Medtronic plc (MDT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MDT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Medical - Devices Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDT | $73.75 | -0.31% | 94.7B | 20.60 | $3.58 | +3.84% |
| BSX-PA | $122.18 | +2.37% | 175.4B | 230.53 | $0.53 | N/A |
| ABT | $86.97 | -0.92% | 151.5B | 24.36 | $3.57 | +2.81% |
| ISRG | $402.30 | -2.42% | 142.5B | 48.76 | $8.25 | N/A |
| SYK | $293.30 | -2.06% | 112.5B | 34.00 | $8.63 | +1.17% |
| BSX | $47.68 | -0.63% | 70.9B | 19.95 | $2.39 | N/A |
| BRKRP | $427.94 | -1.55% | 65B | N/A | N/A | +0.35% |
| EW | $87.66 | -0.57% | 50.5B | 47.38 | $1.85 | N/A |
| DXCM | $73.45 | -1.90% | 28.3B | 31.52 | $2.33 | N/A |
| RMD | $182.82 | -1.94% | 26.5B | 17.64 | $10.37 | +1.30% |
Stock Comparison
MDT vs BSX-PA Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, BSX-PA has a market cap of 175.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while BSX-PA trades at $122.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas BSX-PA's P/E ratio is 230.53. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BSX-PA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to BSX-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check BSX-PA's competition here
MDT vs ABT Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, ABT has a market cap of 151.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while ABT trades at $86.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas ABT's P/E ratio is 24.36. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ABT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to ABT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check ABT's competition here
MDT vs ISRG Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, ISRG has a market cap of 142.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while ISRG trades at $402.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas ISRG's P/E ratio is 48.76. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ISRG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to ISRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check ISRG's competition here
MDT vs SYK Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, SYK has a market cap of 112.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while SYK trades at $293.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas SYK's P/E ratio is 34.00. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SYK's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to SYK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check SYK's competition here
MDT vs BSX Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, BSX has a market cap of 70.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while BSX trades at $47.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas BSX's P/E ratio is 19.95. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BSX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to BSX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check BSX's competition here
MDT vs BRKRP Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, BRKRP has a market cap of 65B. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while BRKRP trades at $427.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas BRKRP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BRKRP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to BRKRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check BRKRP's competition here
MDT vs EW Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, EW has a market cap of 50.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while EW trades at $87.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas EW's P/E ratio is 47.38. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EW's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to EW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check EW's competition here
MDT vs DXCM Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, DXCM has a market cap of 28.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while DXCM trades at $73.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas DXCM's P/E ratio is 31.52. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DXCM's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to DXCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check DXCM's competition here
MDT vs RMD Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, RMD has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while RMD trades at $182.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas RMD's P/E ratio is 17.64. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RMD's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to RMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check RMD's competition here
MDT vs PHG Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, PHG has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while PHG trades at $25.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas PHG's P/E ratio is 21.92. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PHG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is more volatile compared to PHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check PHG's competition here
MDT vs STE Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, STE has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while STE trades at $209.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas STE's P/E ratio is 26.46. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to STE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to STE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check STE's competition here
MDT vs ABMD Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, ABMD has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while ABMD trades at $381.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas ABMD's P/E ratio is 65.36. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ABMD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is more volatile compared to ABMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check ABMD's competition here
MDT vs ZBH Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, ZBH has a market cap of 16.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while ZBH trades at $83.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas ZBH's P/E ratio is 21.70. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ZBH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to ZBH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check ZBH's competition here
MDT vs SWAV Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, SWAV has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while SWAV trades at $334.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas SWAV's P/E ratio is 78.76. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SWAV's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is more volatile compared to SWAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check SWAV's competition here
MDT vs PEN Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, PEN has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while PEN trades at $318.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas PEN's P/E ratio is 73.60. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PEN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is more volatile compared to PEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check PEN's competition here
MDT vs SNN Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, SNN has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while SNN trades at $29.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas SNN's P/E ratio is 20.55. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SNN's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to SNN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check SNN's competition here
MDT vs ALGN Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, ALGN has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while ALGN trades at $166.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas ALGN's P/E ratio is 28.06. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ALGN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to ALGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check ALGN's competition here
MDT vs GMED Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, GMED has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while GMED trades at $78.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas GMED's P/E ratio is 18.29. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GMED's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to GMED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check GMED's competition here
MDT vs PODD Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, PODD has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while PODD trades at $142.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas PODD's P/E ratio is 33.28. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PODD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to PODD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check PODD's competition here
