Veradermics, Incorporated (MANE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MANE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Biotechnology Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MANE | $91.69 | -9.42% | 3.8B | -34.44 | -$2.64 | N/A |
| NVO | $42.96 | -1.81% | 190.8B | 10.06 | $4.27 | +4.19% |
| VRTX | $446.83 | +1.15% | 113.4B | 26.55 | $16.83 | N/A |
| VRNA | $106.91 | +0.11% | 72.7B | -102.80 | -$1.04 | N/A |
| REGN | $635.45 | +1.07% | 65.5B | 15.51 | $40.97 | +0.57% |
| ARGX | $891.32 | +5.82% | 55.2B | 39.56 | $22.53 | N/A |
| SGEN | $228.74 | -0.07% | 43.2B | -57.19 | -$4.00 | N/A |
| ALNY | $303.05 | -0.19% | 40.5B | 76.14 | $3.98 | N/A |
| RVMD | $149.23 | -4.15% | 31.7B | -20.99 | -$7.11 | N/A |
| RPRX | $55.87 | +1.54% | 24B | 29.41 | $1.90 | +1.63% |
Stock Comparison
MANE vs NVO Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, NVO has a market cap of 190.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while NVO trades at $42.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas NVO's P/E ratio is 10.06. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to NVO's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to NVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check NVO's competition here
MANE vs VRTX Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, VRTX has a market cap of 113.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while VRTX trades at $446.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas VRTX's P/E ratio is 26.55. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to VRTX's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to VRTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check VRTX's competition here
MANE vs VRNA Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, VRNA has a market cap of 72.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while VRNA trades at $106.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas VRNA's P/E ratio is -102.80. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to VRNA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to VRNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check VRNA's competition here
MANE vs REGN Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, REGN has a market cap of 65.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while REGN trades at $635.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas REGN's P/E ratio is 15.51. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to REGN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to REGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check REGN's competition here
MANE vs ARGX Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ARGX has a market cap of 55.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while ARGX trades at $891.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas ARGX's P/E ratio is 39.56. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to ARGX's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to ARGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check ARGX's competition here
MANE vs SGEN Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SGEN has a market cap of 43.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while SGEN trades at $228.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas SGEN's P/E ratio is -57.19. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to SGEN's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to SGEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check SGEN's competition here
MANE vs ALNY Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ALNY has a market cap of 40.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while ALNY trades at $303.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas ALNY's P/E ratio is 76.14. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to ALNY's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to ALNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check ALNY's competition here
MANE vs RVMD Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, RVMD has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while RVMD trades at $149.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas RVMD's P/E ratio is -20.99. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to RVMD's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to RVMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check RVMD's competition here
MANE vs RPRX Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, RPRX has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while RPRX trades at $55.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas RPRX's P/E ratio is 29.41. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to RPRX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to RPRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check RPRX's competition here
MANE vs UTHR Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, UTHR has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while UTHR trades at $549.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas UTHR's P/E ratio is 20.33. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to UTHR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to UTHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check UTHR's competition here
MANE vs BNTX Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, BNTX has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while BNTX trades at $88.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas BNTX's P/E ratio is -14.90. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to BNTX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to BNTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check BNTX's competition here
MANE vs ROIV Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ROIV has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while ROIV trades at $28.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas ROIV's P/E ratio is -52.93. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to ROIV's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to ROIV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check ROIV's competition here
MANE vs INCY Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, INCY has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while INCY trades at $102.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas INCY's P/E ratio is 14.46. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to INCY's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to INCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check INCY's competition here
MANE vs INSM Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, INSM has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while INSM trades at $94.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas INSM's P/E ratio is -16.36. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to INSM's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is less volatile compared to INSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check INSM's competition here
MANE vs BGNE Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, BGNE has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while BGNE trades at $184.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas BGNE's P/E ratio is -22.55. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to BGNE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to BGNE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check BGNE's competition here
MANE vs MRNA Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MRNA has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while MRNA trades at $47.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas MRNA's P/E ratio is -5.83. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to MRNA's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to MRNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check MRNA's competition here
MANE vs DNA-WT Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, DNA-WT has a market cap of 18.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while DNA-WT trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas DNA-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to DNA-WT's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to DNA-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check DNA-WT's competition here
MANE vs NBIX Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, NBIX has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while NBIX trades at $163.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas NBIX's P/E ratio is 25.21. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to NBIX's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to NBIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check NBIX's competition here
MANE vs GMAB Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, GMAB has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while GMAB trades at $25.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas GMAB's P/E ratio is 19.05. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to GMAB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to GMAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check GMAB's competition here
MANE vs JAZZ Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, JAZZ has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while JAZZ trades at $238.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas JAZZ's P/E ratio is 2168.82. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to JAZZ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to JAZZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check JAZZ's competition here
MANE vs EXEL Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, EXEL has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while EXEL trades at $52.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas EXEL's P/E ratio is 17.45. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to EXEL's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to EXEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check EXEL's competition here
MANE vs BBIO Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, BBIO has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while BBIO trades at $67.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas BBIO's P/E ratio is -18.08. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to BBIO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to BBIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check BBIO's competition here
MANE vs ASND Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ASND has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while ASND trades at $210.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas ASND's P/E ratio is 23.91. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to ASND's ROE of -56.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to ASND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check ASND's competition here
