $25.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas BWSN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to BWSN's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is more volatile compared to BWSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check BWSN's competition here
MICS vs VZIO Comparison June 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, VZIO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while VZIO trades at $11.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas VZIO's P/E ratio is 162.14. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to VZIO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is more volatile compared to VZIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check VZIO's competition here
MICS vs SONO Comparison June 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, SONO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while SONO trades at $16.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas SONO's P/E ratio is 95.59. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to SONO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is more volatile compared to SONO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check SONO's competition here
MICS vs KOPN Comparison June 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, KOPN has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while KOPN trades at $5.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas KOPN's P/E ratio is 640.00. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to KOPN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is less volatile compared to KOPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check KOPN's competition here
MICS vs HEAR Comparison June 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, HEAR has a market cap of 357.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while HEAR trades at $17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas HEAR's P/E ratio is 57.42. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to HEAR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is more volatile compared to HEAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check HEAR's competition here
MICS vs VUZI Comparison June 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, VUZI has a market cap of 351.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while VUZI trades at $4.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas VUZI's P/E ratio is -10.57. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to VUZI's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is more volatile compared to VUZI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check VUZI's competition here
MICS vs TBCH Comparison June 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, TBCH has a market cap of 248.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while TBCH trades at $12.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas TBCH's P/E ratio is 625.50. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to TBCH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is more volatile compared to TBCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check TBCH's competition here
MICS vs GPRO Comparison June 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, GPRO has a market cap of 171M. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while GPRO trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas GPRO's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to GPRO's ROE of -2.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is less volatile compared to GPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check GPRO's competition here
MICS vs VOXX Comparison June 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, VOXX has a market cap of 169M. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while VOXX trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas VOXX's P/E ratio is -2.43. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to VOXX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is more volatile compared to VOXX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check VOXX's competition here
MICS vs ZEPP Comparison June 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, ZEPP has a market cap of 92.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while ZEPP trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas ZEPP's P/E ratio is -2.51. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to ZEPP's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is more volatile compared to ZEPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check ZEPP's competition here
MICS vs BWNB Comparison June 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, BWNB has a market cap of 91.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while BWNB trades at $25.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas BWNB's P/E ratio is -15.44. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to BWNB's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is more volatile compared to BWNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check BWNB's competition here
MICS vs KOSS Comparison June 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, KOSS has a market cap of 38.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while KOSS trades at $4.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas KOSS's P/E ratio is -37.09. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to KOSS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is more volatile compared to KOSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check KOSS's competition here
MICS vs WETH Comparison June 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, WETH has a market cap of 16.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while WETH trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas WETH's P/E ratio is 1.93. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to WETH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is more volatile compared to WETH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check WETH's competition here
MICS vs FEBO Comparison June 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, FEBO has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while FEBO trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas FEBO's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to FEBO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is less volatile compared to FEBO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check FEBO's competition here
MICS vs PXDT Comparison June 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, PXDT has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while PXDT trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas PXDT's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to PXDT's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is more volatile compared to PXDT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check PXDT's competition here
MICS vs MSN Comparison June 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, MSN has a market cap of 8.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while MSN trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas MSN's P/E ratio is -1.63. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to MSN's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is more volatile compared to MSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check MSN's competition here
MICS vs UTME Comparison June 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, UTME has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while UTME trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas UTME's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to UTME's ROE of -1.61%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is less volatile compared to UTME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check UTME's competition here
MICS vs WLDSW Comparison June 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, WLDSW has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while WLDSW trades at $10.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas WLDSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to WLDSW's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is less volatile compared to WLDSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check WLDSW's competition here
MICS vs RIME Comparison June 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, RIME has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while RIME trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas RIME's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to RIME's ROE of -4.50%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is more volatile compared to RIME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check RIME's competition here
MICS vs BOXL Comparison June 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, BOXL has a market cap of 746.1K. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while BOXL trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas BOXL's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to BOXL's ROE of -6.70%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is more volatile compared to BOXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check BOXL's competition here
MICS vs WTO Comparison June 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, WTO has a market cap of 614.1K. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while WTO trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas WTO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to WTO's ROE of -14.75%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is more volatile compared to WTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check WTO's competition here
MICS vs WLDS Comparison June 2026
MICS plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MICS stands at 7.2M. In comparison, WLDS has a market cap of 264.7K. Regarding current trading prices, MICS is priced at $0.74, while WLDS trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MICS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.50, whereas WLDS's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, MICS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to WLDS's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, MICS is more volatile compared to WLDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MICS.Check WLDS's competition here