MDT vs MASI Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, MASI has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while MASI trades at $178.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas MASI's P/E ratio is 44.35. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MASI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is more volatile compared to MASI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check MASI's competition here
MDT vs BRKR Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, BRKR has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while BRKR trades at $57.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas BRKR's P/E ratio is -238.79. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BRKR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to BRKR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check BRKR's competition here
MDT vs BIO Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, BIO has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while BIO trades at $306.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas BIO's P/E ratio is 51.01. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BIO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to BIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check BIO's competition here
MDT vs BIO-B Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, BIO-B has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while BIO-B trades at $304.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas BIO-B's P/E ratio is 50.64. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BIO-B's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is more volatile compared to BIO-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check BIO-B's competition here
MDT vs GKOS Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, GKOS has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while GKOS trades at $110.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas GKOS's P/E ratio is -33.62. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GKOS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to GKOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check GKOS's competition here
MDT vs NARI Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, NARI has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while NARI trades at $79.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas NARI's P/E ratio is -59.24. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NARI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is more volatile compared to NARI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check NARI's competition here
MDT vs LIVN Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, LIVN has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while LIVN trades at $73.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas LIVN's P/E ratio is 37.41. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LIVN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to LIVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check LIVN's competition here
MDT vs AXNX Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, AXNX has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while AXNX trades at $70.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas AXNX's P/E ratio is -709.80. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AXNX's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is more volatile compared to AXNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check AXNX's competition here
MDT vs IRTC Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, IRTC has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while IRTC trades at $105.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas IRTC's P/E ratio is -124.12. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IRTC's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to IRTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check IRTC's competition here
MDT vs ITGR Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, ITGR has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while ITGR trades at $90.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas ITGR's P/E ratio is 22.37. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ITGR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to ITGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check ITGR's competition here
MDT vs TMDX Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, TMDX has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while TMDX trades at $68.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas TMDX's P/E ratio is 15.66. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TMDX's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to TMDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check TMDX's competition here
MDT vs AXGN Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, AXGN has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while AXGN trades at $39.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas AXGN's P/E ratio is -61.66. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AXGN's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to AXGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check AXGN's competition here
MDT vs NUVA Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, NUVA has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while NUVA trades at $39.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas NUVA's P/E ratio is 75.00. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NUVA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to NUVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check NUVA's competition here
MDT vs ESTA Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, ESTA has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while ESTA trades at $70.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas ESTA's P/E ratio is -47.93. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ESTA's ROE of -2.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to ESTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check ESTA's competition here
MDT vs UFPT Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, UFPT has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while UFPT trades at $216.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas UFPT's P/E ratio is 24.68. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to UFPT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to UFPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check UFPT's competition here
MDT vs PRCT Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, PRCT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while PRCT trades at $26.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas PRCT's P/E ratio is -14.62. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PRCT's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to PRCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check PRCT's competition here
MDT vs AHCO Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, AHCO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while AHCO trades at $9.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas AHCO's P/E ratio is -16.36. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AHCO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to AHCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check AHCO's competition here
MDT vs HSKA Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, HSKA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while HSKA trades at $119.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas HSKA's P/E ratio is -62.49. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HSKA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is more volatile compared to HSKA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check HSKA's competition here
MDT vs TNDM Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, TNDM has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while TNDM trades at $18.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas TNDM's P/E ratio is -13.58. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TNDM's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to TNDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check TNDM's competition here
MDT vs ENOV Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, ENOV has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while ENOV trades at $21.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas ENOV's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ENOV's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to ENOV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check ENOV's competition here