MANE vs KRTX Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, KRTX has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while KRTX trades at $329.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas KRTX's P/E ratio is -28.09. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to KRTX's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to KRTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check KRTX's competition here
MANE vs IONS Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, IONS has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while IONS trades at $74.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas IONS's P/E ratio is -37.05. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to IONS's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to IONS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check IONS's competition here
MANE vs AXSM Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, AXSM has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while AXSM trades at $232.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas AXSM's P/E ratio is -62.62. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to AXSM's ROE of -2.60%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to AXSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check AXSM's competition here
MANE vs SMMT Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SMMT has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while SMMT trades at $14.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas SMMT's P/E ratio is -9.29. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to SMMT's ROE of -3.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to SMMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check SMMT's competition here
MANE vs RNAM Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, RNAM has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while RNAM trades at $72.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas RNAM's P/E ratio is -17.39. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to RNAM's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to RNAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check RNAM's competition here
MANE vs MDGL Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MDGL has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while MDGL trades at $486.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas MDGL's P/E ratio is -36.07. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to MDGL's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to MDGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check MDGL's competition here
MANE vs BMRN Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, BMRN has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while BMRN trades at $56.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas BMRN's P/E ratio is 40.84. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to BMRN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to BMRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check BMRN's competition here
MANE vs ARWR Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ARWR has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while ARWR trades at $73.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas ARWR's P/E ratio is -32.20. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to ARWR's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to ARWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check ARWR's competition here
MANE vs RXDX Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, RXDX has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while RXDX trades at $199.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas RXDX's P/E ratio is -56.47. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to RXDX's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to RXDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check RXDX's competition here
MANE vs CYTK Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CYTK has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while CYTK trades at $71.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas CYTK's P/E ratio is -10.44. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to CYTK's ROE of +1.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to CYTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check CYTK's competition here
MANE vs KRYS Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, KRYS has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while KRYS trades at $301.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas KRYS's P/E ratio is 40.24. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to KRYS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to KRYS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check KRYS's competition here
MANE vs IMGN Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, IMGN has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while IMGN trades at $31.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas IMGN's P/E ratio is -111.55. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to IMGN's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to IMGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check IMGN's competition here
MANE vs HALO Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, HALO has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while HALO trades at $71.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas HALO's P/E ratio is 25.10. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to HALO's ROE of +1.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to HALO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check HALO's competition here
MANE vs BPMC Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, BPMC has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while BPMC trades at $129.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas BPMC's P/E ratio is -51.58. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to BPMC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to BPMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check BPMC's competition here
MANE vs CERE Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CERE has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while CERE trades at $44.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas CERE's P/E ratio is -16.47. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to CERE's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to CERE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check CERE's competition here
MANE vs TECH Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, TECH has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while TECH trades at $51.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas TECH's P/E ratio is 74.27. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to TECH's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to TECH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check TECH's competition here
MANE vs CORT Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CORT has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while CORT trades at $72.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas CORT's P/E ratio is 207.49. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to CORT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to CORT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check CORT's competition here
MANE vs MTSR Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MTSR has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while MTSR trades at $70.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas MTSR's P/E ratio is -23.58. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to MTSR's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to MTSR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check MTSR's competition here
MANE vs IBRX Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, IBRX has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while IBRX trades at $6.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas IBRX's P/E ratio is -8.14. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to IBRX's ROE of +1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to IBRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check IBRX's competition here
MANE vs ALKS Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ALKS has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while ALKS trades at $42.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas ALKS's P/E ratio is 47.56. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to ALKS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to ALKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check ALKS's competition here
MANE vs PCVX Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, PCVX has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while PCVX trades at $47.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas PCVX's P/E ratio is -6.87. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to PCVX's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to PCVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check PCVX's competition here
MANE vs MRUS Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MRUS has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while MRUS trades at $90.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas MRUS's P/E ratio is -17.05. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to MRUS's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to MRUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check MRUS's competition here
MANE vs ACLX Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ACLX has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while ACLX trades at $115.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas ACLX's P/E ratio is -28.27. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to ACLX's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to ACLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check ACLX's competition here
MANE vs NUVL Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, NUVL has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while NUVL trades at $90.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas NUVL's P/E ratio is -15.01. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to NUVL's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to NUVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check NUVL's competition here
MANE vs ABVX Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ABVX has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while ABVX trades at $101.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas ABVX's P/E ratio is -18.98. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to ABVX's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to ABVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check ABVX's competition here
MANE vs RETA Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, RETA has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while RETA trades at $172.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas RETA's P/E ratio is -66.29. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to RETA's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to RETA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check RETA's competition here
MANE vs IMVT Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, IMVT has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while IMVT trades at $31.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas IMVT's P/E ratio is -11.23. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to IMVT's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to IMVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check IMVT's competition here
MANE vs PTGX Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, PTGX has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while PTGX trades at $97.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas PTGX's P/E ratio is -53.80. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to PTGX's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to PTGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check PTGX's competition here
MANE vs TGTX Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, TGTX has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while TGTX trades at $40.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas TGTX's P/E ratio is 14.04. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to TGTX's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to TGTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check TGTX's competition here
MANE vs CNTA Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CNTA has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while CNTA trades at $39.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas CNTA's P/E ratio is -22.26. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to CNTA's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to CNTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check CNTA's competition here
MANE vs KYMR Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, KYMR has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while KYMR trades at $74.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas KYMR's P/E ratio is -20.71. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to KYMR's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to KYMR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check KYMR's competition here
MANE vs LEGN Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, LEGN has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while LEGN trades at $32.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas LEGN's P/E ratio is -23.64. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to LEGN's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to LEGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check LEGN's competition here
MANE vs RYTM Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, RYTM has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while RYTM trades at $86.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas RYTM's P/E ratio is -27.60. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to RYTM's ROE of -2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to RYTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check RYTM's competition here
MANE vs PTCT Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, PTCT has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while PTCT trades at $70.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas PTCT's P/E ratio is -27.94. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to PTCT's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to PTCT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check PTCT's competition here
MANE vs BLTE Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, BLTE has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while BLTE trades at $143.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas BLTE's P/E ratio is -56.44. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to BLTE's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to BLTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check BLTE's competition here
MANE vs CDTX Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CDTX has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while CDTX trades at $221.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas CDTX's P/E ratio is -19.77. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to CDTX's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to CDTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check CDTX's competition here
MANE vs ABCM Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ABCM has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while ABCM trades at $23.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas ABCM's P/E ratio is 2399.00. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to ABCM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to ABCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check ABCM's competition here
MANE vs ISEE Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ISEE has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while ISEE trades at $39.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas ISEE's P/E ratio is -22.44. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to ISEE's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to ISEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check ISEE's competition here
MANE vs LQDA Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, LQDA has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while LQDA trades at $61.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas LQDA's P/E ratio is 363.82. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to LQDA's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to LQDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check LQDA's competition here
MANE vs APGE Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, APGE has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while APGE trades at $86.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas APGE's P/E ratio is -20.07. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to APGE's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to APGE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check APGE's competition here
MANE vs PRAX Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, PRAX has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while PRAX trades at $254.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas PRAX's P/E ratio is -18.96. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to PRAX's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to PRAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check PRAX's competition here
MANE vs SRRK Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SRRK has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while SRRK trades at $44.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas SRRK's P/E ratio is -12.84. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to SRRK's ROE of -1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to SRRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check SRRK's competition here
MANE vs COGT Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, COGT has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while COGT trades at $31.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas COGT's P/E ratio is -14.29. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to COGT's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to COGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check COGT's competition here
MANE vs FBIOX Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, FBIOX has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while FBIOX trades at $24.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas FBIOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to FBIOX's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to FBIOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check FBIOX's competition here
MANE vs APLS Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, APLS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while APLS trades at $41.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas APLS's P/E ratio is 38.35. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to APLS's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to APLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check APLS's competition here
MANE vs CRSP Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CRSP has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while CRSP trades at $51.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas CRSP's P/E ratio is -8.40. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to CRSP's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to CRSP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check CRSP's competition here
MANE vs TERN Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, TERN has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while TERN trades at $52.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas TERN's P/E ratio is -51.41. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to TERN's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to TERN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check TERN's competition here
MANE vs LGND Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, LGND has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while LGND trades at $237.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas LGND's P/E ratio is 30.94. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to LGND's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to LGND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check LGND's competition here
MANE vs CGON Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CGON has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while CGON trades at $53.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas CGON's P/E ratio is -22.96. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to CGON's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to CGON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check CGON's competition here
MANE vs MIRM Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MIRM has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while MIRM trades at $93.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas MIRM's P/E ratio is -6.87. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to MIRM's ROE of -2.89%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to MIRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check MIRM's competition here
MANE vs CAI Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CAI has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while CAI trades at $16.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas CAI's P/E ratio is -5.97. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to CAI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to CAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check CAI's competition here