MDT vs IART Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, IART has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while IART trades at $15.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas IART's P/E ratio is -2.42. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IART's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to IART. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check IART's competition here
MDT vs BFLY Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, BFLY has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while BFLY trades at $4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas BFLY's P/E ratio is -15.27. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BFLY's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to BFLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check BFLY's competition here
MDT vs AVNS Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, AVNS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while AVNS trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas AVNS's P/E ratio is -15.62. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AVNS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is more volatile compared to AVNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check AVNS's competition here
MDT vs INSP Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, INSP has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while INSP trades at $40.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas INSP's P/E ratio is 9.23. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INSP's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to INSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check INSP's competition here
MDT vs ATEC Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, ATEC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while ATEC trades at $7.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas ATEC's P/E ratio is -9.01. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ATEC's ROE of -4.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to ATEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check ATEC's competition here
MDT vs IRMD Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, IRMD has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while IRMD trades at $89.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas IRMD's P/E ratio is 49.10. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IRMD's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to IRMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check IRMD's competition here
MDT vs SILK Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, SILK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while SILK trades at $27.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas SILK's P/E ratio is -18.96. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SILK's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is more volatile compared to SILK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check SILK's competition here
MDT vs FNA Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, FNA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while FNA trades at $13.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas FNA's P/E ratio is -19.83. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FNA's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is more volatile compared to FNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check FNA's competition here
MDT vs CNMD Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, CNMD has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while CNMD trades at $33.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas CNMD's P/E ratio is 19.12. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNMD's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to CNMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check CNMD's competition here
MDT vs AORT Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, AORT has a market cap of 991.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while AORT trades at $20.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas AORT's P/E ratio is 81.70. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AORT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to AORT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check AORT's competition here
MDT vs INMD Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, INMD has a market cap of 855.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while INMD trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas INMD's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INMD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to INMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check INMD's competition here
MDT vs CSII Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, CSII has a market cap of 844M. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while CSII trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas CSII's P/E ratio is -20.83. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CSII's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is more volatile compared to CSII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check CSII's competition here
MDT vs SSII Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, SSII has a market cap of 797.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while SSII trades at $4.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas SSII's P/E ratio is -79.70. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SSII's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to SSII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check SSII's competition here
MDT vs CRY Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, CRY has a market cap of 725.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while CRY trades at $17.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas CRY's P/E ratio is 425.71. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CRY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to CRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check CRY's competition here
MDT vs LMRI Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, LMRI has a market cap of 721.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while LMRI trades at $7.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas LMRI's P/E ratio is -19.26. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LMRI's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to LMRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check LMRI's competition here
MDT vs CBLL Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, CBLL has a market cap of 663.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while CBLL trades at $17.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas CBLL's P/E ratio is -10.79. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CBLL's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to CBLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check CBLL's competition here
MDT vs SIBN Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, SIBN has a market cap of 621.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while SIBN trades at $14.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas SIBN's P/E ratio is -35.92. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SIBN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to SIBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check SIBN's competition here
MDT vs SRDX Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, SRDX has a market cap of 614.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while SRDX trades at $42.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas SRDX's P/E ratio is -34.66. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SRDX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is more volatile compared to SRDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check SRDX's competition here
MDT vs APEN Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, APEN has a market cap of 579.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while APEN trades at $10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas APEN's P/E ratio is -9.43. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to APEN's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is more volatile compared to APEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check APEN's competition here
MDT vs BWAY Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, BWAY has a market cap of 571.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while BWAY trades at $14.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas BWAY's P/E ratio is 66.18. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BWAY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to BWAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check BWAY's competition here
MDT vs NPCE Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, NPCE has a market cap of 555.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while NPCE trades at $16.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas NPCE's P/E ratio is -25.06. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NPCE's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to NPCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check NPCE's competition here
MDT vs TCMD Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, TCMD has a market cap of 550.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while TCMD trades at $24.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas TCMD's P/E ratio is 28.06. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TCMD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to TCMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check TCMD's competition here
MDT vs BVS Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, BVS has a market cap of 549.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while BVS trades at $8.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas BVS's P/E ratio is 19.78. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BVS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to BVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check BVS's competition here
MDT vs CTKB Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, CTKB has a market cap of 541.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while CTKB trades at $4.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas CTKB's P/E ratio is -7.22. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CTKB's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to CTKB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check CTKB's competition here
MDT vs CERS Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, CERS has a market cap of 541M. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while CERS trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas CERS's P/E ratio is -54.00. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CERS's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to CERS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check CERS's competition here
MDT vs ZIMV Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, ZIMV has a market cap of 535.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while ZIMV trades at $18.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas ZIMV's P/E ratio is -27.52. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ZIMV's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is more volatile compared to ZIMV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check ZIMV's competition here
MDT vs PACB Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, PACB has a market cap of 490.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while PACB trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas PACB's P/E ratio is -3.85. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PACB's ROE of -4.88%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to PACB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check PACB's competition here
MDT vs LAB Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, LAB has a market cap of 452.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while LAB trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas LAB's P/E ratio is -8.92. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to LAB's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to LAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check LAB's competition here
MDT vs KIDS Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, KIDS has a market cap of 431.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while KIDS trades at $16.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas KIDS's P/E ratio is -10.01. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KIDS's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to KIDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check KIDS's competition here
MDT vs PMI Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, PMI has a market cap of 429M. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while PMI trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas PMI's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PMI's ROE of +4.99%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to PMI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check PMI's competition here
MDT vs VREX Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, VREX has a market cap of 418.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while VREX trades at $9.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas VREX's P/E ratio is -4.97. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VREX's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to VREX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check VREX's competition here
MDT vs OFIX Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, OFIX has a market cap of 392.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while OFIX trades at $9.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas OFIX's P/E ratio is -6.47. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OFIX's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to OFIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check OFIX's competition here
MDT vs CLPT Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, CLPT has a market cap of 371M. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while CLPT trades at $12.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas CLPT's P/E ratio is -12.37. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CLPT's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to CLPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check CLPT's competition here
MDT vs DCTH Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, DCTH has a market cap of 363.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while DCTH trades at $10.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas DCTH's P/E ratio is 1053.00. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DCTH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to DCTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check DCTH's competition here
MDT vs VMD Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, VMD has a market cap of 363.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while VMD trades at $9.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas VMD's P/E ratio is 25.62. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VMD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to VMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check VMD's competition here
MDT vs AVR Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, AVR has a market cap of 341.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while AVR trades at $9.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas AVR's P/E ratio is -4.18. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AVR's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to AVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check AVR's competition here
MDT vs MASS Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, MASS has a market cap of 334.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while MASS trades at $8.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas MASS's P/E ratio is -9.12. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MASS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to MASS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check MASS's competition here
MDT vs SMLR Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, SMLR has a market cap of 310.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while SMLR trades at $20.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas SMLR's P/E ratio is 3.92. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SMLR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is more volatile compared to SMLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check SMLR's competition here
MDT vs ELMD Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, ELMD has a market cap of 305.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while ELMD trades at $36.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas ELMD's P/E ratio is 31.51. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ELMD's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to ELMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check ELMD's competition here
MDT vs SENS Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, SENS has a market cap of 286.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while SENS trades at $6.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas SENS's P/E ratio is -3.48. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SENS's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to SENS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check SENS's competition here