MANE vs FOLD Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, FOLD has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while FOLD trades at $14.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas FOLD's P/E ratio is -161.00. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to FOLD's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to FOLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check FOLD's competition here
MANE vs AKRO Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, AKRO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while AKRO trades at $54.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas AKRO's P/E ratio is -14.57. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to AKRO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to AKRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check AKRO's competition here
MANE vs ALPN Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ALPN has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while ALPN trades at $64.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas ALPN's P/E ratio is -101.52. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to ALPN's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to ALPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check ALPN's competition here
MANE vs SYRE Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SYRE has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while SYRE trades at $73.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas SYRE's P/E ratio is -34.74. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to SYRE's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to SYRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check SYRE's competition here
MANE vs CELC Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CELC has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while CELC trades at $88.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas CELC's P/E ratio is -22.64. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to CELC's ROE of -2.45%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to CELC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check CELC's competition here
MANE vs TVTX Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, TVTX has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while TVTX trades at $45.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas TVTX's P/E ratio is -91.58. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to TVTX's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to TVTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check TVTX's competition here
MANE vs OPT Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, OPT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while OPT trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas OPT's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to OPT's ROE of +1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to OPT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check OPT's competition here
MANE vs MRTX Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, MRTX has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while MRTX trades at $58.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas MRTX's P/E ratio is -4.82. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to MRTX's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to MRTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check MRTX's competition here
MANE vs XENE Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, XENE has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while XENE trades at $51.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas XENE's P/E ratio is -11.01. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to XENE's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to XENE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check XENE's competition here
MANE vs VCYT Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, VCYT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while VCYT trades at $48.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas VCYT's P/E ratio is 45.12. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to VCYT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to VCYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check VCYT's competition here
MANE vs EWTX Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, EWTX has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while EWTX trades at $35.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas EWTX's P/E ratio is -21.44. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to EWTX's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to EWTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check EWTX's competition here
MANE vs CPRX Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CPRX has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while CPRX trades at $31.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas CPRX's P/E ratio is 18.08. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to CPRX's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to CPRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check CPRX's competition here
MANE vs RYZB Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, RYZB has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while RYZB trades at $62.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas RYZB's P/E ratio is -57.86. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to RYZB's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to RYZB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check RYZB's competition here
MANE vs CBAY Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CBAY has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while CBAY trades at $32.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas CBAY's P/E ratio is -32.81. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to CBAY's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to CBAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check CBAY's competition here
MANE vs ERAS Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ERAS has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while ERAS trades at $11.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas ERAS's P/E ratio is -12.87. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to ERAS's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to ERAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check ERAS's competition here
MANE vs ACAD Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, ACAD has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while ACAD trades at $21.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas ACAD's P/E ratio is 9.76. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to ACAD's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to ACAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check ACAD's competition here
MANE vs NAMS Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, NAMS has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while NAMS trades at $31.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas NAMS's P/E ratio is -17.71. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to NAMS's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to NAMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check NAMS's competition here
MANE vs KNSA Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, KNSA has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while KNSA trades at $48.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas KNSA's P/E ratio is 53.21. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to KNSA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to KNSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check KNSA's competition here
MANE vs SWTX Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, SWTX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while SWTX trades at $46.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas SWTX's P/E ratio is -13.78. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to SWTX's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to SWTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check SWTX's competition here
MANE vs CRNX Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, CRNX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while CRNX trades at $32.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas CRNX's P/E ratio is -6.40. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to CRNX's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to CRNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check CRNX's competition here
MANE vs DNTH Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, DNTH has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while DNTH trades at $80.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas DNTH's P/E ratio is -19.03. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to DNTH's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to DNTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check DNTH's competition here
MANE vs VKTX Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, VKTX has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while VKTX trades at $28.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas VKTX's P/E ratio is -6.86. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to VKTX's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to VKTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check VKTX's competition here
MANE vs TLX Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, TLX has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while TLX trades at $9.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas TLX's P/E ratio is -465.00. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to TLX's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to TLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check TLX's competition here
MANE vs DNLI Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, DNLI has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while DNLI trades at $19.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas DNLI's P/E ratio is -6.78. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to DNLI's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is more volatile compared to DNLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check DNLI's competition here
MANE vs BEAM Comparison June 2026
MANE plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MANE stands at 3.8B. In comparison, BEAM has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MANE is priced at $91.69, while BEAM trades at $29.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MANE currently has a P/E ratio of -34.44, whereas BEAM's P/E ratio is -60.00. In terms of profitability, MANE's ROE is -0.95%, compared to BEAM's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MANE is less volatile compared to BEAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MANE.Check BEAM's competition here