MDT vs CATX Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, CATX has a market cap of 276.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while CATX trades at $3.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas CATX's P/E ratio is -2.54. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CATX's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to CATX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check CATX's competition here
MDT vs MGRM Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, MGRM has a market cap of 243.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while MGRM trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas MGRM's P/E ratio is -11.11. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MGRM's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is more volatile compared to MGRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check MGRM's competition here
MDT vs SGHT Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, SGHT has a market cap of 236.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while SGHT trades at $4.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas SGHT's P/E ratio is -6.21. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SGHT's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to SGHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check SGHT's competition here
MDT vs TMCI Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, TMCI has a market cap of 225.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while TMCI trades at $3.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas TMCI's P/E ratio is -3.61. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TMCI's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to TMCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check TMCI's competition here
MDT vs NVRO Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, NVRO has a market cap of 224.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while NVRO trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas NVRO's P/E ratio is -1.91. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NVRO's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is more volatile compared to NVRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check NVRO's competition here
MDT vs EYES Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, EYES has a market cap of 210M. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while EYES trades at $4.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas EYES's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EYES's ROE of -2.64%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to EYES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check EYES's competition here
MDT vs RXST Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, RXST has a market cap of 204.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while RXST trades at $4.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas RXST's P/E ratio is -4.37. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RXST's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to RXST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check RXST's competition here
MDT vs PROF Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, PROF has a market cap of 196.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while PROF trades at $6.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas PROF's P/E ratio is -5.23. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PROF's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to PROF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check PROF's competition here
MDT vs ANIK Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, ANIK has a market cap of 191.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while ANIK trades at $14.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas ANIK's P/E ratio is -18.20. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ANIK's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to ANIK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check ANIK's competition here
MDT vs BSGM Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, BSGM has a market cap of 191.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while BSGM trades at $6.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas BSGM's P/E ratio is -5.81. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BSGM's ROE of +17.60%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to BSGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check BSGM's competition here
MDT vs EDAP Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, EDAP has a market cap of 179.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while EDAP trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas EDAP's P/E ratio is -5.83. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EDAP's ROE of -1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to EDAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check EDAP's competition here
MDT vs MDGS Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, MDGS has a market cap of 178.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while MDGS trades at $2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas MDGS's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MDGS's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to MDGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check MDGS's competition here
MDT vs QTRX Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, QTRX has a market cap of 165.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while QTRX trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas QTRX's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to QTRX's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to QTRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check QTRX's competition here
MDT vs INGN Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, INGN has a market cap of 164.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while INGN trades at $6.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas INGN's P/E ratio is -6.69. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INGN's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to INGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check INGN's competition here
MDT vs QIPT Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, QIPT has a market cap of 162.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while QIPT trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas QIPT's P/E ratio is -15.87. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to QIPT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is more volatile compared to QIPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check QIPT's competition here
MDT vs APYX Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, APYX has a market cap of 161.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while APYX trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas APYX's P/E ratio is -17.50. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to APYX's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to APYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check APYX's competition here
MDT vs CVRX Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, CVRX has a market cap of 144M. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while CVRX trades at $5.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas CVRX's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CVRX's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to CVRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check CVRX's competition here
MDT vs NNOX Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, NNOX has a market cap of 133.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while NNOX trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas NNOX's P/E ratio is -1.66. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NNOX's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to NNOX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check NNOX's competition here
MDT vs MXCT Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, MXCT has a market cap of 131.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while MXCT trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas MXCT's P/E ratio is -3.42. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MXCT's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to MXCT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check MXCT's competition here
MDT vs SNWV Comparison June 2026
MDT plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MDT stands at 94.7B. In comparison, SNWV has a market cap of 129.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MDT is priced at $73.75, while SNWV trades at $15.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MDT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.60, whereas SNWV's P/E ratio is 15.73. In terms of profitability, MDT's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SNWV's ROE of -4.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MDT is less volatile compared to SNWV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MDT.Check SNWV's competition here